https://x.com/i/status/2036136274546008558
I'm not as critical of right wing women as some on here, but I only recently got twitter and this story was all over my timeline the last couple days. The amount of right wing women outing themselves, shaming men for "pride" and comparing being a harlot to being too proud lmao. So fucking blackpilling man, I legit think I'm going abroad and going eastern Europe, Argentina or just tap out and remix *(lmao meant to say racemix)with an asian
And people wonder why Christianity is getting its shit pushed in all across the globe. I would rather spend an eternity in hell than be associated in any way, shape, or form with cucks like this complete loser and his jew whore wife.
Weakness isn't a virtue, and any religion that wipes the slate clean just because you apologized at the last minute is a fucking joke.
A lot of the problems come from pastors telling the single mothers in their congregations what they want to hear. I read a good take from a based pastor who made it a point to distinguish God's forgiveness from men's vetting of wife material. Basically there's no contradiction between a whore receiving forgiveness for her sins and men deeming her unsuitable for marriage. The fucked up thing is that it's not even that they can't find a chump to wife them up. It's that the chumps willing to do so aren't the top men they feel entitled to. Since accountability is women's kryptonite it's easier to get the pastor to try to shame single men into paying for their bad choices.
Women vote and churches are terrified of losing their tax-exempt status with the feds, so they pander to wahman.
I think the far simpler explanation is that the church is just full of weak men.
Bingo.
Weak men in a purity spiral competing over which can be the weakest, and bathing themselves in sanctimony as if they are better than the rest of us for doing it. I have more respect for a dog shitting on my carpet than I do for any single one of them.
That was Dalrock's argument, and the argument of several based Christian books like "Why Men hate Going to Church."
The Churches are dying so they pander, making themselves even more useless.
Imagine a time where Churches actually provided something of value? It wasn't something you forced yourself to do out of obligation or social pressure but you actually wanted to go.
Maybe no living man in the West has seen such a Church.
I should preface this with saying I am not particularly religious. More agnostic I guess.
In my opinion, something like the thief on the cross next to Jesus getting saved because he repented is okay. This is because God, who is supposed to be all-knowing, would know whether the repentance was genuine or not.
The issue comes when weak people and cucks interpret this as a need to be eternally forgiving to just about anyone no matter the context. No. Humans are not all-knowing God. We cannot know for sure whether someone has truly changed. So in the vast majority of cases, we need to use our best judgement. And in the case of whores being "born again" and "redeemed," the overwhelming majority did not have true changes of heart. They just knew their turn on the cock carousel was ending so they got off and found a beta cuck to support them.
Put more succinctly: forgiveness requires contrition.
This is why the Catholic sacrament of reconciliation is based. Back in the day, if you were repeatedly going to your small parish and confessing to the exact same sins over and over and not improving, the priest could withhold reconciliation if he felt you lacked true contrition. Protestantism did away with that, so they see it as “I said the prayer, now my soul has fire insurance”. The Catholics (of which I am one) aren’t much better. Larger parishes and lack of clergy make this step harder to do. Which is why I confess to the priest face to face.
Protestantism emphasized a direct relationship with God through Christ, without requiring a priest as intermediary for forgiveness (priesthood of all believers). Confession is primarily to God; ongoing sin still has consequences; the congregation can exercise discipline, even removal from fellowship. But ultimate judgment of the soul belongs to God alone.
That you need a priest to tell you the state of your soul and to advise you as to how you should atone is your decision. Personally, I can tell when I've sinned and through study of the bible and sincere prayer, I can repent and atone. I am probably much harder on myself than a Priest would be to technical Catholics.
Not even.
You don't get to assume forgiveness. God decides that. Nothing you do "purchases" forgiveness. You get to ask, then God, in His infinite wisdom and mercy, not the priests claiming his authority, decides.
The idea that they have the ability to forgive anyone is absurd in the first place. They just also don't get to sit in judgement.
The whole point is everyone falls short and you shouldn't waste your time worrying about other people's mistakes rather than trying to atone for your own.
Futher, mistakes are not the same as intentional acts of evil, which we have a duty to resist.
puts on the red tinged sunglasses What kind?
After the Iran war started I finally took a closer look into what Evangelicalism is. The most important thing is that it's non-denominational.
Evangelicalism isn't just fake Christianity. It's a fake religion. A scam pretending to be part of Christianity.