This "17 and 364 day old woman is a child" meme is peak midwittery. Morality defined exclusively by law, then latched onto purely for elevating your own social status.
What's funny is when the programming short circuits like that woman who was yelling at a guy for being a creep and hitting on an "underage 23 year old"
There does need to be a line, and it's not just "puberty" or something. We can argue about whether it should be eighteen, but there needs to be a line. Also, it's not even hard and fast (heh) like people try to portray it. Lots of states have sliding ranges. I don't know the exact specifics, but something like, for example, consensual sex between someone 16-18 is legal if the other part is 18-21. I think many states do that.
I agree the 17.99 meme is a silly situation, and can lead to dangerous and unjust outcomes, but you also have to keep in mind it's a very dangerous slippery slope. Like I said, if the argument is puberty or something - the infamous 'if she bleeds she breeds' - that way...that way lies evil. If it's fine for a grown man to have sex with a sixteen year old, why not fifteen. And puberty happens much earlier...why not 13, 12? If someone goes through early puberty, why not like 9 or something?
I've said it before, but I'll take a solid cutoff that might even err on the side of caution, like eighteen, over a sliding scale that might allow sex with children. One evil is much lesser than the other.
Also, if you think sex with under eighteen is fine...do you think they should have other rights? Should sixteen year olds be voting, for example? Just because they might start being sexually active before eighteen doesn't mean they're adults, and doesn't mean they shouldn't still have extra protections, and not full rights yet. They're not children but, no, they're not adults either. They don't get to vote or sigh certain contracts, or buy certain products, and they should be protected from certain adult behaviors.
You don't go to Heaven because you were a good person. Besides Jesus, there are no such thing as good people.
Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
this always bothered me, especially it being a passage in Romans, written in a Bible compiled by the Romans. It basically says you can be a bad person, an explicitly bad person, but still go to heaven because you believe in God. how convenient for the conquesting, slave keeping, and sexually promiscuous romans.
What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
translation: Please don't sin, pretty please! Just know that your sins are forgiven simply by believing in Christ. no matter how many times you burn villages or fornicate, so long as you believe in Jesus everything will be okay. no need to right your wrongs or anything
Nowhere does it say you won't be punished for sinning. You just won't have to go to hell if you're saved. There's plenty of other kinds of punishments and saved Christians who continue to sin have plenty of regrets in this life and the next.
right, but the Romans claim God (read: the church) saves you, and that you repent to God (the church, usually with a convenience fee) to be clean of your sins. this process never includes actually righting the wrongs that you've done.
Jesus is very clear. First you stop sinning, then you show repentance, only then will absolution be given.
As for how that is applied in practice:
People who don't stop sinning are excommunicated. They are denied absolution and the sacrament and are unable to be part of the congregation (Christian church community) until they have stopped sinning.
Lots of churches are too soft to do any of these things, but when done effectively, we are talking about public shaming, shunning and the peril of damnation unless a person changes their ways, makes amends and gains the forgiveness and acceptance of the congregation again, as lead by a priest.
Being utterly exiled from community used to mean more when cities and towns were smaller, but being cut off from your community should be absolutely brutal, if wielded effectively.
meaning, in a society where christianity reigns supreme, the church decides who gets punished and who must atone. If the church is corrupt (governing institutions always are), then immoral deeds go unpunished.
Meanwhile Romans seems to be only concerned about faith in god. Theoretically, you could be a serial killer who targets non-christians, and your love of God would keep your spirit safe.
based on all the things I've witnessed to make me believe in God, that is not how God operates.
as written, it seems to be divinely inspired by an incredibly jealous God, who doesn't seem to care about people unless they love him. again, very convenient for the Romans who compiled the Bible.
in my experience, God who is all that is good and just does not behave like that.
Have you seen Unforgiven? There's a line in the movie that is something like, "We all have it coming." This is a statement that epitomizes the thought being expressed. Not one of us will act good enough to deserve Heaven. We only can get to Heaven because of Jesus and God's Grace
Without forgiveness, then the community must turn their back on the sinner and cast them out forever.
If sin can be forgiven, if the sinner changes their ways, stops sinning and strives every day to earn forgiveness, then they may be permitted to contribute to the community, and the community can care for them in turn.
