Comments (65)
sorted by:
anonymous570861 31 points ago +31 / -0

Who is sexually abusing kids that aren't pedophiles?

Also there isn't much need to care about the distiction between offending pedos & non-offending pedos. Their rights are protected, they are not arrested for mere thought crimes and I'm keeping my kids the hell away from both.

bamboozler1 19 points ago +19 / -0


Pre-crime is coming, be it for paedophiles OR everyone else…

I’m not saying that we should cut the paedos ANY slack, but if you think that “thought crime” isn’t the future, unless we stop it before it happens, well… You got another thing coming, unfortunately…

VaccinesMachtFrei 18 points ago +19 / -1

They'll use pre-crime to say pedos are good because they thought about doing the crime but didn't, but when we thought crime it will be bad because reasons.

FuckGenderPolitics 17 points ago +17 / -0

Who is sexually abusing kids that aren't pedophiles?

Troons. See, it's very problematic to call a troon a pedophile, even if we would have no problem doing so if he wasn't dressed up in drag. There's something magical about a wig and dress, at least if you're a leftist retard.

Fistmagic 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's primarily fags. You cannot support fags without also supporting pedophilia, as it is how they recruit.

DefinitelyNotIGN 11 points ago +11 / -0

Who is sexually abusing kids that aren't pedophiles?

Lots of people. Circumsizing priests, imams, rabbis, and doctors are sexually harming infants without any sexual desire. Leftists who give children trans meds without informed age-of-maturity consent are chemically sexually abusing children, possibly with no pheliac elements, but instead some deranged Manchausen Sydrome By Proxy.

But USA Today I think would be supporting those people, not speaking against them. Assumption given they're a mass media outlet that makes that kind of post, admittedly, I don't know for sure.

YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who is sexually abusing kids that aren't pedophiles?

I suppose if you're sexually abusing kids purely for the psychological thrill instead of a sexual one you're not doing it based on a sexual desire for the child but out of a general desire to hurt people and you're just using sex unerotically as your method to cause harm...

But I think we can we can ignore the semantics and just call them fucking pedos.

SupremeReader 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who is sexually abusing kids that aren't pedophiles?

Criminals who only make profit, and criminals and war criminals who use it as just a method of torture (let's say, a broomstick handle up a Muslim boy's ass as humiliation, or forcing father watch his daughter being raped by another prisoner at gunpoint).

TentElephant 25 points ago +27 / -2

Pedos deserve more than simple oppression.

The Father of the Sexual Revolution, Alfred Kinsey, and creator of the Kinsey Scale of sexuality, conducted infant rape and documented it in his 1946 work Sexual Behavior In The Human Male. Bill de Blasio put pedos next to elementary schools. The Tavistock Clinic was doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children, but was fortunately slapped down recently by reactionary judges. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. A high school in Ohio included child porn as part of it's curriculum, and a high school in Texas was caught giving kids pedo fan fic.

Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:

These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.

-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae

any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity... Instead of condemning pedophiles for their involvement with lesbian and gay youth, we should be supporting them. They need us badly.

-Pat Califia, The Aftermath of the Great Kiddy-Porn Panic of '77

Naked kids have been a staple of delight for centuries, for both parents and onlookers. So to label pedophilia as criminal is ridiculous.

-Allen Ginsberg, The Liberation is the Word, literary author, gay activist and founding member of NAMBLA

This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.

-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws

Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.

-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory

But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.

-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"

It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not ­it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.

-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.

If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.

-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.

But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.

-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws

Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, good and adjusted in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. Initially, the child has to submit to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family, which process makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and anxiety.

-Wilhem Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism

Other notable globohomo clergy:

Judge Brett Blomme, organizer of Drag Queen Story hour, made child porn in his home.

Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.

Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.

Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".

Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.

Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:

Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.

Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:

Rodney Reed raped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.

Plebbit is run by tranny pedos.

tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.

Last updated 18 September 2021

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
TentElephant 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please do and spread it everywhere, but be warned that any single one of these points will get you banned on reddit by the ironically named anti-evil. Twitter has also banned me a couple times for some of the quotes.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
SupremeReader -5 points ago +2 / -7

Stop behaving like a bot please.

brappablat 15 points ago +16 / -1

If they normalize this sort of thing will they still have the planted CP thing as a weapon in their arsenal?

I never want to hear another word about problematic age gaps between consenting adults again

bamboozler1 15 points ago +15 / -0


I fucking hate that word. Can we wipe it from the dictionary, along with like “white/male privilege”..?

