Comments (84)
sorted by:
Hand_Of_Node 69 points ago +71 / -2

It's normal to become racist once cognitive development has sufficiently progressed.

TentElephant 45 points ago +45 / -0

If you haven't been called a racist, you need to ask yourself if there is something wrong with you.

Arkana 36 points ago +36 / -0

Basically every great European man prior to 1945 would have been considered horribly racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. If that's not an indication that those words should hold no weight over you, then I don't know what would.

serengetidesert1973 24 points ago +24 / -0

Every person on earth*, we didn’t invent it.

deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
ZerroDefex 3 points ago +3 / -0

Out of everyone I've known the most racist of all have mostly been Indian. Given that they still have castes in their homeland shouldn't be very surprising.

deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +3 / -1

Which beliefs are you talking about?

TentElephant 10 points ago +10 / -0

The 1940 Survey Of Military Personnel About Jews has what would now be considered unpopular opinions:

78%+ of the US military wanted to keep negro units segregated

86% of enlisted men agreed with the statement "There is nothing good about Jews"

90%+ disagreed with the statement "If the Jews who are now in Europe want to come to the United States, we should let them in" which is even more notable considering that...

83% of officers and 60% of enlisted believed Jews "suffered very much under the Hitler government"

PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lulz; who’s that guy

TentElephant 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hans Herman Hoppe, he is THE libertarian at the moment and not in the lolbert sense. His most famous work is Democracy The God That Failed, but you probably know him best for the term "physical removal" which inspired all the helicopter memes.

While he is ultimately a hardcore anarchist, he is sympathetic to monarchy and has nothing but disdain for democracy. He has proposed a utopian vision of "a land of 1000 Lichtensteins" where monarchical city-states compete for citizenry to voluntarily associate with and disruptive peoples are regularly ejected with force.

Spez: Here is one my favorite passages:

A member of the human race who is completely incapable of understanding the higher productivity of labor performed under a division of labor based on private property is not properly speaking a person (a persona), but falls instead in the same moral category as an animal-of either the harmless sort (to be domesticated and employed as a producer or consumer good, or to be enjoyed as a "free good") or the wild and dangerous one (to be fought as a pest). On the other hand, there are members of the human species who are capable of understanding the insight but who lack the moral strength to act accordingly. Such persons are either harmless "brutes living outside of and separated from human society, or they are more or less dangerous criminals. They are persons who knowingly act wrongly and who besides having to be tamed or even physically defeated must also be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime to make them understand the nature of their wrongdoings and hopefully to teach them a lesson for the future. Human cooperation (society) can only prevail and advance as long as man is capable of subduing, taming, appropriating, and cultivating his physical and animalistic surroundings, and as long as he succeeds in suppressing crime, reducing it to a rarity by means of self-defense, property protection, and punishment.

PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based AF.

Too bad seems like a far cry anything like this will ever be established at this point.

Gizortnik 18 points ago +24 / -6

I've always considered racism a sign of mental weakness because you're failing to take responsibility for your own problems.

As for what the Left calls racist, you don't need cognition to be racist at that point. Inanimate objects are racist to the Left.

Hand_Of_Node 11 points ago +11 / -0

Racism: the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities

Do they not? How would you even recognize a race if you didn't recognize different distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities?

I've always considered racism a sign of mental weakness

As you can see, your belief is the opposite of reality. Sucks for you, but the whole point of propaganda and brainwashing is to gain control of another persons thoughts, beliefs, and behavior.

Gizortnik 3 points ago +4 / -1

That's not racism. It's not even close.

Either accept Leftist definitions because you're a Leftist, or use the right definitions:

Racism: The assumption that psychocultural traits and capacities are determined by biological race and that races differ decisively from one another which is usually coupled with a belief in the inherent superiority of a particular race and its right to domination over others.

  • Webster's 3rd New International Dictionary page 1870

If you're asserting that Leftist definitions are reality, then you belong on the helicopter with the rest of them.

Hand_Of_Node 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hope that belief works out for you.

BidenLikesMiners 1 point ago +2 / -1

thats a retarded definition of racism, maye its race ism, but racism is the belief that certain races are superio to others.

Hand_Of_Node 3 points ago +3 / -0

racism is the belief that certain races are superio to others

Only in the minds of the brainwashed young.

almond_activator 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have used "Racism is the belief that certain races are morally superior to others" with some success.

It is possible to acknowledge that one or another might have some practical advantage or disadvantage without denying that each individual member of any race is a human being, deserving of all the individual rights accorded to any other human being, in the absence of actions taken to deny such rights to others.

The ability to acknowledge differences and exercise freedom of association is paramount to the existence of liberty and therefore the survival and prosperity of humanity as a whole.

Hand_Of_Node 3 points ago +3 / -0

in the absence of actions taken to deny such rights to others.

