Basically every great European man prior to 1945 would have been considered horribly racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. If that's not an indication that those words should hold no weight over you, then I don't know what would.
Out of everyone I've known the most racist of all have mostly been Indian. Given that they still have castes in their homeland shouldn't be very surprising.
Hans Herman Hoppe, he is THE libertarian at the moment and not in the lolbert sense. His most famous work is Democracy The God That Failed, but you probably know him best for the term "physical removal" which inspired all the helicopter memes.
While he is ultimately a hardcore anarchist, he is sympathetic to monarchy and has nothing but disdain for democracy. He has proposed a utopian vision of "a land of 1000 Lichtensteins" where monarchical city-states compete for citizenry to voluntarily associate with and disruptive peoples are regularly ejected with force.
Spez: Here is one my favorite passages:
A member of the human race who is completely incapable of understanding the higher productivity of labor performed under a division of labor based on private property is not properly speaking a person (a persona), but falls instead in the same moral category as an animal-of either the harmless sort (to be domesticated and employed as a producer or consumer good, or to be enjoyed as a "free good") or the wild and dangerous one (to be fought as a pest). On the other hand, there are members of the human species who are capable of understanding the insight but who lack the moral strength to act accordingly. Such persons are either harmless "brutes living outside of and separated from human society, or they are more or less dangerous criminals. They are persons who knowingly act wrongly and who besides having to be tamed or even physically defeated must also be punished in proportion to the severity of their crime to make them understand the nature of their wrongdoings and hopefully to teach them a lesson for the future. Human cooperation (society) can only prevail and advance as long as man is capable of subduing, taming, appropriating, and cultivating his physical and animalistic surroundings, and as long as he succeeds in suppressing crime, reducing it to a rarity by means of self-defense, property protection, and punishment.
Racism: the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities
Do they not? How would you even recognize a race if you didn't recognize different distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities?
I've always considered racism a sign of mental weakness
As you can see, your belief is the opposite of reality. Sucks for you, but the whole point of propaganda and brainwashing is to gain control of another persons thoughts, beliefs, and behavior.
Either accept Leftist definitions because you're a Leftist, or use the right definitions:
Racism: The assumption that psychocultural traits and capacities are determined by biological race and that races differ decisively from one another which is usually coupled with a belief in the inherent superiority of a particular race and its right to domination over others.
Webster's 3rd New International Dictionary page 1870
If you're asserting that Leftist definitions are reality, then you belong on the helicopter with the rest of them.
I've always considered racism a sign of mental weakness because you're failing to take responsibility for your own problems.
Assuming you're using the version of racism that means a racial/ethnic hierarchy exists, isn't that only true when it's an endgoal belief? For example, I could use it as a stepping stone to say that everyone is genetically predisposed towards some proficiency or behavior, but them making a choice whether to embrace it just increases the weight of responsibility on an individual. Whereas a person that stops at the racism has less use for responsibility because genes are the final determiner.
Racism exists as a protection racket for a weak fringe in order to give the Racialist elite the authority to dominate society, and crush dissent as being disloyal to the race.
A little jealous, it looks like it's written in an interesting way. Written for precision rather than ease of understanding.
I'll share my source to grant a comparison.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition), year 2000. (I thought it was older, shame on me for not buying ancient dictionaries when I had the chance).
Racism. 1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others. 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
Which is basically what I remember being expressed in the 80s and 90s, so I'm not sure when the common definition really changed. What year was your dictionary from?
It's normal to become racist once cognitive development has sufficiently progressed.
If you haven't been called a racist, you need to ask yourself if there is something wrong with you.
Basically every great European man prior to 1945 would have been considered horribly racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. If that's not an indication that those words should hold no weight over you, then I don't know what would.
Out of everyone I've known the most racist of all have mostly been Indian. Given that they still have castes in their homeland shouldn't be very surprising.
Which beliefs are you talking about?
Lulz; who’s that guy
Hans Herman Hoppe, he is THE libertarian at the moment and not in the lolbert sense. His most famous work is Democracy The God That Failed, but you probably know him best for the term "physical removal" which inspired all the helicopter memes.
While he is ultimately a hardcore anarchist, he is sympathetic to monarchy and has nothing but disdain for democracy. He has proposed a utopian vision of "a land of 1000 Lichtensteins" where monarchical city-states compete for citizenry to voluntarily associate with and disruptive peoples are regularly ejected with force.
Spez: Here is one my favorite passages:
Based AF.
Too bad seems like a far cry anything like this will ever be established at this point.
I've always considered racism a sign of mental weakness because you're failing to take responsibility for your own problems.
As for what the Left calls racist, you don't need cognition to be racist at that point. Inanimate objects are racist to the Left.
Racism: the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities
Do they not? How would you even recognize a race if you didn't recognize different distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities?
As you can see, your belief is the opposite of reality. Sucks for you, but the whole point of propaganda and brainwashing is to gain control of another persons thoughts, beliefs, and behavior.
That's not racism. It's not even close.
Either accept Leftist definitions because you're a Leftist, or use the right definitions:
If you're asserting that Leftist definitions are reality, then you belong on the helicopter with the rest of them.
Hope that belief works out for you.
thats a retarded definition of racism, maye its race ism, but racism is the belief that certain races are superio to others.
Only in the minds of the brainwashed young.
Assuming you're using the version of racism that means a racial/ethnic hierarchy exists, isn't that only true when it's an endgoal belief? For example, I could use it as a stepping stone to say that everyone is genetically predisposed towards some proficiency or behavior, but them making a choice whether to embrace it just increases the weight of responsibility on an individual. Whereas a person that stops at the racism has less use for responsibility because genes are the final determiner.
I'm using the correct definition: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/13zzVkx3U0/x/c/4JH6UJCbDoh
Racism exists as a protection racket for a weak fringe in order to give the Racialist elite the authority to dominate society, and crush dissent as being disloyal to the race.
A little jealous, it looks like it's written in an interesting way. Written for precision rather than ease of understanding.
I'll share my source to grant a comparison.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition), year 2000. (I thought it was older, shame on me for not buying ancient dictionaries when I had the chance).
Racism. 1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others. 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
Which is basically what I remember being expressed in the 80s and 90s, so I'm not sure when the common definition really changed. What year was your dictionary from?