Yes, how dare I identify a pattern of behavior where Trump has done exactly this same thing a thousand times before?
How does everyone still have trouble seeing through this tactic? He doesn't care about that shit: he's throwing his weight around trying to get a more favorable deal.
It's funny that you think you are.
can confidently say that Imp doesn't piss us off
Then why the endless threads about him on a forum where he's only able to post once a year if that?
purely to fuck with him and rile him up.
Confession through projection
my comments get reported all the time.
And yet here you are, poor persecuted you.
If the Trump administration has any integrity left, they will crack down on Visa and MC for this, and that will affect what they're doing in other countries as well.
In any rational country, the authorities would collectively just treat this as a FAFO moment and that would be the end of it.
Too many women with disposable income (not actually theirs) to spend on therapists and psychologists.
And yet you have no compunction against using the rule you want to get rid of to silence your detractors.
You only want R16 gone so that you and all your friends and alts can turn this into just another ConPro style echo chamber where no one can have any conversation without 20 comments in the thread making it about the Jews and anyone who calls you on it getting downvoted into oblivion.
The heckler's veto is not free speech.
Your suggestions would be golden on a board full of honest actors. Unfortunately forums like this one attact all sorts of dishonest actors whose entire purpose is to derail discussion: sometimes feds, sometimes fifth-columnists, sometimes just extreme autists looking for an echo chamber where they can have their own ideas reflected unquestioningly back at them. Such people can't just block and move on because they're only here to drag us all down into the mud with them.
Here's the thing: Imp constantly goes out of his way to argue with the stormfags and piss them off, so contrary to their plaintive, hand-wringing demands that they should be allowed to say whatever they want about their own target groups, they will immediately start reporting every comment Imp makes in order to bring him to Dom's attention and get him banned.
DoM doesn't go around reading every thread: he responds to reports. Those of us who are actually principled, unlike the stormfags, don't go around reporting all of their nonsensical tin-foil-hat Jew-baiting statements. If we did, many of those users would be gone just as quickly as Imp. The fact that so many of them are still here is simply a function of their own hypocrisy: they will hide behind free-speech principles at the same time as they go out of their way to get people who disagree with them banned, even if that person is harmless as Imp, because they are incapable of arguing in good faith.
Prayers for all the Boomers who will read this article and be completely unable to process the information it contains.
The amount of cope around this film is hilarious. "It doesn't need to break even: it's just stage-setting!" "Marvel has way more riding on Fantastic 4 than DC has on this film about their central character!"
Zach Snyder's Man of Steel was the worst Superman film ever made. If your movie can't even outdo that at the box office, it's just a failure.
We need to take back our country.
MGTOW proven right again #yesallwomen
I have less than zero patience for oppression-complex historical revisionism or Marxist cultural relativism.
90% of the population
Source?
tens of millions dead across the continent
That would be a neat trick, considering there were not that many people in the Americas at the time of Columbus' arrival.
torturing, burning and hanging people by their genitals
Yeah, some of the conquistadors were dicks. That does not in any way make them the moral equivalent of the industrial-scale practice of human sacrifice that the Aztecs were using to keep their own conquered enemies under control.
sacrificed people not out of cruelty but because they believed they had to
Well that makes it okay then.
advanced mathematics, engineering and metallurgy
Then why were they living in mud huts and killing each other with stone axes?
someone born centuries ago would sit there miserable because they didn't own a smartphone
No, but they might be miserable because half or more of their brothers and sisters would have died before reaching adulthood, or because they had a gangrenous infection that was slowly killing them and causing them immense pain as it did so, or because they were enslaved and being worked to death in a field.
Our modern society may not be perfect, but all of the innovations and developments that we have access to are the result of generations of desperate, brilliant men working and experimenting in order find ways to make their children's lives easier and less miserable than theirs had been. That is the fundamental basis of all of human progress.
Try telling any captured Tlaxcaltecan child who was about to have his heart carved out that being raised by nuns in a monastery is no better than what he is about to endure. Try telling anyone dying slowly and painfully of an illness that is today easily treatable that he is luckier than a man who gets to live into his 70s and watch his grandchildren grow up. Try telling any mother who lost half her children to easily preventable diseases that her emotional devastation makes her no less fortunate than the mother who has to manage her healthy child's smartphone addiction.
The Spanish were morally superior to the Aztecs because, despite all their own persistent flaws, their ancestors had already lived through the epoch of human sacrifice and solving problems of food scarcity with mass killings, and they had learned their lessons from it. The notion that they should simply sit by and allow the industrialized human sacrifice and abject poverty to continue unabated because "iss dey culcha" is no different from saying we should allow crazy woke bitches to mutilate their own children in the service of trans ideology because they believe they have to.
But nowhere near as honest as "Trump cares more about Israel than he does about America, so based on that one issue alone I think you should vote for 20 million more illegal immigrants, endless DEI mandates and and trannies in every daycare, because Israel totally doesn't matter more to me than my own country does."
The criticism of Trump caputulating to Israeli warmongering is valid. Your problem is that it seems to be the only thing you care about.
Bro, if I presented you with a time machine and told you you could go anywhere in the world at any period in history, but you don't get to decide, when you step out of the time machine, whether you're the king in his castle or the serf working the field or the mine: if you had that choice to make, you would be insane to choose anything other than the West in the late 20th century.
As imperfect and miserable as our society is, it's the best humanity has come up with so far.
"Vote for the gay race communists because they'll stand up to Israel more" will be the death of the right.
Let's all take a moment to remember the horrors that the evil Spanish colonizers inflicted on the noble savages of Mezoamerica, which included the introduction of horses, infrastructure, European medicine, and stopping them from carving out the still-beating hearts of their own children in sacrifice to their gods.
Gawker no longer exists because of Hulk.
No matter what else he did or didn't do, on that basis alone he left the world a better place than he found it.
We gonna start believing polls now?
Keith Richards is in his eighties and playing live shows. He did so many drugs that he solidly can't remember a full decade of his life. There's no arguing with good genetics.
There are at least half a dozen logical fallacies at play here. Straw-man, No True Scotsman, false dilemma, appeal to authority, appeal to emotion, bandwagoning, etc.
The bar that SCOTUS has previously set for protected vs unprotected speech is that your threat must be realistically actionable in order for it to qualify as a genuine death threat, just as incitement to violence is only criminal if there is a realistic possibility that someone might actually act on your words.
Threatening to kill hypothetical individuals on a hypothetical list that official sources all insist is not real does not seem to meet that criterion, but we'll see if the courts try to walk it back.
No, I mean constantly saying shit he doesn't mean and pretending things he doesn't care about are non-negotiable conditions for a trade deal, right up until it stops being convenient for him and he abandons them.