It’s just… Gross. 🤮

brappablat 18 points ago +18 / -0

It was a perfectly good word before they rewrote the dictionary

FuckGenderPolitics 14 points ago +14 / -0

Is it even used non-ironically anymore? It's become a parody of itself. They seem to prefer terms like "icky", "gross", and "totally not okay" like the mental 5 year olds they are. If they're feeling really intellectual they'll say there's "a lot to unpack".

DefinitelyNotIGN 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've heard it used unironically even just this CurrentYear. The Left Can't Meme is a meme, but they can and do, they're just bad memes. Problematic as a lefty meme word has faded from the niche circles, but it is still circling the "normie"-tier lefty circles.

BidenLikesMiners 3 points ago +3 / -0

uhh okay sweatee, is always followed by the rest of the gay woke dictionary.

Lurker404 14 points ago +14 / -0

Do you hear that? That's the sound of Weimar 2.0.

NihilistCaregiver 12 points ago +12 / -0

Thread is here. Everyone is mad at them lmao.


acp_k2win 15 points ago +15 / -0

Everyone is mad at them

Doesn't matter, they are fertilizing the culture for normalization which they will call "inclusivity" and "acceptance".

Unless something fedpost happens to them they will keep doing it. Using idea laundering and subverted sources that were previously trusted to manufacture consensus they will incrementally create an atmosphere where anyone who disagrees is portrayed as unsympathetic.

Then the next step is to demonize and ostracize anyone who publicly speaks out against it. And the last straw is to make pedophiles a "protected class" where there is legal sanctions against anyone who isn't sufficiently supportive.

This is the EXACT SAME THING they did with race mixers, faggots, and trannies. I'm surprised they are going right for the endgame and skipping over furries/bestiality and necrophilia. I guess they think they won and don't have to be subtle anymore.

FuckGenderPolitics 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm surprised they are going right for the endgame and skipping over furries/bestiality and necrophilia.

Maybe they consider those groups even more oppressed than pedos. When the time comes the animal fuckers and corpse fuckers will try to cancel the kid fuckers for violating the sacred tenets of social justice. We'll be living on the smoking ruins of Western civilization but at least we'll be able to laugh at the degeneracy, which you gotta be able to do to keep yourself sane in clown world.

GimmeFuelGimmeFire 6 points ago +6 / -0

Should have archived it because they've deleted the thread.

NihilistCaregiver 5 points ago +5 / -0

Link is still up. My link was not to the original post, but their "correction" where everyone is calling out their BS.

deleted 10 points ago +12 / -2
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
FuckGenderPolitics 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's working out great for them because they tricked the normies into putting up with their degeneracy. Not so much for Western civilization. What I don't get is why anyone falls for that bullshit anymore. "We just want to be left alone" contained an implicit promise to leave the rest of the world out of their perversion. Before they violated that promise I could at least understand the argument that people should butt out of shit that doesn't affect them. But now we have proof these twisted little fuckers will see to it that their degeneracy affects everyone else, so people should stop falling for that argument.

deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

And then one day, for no reason at all...

Xzal 5 points ago +5 / -0

Consent matters, unless it's with kids. But then it matters for them when choosing to troon or not. But consent still doesn't matter, when it comes to getting the vaxx for kids, but it does for gender changing drugs.

There's more twists in their logic than an Echer painting.

Ricky_CIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think all MAPs should be hung on walls.

realerfunction 3 points ago +3 / -0

there needs to be Judgment for this

CletustheElitist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh hello HILL! HILL: Heya Cleet! It's a good day to die! HILL: Sure is!

LeRiverDanube 3 points ago +3 / -0

these are the same people who cannot differentiate between drawings and the real thig btw.

GeneralBoobs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine that, another pedo in the press.

Galean 3 points ago +3 / -0

Soon all movies must have one pedo for representation. If it was not already a clusterfuck, the next gen medieval inspired movie will feature one gay, one lesbo, one trans, one furry, one pedo, one guy with disabilities a mix of ethnicities and gender pronouns and of course more then 50% women.

RealDrJester -1 points ago +3 / -4

With the white male a bumbling idiot being beaten or pwned by a woman(or some other diversity)

TakenusernameA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wake me up when theyre raping trees.

VikingHalo45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pedo said what?

Steampunk_Moustache 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need a 'reset the clock' phrase for this. A go-to short statement for when something they said would never happen, happens.

BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +2 / -0

resniff the clock lmao

Smith1980 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only a matter of time

yeldarb1983 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to think USAToday was at least somewhat sane...

