https://x.com/i/status/2036136274546008558
I'm not as critical of right wing women as some on here, but I only recently got twitter and this story was all over my timeline the last couple days. The amount of right wing women outing themselves, shaming men for "pride" and comparing being a harlot to being too proud lmao. So fucking blackpilling man, I legit think I'm going abroad and going eastern Europe, Argentina or just tap out and remix *(lmao meant to say racemix)with an asian
check out the Schnozz on his wife
who would've thunk the jew who marries a promiscious whore would be such a grade A cuck?
That's just a Happy Merchant in a wedding dress. It would be anti-Semitic to draw her picture. LMAO
I could spend a lifetime learning to draw, reviewing every single picture created by the Nazis depicting Jews as ugly and hideous as possible, and still never produce a face half as grotesque...
...and I'm only seeing it from the side.
An anti-semitic cartoon marrying a soyfacer in front of a mystery meat pastor. If I didn't know better I'd guess it was a still taken from the background of an AI Bibi vid.
Fully tilted back goblin ears too.
I don't understand why someone would post something like this about themselves to begin with.
That's been most people's reactions, I genuinely can't imagine it unless he's a cuck or something. But as bad as the post itself is, the response is way worse. I find gender war stuff super blackpilling so have avoided it for the most part, seeing this was eye opening in a bad way
Genuinely you would need to have a humiliation fetish or be one of the most delusional people alive to think that essentially castrating yourself like that is in any way virtuous.
There are plenty of delusional fucks who think exactly that. They think putting up with that crap makes them "good men" and more datable because they were sold a false bill of goods by the feminists. Some of them are straight up cucks but feminism has done a number on the ones who aren't.
It's just more subversion and trying to shame men into accepting it as the norm
That's my assumption as well.
is something that has never been said sincerely.
Scratch a tradthot and a feminist bleeds.
Yeah. A true traditional woman wouldn't be attention whoring on social media in the first place except maybe wholesome vacation/holiday pics of her family. After all, her husband is the only male attention she needs, right?
And people wonder why Christianity is getting its shit pushed in all across the globe. I would rather spend an eternity in hell than be associated in any way, shape, or form with cucks like this complete loser and his jew whore wife.
Weakness isn't a virtue, and any religion that wipes the slate clean just because you apologized at the last minute is a fucking joke.
A lot of the problems come from pastors telling the single mothers in their congregations what they want to hear. I read a good take from a based pastor who made it a point to distinguish God's forgiveness from men's vetting of wife material. Basically there's no contradiction between a whore receiving forgiveness for her sins and men deeming her unsuitable for marriage. The fucked up thing is that it's not even that they can't find a chump to wife them up. It's that the chumps willing to do so aren't the top men they feel entitled to. Since accountability is women's kryptonite it's easier to get the pastor to try to shame single men into paying for their bad choices.
Women vote and churches are terrified of losing their tax-exempt status with the feds, so they pander to wahman.
I think the far simpler explanation is that the church is just full of weak men.
Bingo.
Weak men in a purity spiral competing over which can be the weakest, and bathing themselves in sanctimony as if they are better than the rest of us for doing it. I have more respect for a dog shitting on my carpet than I do for any single one of them.
That was Dalrock's argument, and the argument of several based Christian books like "Why Men hate Going to Church."
The Churches are dying so they pander, making themselves even more useless.
Imagine a time where Churches actually provided something of value? It wasn't something you forced yourself to do out of obligation or social pressure but you actually wanted to go.
Maybe no living man in the West has seen such a Church.
I should preface this with saying I am not particularly religious. More agnostic I guess.
In my opinion, something like the thief on the cross next to Jesus getting saved because he repented is okay. This is because God, who is supposed to be all-knowing, would know whether the repentance was genuine or not.
The issue comes when weak people and cucks interpret this as a need to be eternally forgiving to just about anyone no matter the context. No. Humans are not all-knowing God. We cannot know for sure whether someone has truly changed. So in the vast majority of cases, we need to use our best judgement. And in the case of whores being "born again" and "redeemed," the overwhelming majority did not have true changes of heart. They just knew their turn on the cock carousel was ending so they got off and found a beta cuck to support them.
Put more succinctly: forgiveness requires contrition.
