Remember how Trump was campaigning in blue states near the end? Almost like he didn't think he was going to lose any of the swing states and might be able to pick up some blue ones?
Remember how Kamala was campaigning in blue states near the end? Almost like she didn't think she had any chance to win any swing states and was worried about losing some blue ones?
Watching what people do is far more useful than listening to what they say.
Something like 1.4 million votes cast in Arizona for president.
And 2.1 million votes cast for the Kari Lake senate seat.
Totally legit.
*edit: numbers have been updated and it's much closer now. Still difficult to believe that Trump voters wouldn't have also picked Lake.
When Obama won I didn’t throw a tantrum because I had to go to work
That's the difference. They don't have real jobs with consequences if they don't show up; at best they have classes ... which were canceled by their leftist professors.
Unfortunately counting ballots well after Election Day
And kicking out poll watchers to "count" them in the middle of the night by running the same ballots through voting machines repeatedly while counting was supposed to be "stopped"... Then suing Guiliani for defamation for pointing it out and stealing all of his money and property to give it to two ghetto trash bitches.
Then courts refusing to hear a single case and throwing them all out on procedural grounds of standing or laches.
There were plenty of shenanigans. There's a possibility, obviously, that they all meant nothing and that the election was legitimate. But what it absolutely, 100%, was not, is credible.
Listened to him with Blonde last night. My bigger issue with his stance is that he seems to focus almost entirely on national politics.
How are decent local politicians supposed to get in to at least attempt to unseat the socialist freaks if you refuse to vote? You're just ceding the entire political machine to them in the hopes that they won't murder you before it collapses and that you'll survive the collapse.
Neither should be offered.
If you don't want your opinions out there, don't put them out there. If you want them limited, then make the entire account limited and invisible to everyone except those that you explicitly whitelist.
If you don't want replies, just hide them from the mute-r. But let the mute-ee reply and show them right along next to the other publicly visible replies.
Fuck this noise of "I want to be a public figure and make public statements but I don't want anyone to be able to respond in a way that I don't like."
That's a stupid heuristic.
You'd refuse to vote for a Thomas Massie or Ron/Rand Paul just because you'd voted for them twice already?
And you're refusing to vote for arguably the US president in (at least) 40 years because you already voted for him twice?
I've got a couple of heuristics that help and kind of mitigate the need for things like SBI detected:
Cal arts or similar shitty art style? Ignore.
Received any awards from any "game festivals"? Ignore.
Marketing materials feature quotes from mainstream gaming publications? Ignore.
Female protagonist? Ignore, unless she looks traditionally beautiful, or shown to be actually sexy.
Black protagonists with dreadlocks? Ignore.
Black protagonists featured first? Ignore.
Yeah, this does catch some stuff that might actually not suck, but oh well. There's plenty of other stuff to play.
Plus Factorio: Space Age just came out so that should keep me occupied for the better part of 2025.
Not sure who you've been listening to but there's been a ton of emphasis on down-ballot races on the commentators that I listen to. e.g. Dan Bongino has interviews every Sunday and they are frequently senate/house candidates.
Just finished listening to it.
Great interview. Especially the number of times Rogan brought up subjects that Vance knew nothing about (hemp, psychedelics, shooters on SSRIs, etc) and Vance came off as genuinely interested in learning about them.
5 1/2 million views already. For a VP candidate.
There is no fucking way that Kamala/Walz is anywhere near this level of popularity. I think if there were no ballot harvesting or other shenanigans going on, Kamala pulls sub 50 million votes.
Difference there is that those small countries were on the opposite side of the planet and occupied by a native people who have nothing to do with the people who were trying to "liberate" them.
Ukraine is right next door to Russia and a lot of its citizens consider themselves to be Russian. (And for that matter, Ukraine considers them to be Russian as well, which is why it had been ethnically cleansing them.)
You intentionally miss the point and then act like an asshole when people aren't interested in your goalpost moving and name calling.
Would I prefer to live in a world where race doesn't matter? Yup. Do we live in that world? Nope. And no amount of deflection with irrelevant statistics will change that.
Also, reminder: you're stuck in here with us.
They also wouldn't say they need 5 days to count
Actually, that's exactly what they need.
After polls have closed, the fraudsters are able to see exactly who has voted, so they can start churning out ballots from people who didn't vote and have those ballots miraculously appear in "misplaced" or "found" boxes (with no chain of custody) to be counted in the days following the election.
That's why we get the F charts.
Exactly.
He talks about the news and tells the fucking truth and does it in a humorous way.
I roll my eyes when he goes on yet another, "this gigantic failure of government and corporate corruption is why we need socialism!" but at least he doesn't simply ignore that the corruption is happening.
I refuse to believe they're this dumb.
They are dumber.
I just had an acquaintance ask me how I was voting, and then she got all offended because she sincerely believed that Trump wanted to kill all the black people and Mexicans.
incorrect SQL query
That a student that's taken a single semester of databases would understand how to fix and probably not make in the first place.
"wow, I've got 10 rows in 1 table and 10 rows in the other that I'm trying to do a 1:1 join on and somehow I'm getting 100 results that have duplicate values? What could it possibly be?"
If we get any subset of:
I will consider it at least a minor success.