Conservahoe trying to revive metoo and make rape allegations against her ex-fiancé? It’s almost like being a professional victim is the only thing female congressmen do aside from insider trading.
Female “conservatives” are truly the most awful feminists, the entire thread is filled with white knights and stupid cunts doing the feminist power play.
Until you have been raped and taped, maybe you could just keep it to yourself. Maybe she feels more "men" need to see how women are treated so we can get protection from these a@@holes instead of being made to feel like it's our fault.
She's a RINO, supporting transgenderism for example before she was against it, but if she's telling the truth that he took naked pictures of her without her consent, then she's unquestionably in the right.
He’s her ex fiancé, the likelihood of them being “without her consent” is about the same as a female teenager actually being “raped” by her boyfriend when they’re caught by her parents.
Maybe, maybe not. The images should make that clear. E.g. it seems that the videos were taken clandestinely. If the camera is out there in the open, visible to her, then not so much.
It's possible even for an attention whore RINO to be victimized.
I'm sure you'd rather call it 'simpery' than you being called out for your raving lunacy. But given how obsessed you are with that episode, it must have left a mark.
Let me remind you that you were saying that Tulsi should get no position in the Trump administration, even one unrelated to guns, because you think that children should be able to buy machine guns. It looks like your own guy disagreed with you there. No wonder you're seething at me.
Still doesn’t mean anything under the law or make a case for… rape. At worst you have a guy who has a nude video of an ex fiancée, in DC it’s a single party recording consent state, so if he interacts with her at all in the video and/or didn’t publish the material or sell it then it’s at best a grey area.
I wasn't talking about the rape stuff, only about the images.
Also, I'd be absolutely shocked if 'single party consent' applied to taking nude or sexual pictures of people, in whatever state. Everything I can find about 'single party consent' is about audio only, but of course, I spent 10 seconds on it.
Also, I'd be absolutely shocked if 'single party consent' applied to taking nude or sexual pictures of people.
It really boils down to usage. If he tried to use them for anything (i.e. blackmail), sell them, or distribute them then he would likely be in prison already. Based on the story they were entirely for personal use, which is again a gray area. For example if the footage is from security cameras in his house, he’s allowed to own that footage under single party consent. His home, his cameras, his consent. That doesn’t change unless a crime was committed in the film or the film itself was distributed in some fashion.
The photo I saw her talking about was clearly taken from a kitchen facing a common area and what looks like it might be a sliding glass door.. Not exactly where one would expect a camera to be hidden if the intent were to take naked photos.
When are women going to jail for making fake rape accussations without your consent? Especially the ones 40 years later just as you are about to become a president or supreme court justice.
Didn't MTG decry that Kiwifarms had "doxed" her a few years back around the time of the Keffals #DropKiwiFarms drama because the loon that did it declared that they were "Kiwifarms" and she took the bait?
She sponsored a bill imposing transgenderism as a part of the Civil Rights Act.
She claimed her house was graffiti'd by Antifa. At the time, I wondered why on earth Antifa would target one of its own. Many suspected her of staging that attack.
She claimed that some black guy who had outstanding warrants and who was shot for driving away dragging a cop with him (IIRC) was 'shot for having an air freshener'.
Conservahoe trying to revive metoo and make rape allegations against her ex-fiancé? It’s almost like being a professional victim is the only thing female congressmen do aside from insider trading.
Female “conservatives” are truly the most awful feminists, the entire thread is filled with white knights and stupid cunts doing the feminist power play.
It’s always men’s fault
She's a RINO, supporting transgenderism for example before she was against it, but if she's telling the truth that he took naked pictures of her without her consent, then she's unquestionably in the right.
He’s her ex fiancé, the likelihood of them being “without her consent” is about the same as a female teenager actually being “raped” by her boyfriend when they’re caught by her parents.
Maybe, maybe not. The images should make that clear. E.g. it seems that the videos were taken clandestinely. If the camera is out there in the open, visible to her, then not so much.
It's possible even for an attention whore RINO to be victimized.
No they fucking wouldn't.
Oh we are all well aware of his simpery. Start talking shit about Tulsi Gabbard if you really want to see him go.
I'm sure you'd rather call it 'simpery' than you being called out for your raving lunacy. But given how obsessed you are with that episode, it must have left a mark.
Let me remind you that you were saying that Tulsi should get no position in the Trump administration, even one unrelated to guns, because you think that children should be able to buy machine guns. It looks like your own guy disagreed with you there. No wonder you're seething at me.
RETARD ALERT
Still doesn’t mean anything under the law or make a case for… rape. At worst you have a guy who has a nude video of an ex fiancée, in DC it’s a single party recording consent state, so if he interacts with her at all in the video and/or didn’t publish the material or sell it then it’s at best a grey area.
I wasn't talking about the rape stuff, only about the images.
Also, I'd be absolutely shocked if 'single party consent' applied to taking nude or sexual pictures of people, in whatever state. Everything I can find about 'single party consent' is about audio only, but of course, I spent 10 seconds on it.
It really boils down to usage. If he tried to use them for anything (i.e. blackmail), sell them, or distribute them then he would likely be in prison already. Based on the story they were entirely for personal use, which is again a gray area. For example if the footage is from security cameras in his house, he’s allowed to own that footage under single party consent. His home, his cameras, his consent. That doesn’t change unless a crime was committed in the film or the film itself was distributed in some fashion.
The photo I saw her talking about was clearly taken from a kitchen facing a common area and what looks like it might be a sliding glass door.. Not exactly where one would expect a camera to be hidden if the intent were to take naked photos.
Women shouldn't have the right to spell 'chaperone' correctly.
A retard's place is in the asylum.
When are women going to jail for making fake rape accussations without your consent? Especially the ones 40 years later just as you are about to become a president or supreme court justice.
Well she is straight up a feminist so not conservative
Yeah, this is fucking sketchy as Hell.
Can we please get rid of these female republican representatives.
Can we please get rid of the 19th amendment
MTG?
Didn't MTG decry that Kiwifarms had "doxed" her a few years back around the time of the Keffals #DropKiwiFarms drama because the loon that did it declared that they were "Kiwifarms" and she took the bait?
Maybe. It does sound like something someone of her generation would say.
I guess she's okay.
She's almost as bad as AOC.
In some ways worse, since she is, allegedly, on Our Team.
I'll wait to see the reviews first.
What approval rating do you think would be high enough to go see?
I'd be happier if it was Boebert but I'll take what I can get.
Luna would be even better.
She's claiming she was raped...??
I dunno what happened but she's clearly crazy
She has a long history of crazy.
That said, I'm reserving judgment on this one.
There's also the crusading for sex-segregated spaces for women after she was a pioneer in taking those same spaces away from men.
That one I think was when a female cop mistook her gun for a taser. It was an early claim made by the family of the deceased.
Dragged a cop or did they jump on someones car and shoot them on purpose.Something which has happened plenty of times before.
The Patterson Gimlin footage showed more nudity than her "going there" nude image.
...was there a tv judge named nancy mace? that's all I can think of when I hear this chick's name..
Nancy Grace. (also a professional attention whore)
ah, my mistake, thank you
Nancy Grace wasn't a judge, but a lawyer who went on to be a TV news host.
ah, my mistake. so many tv judges it's hard to keep track, lol.
Repeal the 19th.
Put this bitch in a cage and throw it in the river
Might as well call it “Whoring for the Children.”
Stop trying to throw the mid-terms, Nancy.
Why is it that we voted in a whole new party, and they're immediately rerunning, the narratives of the previous party?
Why the f*** is the government a vegicle for attention seeking women to get revenge in their ex's, because they're bored or whatever?