Is it enough? That isn't up to us. God will judge them soon enough.
If they will not stop sinning, then they are excommunicated and cast out. There are not unlimited chances to earn the forgiveness of the community.
Also, bear in mind that Jesus was very clear that people should obey the law. The role of the church is to care for the spiritual needs of a community, not the need for law and justice. That is left to a different, mortal authority.
This is why priests attend and counsel prisoners to be put to death. Even if they have never sinned again, that doesn't erase the past nor undo the judgement of the law. Even if they die with their soul in a state of grace, they are still put to death. What comes after that is up to God.
That’s not what it says. The Bible says you could have done terrible things, but if you repent and seek forgiveness through Christ, you can still be saved.
I don't "get it" with the 5 Black guys? Or is that the one guy who died recently?
Leftists are retarded.
Furthermore: it is the LEFT who uses all those "weasel words" and more (bottom right side) NOT us! Like "exploring their sexuality" for a 6 year-old or "freedom to chose their gender" = brainwashing them with p0rn.
I guess "the Blacks" are going to get their revenge because Hogan said "nigger" on tape, or something?
But, yeah, it's a really shitty meme. Since Hogan is such a bad guy in their eyes, he's in Hell, right? So are those black dudes in Hell too? Or did Hogan somehow go to Heaven, but that involves getting gangbanged by black dudes?
It's schizophrenic. I guess because it's AI. Maybe it's the heavenly clouds that are throwing me off. But the whole thing is weird.
I remember that, his daughter was dating a monkey, and he expressed his sentiment that we would all find agreeable, and so he became their latest hitler for a time.
Gawker no longer exists because of Hulk.
No matter what else he did or didn't do, on that basis alone he left the world a better place than he found it.
This "17 and 364 day old woman is a child" meme is peak midwittery. Morality defined exclusively by law, then latched onto purely for elevating your own social status.
What's funny is when the programming short circuits like that woman who was yelling at a guy for being a creep and hitting on an "underage 23 year old"
There does need to be a line, and it's not just "puberty" or something. We can argue about whether it should be eighteen, but there needs to be a line. Also, it's not even hard and fast (heh) like people try to portray it. Lots of states have sliding ranges. I don't know the exact specifics, but something like, for example, consensual sex between someone 16-18 is legal if the other part is 18-21. I think many states do that.
I agree the 17.99 meme is a silly situation, and can lead to dangerous and unjust outcomes, but you also have to keep in mind it's a very dangerous slippery slope. Like I said, if the argument is puberty or something - the infamous 'if she bleeds she breeds' - that way...that way lies evil. If it's fine for a grown man to have sex with a sixteen year old, why not fifteen. And puberty happens much earlier...why not 13, 12? If someone goes through early puberty, why not like 9 or something?
I've said it before, but I'll take a solid cutoff that might even err on the side of caution, like eighteen, over a sliding scale that might allow sex with children. One evil is much lesser than the other.
Also, if you think sex with under eighteen is fine...do you think they should have other rights? Should sixteen year olds be voting, for example? Just because they might start being sexually active before eighteen doesn't mean they're adults, and doesn't mean they shouldn't still have extra protections, and not full rights yet. They're not children but, no, they're not adults either. They don't get to vote or sigh certain contracts, or buy certain products, and they should be protected from certain adult behaviors.
Or, alternatively, a "consenting" Aisha.
a 17 and 364 days old female is indeed underaged. the line has to be drawn somewhere, and 18 is the line.
You don't go to Heaven because you were a good person. Besides Jesus, there are no such thing as good people.
Romans 3:20-24
this always bothered me, especially it being a passage in Romans, written in a Bible compiled by the Romans. It basically says you can be a bad person, an explicitly bad person, but still go to heaven because you believe in God. how convenient for the conquesting, slave keeping, and sexually promiscuous romans.