Here's the problem area. Why won't the jews leave us alone to live our lives as we deserve? Then there's the negro. Kill Whitey is not an isolated imperative that's difficult to find. One can see it reflected in the annual FBI crime statistics.

As for your definition, what causes that potential 'superiority' belief? What is it based on?

A: the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities

Which they do. You can see the differences in physical characteristics between races. The qualities and attributes found in Japanese are vastly different (superior?) to those found in the negro.

Now, it's not necessary to jump from differences to superiority, unless you import incompatible races into your culture. Is a car superior to a boat? Well, depends on whether you're traveling on land or on water. Keep the cars on the land and the boats on the water if you want good results. Same with races.

evilmathmagician 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've always considered racism a sign of mental weakness because you're failing to take responsibility for your own problems.

Assuming you're using the version of racism that means a racial/ethnic hierarchy exists, isn't that only true when it's an endgoal belief? For example, I could use it as a stepping stone to say that everyone is genetically predisposed towards some proficiency or behavior, but them making a choice whether to embrace it just increases the weight of responsibility on an individual. Whereas a person that stops at the racism has less use for responsibility because genes are the final determiner.

Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm using the correct definition: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/13zzVkx3U0/x/c/4JH6UJCbDoh

Racism exists as a protection racket for a weak fringe in order to give the Racialist elite the authority to dominate society, and crush dissent as being disloyal to the race.

evilmathmagician 3 points ago +3 / -0

A little jealous, it looks like it's written in an interesting way. Written for precision rather than ease of understanding.

I'll share my source to grant a comparison.

The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition), year 2000. (I thought it was older, shame on me for not buying ancient dictionaries when I had the chance).

Racism. 1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others. 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

Which is basically what I remember being expressed in the 80s and 90s, so I'm not sure when the common definition really changed. What year was your dictionary from?

Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because of how the Left changes language, I'm starting to realize the value of old dictionaries. Literally that scene from 1984. I'd bet that the definition changed post 2014. GamerGate really is a a good demarcation, unfortunately.

The book is from 1993, and this is the Unabridged Dictionary. It sure as fuck must have been pricey at the time. It's 2,662 pages.

The last word is

Zyzzogeton: a genus of large South American leaf-hoppers (family Cicadellidae) having the pronotum tuberculate and the front tibiae grooved."

Galean 50 points ago +51 / -1

Unfortunately that will become common, CRT and the gaslighting on the left will bring back racism in a big way.

Immigration, my personal thoughts on the matter.

 The left does not recognize that mass immigration destroys local culture and identity, creates tension and in most cases a huge violent crime spike, they will call you racist for observing it, they will call you racist for thinking your culture is worth defending, they will call you racist for moving your kids from a school full of immigrants because your kid would come home in tears every day. 

Then the left double down and asks special treatment for the immigrants, because immigrants on average will have less money and do not speak the language properly if at all - it does not matter that is logical and is not proof of discrimination. On top of that they will call your own culture racist for existing while white or asian.

So mass immigration will destroy your culture, hurt your kids, make you the subject of discrimination and the left will cheer for it.

The left could have done the same but instead of calling everyone racist they would ask for projects to preserve local customs and culture and national identity and integration of immigrants. Instead of discrimination against whites they would make it impossible to discriminate based on race, protect everyone equal, recognize violent behavior in immigrant population and act to correct it instead of calling anyone who notices racists.

The left chose the path of conflict and hate, racism is being created by the left, willingly.

May god protect us all.

subbookkeeper 42 points ago +42 / -0

The left does not recognize that mass immigration destroys local culture and identity, creates tension and in most cases a huge violent crime spike, they will call you racist for observing it, they will call you racist for thinking your culture is worth defending, they will call you racist for moving your kids from a school full of immigrants because your kid would come home in tears every day.

They do recognise that. They are expressly trying to tear down society. What do you think "deconstruct" means? It means to take something apart. I'm going to assume you haven't seen Yuri Bezmenov's most common interviews, you should look him up, before youtube deletes all mention of him.

ZerroDefex 3 points ago +3 / -0

They do recognise that. They are expressly trying to tear down society. What do you think "deconstruct" means? It means to take something apart. I'm going to assume you haven't seen Yuri Bezmenov's most common interviews, you should look him up, before youtube deletes all mention of him.

The useful idiots on the Left don't, they believe the crap that their masters like Soros tell them while ones like him known damn well what they're doing. They want to reduce every country down to 3rd world status.

Kurskar 22 points ago +22 / -0

I've noticed anecdotally in the UK at least that is definitely happening to a lot of males. Females however are doubling down on the retardation. Just as an example on tinder i have never ONCE seen a single woman or spoken to one that has right leaning views at all. Like not one. High school students are all left woke and same in university. I wonder if there has ever been a bigger gap in the views of men and women.