This is why the Catholic sacrament of reconciliation is based. Back in the day, if you were repeatedly going to your small parish and confessing to the exact same sins over and over and not improving, the priest could withhold reconciliation if he felt you lacked true contrition. Protestantism did away with that, so they see it as “I said the prayer, now my soul has fire insurance”. The Catholics (of which I am one) aren’t much better. Larger parishes and lack of clergy make this step harder to do. Which is why I confess to the priest face to face.
Protestantism emphasized a direct relationship with God through Christ, without requiring a priest as intermediary for forgiveness (priesthood of all believers). Confession is primarily to God; ongoing sin still has consequences; the congregation can exercise discipline, even removal from fellowship. But ultimate judgment of the soul belongs to God alone.
That you need a priest to tell you the state of your soul and to advise you as to how you should atone is your decision. Personally, I can tell when I've sinned and through study of the bible and sincere prayer, I can repent and atone. I am probably much harder on myself than a Priest would be to technical Catholics.
Not even.
You don't get to assume forgiveness. God decides that. Nothing you do "purchases" forgiveness. You get to ask, then God, in His infinite wisdom and mercy, not the priests claiming his authority, decides.
The idea that they have the ability to forgive anyone is absurd in the first place. They just also don't get to sit in judgement.
The whole point is everyone falls short and you shouldn't waste your time worrying about other people's mistakes rather than trying to atone for your own.
Futher, mistakes are not the same as intentional acts of evil, which we have a duty to resist.
puts on the red tinged sunglasses What kind?
After the Iran war started I finally took a closer look into what Evangelicalism is. The most important thing is that it's non-denominational.
Evangelicalism isn't just fake Christianity. It's a fake religion. A scam pretending to be part of Christianity.
"What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound? By no means! How can we who died to sin still live in it?" -Romans 6:1-2.
Amazing that a man can have sex with a whore, father three children, and still be a fag.
I guarantee his whore wife despises him and is a) cucking him and b) plotting the divorce rape.
Oh and I forgot to mention, lot of V tubers exposing themselves. I've thought for a while that a lot of these women are just appealing to the lucrative and neglected chud audience by cosplaying as trad
They're women. Their malice is innate regardless of the mask they put on it.
Asking for forgiveness is all well and good, but women addicted to attention and validation are too willing to make a spectacle out of it, which invalidates the entire thing in my mind. The X post in question does exactly that, provide massive validation and attention, and to women this is more potent than crack.
Modern society doesn't force contrition on women, it does exactly the opposite: enables their attention seeking and validation needs, something that their husband provided in the past.
I'm starting to think women should be not only banned from voting, they should be banned from the internet entirely.
31m views on that post btw lmao, the damage feminism has done to the west may be too great to fix
No, it's just going to be an extremely unpleasant process.
Things will get worse before they get worse.
Some of those replies are spicy.
“No early life history needed.”
Shows how few people use tumblr :
Her testimony has been pinned to her socials for like six years.
I find that too many (mostly women) people turn a perfectly valid argument (virgins for virgins) into a game of whataboutism over manwhores online who make their money off rage baiting for views by saying all non-virgin single women are pieces of trash.
The manwhores are the men said women even consider to be people. The 7-and-belows may as well be furniture. Completely invisible.
Immigrants read this and think :
“I want to live near his wife”
Team Vagina will always trump any other polticial position when the rubber meets the road. No woman wants to give up female only privileges or take true accountability. A reformed whore is just a success story for all feminists to say "see? Have your fun, rack up a 1000 cock count in college, and there's always some beta virgin out there who is so starved for female validation he'll override his biological disgust of your past"
Her nose is a whole god damn level in Uncharted, that thing keeps the Mongols out of China god damn
I don't see anything wrong with a virgin guy marrying an ex whore.
The issue for me comes down to how she treats him. The problem I have with women who are ex whores is that they often treat the men they're with in their ex whore phase significantly worse than the way they treated the men when she was a whore. This is insulting but it's extremely common.
When men fuck a thousand women then marry a marry they treat that woman better than the women they fucked before.
