Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

48
87% of Conservative Party of Canada delegates vote in favour of non-binding resolution supporting single sex spaces and defining the word "woman" as "(a) female person." (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by YesMovement 2 years ago by YesMovement +48 / -0
32 comments share
32 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (32)
sorted by:
▲ 15 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

They also adopted a child protection resolution, though oddly only at 69%?

https://twitter.com/ThevoiceAlexa/status/1700598770277241335

“Protecting Children's Mental and Physical Health Conservative government will protect children by prohibiting life altering medicinal or surgical interventions on minors under 18 to at gender confusion or dysphoria”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

Nice?

I really have not got much hope for them, the fact that passed at only 69% and the other is non binding tells me they may not have the balls to do the purge Canada needs to do.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

I'm watching the video in the linked tweet now- at 1:50 mins in there's a fat lesbian who claims to be a doctor opposing this who gets a large amount of cheers.

In other words, my PPC membership card remains firmly intact.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kiaatikea 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

"Conspiracy" time: she and the ones cheering are paid actors/infiltrators. Would not surprise me one bit a this point. Someone needs to do a background check on her

Edit: after looking quick into it, she's probably legit. Her name is Lisa Bonang if anyone else wants to confirm, she has x, LinkedIn, etc and she really is a doctor

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Nah she's real, the official Conservatives are cucked to hell.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– Benevolentdictator 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Their leader Poilievre last week already publicly stated that he doesn't have to adopt anything approved at the convention from the grassroots.

ie. Everything is being run by a few party staffers at the top.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Muh women most affected...

This is classic ratchet conservatism. The destruction of women's spaces is the end of a process that began with the destruction of men's spaces. By explicitely ignoring men in this resolution, what they're effectively stating is:

"We're going to concede the point that men don't have the right to their own spaces, but women do. From now on, the political discourse will revolve around the definition of female and person, rather than upholding fundamental rights regardless of how far we've strayed from that principal."

It inherently hypocritical because they're arguing both that women are different from men, requiring their own spaces, but men are not different from women, and so don't require such spaces.

It's woke as fuck and not any sort of victory to be celebrated.

Edit: Didn't notice "grants" or "scholarships" the first time through; so women can get affirmative action but not men? This is utter feminist bullshit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Person =/= human. Interesting.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– censorthisss 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Do they define female person? If not, it could include trannies.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– NoEyesNoGroin 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

This is just Feminism vs Intersectionalism. The "Conservative" party of Canada is just a bunch of emasculated cucks.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Grumman 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

The last bit undermines its usefulness. The possibility of someone voting against women-only grants and scholarships means you can't just throw the other 13% out of the party immediately.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– JiggsawCalrissian 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Oh my fuck we can define what a woman is. Don't even have to have a PhD in biology either

Imagine. Acknowledging the obvious. How audacious

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– FutaCumDiet 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Pierre has already show his hand in voting in favor of Bill C-4 and avoiding questions about stopping the flow of migrants.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– HusbandsLead 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Non-binding

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– subbookkeeper 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

13% huh

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

TRAITORS

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Shill4Hire 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Can they define "person" and "female", though?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– deleted 17 points 2 years ago +17 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

I don't want those freakazoids who have their breasts chopped off in men's spaces, but let's be real, they are not sexually aggressive nor a threat to anyone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

Mostly peaceful

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Rezlung 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Yeah but I would beat the fuck out of those bitches lol, they’re not gonna overpower me and rape me in the bathroom like mtf trannies could easily do to real women in their bathrooms

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– deleted 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– Rezlung 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I’m not a little kid at a Christian school so I still feel pretty safe from the transmen sadly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

Men's spaces were already destroyed by feminists decades ago so there's not much left to protect.

Plus while women invading our spaces have pussied them and made them lame, we're not at much risk of physical/sexual assault like the women are. And any man who loses a sporting event to a "trans woman" probably deserves to lose anyways.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

Not the point of men's spaces.

Men need space to be men without having to constantly watch our every move to make sure we don't inadvertantly hurt the woman around us, either physically or emotionally.

Without learning what being a man means, not only are you unable to embody the masculine energy desperately needed by our society today, but you fail to understand why women need to be treated differently.

The destruction of men's spaces is a prerequisite of the collapse of our civilization; we need them back.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The TERF way. Amazing how people thought they were based when all they were upset about is women dealing with diversity instead of just men.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy