1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

A microwave oven emits 600 to 1200 Watts of power. Cell towers emit far less - 10 to 50 Watts - and cellphones emit less again. You can't present raw energy transfer as evidence that microwaves are dangerous and not care about the amount of raw energy being transferred, for the same reason that a 1 kW laser isn't evidence that flashlights are dangerous.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

First, I'd like to state that I'm aware of the issues associated with 5G cell towers and the health risks associated with them.

There are none. Microwaves have no special effects on the human anatomy either pulsed nor unpulsed. Exposure to microwaves will dump the energy into the outermost layer of your skin as heat, which is only an issue if the intensity is far, far higher than any communications antenna, in which case the radiant heat will become obvious and intolerable before it becomes damaging.

If there are problems with 5G, it's Chinese backdoors in the hardware or the denser network allowing more precise triangulation, not that less energetic radiation at lower intensities than the visible light and infrared you're exposed to every day is somehow more capable of hurting you.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

Immigration should be restricted to peer cultures you don't have to destroy for your own safety. That's what's wrong with having gypsies around - not that they're a minority culture, but that they're a hostile culture.

8
Grumman 8 points ago +8 / -0

It can't. Britain has already had at least one case where it said it couldn't offer sanctuary to a Pakistani Christian because of all the Pakistani Muslims they've already let in.

12
Grumman 12 points ago +12 / -0

It won't work. It's not supposed to work. Just as the various bail charities exist to help criminals skip bail (because neither the charity nor the criminal cares if the charity doesn't get their money back), so too does skipping this step entirely and just letting the criminal pinky swear that they'll show up to court with no money on the line if they lie.

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. If your mechanised infantry aren't better at killing things than a bunch of space truckers, then what's the point of having mechanised infantry?

7
Grumman 7 points ago +7 / -0

The message is real - you're supposed to hate any Westerner with an appropriate sense of self-preservation about him and his rape cult.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have walking robots, but those are expensive and need to be connected to a cable as far as I've seen.

Using a tether during testing is just good sense - even if you don't need it, you don't know you don't need it until you've done the test.

26
Grumman 26 points ago +26 / -0

At least raiders leave afterwards. These are invaders.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

You're not giving me anything to work with by saying "Someone, somewhere said '5G bad,'" but I obviously don't believe them. Electromagnetic radiation can be harmful through its quality or its quantity, and neither applies here. The damage caused by ionising radiation requires more energetic forms of light than visible light, like ultraviolet light or X-rays, while microwaves are orders of magnitude less energetic than the already-safe visible light. Neither pulsed nor unpulsed microwaves are dangerous except through the Archimedes heat ray method of sheer brute volume, and it's simply not credible that people wouldn't notice that a communications antenna was drawing as much power as a military radar transmitter or putting out so much radiation that it was literally cooking people.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

The safety of the technology is clear cut. This is a tried and tested technology that we've already been using for almost a century. We know its safe, and we know what it takes to make it unsafe.

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's fanart. There are representatives of the other Alliance races wandering around Stormwind - including Night Elf and Gilnean refugees - but the closest thing to an orc is a troll emissary who has been surrounded by armed guards at the docks.

34
Grumman 34 points ago +34 / -0

I have no problem with them having solidarity with their race.

You should - their solidarity with criminals is why the entire culture is fucked.

13
Grumman 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's Staten Island - they've been voting Republican in four out of the past five presidential elections.

4
Grumman 4 points ago +4 / -0

He has two convicted getaway drivers on his staff. Brain damaged Fetterman is less questionable than pro-murder Fetterman.

11
Grumman 11 points ago +11 / -0

If you only decide you were raped a decade later, it wasn't rape.

8
Grumman 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm going to assume before watching this that Blinkin's reply wasn't "Elon isn't Ukrainian, you thrice-damned retard."

5
Grumman 5 points ago +5 / -0

The last bit undermines its usefulness. The possibility of someone voting against women-only grants and scholarships means you can't just throw the other 13% out of the party immediately.

9
Grumman 9 points ago +9 / -0

I would be wary of nuclear commercial cargo ships too, if they're going to be manned by third-worlders and sailing past Somalia without authority to shoot every pirate stupid enough to lay eyes upon them.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Neither boys nor girls should be subjected to this abuse. Her saying girls shouldn't be isn't incompatible with you saying boys shouldn't be, you idiot.

6
Grumman 6 points ago +6 / -0

He was a write-in candidate with three votes. So not the kind of high profile target that might credibly warrant such a response.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›