It's interesting that numerous - though not all - lynchings were because the person had clearly committed a crime worthy of the death sentence. But they had bought their way out of prison, or it was expected they would.
Every time they start shreaking about 'racism' in lynchings I wonder if the real main concern among the elites is more about protecting themselves.
I mean it's a simple reverse feminism sequence.
Take "where is the nearest man and how is he to blame for this?" and replace man with feminist.
Difference is, for a while it was pretty accurate, because feminists quite often behind this stuff.
This is the female cop in a minneapolis suburb that shot someone by accident, right before george floyd, but they didn',t turn it into george floyd because it was a woman and blm and the democrats only wanted to racially target white males.
It was democrats trying to keep slavery going, then trying to keep segregation going.
But it's beside the point because 50 years ago is 1975, a point at which he'd be talking about the 'magic' of lobotomies and how great lobotomies are.
I think the democrats have been so effective in making being a republican come across as a social negative, that this is where you end up.
Lots of people still vote republican, but to actually join the republican party and officially have that as a brand everywhere you go, they're left scraping the bottom of the barrel for people willing to do that.
There were unwarranted police killing in the minneapolis area right before this by DEI hires.
And actually killed people, unlike chauvin, who simply restrained a guy who had been striggling with police while trying to hide his drugs in his mouth and OD'ing from it.
A somali police ifficer pulled up in front of a white womans house and shot her to death for no reason in minneapolis. A white woman shot a black guy who had earrants but was just trying to flee when she mixed up her taser and her gun.
Chauvin was white and male, so they jumped on the chance to pretend he killed someone because he was the right race and gender for their madeup story.
Why is it that we voted in a whole new party, and they're immediately rerunning, the narratives of the previous party?
Why the f*** is the government a vegicle for attention seeking women to get revenge in their ex's, because they're bored or whatever?
I always debate for spy shows like burn notice, whether they get bad as time goes on, or whether they become unwatchable because they run out of "feel good tricks" and become a more realistic kind of swampy mess that kind of stuff actually turns into.
I love burn notice as a series but it definitely trailed off in the last few seasons.
I'd lean more toward group narcissism aka extreme tribalism...over individual narcissism.
You watch one of your own tribal members get hurt and you wince or get angry.
vs
You watch enemy tribe members get killed and feel nothing as they are outgroup.
The whooping and howling about attacking and destroying 'outgroup' tribe members.
A pathological dedication to your own tribe while an abject either hatred or apathy towards any other tribe.
Still remember a.i. generating pics of completely wrong ethnicities in historical blgarb was 'why do you care blabla" until people started geberating black nazis. Then 'suddenly' historical accuracy mattered a little.
Maybe they asked "have you ever gotten fucked by a.i.?" and drew the wrong conclusions.