From Romans 6:1-4
translation: Please don't sin, pretty please! Just know that your sins are forgiven simply by believing in Christ. no matter how many times you burn villages or fornicate, so long as you believe in Jesus everything will be okay. no need to right your wrongs or anything
Nowhere does it say you won't be punished for sinning. You just won't have to go to hell if you're saved. There's plenty of other kinds of punishments and saved Christians who continue to sin have plenty of regrets in this life and the next.
right, but the Romans claim God (read: the church) saves you, and that you repent to God (the church, usually with a convenience fee) to be clean of your sins. this process never includes actually righting the wrongs that you've done.
Jesus is very clear. First you stop sinning, then you show repentance, only then will absolution be given.
As for how that is applied in practice:
People who don't stop sinning are excommunicated. They are denied absolution and the sacrament and are unable to be part of the congregation (Christian church community) until they have stopped sinning.
Lots of churches are too soft to do any of these things, but when done effectively, we are talking about public shaming, shunning and the peril of damnation unless a person changes their ways, makes amends and gains the forgiveness and acceptance of the congregation again, as lead by a priest.
Being utterly exiled from community used to mean more when cities and towns were smaller, but being cut off from your community should be absolutely brutal, if wielded effectively.
meaning, in a society where christianity reigns supreme, the church decides who gets punished and who must atone. If the church is corrupt (governing institutions always are), then immoral deeds go unpunished.
Meanwhile Romans seems to be only concerned about faith in god. Theoretically, you could be a serial killer who targets non-christians, and your love of God would keep your spirit safe.
based on all the things I've witnessed to make me believe in God, that is not how God operates.
Username checks out. You have to ignore the entire context of the Bible and claim it's not divinely inspired to reach this conclusion
as written, it seems to be divinely inspired by an incredibly jealous God, who doesn't seem to care about people unless they love him. again, very convenient for the Romans who compiled the Bible.
in my experience, God who is all that is good and just does not behave like that.
Have you seen Unforgiven? There's a line in the movie that is something like, "We all have it coming." This is a statement that epitomizes the thought being expressed. Not one of us will act good enough to deserve Heaven. We only can get to Heaven because of Jesus and God's Grace
Without forgiveness, then the community must turn their back on the sinner and cast them out forever.
If sin can be forgiven, if the sinner changes their ways, stops sinning and strives every day to earn forgiveness, then they may be permitted to contribute to the community, and the community can care for them in turn.
Is it enough? That isn't up to us. God will judge them soon enough.
If they will not stop sinning, then they are excommunicated and cast out. There are not unlimited chances to earn the forgiveness of the community.
Also, bear in mind that Jesus was very clear that people should obey the law. The role of the church is to care for the spiritual needs of a community, not the need for law and justice. That is left to a different, mortal authority.
This is why priests attend and counsel prisoners to be put to death. Even if they have never sinned again, that doesn't erase the past nor undo the judgement of the law. Even if they die with their soul in a state of grace, they are still put to death. What comes after that is up to God.
That’s not what it says. The Bible says you could have done terrible things, but if you repent and seek forgiveness through Christ, you can still be saved.
Amen
Ironic comong from the party of cuties and drag in schools
& giving p0rnography to kindergarteners too! Without parental consent OR knowledge.
I don't "get it" with the 5 Black guys? Or is that the one guy who died recently?
Leftists are retarded.
Furthermore: it is the LEFT who uses all those "weasel words" and more (bottom right side) NOT us! Like "exploring their sexuality" for a 6 year-old or "freedom to chose their gender" = brainwashing them with p0rn.
I guess "the Blacks" are going to get their revenge because Hogan said "nigger" on tape, or something?
But, yeah, it's a really shitty meme. Since Hogan is such a bad guy in their eyes, he's in Hell, right? So are those black dudes in Hell too? Or did Hogan somehow go to Heaven, but that involves getting gangbanged by black dudes?
It's schizophrenic. I guess because it's AI. Maybe it's the heavenly clouds that are throwing me off. But the whole thing is weird.
Black People Heaven is Hell for everyone else and there’s infinite rape up there.
I remember that, his daughter was dating a monkey, and he expressed his sentiment that we would all find agreeable, and so he became their latest hitler for a time.
Sic semper tyrannis indeed.
Accidentally based bluesky retard.
Hulk Hogan's history of charity versus his use of the N-word to describe a 'romantic interest' of his clueless and low-IQ daughter.