Ex-whores though often give their husband a once a month mercy fuck where she's a starfish and he finishes in 5 minutes after doing all the work himself. But when she was a whore she'd be sucking the guys dick for hours, fucking all night long and begging for the guy to fill her up. If she treats her new husband as well as she treated her best fuck from her white days then all the power to her but I know from experience that's rarely the case.
These "reformed slut" women had all their fun when they were young and attractive with peice of shit men, then they switched into resource acquisition mode and are now longer fun for their new nice guy husband after they became an ex whore. It's downright insulting, manipulative and evil.
Be a whore and marry a virgin all you want but treat your significant other better than any of the men in your past you'd ever been with. That's all I ask and care about.
As someone who did this, what are you talking about?
I'm not going to make broad generalisations, but this is not my experience at all and, further, conpletely misses the problem.
First, yes there was sex. Lots of sex. She was bugging me half the time. Because why would I stay with her if there wasn't? That's the first problem; because I was a virgin I overemphasized the importance of sex and she, being a whore, knew she could use that to cement the relationship.
Second, does "treating him well" mean nothing other than offering sex frequently and acting enthusiastic? Because that's a very shallow understanding of relationships. She needs to support you. She needs to be the reason you go out and work a 14 hour shift, put yourself between her and physical danger, and make political decisions that will enrich your families future. That means emotional and logistical support, not just sex.
Finally, the problem with whores, the actual problem, is that they cannot commit. Something breaks in their brains where they are always looking for the next thing, something better than what they currently have (the grass is always greener) rather than trying to improve their current situation. That's why whores cannot have successful relationships, no matter how well they treat their husbands; they will always be a side-eye away from destroying everything.
I know that current standards are low, but you deserve more than getting your dick sucked and you won't become the man you should be just to get it. Don't let low value women waste your time.
Yeah, that's another problem. But the reformed slut who isn't a sexual being anymore is common too. Lack of commitment is a problem for all women, even virgins.
Sure, but you at least deserve that
Idk man I think a playboy can handle an ex whore who is truly repentant. But a virgin in the modern day is a recipe for disaster. She will not respect him, pair bonding fucked etc.
There are comments railing on that lad for even posting it, but I say, GOOD!
This is further corroboration and real-world proof of the data that is already out there.
Posts like this need to be archived because it highlights and contextualises what a lot of the studies already tell us about most wenches today.
While some feed themselves a blue-pill painted white that tells them that straight White men are marrying White women in the West (though not all of them straight), the reality is that the marriage is taking place AFTER the woman has already whored herself out.
I made a reply in a thread some time ago with the data on this, and the average body count of the wenches in the West came out to around 8 - 9.
As it's already been noted, a lot of men are virgins, and something like 66% of them have not been in a relationship ever or in a relationship in the past year.
There's a starvation of affection out there, and a lot of simps like the one who made that Twitter post that kicked off all the discussion is the perfect example of a man without principle who sated his flesh over his righteousness.
A principled man can forgive a whore, but there is nowhere in the Bible that says he should marry her.
The problem is, a lot of right wing women are still just that, women. Our favorite woman hater, TheImp points this out. Women will go to bat for other women, even if it's at their detriment. If any of you watch Kirsche, who's an ex-leftist woman who's kind of center right, she is self aware that her "woman brain" prevents her from doing the kind of things us guys wouldn't be afraid to do to others, and she knows it's a detriment to society as a whole if we all thought like someone with "woman brain".
Also do take note the "New Right" is a mix of ex-Democrats (like me) lolbertarians, tradcons, funny hat-haters (yeah I'm talking about you guys), and born again fags like the guy we were making fun of. We're only united because the left has gone so far off the deep end it's pissed off people with disparate views to unite to stop them because we all see the modern left as a threat to civilization and our livelihoods.
So yes, you're gonna have a lot of people with EXTREMELY stupid opinions you disagree with. You'll see that a lot of "right wing" women are just women who saw a sinking ship and jumped onto the other team to save themselves, others will be hypocrites that make absolutely no fucking sense in their behavior as the only people they're serving is themselves, etc.
But yeah, this virgin openly talking about this is the kind of shit WE'RE TIRED OF SEEING on the left. Leftists openly talking about their dirty laundry and shit decisions is absolutely frustrating. I don't want to know about your fucking bedroom life and it's not something you should be fucking proud of.