That's always their first defense. "This is just fueling anti-X talks!" As if there isn't an actual event that happened and a literal person brutally hurt/killed.
We saw it applied heavily post 9/11 when America was coming together in unity to fucking hate Muslims and they couldn't have that.
It always comes back to that norm Macdonald tweet: to a leftist, the worst part about a Muslim detonating a nuclear bomb and killing 50 million Americans would be all the resultant Islamophobia.
Early in his career a journo asked to interview him. So they did a walk-and-talk in a busy area of the city. Every so often the journo asked Rush if he wanted to stop for a coffee, or a snack, and Rush would oblige. When the story was published, the journo wrote about how Rush was such a fat pig that he made them stop for coffee and snacks frequently during the interview.
Thanks in part to Rush's exposing journos for their political narratives, loaded questions, polls taken from select demographics to create news, headlines that contradicted story content, and talking points repeated almost verbatim across cable news outlets, I learned this lesson second hand.
This has been the case with every single person I have talked to who has had firsthand experience with journalists. If you have direct knowledge of any reported story, you'll know that it's wrong.
“At any point you get a chance to bully fucking journalists, fucking bully them. The majority of them are pieces of absolute shit, and they're just trying to get ahead in their paygrade; fucking bully them. They're fucking liars, and they will do anything just to make a dime from their bullshit stories.”
That's actually too generous. Journalists aren't lying to make money, they're lying to advance their politics. They're not trying to suppress this story because they think an article like this is profitable, they're doing it because they think whites defending themselves from blacks is disgusting, and would rather see any number of whites killed by black criminals than a single republican win an election.
Journalists aren't greedy, they're white- and man-hating pieces of shit who think advancing their detestable political beliefs are infinitely more important than telling the truth.
Hiring journalists is just a filtering mechanism. For every position at a mainstream news media outlet, there are probably 1,000 applications minimum. Finding someone who will say and write exactly what you want them to say and write is trivially easy, and you won’t have to pay them very much at all because the work is so desirable. No coercion or direct orders required; propaganda is just a function of choosing whom to hire, whom to fire, and whom to promote.
If you think it matters if a Republican wins, you’re not seeing the big picture here. Nothing gets better, republicans pander to minorities damn near as much as democrats, and when they promise all sorts of actions on their base’s behalf, they deliver nothing of value, you’re lucky if they even slow down the ever-encroaching leftist/j’ish agendas, they generally don’t even do that anymore.
Media j’ws know what’s going on, they know it’s a uniparty in Congress and at a state level, their job is to gaslight the right, and promote the leftist worldview because it’s all about dividing Whitey, and weaponizing all other demographics against right wing Whites.
These people literally ignore crime and would step over the bodies of dead victims to do a story about the “oppressed” killer because his handcuffs are too tight.
In deflecting this, Axios isn't doing anything substantively different than what Republicans are themselves are doing. Republicans are making this about media, judges, etc. but the root issue is that Whites need to be able to separate from blacks.
Big R Republicans are filtering this event through their Martin Luther King race filters. Their filters are not race realist yet, and for most of them, will never be race realist, they are that programmed (and old, as mostly they are boomers.)
Meanwhile, white Gen A and Gen Z are thinking about warming up tree shredders and dreaming of running violent savages like this through them feet first.
He is literally doing the "this is horrible because republicans will use it as ammo" thing.
Combined with a double dose of DARVO. He takes someone thinking "that could be my wife/sister/daughter" and spins that around to be "i wand to murder my wife/sister/daughter".
He's a bad faith actor who wants to sabotage White people. This is readily apparent to anyone who's familiar with his posting patterns at this point. He's a lot more skilled in his efforts than most of the drooling anti-White idiots we get around here though, I'll give him that.
Blinding yourself isn't me being skilled, it's you just trying to hold onto a narrative about me that never made any sense. That, and you literally don't have any anti-Whites here. None.
Well, maybe Haterjuiced, but he's a genuine troll.
