I've always considered racism a sign of mental weakness because you're failing to take responsibility for your own problems.
Assuming you're using the version of racism that means a racial/ethnic hierarchy exists, isn't that only true when it's an endgoal belief? For example, I could use it as a stepping stone to say that everyone is genetically predisposed towards some proficiency or behavior, but them making a choice whether to embrace it just increases the weight of responsibility on an individual. Whereas a person that stops at the racism has less use for responsibility because genes are the final determiner.
Racism exists as a protection racket for a weak fringe in order to give the Racialist elite the authority to dominate society, and crush dissent as being disloyal to the race.
A little jealous, it looks like it's written in an interesting way. Written for precision rather than ease of understanding.
I'll share my source to grant a comparison.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition), year 2000. (I thought it was older, shame on me for not buying ancient dictionaries when I had the chance).
Racism. 1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others. 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
Which is basically what I remember being expressed in the 80s and 90s, so I'm not sure when the common definition really changed. What year was your dictionary from?
Because of how the Left changes language, I'm starting to realize the value of old dictionaries. Literally that scene from 1984. I'd bet that the definition changed post 2014. GamerGate really is a a good demarcation, unfortunately.
The book is from 1993, and this is the Unabridged Dictionary. It sure as fuck must have been pricey at the time. It's 2,662 pages.
The last word is
Zyzzogeton: a genus of large South American leaf-hoppers (family Cicadellidae) having the pronotum tuberculate and the front tibiae grooved."
Assuming you're using the version of racism that means a racial/ethnic hierarchy exists, isn't that only true when it's an endgoal belief? For example, I could use it as a stepping stone to say that everyone is genetically predisposed towards some proficiency or behavior, but them making a choice whether to embrace it just increases the weight of responsibility on an individual. Whereas a person that stops at the racism has less use for responsibility because genes are the final determiner.
I'm using the correct definition: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/13zzVkx3U0/x/c/4JH6UJCbDoh
Racism exists as a protection racket for a weak fringe in order to give the Racialist elite the authority to dominate society, and crush dissent as being disloyal to the race.
A little jealous, it looks like it's written in an interesting way. Written for precision rather than ease of understanding.
I'll share my source to grant a comparison.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition), year 2000. (I thought it was older, shame on me for not buying ancient dictionaries when I had the chance).
Racism. 1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others. 2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.
Which is basically what I remember being expressed in the 80s and 90s, so I'm not sure when the common definition really changed. What year was your dictionary from?
Because of how the Left changes language, I'm starting to realize the value of old dictionaries. Literally that scene from 1984. I'd bet that the definition changed post 2014. GamerGate really is a a good demarcation, unfortunately.
The book is from 1993, and this is the Unabridged Dictionary. It sure as fuck must have been pricey at the time. It's 2,662 pages.
The last word is