The NSDAP led Germany would probably have lasted many a year longer if they didn't draw the ire of international finance.
Also if it didn't go around invading its neighbors. Or even if it had stopped doing that in 1939, and probably even 1940.
Even had Hitler not invaded Poland war would have been inevitable.
That is a counterfactual that you can't prove and no one can disprove. Maybe, maybe not.
Personally, I blame the attacks on Nazism for the fall of Nationalism as a political concept. That is why I push for it to be discussed so much. Once that taboo is broken it becomes much more likely to have Nationalism rekindled.
I'm sure nationalism will be much more successful once you associate it with the Nazis.
That is a counterfactual that you can't prove and no one can disprove. Maybe, maybe not.
Considering that the war was brought about by treaties and international financial pressure, it was pretty much inevitable.
Also why did you not just reply to both points at once?
I'm sure nationalism will be much more successful once you associate it with the Nazis.
You're reading it backwards.
Nationalism is currently maligned because it made to associate with Nazism.
By removing the stigmata from Nazism it therefore strengthens the position of Nationalism and creates another platform to counterattack the Bolsheviks.
Considering that the war was brought about by treaties and international financial pressure, it was pretty much inevitable.
The last thing that international finance wanted was yet another destructive world war. Secondly, there was no treaty with Poland, just a guarantee.
So no, it was not inevitable, but I understand why it is in your interest to pretend that it was.
By removing the stigmata from Nazism it therefore strengthens the position of Nationalism and creates another platform to counterattack the Bolsheviks.
You're never removing the stigma from Nazism, and by trying to do so, you're associating what you view as your own ideology with Nazism - thus discrediting yourself.
Also if it didn't go around invading its neighbors. Or even if it had stopped doing that in 1939, and probably even 1940.
That is a counterfactual that you can't prove and no one can disprove. Maybe, maybe not.
I'm sure nationalism will be much more successful once you associate it with the Nazis.
Considering that the war was brought about by treaties and international financial pressure, it was pretty much inevitable.
Also why did you not just reply to both points at once?
You're reading it backwards.
Nationalism is currently maligned because it made to associate with Nazism.
By removing the stigmata from Nazism it therefore strengthens the position of Nationalism and creates another platform to counterattack the Bolsheviks.
The last thing that international finance wanted was yet another destructive world war. Secondly, there was no treaty with Poland, just a guarantee.
So no, it was not inevitable, but I understand why it is in your interest to pretend that it was.
You're never removing the stigma from Nazism, and by trying to do so, you're associating what you view as your own ideology with Nazism - thus discrediting yourself.
Germany had a perfect right to take back the lands and the German population that was taken from her under the egregious Treay of Versailles.
She also had a perfect right and indeed an obligation to defend herself against bolshevism, internally and externally.
Like Bohemia?
Funny how the Hitler fanboys never say a thing about the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
lol, she 'defended herself' by bringing the Bolsheviks to Berlin.