So glad they cleared that up for me...

theradraccoon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish I was still friends with that bitch who told me I was a homophobe for insisting that liberals had no real goal besides tearing down social norms. Gay marriage doesn't lead to approving child molestation because of progressive degeneracy but because liberals need to keep finding new walls to tear down. What comes after normalizing pedophilia? Animals? Corpses? I'd like to hear her take on this. But it'd probably be stupid.

pertivi 2 points ago +2 / -0

True !

in the sense that hemophilia is blood that can but does not want to clot, cinephile is someone that loves movies but never watch them, musicophile is someone that likes music but never listen to them , coprophile is someone attracted to shit but never eats them etc etc

They are like the parents from "Dogtooth"

BIgDaddyDangler2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Waiting for "Dad, get the fire and brimstone, these fuckers didn't learn the bajillion other times we spanked them. Time to make it permanent."

Tourgen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. It is the natural path for the Progressive Ideal. If we are all equal, than there can be no real difference between children and adults.

They already convinced the majority that there is no difference between men and women, except that men are inherently evil with evil instincts and need to be more like women.

next, the kids. It's what the progressives do.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
MegoThor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone that stands up for pedophiles is themselves a pedophile.

RealDrJester -4 points ago +3 / -7

This has been the common goal of all leftists, the biggest note are the leftists of the nazi party who tried to normalize it. Thank fuck Capitalism stopped these socialists.


Other scholars have examined the abuse of children by German soldiers; however, they have not examined in detail the ways in which male and female children were conceived of by the German military and Nazi regime, nor have they analyzed the ways in which abusers were discussed.32

Although the law against the sexual abuse of children, §176 section 3,329 gives the age of consent as 14, which means all sexual contact with a child under that age was to be legally punished, what the documents indicate is if the judges or accused believed the child looked over 14, charges of child abuse were not lodged, or could be dismissed. Furthermore, the judges believed female children could entice soldiers into sexual activity; they were held responsible for the sexual abuse, although that belief was counter to the law. Moreover, determinations of punishment were not based on whether a standard of evidence had been met, on whether the soldier had sexually abused a minor, but rather on the perceived effect of that abuse. Mitigating circumstances could be offered if the judge believed the girl to be un-traumatized by the abuse and if the judge believed the girl had not been morally damaged; there is never an explanation of how a female child should have behaved to demonstrate trauma, nor is there an explanation of how moral damage was gauged.330


By contrast, those men believed to be good soldiers, to have adhered to norms of military, German, and Nazi masculinity were often favored with excuses that could result in a lesser punishment. In cases of child abuse, parallel mitigating factors were available for men who abused female children and female children were subject to gendered evaluations of behavior. If female children were found to have acted in some way contrary to expectations, or if they were physically developed beyond their age, according to the judge, they were frequently blamed for having instigated the sexual contact; the judges also believed that they were, as sexually experienced individuals, less traumatized by sexual violence


Rape was not a concern for the Nazi party, nor was the prosecution of incest, and after an initial spike in rates of criminality for the abuse of children, there was a decline in the late 1930s. The decline in prosecution of cases in which women and children were the primary victims—rape, incest, and violations of §176 section 3—suggest to Dickinson, that “[d]espite their rhetoric, the Nazis were not in truth terribly committed to the family.”3

+++++Page 183, to 197 for MULTIPLE EXAMPLES+++++ ....

In 1940, two men, Soldat Georg E. and Schütze Richard L. were charged with, but tried separately for having sexual contact with two underage German girls.336 Georg E. was accused of, over several days, kissing a girl, reaching under her skirt and touching


The accused could guess in good faith, that witness W. was already 14 years old.” He continued: “According to the circumstances, [the girls] sought out the contact with the accused. The court therefore is of the belief that both the girls did not object to the immoral efforts of the accused.” Richard L. was acquitted because W. appeared older than she was; she appeared to be fourteen years old, and thus Richard L. could not be charged with violating the law against sexual contact with a minor under the age of fourteen


In his sentencing opinion, the judge said that “without question, [she] is developed far beyond her age, and makes a considerably older impression than 13 years.” The victim stated in her testimony that she told the accused how old she was, but the judge dismissed her statement in the following way: Even if [she] should have given the accused her exact age, it does not seem impossible that the accused thought that this statement of age, as it often happens with females, was not fact but flirting, because the condition of [her] body which was developed far beyond her actual age and her experience and cavalier attitude in sexual matters seem to speak too clearly against [her being thirteen]


He had placed a seven year-old German girl on his lap, “played with her in peculiar ways,” and touched her on the buttocks. One month later, he touched her on her stomach, just above her genitals. According to the court, the girl was the daughter of a father who had been sterilized, and a mother whose morals were questionable. The judge believed that what the defendant had done was “not of a very severe nature,” and questioned the role of the victim by saying that she was “not entirely morally pure,” and that she had “very much accommodated the efforts and propensities of the accused.”


