Paying upfront is always a bad call. That is in fact how you get scammed. Girls will tell you upfront is all they accept and it's how the game is but that's only true if you're at a brothel where the girl is on a leash and has to perform for the establishment. If she's independent you never pay upfront unless you're willing to take a risk.
Think about it from the girls perspective. You're bigger than her and can overpower her so if she performs and you're the kind of guy who would then refuse to pay her, what is she going to do about it? She can't overpower you and you're confrontation enough to deny her payment after she performed meaning you likely would fight her if she persisted. If you pay her first then she performs and you're the same kind of person who would not pay her and stand your ground on it then you're also the kind of person who would demand your money back and threaten her or prevent her from leaving to get your money back. What is she going to do about it? You can overpower her and take it either way. That means if you're the kind of person to scam her, it doesn't matter whether you pay upfront or not. Also, if you "didn't have the money" and plan on scamming her that way, you could just withdraw the funds and not giving it to her so proving you have the funds does nothing for her either. No matter how you look at it, you paying first has virtually 0 barring on her outcome. Girls only insist on getting paid first if the thought of scamming you is running through their mind because if you're a nice guy they can scam, you'll not stop her if she walks out with your money but only after you give it to her. If you haven't given it to her, she'd have to overpower you first.
So protip for the guys out there never ever give the woman the money first unless it's at a brothel and don't let the girl convince you that's the "norm" because as you can see from this video also, it's not. Girls will negotiate.
But never talk to girls about "getting scammed" as your reasoning because it just makes you look weak. If you're buying girls you need to be the one calling the shots not a simp letting her call the shots. You say I don't pay first, that's how I do things, if you don't like it you can leave. And that's that. Treat them like a replaceable whore because that's what they are. It's kind of like buying a car. You need to be prepared to walk like you don't give a shit. If she knows you're hung up on her then she has all the leverage to scam you. If the girl truly thinks she's too good for your money and she should be the one calling the shots she's going to be a terrible performer anyway. She's a man hating feminist working as a whore.
Anti white laws. That's all this is. The government is the reason white people are driven to mass shootings. The politicians should all be hanged.
Feminists don't care and will never care. Any of the perceived problems of feminism will happen for the next generation and since the feminists won't be having children, they care about the next generation even less than most people.
Deport all natives to Africa, imo.
Yes, I recently had to make a transaction outside of the system and it's damn near impossible. Crypto is in fact the best way but reintegration after you get it to crypto still posses a challenge. I was unable to solve it and had to get a foreigner involved.
Joint decision = coerced//pressured, from a woman's perspective.
I didn't just mean physical appearance. But I realized I worded that poorly. I mean like some women can make themselves entirely unbecoming in private such that guys want nothing to do with them. Also, how she dresses for church might be the only time she puts only makeup and clothes other than pajamas. I remember when I was younger so many guys I knew would constantly talk about "how to convince their SO to put effort into their look." Maybe church is the only time but since it's church she also doesn't like to have sex on church days and the guy is royalty screwed.
Point I was trying to make is most people really have no clue how good or bad a relationship is from observing. You need more information on the inside. One of my friends used to have the picture perfect relationship on the outside but he'd confuse in me his wife didn't like to have sex and he'd purchased a new pocket pussy because his wife won't sleep with him. That seems to be a huge problem in more relationships than people realize. He can't get laid meanwhile she's driving the new SUV and he's still driving the beater.
Exactly. I'm single and I don't envy 90% of the relationships I observe. It's rare... exceptionally rare, I ever envy a man's relationship with a woman. Most women are women I'm happy to not be in a relationship with.
There's a lot of things you don't know about the innerworkings of a relationship that you'd never know from casual observation though. Does she put out? Is she actually attractive? It's one thing to stick around for the husband's stability and resources but it's another to actually give men what they want.
Teenage boys: Wow, the entire system of our society is setup against me from every law, to every cultural norm. I'm now even realizing my mother has been sabotaging my development into a man since I was a child and my father was too weak to do anything about it. All I want in life is a loving wife and a job that fully utilizes my potential but women hate me and I'm told the job I want is going to go toward a woman instead of a man because men who existed long before me got to benefit from a patriarchal society that I never grew up in. Any time I try to tell anyone about my problems they spin things around and say that I'm actually the problem while also saying my thoughts on my struggles are offensive to everyone else so instead I learn to bottle everything up inside. Absolutely no one cares to help me. I'm going to kill myself.
Teenage girls: I sent a snapshot where I flashed my tits to the captain of the football team and he shared it with the whole team. Now all the guys and girls at school are calling me a slut. I'm going to kill myself.
They are not the same.
- You can but your wife won't approve and that is the real problem. Why should your wife have any say over what you can and cannot do when you have no say over what she can and cannot do?
- See answer to #1
- True
- True.
- Most married men have no masculinity because it's not allowed. (See answers to 1 and 2).
- True.
I would disagree with your assessment. Kids are not worth sacrificing yourself for. There's a reason our society is in a state of dysgenics. IQs are down irrespective of immigration and every metric that matters in outcomes is coming down. The men who are having kids and who are willing to sacrifice their liberty to submit to a woman in order to have kids are among the lowest quality men in society. The highest quality men are not engaged in relationships with women. You know who reproduces in significant numbers? Africans and Indians. Are those quality humans?