AbolishFemaleVote 19 points ago +20 / -1

Exactly this whole bullshit that is going on right now is the female imperative at work.

Women have been empowered far beyond what they deserve due to their own effort.

Now they have the power to do all that those sows lust for:

  • Safety instead Liberty
  • Communism
  • Psychopathic tingles from Ahmed the Pisslim instead of admiration for civilisation.
ZerroDefex 4 points ago +4 / -0

Right-leaning women are smart enough to stay off of Tinder in the first place.

osculate_posterior_p 17 points ago +17 / -0

Real income in the US has been flat since the early 70s. Three things happened during the early part of that decade. Mass immigration from the “reform” bill in the mid 60s kicked in. The dollar went off the gold standard. We started doing business with China.

Three giant disasters that have made our income stagnant for 50 years while cost of housing, education, and medicine have gone up by multiples.

tight-county-asshole 35 points ago +35 / -0

It's not even racist, It is just a rational response to them raping, murdering and destroying the local culture whilst openly admitting they want white people to go extinct.

subbookkeeper 27 points ago +29 / -2

What do you think allowed the Nazi's to come to power? it was the complete ineptitude and fecklessness of the weimar government.

Consoomer1234 25 points ago +25 / -0

I know right but that’s wishful thinking, no one like that is going to save us. It would be hilarious to see what method Hitler would use to execute Fauci though.

BidenLikesMiners 9 points ago +9 / -0

hitler would more likely support fauc, have you not read their experiments?

ZerroDefex 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have people forgotten that the Nazis were socialists as well?

subbookkeeper 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kek. disavowed

Gizortnik 13 points ago +13 / -0

It was mostly the fact that after the Social Democrats had destroyed the economy, then recovered it with aggressive free-market policies, they were planning on introducing socialism all over again. The Communists (still sponsored by the Soviets) were hell bent on revolution, and the National Socialists advertised themselves as a kind of Centrist, Technocratic, 3rd way that would unify the German people and only bring about the good parts of Socialism.

subbookkeeper 14 points ago +14 / -0

also they were expressly against child prostitution and sexual experimentation on children.

Gizortnik 1 point ago +2 / -1

What they weren't against was sending those kids to die against Russian machine guns, and having 15 year olds get fucked and pregnant to build armies.

Perhaps it's not against sexual experimentation, but it's absolutely in support of the sexualization of children.

BYEBYE 21 points ago +21 / -0

As a canadian I would think the Indigenous communities would want less immigration. But they don't seem to care.

WeedleTLiar 21 points ago +21 / -0

Frankly, the First Nations are politically schizophrenic and have no idea what they want. The government just finds some radical group they agree with and promote the hell out of them (see the railway protests just before covid struck).

They can't even identify their problems let along the solutions. The federal goverment fails to provide clean drinking water, ignores hundreds or thousands of murders of their women every year, and kills their kids in the schools they set up and they're like "the government needs to do better". It would never even occur to them to say "we need to govern ourselves".

It's an excellent lesson in what Canadian authoritarian communism looks like in practice. They were the test subjects; the reason they don't protest immigration is the same reason we don't protest immigration.

oilwellpauper 9 points ago +9 / -0

the federal government gives reservations millions of dollars, it just all goes to the chief with 0 oversight

Benevolentdictator 6 points ago +6 / -0

It would never even occur to them to say "we need to govern ourselves".

First Nations groups have been bleating about self-government and sovereignty for decades.

The problem is that their version of self-government doesn't involve any self-taxation or revenue generation, so "sovereignty" boils down to continued federal funding without any oversight, accountability, responsibilities or failsafes.

The shakedown also never ends. When self-governing First Nations leadership fail to address their communities' problems, there's never any self-reflection or accountability, just more whining about the federal government failing them/system racism and going back to Ottawa hat-in-hand looking for more funding.

There's also the delusion that every reservation in the country, over 600 of them, should be legally and politically be recognized as a sovereign country or "Nation", negotiating with Canada on a "Nation-to-Nation" basis. When in reality, most reservations are closer to a podunk town with one or two big extended families, that have no taxation power, no industry and no infrastructure.

First Nations are also obsessed with a weird version of collective conservatism. The solution to every economic and social problem is always to "look back our heritage and return to our cultural traditions". Which is fine in theory, but also just gets adopted without question or evidence how outdated native practices from hundreds of years ago are supposed to feed your citizens, build infrastructure, great jobs, treat addictions, raise children out of poverty, fight sexual abuse, etc.

It's just magical thinking that if we could just return to how things were before the white man arrived (while still taking the white man's handouts and embracing all European technology and creature comforts), that a modern collective utopia will emerge.

deleted 14 points ago +16 / -2
MrGiggles 12 points ago +13 / -1

To be united by hatred is a fragile alliance at best…

Ariztides 1 point ago +2 / -1

But capable of great damage in the short term.