Unteroffizier Peter G. was accused of abusing a ten year-old girl, but was charged with drunkenness rather than child abuse.352 The judge harshly criticized the accused because the crime could damage the reputation of the Wehrmacht in the occupied territories, and because “as an Unteroffizier, [he] was supposed to behave flawlessly and to always keep a grip on [himself], also after drinking alcohol.” The judge believed the accused deserved a “considerable” punishment because he “violated the reputation and honor of the Unteroffizierkorps in severe ways,” and because the crime was “damnable.”


Assassin47 5 points ago +7 / -2

No, what you're talking about was endemic to German culture. The Nazis just lied about eliminating it, like most groups trying to gain power. The thing about a judge "believing a child to look over the age of 14" was also common in a lot of countries - and probably still is in some. Some judges being perverted old men also has nothing to do with Germany specifically.

This is like blaming the Taliban for Bacha bazi. Yeah they're terrible in their own way but have nothing to do with that.

Even if you're talking about leftists in general, I don't think they all want that. That is the endgame of their "break down the family" ideology but many don't realize it. But much of this stuff happens in traditional cultures too.

RealDrJester -2 points ago +2 / -4

perverted old men also has nothing to do with Germany specifically

Only possible if you were a nazi. Otherwise, the key was thrown away.

I don't think they all want that.

I was talking in general terms. It would be pretty difficult if I were to list a bunch of people like, "nazis, antifa, certain communists, some LGBT..." I would be here all day.

WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +5 / -1

Oh great, it's the anti-else

anonymous570861 3 points ago +3 / -0


I am guessing you're talking about the user that is also called Then , who posts on ConsumeProduct .Win ?

I like his info dumps & memes, even though he can sometimes make dumb decisions like accussing anyone & everyone of being shills & glowies if they disagree with him.

RealDrJester -4 points ago +1 / -5

They have been at it for decades, trying to normalize this garbage.

SupremeReader 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why not go straight to Dirlewanger? Fucking real horrorshow and only because he was given practically unlimited power over people despite being widely despised by his comrades and superiors, and he had been relatively harmless during peacetime and even "persecuted" by his own. Also the nightmare of WWI made him so. As explained by the top comment at https://www.quora.com/Who-was-Oskar-Dirlewanger (expand the top answer, skip the other answers and read elsewhere about him during WWII if you want so).

https://www.quora.com/Is-Nazi-officer-Oskar-Dirlewanger-depicted-in-any-movie being an interesting "technical" thread even as the top answer guy tries to whitewash them with just "some war crimes" which was is ridiculous as they hardly ever did anything but war crimes.

People will always be more attracted by stories than reality. They want things that shocks, not boring and “politically incorrect” historical facts. They will rather prefer a horror story of some band of nazi psychopaths who butchered an entire school even tho historically, besides rumors of some unknown eye witness there's no evidence of.

Yeah, except it wasn't a school, it was an orphanage (Christian Orthodox) and the guy can over come here an find the mass grave site near the restored Jan Klimak church. (The witness is also not "unknown", it was a German veteran, and he thought it was "some kind of school" because he had no idea, just a lot of children.) It was also nothing particularly special for Dirlewanger.

And Come and See is hardly "Soviet propaganda", and it's an allegory. It's so much different than let's say an usual Yugoslav partisan movie, the silly genre parodied in Underground. An interesting and even more "religious" Soviet partisan film is The Ascent.

RealDrJester -1 points ago +2 / -3

Fascinating indeed.

And he practically only received a small slap on the wrist "Himmler, SS leader and right arm of Hitler, advises him to calm down and sends him to Spain in 36"

SupremeReader 2 points ago +2 / -0

There was a quite The Kindly Ones style memoir of one of his men published recently: https://www.historynet.com/book-review-the-ss-sonderkommando-dirlewanger-edited-by-rolf-michaelis.htm

did nothing wrong

RealDrJester -2 points ago +1 / -3

Oskar Dirlewanger is a case in point, a man whose vaulting ambition and sadistic cruelty facilitated his rapid rise from imprisoned pedophile to senior officer in the Waffen-SS, leading a private army of poachers, penal troops and foreign collaborators.

Thank you for this source. I shall add into the list. I do have to say that you may catch some hate from the stormcuckers posting here.