As 45 had to care to a certain extent because runaway public opinion could get him removed or work against him.
As 47 not even right-leaning centrists still trust anything the media says anymore so they can't manufacture opinion. All they can do is rile up the radical left, which is not very or even countereffective.
Who cares. It's all just emotional manipulation, from Trump and the outrage about supposedly innocent people dying.
A million people or something like that dead in Ukraine and it's almost entirely our fault - Victoria Nuland and her crew. You think scenes like this haven't been happening for three years now? This attack is nothing in the grand scheme of things.
Except Trump's purpose in sharing this is to send the message that he's a madman, we aren't fighting with a hand behind our back anymore, and they better knock it off. Which as vulgar as it may seem may actually save lives.
A Touch of Cloth is in the same vein.
It's nowhere near as good as Naked Gun let alone Police Squad, but it was kind of entertaining.
Basically the cigarette joke from name confusion without the rest.
Supporting this, research from the 90s found the number one factor in whether a neighborhood gets better or worse is the number of black people.
Poverty was close, but out of 30+ factors the research looked at nothing besides that was even in the same ballpark.
"White people often make snap judgements about character based on appearance."
Racist AI judging people by their appearance warns not to judge people by their appearance? Which is it, Gemini?!
AI from the U.S. "can predict if someone is a criminal, based solely on a picture of their face" with 80% accuracy and "no racial bias" (the higher proportion it determined for blacks matched the real numbers). AI from China can predict criminality with 89.5% accuracy.
We already know that genes play a huge role in criminality, especially violent crimes, so that lends credence to the AI results; physiognomy only failed because it was looking at the wrong variables... like for instance head size.
Sure, lots of Irish have a giant potato head but that doesn't make them bad people.
The issue is that the administration could just claim they determined a citizen isn't actually a citizen and deport them. Maybe you look similar and have the same name.
But what these propagandists don't tell you is these deported gang members were given the opportunity to claim they were citizens and get a hearing, delaying their deportation.
They didn't falsely claim to be citizens probably because they're not whiny little bitches. Like I have more respect for these murderers than the people that come through 5 other safe countries then whine about how they're so scared and need asylum - and then go back and vacation in their home country.
I don't think you're fully grasping the scope of corruption we're facing,
You didn't answer the question, just vague 'it's all globalism all the way down'. Ok, whatever. That's meaningless.
Years. Thank you. Years. Trump will be out of office before manufacturing comes back.
It takes years for the most complicated tech manufacturing that need a clean room and operate on like angstrom scale. Cars maybe a year (but cars are already made here). Other stuff six months, easily doable in less.
Are you not familiar with the monopolies and trusts going on in several economic sectors ... You guys are trying to tackle a massive problem by going after the branches, not the roots.
How much of the economy are monopolies that also compete with other countries? Hardly any of it. A monopoly that could raise prices due to tariffs could raise prices anyway because they're already being protected from foreign competition, for instance by the military having to buy domestic components.
Are you unaware how long it takes a large company to shift manufacturing?
A high-tech semiconductor fab only takes a few years here, even with our red tape, and lots of manufacturing requires much less time to set up. The Chinese can do it in weeks; we can too if we want to.
Prices will never, ever go down if malicious banking practices aren't stopped/solved.
That's a completely different issue and obviously I was talking about adjusted dollars.
They'll raise prices on everything. It's basic economics 101. ... Even if one or two companies get their goods restricted because of increased tariffs, but 2 others don't, all of the companies will raise their prices.
The companies not tariffed will raise prices initially while they increase production to replace tariffed now-too-expensive goods then price war with each other to lower prices.
In the short run, higher prices and more jobs, in the long run prices return to near prior levels except made in America with new, modern equipment.
So you think losing 2% of your wealth per year is the same catastrophe as losing all of it maybe once in your lifetime? You should just admit you're wrong rather than this bizarre display.
I gave your some credit as maybe an idealistic youth, but this is just retarded.
Why would you buy insurance for a $3000 max payout? Just put the money in an investment account and even if you get unlucky several times you can weather it. This is a strawman example.