Fragarach 7 points ago +7 / -0

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."

Forgehound 7 points ago +8 / -1

Communism preys on the slighted

oilwellpauper 6 points ago +6 / -0

the only thing they care about is handouts to buy booze with

acp_k2win 16 points ago +16 / -0

The mainstream definition of racist boils down to "uses pattern recognition to make decisions"

Slop 14 points ago +14 / -0

You just gotta remember that the antiwhite crowd is extremely small but loud and backed by powerful people. Don’t let them turn you against your fellow citizens who don’t feel that way. That’s what they want.

MetalGearMk4 10 points ago +10 / -0

Everybody is racist it's human nature

WeedleTLiar 8 points ago +9 / -1

The problem is far less the foreigners (who are useful tools) as it is the race traitors that use them.

You could expel every single immigrant, 5 generations back, and the globalists would just import more.

On the plus side, immigrants are often super-racist against their national neighbors so they can provide you lota of fun stories.

ViagraFalls 8 points ago +9 / -1

Apparently, I was racist before I got to middle school. In fifth grade I tried yelling, "Hey nggr!" out the bus window while we passed the ghetto apartments just to see what would happen.

deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
ZerroDefex 2 points ago +2 / -0

Means as much now as calling us terrorists.

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
TacticalRacism 5 points ago +6 / -1

According to the lefties you've been racist since the day you where born. So embrace it nigger.

Erock_The_Red 5 points ago +5 / -0

The word racist now means nothing to me anymore...

Googatone 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yes, you're beginning to stand up for yourself. It means you have pride and are seeing the world for what is is/ has become. Hold onto that anger until you're ready to use it

GimmeFuelGimmeFire 4 points ago +4 / -0


censorthisss 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'm still not racist. I'm just more firm than ever in my belief that certain cultures are incompatible with western societies, and in my belief that the globalist cabal wants to destroy white majority counties for nefarious reasons.

Razzyrazz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same, my racism has gone up ten fold in the last 5 years.

alexander-rysing 4 points ago +7 / -3

When they said your grandkids will be brown, what they really meant was that they would join the brown shirts.

ApparentlyImAHeretic 4 points ago +5 / -1

Remember who the enemy is: The race grifters. Not the foreigners themselves. Mass immigration and illegal immigration are bad and lead to more problems than they are worth, but the honest immigrants that come here legally with the intent of adopting the new society should not be thrown under the bus.

the_nybbler 2 points ago +2 / -0
Gizortnik 2 points ago +7 / -5

If you've become racist because of what someone else said about you, it's because you're mentally weak.

However, being isolationist has nothing to do with racism.

DoctorProfessorRobot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course it makes sense.

The big distinction you have to make, though, is that enemy part of 'enemy foreigners.' There are people who move here legally, who have every intention of integrating into the local culture. For all extents and purposes, those people are working hard to drop the 'foreigner' part, and I don't think there's good reason to treat them the same as some invader bashing his way through police barricades with the explicit purpose of exploiting our wealth. The only problem I have with legal immigrants is that we shouldn't have any right now til the damage being done to us by the border crisis is stabilized.... But that's a problem I have with the powers that be for allowing the legal immigration, not really with the immigrants themselves.

MargarineMongoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Were you not there already?

TheImpossible1 -11 points ago +3 / -14

That's what female supremacists want you to do.

That's why they created white privilege theory and BLM.

They can keep us all divided and set us on each other whenever it looks like we might unravel their power.

ScutFarkus -22 points ago +2 / -24

Depends on your homeland. Where bouts are ye

TentElephant 24 points ago +28 / -4

I'm a Cherokee who wants the natives south of the US border to go back where they came from, unless they want to be slaves as is my traditional native culture for dealing with them. The anglos can stay if they pay me $20 million in reparations, adjusted for inflation, for the slaves the Union imperialists stole from my native ancestors with their Irish jackboots.

Galean 6 points ago +8 / -2

I like that approach but are those south of the border really natives? I thought they had more European DNA then native DNA.

ScutFarkus -27 points ago +2 / -29

I don’t recall asking you a god damned thing.

TentElephant 22 points ago +24 / -2

You're a pedo.

TentElephant 20 points ago +20 / -0

The far-left Republican party has a lot of pedos too, for it is the fundamental nature of leftists, but Qtards are insane; there is no conspiracy to stop the satanic pedos that rule the world. Optimism is cowardice.

deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
ScutFarkus -16 points ago +2 / -18

Pray to moloch 5 times daily

TentElephant 17 points ago +17 / -0

I don't get invited to those parties. Say hi to Paul Pelosi for me.

Cyberguy64 4 points ago +4 / -0

Convenient that you forgot the question mark in your first post.