You actively obfuscate threat identification and get spergy at the merest hint of a White racial identity and in-group preference forming, which is the most basic biological defense mechanism a population can have.
First, no threat identification was made. If you're going to identify a threat, actually articulate something of value. Here's one that literally no-one pointed out because 'black man bad': dude was literally curled up into a fetal position, with a hoodie over his face, and crying, on a bus. That's you're dead give away that something's wrong. It is incorrect to see Clarence Thomas walking down the street and start shooting.
Second, "White in-group preference" is inherently stupid, because it's no different than saying, "the Gypsies and Albanians are my brothers. We are no different."
Yes. Yes, we are. It's the same reason the English and Irish are focusing on English and Irish identity. And why Albanian and Polish immigration is also being restricted by the nationalists. This is the same shit Enoch Powell was trying to explain 50 years ago. "he yppo" is not good enough.
You defense mechanism should be towards your actual people... the Americans. (Or at least my people, I don't remember where your from)
What you should be recognizing is that 50 years of continual communist agitation and capture of black communities might have had a negative effect on a population... as it did with the east germans when their IQ was 1 SD lower than the westerners. You don't want to accept that blacks are to communists what women are to communists: a skin-suit to deflect your attack and re-direct you in the wrong direction.
The relevant identity is White American (with White sometimes used as a short hand). The non-Whites don't care about an American identity. They care about race. This isn't because of Communism. That's just how they are. Communists have weaponized them to be fair, but they used them to do a bunch of shit you support.
Chasing the ghost of Communism around in circles will do nothing to stop the GOP from importing infinity Haitians, but you know that. Your whole point is to offer alternatives to White identity that will not work.
We covered this in the other thread. Mandatory versus optional interactions. Also, are you now ignoring per capita? Does the outlier of black violence only become a problem when the white murder rate hits zero? What even is your argument here?
Nothing to do with interactions, you don't care about interactions. You think genetics determine all behaviors and nothing else. You think white men can't kill white women, it's just not part of their genes. They certainly can't murder them randomly!
Yet, all available historical evidence points to the contrary. You just won't accept that white people are capable of bad things to white people... even while you literally watch white Leftists bury this story.
Journalists are like Hollywood celebrities. They are not human, they are puppets that dance. You wouldn't believe a wooden puppet, ventriloquist voice, would you?
When your priorities are "this will help my opponent" you know you're talking to a journalist. Normal people would worry that this would happen to their child, spouse, themselves...at this point I believe them all to be fucking bug people, not actual real living people, no soul, no ambition(other than money), no thought.
Tragic as any loss of human life maybe, the U.S. is a very long way from Ukraine. Why would a female refugee travel alone to a country that shares no border or common language with her country of origin? Moreover, why is a pretty young woman riding public transit anywhere in the western world?
You're not allowed to question why immigrants run to the countries with the biggest load of handouts.
Leftoids will say people have a right to claim a refugee status (I don't disagree) but they will fail to mention that the globally recognized definition of a refugee and their rights states that they should flee to the nearest safe country available.
Somehow I doubt the USA was the closest available country.
They are the ultimate bullies. They strike from behind the protection of their corporation. They are like that little bastard in grade school who never got the beating he deserved because his big brother would kick the ass of anyone who tried.
"More undeniable real-life events back what MAGA's been saying the whole time," isn't the own they think it is. They're technically right, just pathetically obsessed.
"no! You can't use use your eyes to see what's going on!"
I've seen tons of "but this is just being used to push anti black hatred"
No, it's about the facts. This shit happens all the time, and overwhelmingly it's one race committing these crimes.
That's always their first defense. "This is just fueling anti-X talks!" As if there isn't an actual event that happened and a literal person brutally hurt/killed.
We saw it applied heavily post 9/11 when America was coming together in unity to fucking hate Muslims and they couldn't have that.
Sometimes anti-X talks should be fueled anyway.
