The AI needs a programmer to make it lie on demand, the journalists do it themselves...

In this future, almost everyone else has died, to permit this idyllic lifestyle, but that's OK, because they died for "progress"

At least they're using GDP per capita.

The British government still sees only GDP - by which metric, halving everybody's wealth, as long as you triple the population, is just fine

Feminists revealed to only be bound together by their bottomless hatred of men.

Film at 11.

It was in Rajasthan, right on the Pakistani border, and where the, um, "traditional" Indians tend to live.

I'm sure some do, but I'm fairly sure NPCs wall themselves off from the haram well enough that some support - or suppress - things without knowing a thing about them.

At this point, the left is REEE'ing so hard over the damn movie that they could just be NPCs, unknowingly supporting paedophilia.

Does that mean the innumerable Tumblr shippers are in fact hateful?

They were providing legal defence for the Wethermen when they were conducting their bombing campaign, were they not?

What's happening in Portland is the toned-down PR-friendly version, at least until people stop reporting on it and they can go full CHAZ.

Well, with an attitude like that, I suggest you get used to being a disappointment.

And, of course, the BBC would by far prefer to talk about criticism of Marianna Springs (it's remarkable how often "online abuse" is synonymous with "criticism") than about their own disinformation that Springs somehow gives a pass...

"Oh, no, my bad-faith attempts to denigrate people's belief systems were met with hostility!"

Do you not realise how transparent you are?

Do I think Christians are correct about everything?

No, of course not, if I did, I would be one

Do I think picking out specific passages in an attempt to misrepresent the entire religion is a worthwhile exercise on any level?

No, of course not. That'd be like trying to run a cancel culture mob on you for some dumb shit you said as a teenager. Is it representative of the thing as it actually is? If not, why these infantile attempts to own the Christians.

Honestly, people like you are why I barely discuss my atheism, because I'm concerned that when I do, people will think that I am like you

"The Science™" - it's far more a commercial concern than an epistemological one.

I mean, from what I'm following of his ideology, he's completely correct.

Male men and male women will compete against each other perfectly equally, and the only ones who lose out are the females, at least in the world deGrasse Tyson advocates for

Oh, man, I never pay for this kind of stuff.

But I'd pay to see that.

But, those mindless midwits have successfully transferred all of their assets in the present and most of their assets in the future to the state, so it's at least partially working as intended.

Because the only thing they're attempting to learn is how to trigger mindless knee-jerk responses showcasing the racism they are so desperately seeking.

Ahh, so yet another adherent of eco-feudalism...

... again?

... so this is the Biden administration complaining about nepotism?

Are they trying to reclaim the "irony is dead" thing from Kissinger?

Oh, they don't blame anybody.

They just keep talking about how this time, the same policy will actually work.

Well, not even that worked for us over in the UK, did it?

The reason quoted is "Muh GDPR", but, well, that's bollocks.

GDPR doesn't require such a thing, it doesn't enforce any limit in the legislation, so I suspect this is Ubi using the legislation as a fig leaf to cover a source of action they wished to undertake anyway.

They're desperately trying to run away from reality. Part of how they do that is to pollute the English language so that nothing means anything any more.

Honestly, given that their only life experience is advocating for revolution, I suspect they'll quite quickly find work supporting a building somewhere.