2
SR388-SAX 2 points ago +3 / -1

When someone's litmus test is, "if he doesn't come out and denounce Israel and name the Jew," I suppose he's no different than the other options.

Otherwise if you look at the individual appointments, despite a few head-scratchers, the cabinet he's assembling is worlds better than any other of my lifetime.

3
SR388-SAX 3 points ago +3 / -0

You can't see people's looks on the internet.

Holy Missing The Point, Batman.

simple logic it's going to be extraordinarily unlikely.

I'm just going to roll my eyes and walk away from this one because it's got nothing to do with "logic", and at best it would have something to do with "probability," but only if you have a midwit's understanding of probability.

6
SR388-SAX 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've never seen someone who was both attractive and intelligent.

Have you ever interacted with people outside of the internet? Because it's really not that uncommon.

My AP calculus and physics classmates included my state's Jr. Miss competition winner.

14
SR388-SAX 14 points ago +14 / -0

Any time someone says "capitalism" I just respond, "I don't know what that is. Can you explain what you mean by it?"

1
SR388-SAX 1 point ago +3 / -2

Antifa are neither fascists nor nazis, they are communists that the fascists and nazis had fought with.

Those are all, essentially, the same thing. Nationalist communists vs. globalist communists.

12
SR388-SAX 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's not entirely "privilege" -- there's also a strong correlation between attractiveness and IQ.

But yeah, attractive women have large, clear bonuses on top of that.

34
SR388-SAX 34 points ago +34 / -0

All you have to do to be a successful woman, in the eyes of nearly everybody, is take reasonably good care of yourself. Don't get super fat, don't accrue mountains of debt or fatherless children, and limit your promiscuous sex to some form of serial monogamy.

If you can do that, it doesn't really matter how attractive you are. People generally won't have a problem with you.

8
SR388-SAX 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don't trust any sub that Spez hasn't nuked

Akin to "I wouldn't want to belong to any (club/sub) that would have me as a member."

2
SR388-SAX 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the dude is even 10% genuine, from the interviews I've listened to him, it would be an FBI full of Indians who love the USA and take no shit from career government bureaucrats.

Ideal? No. Better than what we have? Absolutely.

22
SR388-SAX 22 points ago +22 / -0

Why the fuck is an 87 year old talking like a more retarded millennial?

No idea, but ...

George Takei

Stephen King

Rob Reiner

Mark Hamill

it's not exactly an uncommon thing. I just assume that they're all pedophiles at this point.

2
SR388-SAX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Feds don't need access to our devices to spy on us, they simply harvest all of our communications directly from backbone internet hardware.

30
SR388-SAX 30 points ago +31 / -1

Also probably adds root kits to your PC and spies on you.

6
SR388-SAX 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is FromSoft a publicly traded company?

3
SR388-SAX 3 points ago +3 / -0

My personal experience with them all is Southwest is the best for domestic

Southwest is absolutely all-in on the DEI and LGBTQ+ garbage.

9
SR388-SAX 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just block the LGBTQ+ tag.

I wish there were a way to add blocks for publisher-added tags too. If a publisher adds the "Female Protagonist" tag, I will not buy it. But, if it's just some stupid shit added by the community and the game just happens to have a female protagonist I don't want to punish the publisher for it.

5
SR388-SAX 5 points ago +5 / -0

You've got nothing to apologize for. OP went straight to ad hominems despite being wrong.

29
SR388-SAX 29 points ago +29 / -0

I don't understand how people can still watch any of the major sports leagues in the US. They're all this bad.

And that's ignoring all of the rule changes that make them a worse game but a better Entertainment Product (tm).

18
SR388-SAX 18 points ago +18 / -0

You know what’s going on from the news, but information in America is driven by money. It’s a business

So is he saying that the news is fake?

That void is filled in part by the film industry, by documentaries and narrative films.

So those industries aren't businesses driven by money? Are they some sort of philanthropic organizations?

1
SR388-SAX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Feds don't need pardoning -- they were all of the anonymous "unindicted co-conspirator X" individuals listed in the actual indictments.

2
SR388-SAX 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mozilla is literally "controlled opposition." Google (Alphabet) is effectively the owner of Firefox through "donations".

5
SR388-SAX 5 points ago +5 / -0

This was a clear choice between a candidate who pledged to defend America’s founding values

Wait a minute -- I thought we were founded on racism and white supremacy? Did I miss a talking point update?

2
SR388-SAX 2 points ago +3 / -1

Expecting people to play by the same shitty rules that everyone is forced to

oh no, such hypocrisy!

view more: Next ›