A real example is more like a 100-sided die you roll once a year and if you get 1 then you're completely wiped out. Financially ruined and have to live under a bridge. This is what real insurance is for, unpredictable events that will seriously impact your life that you can't just save for.
Mathematically you could say that insurance should be 1% of your wealth, but that's the cost to insure not the value to the insured. If your choice is either have a 1% risk of catastrophic loss or 2% for the insurance what would you actually do? You'd pay the 2%. Ask yourselves honestly how much you would pay to avoid a 1% risk of total loss of everything you have. That difference is the value you place on the service of eliminating the risk.
If you think the insurance should be priced at the cost to insure rather than the value to the insured then you must consider eliminating risk to be of zero value. If that truly has no value to you then you wouldn't ever buy any insurance even at cost to insure. I doubt you'll go through your whole life and never buy insurance for anything, so clearly you don't actually believe the ideas you espouse.
The ideal insurance company from the perspective of the customer is one which has zero employees, zero rent, and zero stockholders. All premiums go right back to the customers.
No, the ideal insurance is one that pays out legitimate claims when the customers need it and at a premium that is justified by the risk variance. Customer doesn't give a shit about anything else.
In fact, people will pass over insurance that's too low.
If people believe the value of the insurance is 20% over amortized payout because of high risk variance they'll not buy insurance at 2% over because they'll suspect something is wrong; if people are willing to pay 20% extra to not roll the dice and you're only charging 2% then they'll expect the company to not pay them when they need it (and they'd be right).
Everybody in the US that has private insurance believes it's a better deal to have it instead of rolling the dice. There's no individual mandate. If it's not worth it for you, roll the dice - or get catastrophic insurance that pays for your casket.
The only due process should be that if you can show that you're a citizen or legal resident then they release you.
Not reported on, all these people deported were asked if they are citizens or legal residents and said no.
I didn't really realize this before since I've only seen the occasional video, but going back many years if he's not playing a game he's on twitter or youtube.
I think his W's are a result of Elon opening up twitter to most free speech (((with a notable exception of course))).
The only way it could possible work out well at least at first is if the organization already had a real plan they wanted to do but just couldn't make the administrators do it.
It sounds like a lot of departments already knew what was wrong and how to fix it, but they'd have to fire thousands and couldn't.
"While you were sleeping, everyone in the city was installed code. It was a brilliant idea by Dr. Cocteua that an organic bio-engineered microchip be sewn into the skin. Sensors all over the city can zero in on anyone at any time."
This fascist crap makes me want to puke.
Why would a god need protection from the sun's rays? If anything they should look Eflen white, so untouched than they almost glow.
Same reason why any deity that's not an avatar of gluttony should be fit; women slim and soft and men chiseled but not hulkish because their strength doesn't come from their matter.
The correlation will have to be established before a random control group can be done, so the best you're going to get until then is access to the data on who got what vaccine when to find those correlations.
He just said CDC will publish all their data on vaccines and he's fixing reporting such as VAERS so it actually works.
So it sounds like he's on top of things, but he does seem more turtle and less hare. Hopefully he gets to the finish line before his term is over.
Eh neither side was really in the right.
If I remember right they showed the actors pushing the car because it ran out of battery after an hour and Elon said the car was reporting to Tesla HQ the whole time and never ran out of battery and the show said had they actually driven it on the track for an hour the battery would have run out.
The show deceived the audience into thinking they actually drove the laps, Elon wanted to deceive buyers that the car didn't need recharging after a hot minute on the track.
Obviously they have the agenda of all blacks are victims of white racist patriarchy, but what I don't understand is how is it are all the medial-blown cases fake?
Like I'm pretty sure every single one of the "alleged hate crime incidents" reported by NPR have turned out to be hoaxes, which NPR of course never informs their audience of. All the ones I've checked anyway.
It is really the case there are no outrageous incidents anywhere in 350 million or are media purposely picking ones that anybody doing any amount of research will know are fake just to create division?
I think it's actually more likely that they learn of some outrageous event and wait until their private news chats to say it was a hoax before they report on the "allegation" than there are no actual cases.