Also came out of Rogan with a better opinion of him as a person, but a lesser chance he'll be the 2028 nominee.
He just doesn't grab you by the ear like Trump does. He's a perfect choice for VP though and that makes me think Trump has learned some valuable lessens from all the hurdles they've thrown down before him.
The purpose is to demoralize Trump supporters and rally Harris supporters.
The station isn't 'in on the steal' but it is manipulating public opinion similar to "51 intelligence officers" or Google/Facebook only reminding Democrats to vote.
It maybe be coordinated or just aligned, but it is on purpose.
Could be change of address form. It only lasts a year so sometimes people do it for several years.
I doubt anybody would be so brazen as voting dozens of times in their own name. The cheating they just assign each ballot to a different non-voter.
But it's great to be hyper-vigilant even if it makes Trumpers look like conspiracy theorists. The more the cheaters think people are watching the less comfortable they'll be cheating.
Repeal it entirely.
Data in transit and caches are already protected elsewhere in the telecommunication acts. All the Facebooks and Instagrams and Reddits can be done client side from raw data published by individuals and cached with simple data buckets.
When the presentation is done on your own computer you can control it yourself or write alternate clients that don't censor or bias.
Just enact the repeal a year off to give enough time to adjust.
Possibly the database has all the previous addresses for a voter and this table is pulling data from multiple sources.
So you have a database of "voter ID / voted on" with one record. And a "voter ID / address / date of address" with all their old addresses ("urban" people get evicted and move around a lot).
Then you combine them and get a list of addresses and votes, but the votes are all referring to one vote.
Even this Bezos Op-Ed is dishonest:
"Americans don’t trust the news media"
Liberals still today have a lot of trust in the news media as a whole, almost unchanged for the last 30 years, and very high trust in WaPo, NYT, Atlantic, NPR, etc - which are all garbage.
He linked to the poll so he knows it's a left / right divide and not Americans as a whole.
What he should say is that having half the country with zero trust and the other half with a great deal of trust clearly shows actual bias and he's going to fix the actual bias. And ironically, WaPo coming out and endorsing Trump with a well-reasoned examination of why Trump is the right choice would do so much in fixing the perception. In an epic reversal they could justifiably trash the Democrats for not having a primary, facilitating cheating, spreading hoax after hoax, hateful Hitler rhetoric, and so on.
WaPo Trump endorsement saying "you're the bad guys now, and WaPo is not going to be the bad guy anymore". But he doesn't even have the balls to be honest about the problem much less do what it takes to correct it.
SocraticMethod1 is just engaging in wishful thinking, like a liberal, that it's somebody else's fault - Democrats / the environment.
There's no example anywhere in the world of large groups of blacks even in good conditions being compatible with a thriving Western society.
Here's a counter example: the #1 factor in whether a neighborhood gets better or worse is the number of black residents. Higher than poverty, access to jobs, resources, hospitals - anything else. In other words, a wealthy all-black neighborhood is all but guaranteed to quickly go to shit. And these are kids with all the benefits of wealth and successful, smart parents and they still fail.
Democrats didn't create the "urban" morass, they just allowed it to happen by removing corporal punishment from schools and other things to try to impose Western-style civilization.
They should have explained that this specific shape creates an optical illusion for vampires and some idea of what it looks like - that they can't tell where the sword is, or it appears much larger, or it shimmers like it's magic or such as.
It's a cartoon they could even show it to the viewer so we could say "holy shit that would scare me if I was a vampire".
The only way they could ever make money on WNBA is if they had a minimum attractiveness requirement.
To play you have to poll 100 random dudes and be rated at least a 6.
You could say that's kind of ugly, but even that would be a huge improvement over most of the players.
the Journal worked to substantiate the notion that the concentrated bets represent some form of intentional narrative-control scheme,
If somebody wants to buy a large stake they aren't going to do it all at once since that'll spike the price.
If the true odds were 52/48 the price would quickly go from 52¢ Trump to like 90¢ Trump and most of their shares will be purchased at 90¢, then the price will settle back close to 52¢. They'd have 90¢ shares the consensus valued at 52¢.
Buying over a long period gives the market time to soak up the bet without excessively raising the odds.
Go with the prediction markets. Markets in principle factor in everything, including cheating.
So since the markets are only somewhat favoring Trump, he wins but it's electorally close. A Virginia or some other upset they didn't expect to need widespread cheating in will put him over the 270.
Point is the kids were around enough cocaine to have it in their hair. Doesn't mean they were snorting it, but normally kids don't have any cocaine in their hair.
I could see Barnes thinking if it got to the Supremes they'd say you can't search a home because of 'looks like an addict' (there was way more cause), but since it turned out he actually was a druggy freak it'll never get that far.
edit: also Robert Barnes is Vizzini
Right, BYD says we can build a factory in Mexico and build cars to sell in Mexico and Canada, or build a factory in the U.S. and sell in Mexico, Canada, and the U.S.
But that's more Art of the Deal than an economic tax on imports.
When another country is manipulating an industry with subsidies or unfair labor the only market solutions are subsidies and tariffs.
Subsidies send your own government money to everybody else in the world. It's a risky strategy that only works if other countries don't respond to protect their industry.
Tariffs send your own people's money to the government or domestic companies, which is spent in your own country. It's a safe strategy that only fails when it's too high for people to bear or when it's protecting dysfunctional domestic companies (monopoly, overly regulated, strong union, etc).
We know the lefty media is in group chats because some of the chat logs have leaked.
I think somebody in chat says "how do we spin this Fox interview so it's not a disaster" and somebody else says "let's call Baier 'testy'" and then everybody has to use that word like a high school mean girls clique.
I don't think mockingbird tells them to all say the same thing. CIA is probably like "you idiots you're giving the game away", but can't intervene directly because those 'journalists' aren't smart enough to be in on it.
It's simply not believable for Kamala to win and they don't want a hot civil war, which they nearly had with a more believable steal.
And they don't have to.
Trump is still a puppet, but instead of a marionette with strings he's a bull chasing red. They'd much rather have a marionette, but the bull isn't escaping their ring (mostly impeachment, D house/senate, threatening the family, etc).
Like I doubt we find out about JFK or Epstein because they'll make some offer to Trump like helping him deport illegals or save the economy. If we do get an Epstein client list it'll be like a matador being gored - happens sometimes, but the bullfighting continues with a new bull and new matador.
Really? I wouldn't know.
I haven't read the whole ruling, but I'm going to assume 230 pages of administrative law is hiding a lot of BS in there.
It looks like vague, poorly defined, all-encompassing terms so anybody can be in violation just because the FTC decides to go after them. "Any misrepresentation" in any commercial - isn't that all commercials?
She's not as dumb as she seems, but she's twice as lazy as she seems.
She's consistently failed through her whole lifetime by not putting in the work, failing, then only doing as much as was necessary. Law school, bar, DA, senator - where she just voted Yes on whatever Pelosi said to.