It always comes back to that norm Macdonald tweet: to a leftist, the worst part about a Muslim detonating a nuclear bomb and killing 50 million Americans would be all the resultant Islamophobia.
Rush Limbaugh learned this first hand too.
Early in his career a journo asked to interview him. So they did a walk-and-talk in a busy area of the city. Every so often the journo asked Rush if he wanted to stop for a coffee, or a snack, and Rush would oblige. When the story was published, the journo wrote about how Rush was such a fat pig that he made them stop for coffee and snacks frequently during the interview.
Thanks in part to Rush's exposing journos for their political narratives, loaded questions, polls taken from select demographics to create news, headlines that contradicted story content, and talking points repeated almost verbatim across cable news outlets, I learned this lesson second hand.
This has been the case with every single person I have talked to who has had firsthand experience with journalists. If you have direct knowledge of any reported story, you'll know that it's wrong.
“At any point you get a chance to bully fucking journalists, fucking bully them. The majority of them are pieces of absolute shit, and they're just trying to get ahead in their paygrade; fucking bully them. They're fucking liars, and they will do anything just to make a dime from their bullshit stories.”
That's actually too generous. Journalists aren't lying to make money, they're lying to advance their politics. They're not trying to suppress this story because they think an article like this is profitable, they're doing it because they think whites defending themselves from blacks is disgusting, and would rather see any number of whites killed by black criminals than a single republican win an election.
Journalists aren't greedy, they're white- and man-hating pieces of shit who think advancing their detestable political beliefs are infinitely more important than telling the truth.
If journalists were just greedy, they'd be more ethical.
Hiring journalists is just a filtering mechanism. For every position at a mainstream news media outlet, there are probably 1,000 applications minimum. Finding someone who will say and write exactly what you want them to say and write is trivially easy, and you won’t have to pay them very much at all because the work is so desirable. No coercion or direct orders required; propaganda is just a function of choosing whom to hire, whom to fire, and whom to promote.
If you think it matters if a Republican wins, you’re not seeing the big picture here. Nothing gets better, republicans pander to minorities damn near as much as democrats, and when they promise all sorts of actions on their base’s behalf, they deliver nothing of value, you’re lucky if they even slow down the ever-encroaching leftist/j’ish agendas, they generally don’t even do that anymore.
Media j’ws know what’s going on, they know it’s a uniparty in Congress and at a state level, their job is to gaslight the right, and promote the leftist worldview because it’s all about dividing Whitey, and weaponizing all other demographics against right wing Whites.
These people literally ignore crime and would step over the bodies of dead victims to do a story about the “oppressed” killer because his handcuffs are too tight.
In deflecting this, Axios isn't doing anything substantively different than what Republicans are themselves are doing. Republicans are making this about media, judges, etc. but the root issue is that Whites need to be able to separate from blacks.
The same Republicans complaining about Axios will join hands with them to attack anyone who proposes the actual solution to this problem. Hell, we just had a story here about Republicans patting themselves on the back for importing a bunch of Haitians. https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1AR0C3EWnR/reminder-that-gop-actively-despi/c/4eVMM4s4Bmc?d=50
Big R Republicans are filtering this event through their Martin Luther King race filters. Their filters are not race realist yet, and for most of them, will never be race realist, they are that programmed (and old, as mostly they are boomers.)
Meanwhile, white Gen A and Gen Z are thinking about warming up tree shredders and dreaming of running violent savages like this through them feet first.
"No white man would ever stab a white woman!"
It's not republicans repeating what Axios is doing. It's you. You're deflecting from a media cover-up to argue for National Socialism. Spare us.
Gizortnik is using leftist tactics here.
The more Whites are around blacks, the more we will get murdered. They murder far more than we do. It's quite simple.
He is literally doing the "this is horrible because republicans will use it as ammo" thing.
Combined with a double dose of DARVO. He takes someone thinking "that could be my wife/sister/daughter" and spins that around to be "i wand to murder my wife/sister/daughter".
I literally never said any of that, but you made it up from whole cloth anyway.
