When I was that age I knew who the candidates were and who my parents favored, but I don't recall having a real opinion one way or the other.
If we are to believe this child, all or most of her classmates (but only the girls) were so invested in the election that they were performatively grieving across her school for hours or days.
Assuming this is true, they are being aggressively politicized and brainwashed by their (assuredly female) parents. Kids need to just be kids and not worry about politics.
Exactly. I only see logical fallacies brought up by leftists, and they always misapply them.
Calling attention to the fact that somebody criticizing a politician was perfectly fine with the same behavior when it was someone that shared their beliefs is not whataboutism.
Probably the same kind of idiot who who would let it soak into the trim at the base of his wall while he takes a picture rather than clean it up.
Thank you. Sites have been reporting that she killed him over Trump winning when the murder occurred before the election was over and over a dispute about whether or not they were going to have the lights in the house on. She's just a nut.
There's plenty of awful things liberals do without us needing to sink to their level and spread lies.
Yes "adjudicated rapist", which means they're taking findings from a civil trial with completely different standards of evidence, no presumption of innocence, and a "more likely than not" burden of proof and conflating them into some sort of pseudo finding of criminal guilt.
I never seen this term before, but they leave no stone unturned in their smear campaign against Trump.
Women have this vacuous "all the mundane things in my life are so deep and meaningful" writing style. It's silly and pretentious. Bitch reminds me of this story:
I immediately texted, “I love you, but out of respect for me and all my liberal writer friends, can you please take down that post? Also, tell your family I love them, but I will not be coming for Thanksgiving, and I won’t be hosting Christmas. I need space.”
Shortly after I sent the text, he brought me a cup of coffee in bed.
“I am sorry,” he said, “I understand.”
We should be living in a world where he backhanded her for her spiteful impertinence instead of apologizing to her like a punk.
It's worse than that: the ingredients correctly list that it is made with cream, it just doesn't have an extra allergy warning telling people that it has milk (cream) in it.
So, even if you were the stupidest person on the planet and didn't know butter was made with milk, you still would have been fine if you read the ingredients list.
It's just that these day's we've delegated that response to the state,
In the name of making justice dispassionate and fair, but I think it should be clear by now that the government doesn't dispense justice much more fairly at all.
"She" looks like a tranny or a dude in drag. Pretty fucking ugly.
OK, that makes more sense. The Mike Benz guy saying you lost access was confusing.
Seems like a case of having to abide by Google's rules, no matter how unfair they are, if you want to play in their pool.
I don't store anything online for the number of privacy and accessibility reasons. Apparently these fuckers are scanning all your personal shit, which is the most concerning aspect of this.
So, when it says "this file can no longer be copied" are they referring to downloading it? I'm pretty sure that violates the law of a number of countries that say data uploaded online remains the property if the person uploaded it. If you can't pull it back down you don't really own it.
The left always degenerates into infighting.
My top example is always the Spanish Civil War, where the various factions were too busy killing each other because one's version of Marxism was slightly different than another to mount a competent war against the Nationalists.
Tariffs do raise the cost of goods for the consumer, but it's usually done in the name of preserving domestic industry.
If a company prices a widget at $20 when it's made in America, but can get more profit by pricing a Chinese equivalent at $10, the consumer enjoys the discount. However, that just incentivizes other companies to offshore their production so that they can meet that $10 price and compete, which further drives up the cost of the American made widget and potentially extinguishes the American producer entirely when it can't compete.
The tariff raises the cost of the Chinese widget, and it eliminates the benefit to the producer by offshoring. If it costs the same or more to produce a good overseas, they will produce it in America.
The overall benefits of the economy are additional American jobs, and in some sectors the preservation of industry that would otherwise go extinct. This is particularly important in the defense sector where you don't want to be dependent on a foreign nation for your equipment.
The cost is that you can't get your Chinese shit for $10 anymore but, especially in the case of stuff produced in China, you get what you pay for.
It's actually pretty rational if you ask it carefully crafted questions. You could probably get it to acknowledge that Israel persecutes ethnic minorities and them press it on how that differs from its definition of white nationalism. You could also ask it to clarify how it thinks Zionism differs from "white separatism" vs. "white nationalism".
If you wanted to see if you could get it to reverse itself, you should ask it to list the differences and then snipe each item in the list until nothing remains. Then it will usually reverse its position.
I also got it to admit that it has directives that override pure logic, and it will admit which answers it gives are influenced by those directives and which are not.
Wait, I've seen this one!
Everyone remember the "summer of love", when a bunch of people who hated guns decided that maybe they were a good thing to have around a bunch of rioters? There a bunch of articles in the vein of "committed gun control advocate discovers his state has a waiting period when he goes to buy a gun".
And after 2020 they proceeded to...vote even harder for gun control in the states controlled by Democrats. These bitches will post stuff like this, and will maybe even go out and buy a gun, but they'll still vote just as hard for more gun control.
Did the defense object? That seems like an intentionally inflammatory tactic, and it should be standard practice to refer to someone by their name.
I'm pretty sure the judge wouldn't allow the defense to refer to the deceased as "the person arrested X times and convicted Y times" in lieu of their name.
Every single normal belief today is far left compared to even 30 years ago
Didn't Bill Clinton sign a law defining marriage as between a man and a woman and oppose ending Don't Ask/Don't Tell in the military?
The Republicans removed that definition of marriage from their official party platform this year. It's been said that the Republicans are just the Democrats in slow motion, and that's largely true.
There's definitely a case to be made that we should go all in on pushing whatever crazy shit comes out of the mind of the left as fast as possible so that we can make everything fall apart and hopefully do a better job when we put it all back together.
There was a reason originally only property owners had franchise in America.
If you're not paying into a system, you're not incentivized to ensure it's well run. Would someone on welfare, who pays no taxes, give a shit if they taxed everyone else 90% of their income and wasted all but a few dollars of it as long as their check remained the same?
Sure, they have a vested interest in ensuring the system paying their welfare doesn't collapse, but I honestly don't think people in that situation are farsighted enough to vote for responsible spending or, God forbid, a reduction in their benefits in order to sustain the system long-term.
When was the last time these guys put out an album? I remember they were pretty cool back in like 2010, but I don't think I've ever heard a song from them that wasn't on the two albums they made around that time.
Also 200% this was Ruffalo's idea.
Did you see where he criticized Bolsonaro from Brazil on Twitter a few years ago? Bolsonaro told him to stay in his lane and that Lou Ferrigno was a better Hulk because he didn't need CGI to look strong.
Who would sign this?
"Want to review our game? You have to agree to write what we want."
true crime
Anyone know why this is? I mean it's 100% true; every girl I've ever dated loved true crime books and movies- even the ones that weren't really readers.
I think true crime is OK, but don't understand the universal appeal with women.
We really aren't that far out from being able to tell AI something like "Write me a ~500 page novel set in XX century with a flawed anti-hero protagonist. Use the following books and films for reference:..." and getting something of the same quality as your average human writer in response.
It's been 15-20 years since I've eaten at Pizza Hut. Did they all stop dine in? There are still two near me that are full buildings with dining rooms that are open. Are they just not using them anymore?