If the state of marriage and relationships isn't fixed, we're going to continue to degenerate as a species.
We should make death the punishment for false rape accusations. Might reduce the number of cases. Death by public hanging preferably too.
You know how McKinsey does studies? I'm not even joking because this is how almost all high finance/business people do "studies". First, you pick what conclusion you want, then you find data to support your conclusion. Voila, that's a business study for you.
What should be evident to anyone now is that governments are actually the ones who finance and start protests for things the government wants to do. Government loves protests as long as the protests are helping the government. For protests that aren't in the governments favor though... well those aren't allowed.
So yes, protest all you want as long as you protest in the way we want you too. For democracy. Just like if you vote against one of their chosen political leaders, you're against democracy. Vote the way we tell you to for democracy! Same for protesting. Protest the way we want you to for democracy!
Japan was great until the West ruined them.
No, it doesn't. Women objectively are ruined worse than men as a whole. You argue like a woman. But but not all women are like that, check the exception. What is this reddit. I am arguing averages and on average women are made worse off than men, on average.
Yes but it ruins women worse than it ruins men.
Yes and many women do in fact seek this out and find it but many also fail and in the process they permanently damage themselves. There's way more women without bushes that will try anal than there are dudes with 8" dicks that can get hard on command and fuck at full speed for 20 minutes straight any time the woman wants.
You may care about equality between men and women but I don't. We need to curb women's behavior in society to promote better quality women. Men are fine enough.
Yeah, that's definitely a factor. There's a lot of factors at play though, not just one. I think women's nature actually compels them toward this behavior also. The theory being that women want to be dominated but only by strong men so they specifically shit test men to ensure they're strong and men are failing miserably right now in part due to the government's oppression of men to elevate women. This leads to women doubling down on "testing men" which means imposing on the men such that they become men and flipping the natural hierarchy around such that the women now dominate the men. This is in women's nature and the structure of society is empowering this aspect of their nature while preventing men from taking the proper corrective action.
I'll be honest with you. There is no web browser that is outside of the system. You're just picking through the trash trying to find whatever is least dirty. If you're that concerned about privacy/anonymity, you'd build your own. If you're concerned about privacy/anonymity but not that concerned, just use whatever works best for you.
Librewolf is your best browser available but I found some of its standard features annoying so I use Brave.
Bromite is also worth considering.
Why don't women want to be women? Because they understand deep down that means they need to submit to man so instead of doing what God has programmed as their inherent nature they are rebelling by trying to become men.
It's not Muslims killing White Women. It's White Women killing their own civilization through their childlike rebellion against male dominance.
For me, grand strategy requires a few things to be successful.
-
Every aspect of the "strategy" in the game needs to be able to be automated but "how" it is automated should be left to me. I should be able to optimally playthrough a game without having to manually control every aspect such that the game becomes tedious.
-
No cheese. Optimal strategies should not exist where you do things that are just so obviously cheesy and not intended. Like say in your world you start off with a city that has a governor and a warrior unit. On turn one you shouldn't degrade your warrior unit to gain 50 Iron then fire your governor so you can encourage crime only to immediately review you governor and get an additional growth bonus for lowering crime. Cheesy shit like this always pisses me off in strategy games.
-
Highly customizable races, cultures, etc... that have significant impacts on how the game's strategy is played. Maybe I want my Romans to be a highly religious society along with a warrior society well, if I go down that root, I should have access to buildings, units, types of attacks, types of special abilities, etc... that are going to be significantly different than if I went an atheist warrior root such that the way I play the game becomes highly different given the way in which I choose to develop my people.
-
Lots of different avenues for success. The more variability in how to play the game, the more fun it is. Like tech rushing shouldn't always be the be-all-end-all strategy. A common problem in Grand strategy games with "advancement", imo. Like having low tech but maybe a highly religiously zealous group of low tech but high numbers should perhaps be viable. To make this more "realistic", I'd recommend not doing civilization style where you progress through the ages cause it gets tough to imagine the realism between horses beating tanks or whatever.
-
Don't make negotiating with NPCs the way to win the game. Make it a potential side thing to gain a slight advantage but too many grand strategy games pretty much make the whole game depending upon negotiating with dumb AI, which is trash.
Damn, looks like the investment bankers were worth the money this time around.
Usually the western ones are feminists but the non-Western ones aren't always as feminist. Unless you go by the Imp1 definition where all women are feminists, period. But I've noticed a huge difference between western whores and eastern whores. Western whores treat you like you're the pathetic person resorting to buying whores and they have this air of contempt/disgust for you despite the fact they're the ones resorting to whoring. It's weird. Like the girls resent the men for buying whores because they shouldn't have to whore and should just get everything they want without doing anything but they're forced to whore because men are pigs so it's all men's fault and men are pathetic for buying whores even though they're one whoring but they aren't pathetic because they're not a whore, they're temporarily embarrassed Queen. That seems to be the western stick. Eastern whores a lot more humble overall except the Russians (non Western Russians but Russian chicks who can't get into the west). These Russian whores are more gangster than western black pimps.