And how are you trying to re-frame Arch as a "victim" of his own comment?
you never said:
Huh, it says your name right there.
It wasn't a goose stepping Nazi that murdered that girl.
Arch is choosing to diminish a media cover-up to emphasize his nonsensical ideology. That has nothing to do with your accusation.
He's a bad faith actor who wants to sabotage White people. This is readily apparent to anyone who's familiar with his posting patterns at this point. He's a lot more skilled in his efforts than most of the drooling anti-White idiots we get around here though, I'll give him that.
Blinding yourself isn't me being skilled, it's you just trying to hold onto a narrative about me that never made any sense. That, and you literally don't have any anti-Whites here. None.
Well, maybe Haterjuiced, but he's a genuine troll.
You actively obfuscate threat identification and get spergy at the merest hint of a White racial identity and in-group preference forming, which is the most basic biological defense mechanism a population can have.
Literal nonsense on all accounts.
First, no threat identification was made. If you're going to identify a threat, actually articulate something of value. Here's one that literally no-one pointed out because 'black man bad': dude was literally curled up into a fetal position, with a hoodie over his face, and crying, on a bus. That's you're dead give away that something's wrong. It is incorrect to see Clarence Thomas walking down the street and start shooting.
Second, "White in-group preference" is inherently stupid, because it's no different than saying, "the Gypsies and Albanians are my brothers. We are no different."
Yes. Yes, we are. It's the same reason the English and Irish are focusing on English and Irish identity. And why Albanian and Polish immigration is also being restricted by the nationalists. This is the same shit Enoch Powell was trying to explain 50 years ago. "he yppo" is not good enough.
You defense mechanism should be towards your actual people... the Americans. (Or at least my people, I don't remember where your from)
What you should be recognizing is that 50 years of continual communist agitation and capture of black communities might have had a negative effect on a population... as it did with the east germans when their IQ was 1 SD lower than the westerners. You don't want to accept that blacks are to communists what women are to communists: a skin-suit to deflect your attack and re-direct you in the wrong direction.
The relevant identity is White American (with White sometimes used as a short hand). The non-Whites don't care about an American identity. They care about race. This isn't because of Communism. That's just how they are. Communists have weaponized them to be fair, but they used them to do a bunch of shit you support.
And you claim you're not anti-White...
Are you familiar with the prisoner's dilemma?
Or, you could stop Communism festering in your country. But no keep trying to James Lindsey me.
But your not going to do that because you're a National Socialist, and that is an fellow traveler ideology.
Chasing the ghost of Communism around in circles will do nothing to stop the GOP from importing infinity Haitians, but you know that. Your whole point is to offer alternatives to White identity that will not work.
Pick one.
Ah yes, it's China's fault that the GOP supports White Genocide. Nailed it!
Literally millions of dollars of DIE funding coming directly from China, as the Soviets did before.
simply for being nearby. the only way to not get stabbed by a black is to never be near them
Again: "No white man would ever stab a white woman for being nearby"
You're not familiar with violent, drugged-out, schizophrenics.
we had segregation long before adolf's grandfather's time
And yet, white women were still murdered.
No, that must just be jewish hypnotism again. /s
You've lost the plot. You are arguing that because murders occur in Iceland, Haiti is safer than Iceland.
No one said that either.
We covered this in the other thread. Mandatory versus optional interactions. Also, are you now ignoring per capita? Does the outlier of black violence only become a problem when the white murder rate hits zero? What even is your argument here?
Nothing to do with interactions, you don't care about interactions. You think genetics determine all behaviors and nothing else. You think white men can't kill white women, it's just not part of their genes. They certainly can't murder them randomly!
Yet, all available historical evidence points to the contrary. You just won't accept that white people are capable of bad things to white people... even while you literally watch white Leftists bury this story.
They are not journalists, they are propagandists aiming to end western civilization.
Journalists are like Hollywood celebrities. They are not human, they are puppets that dance. You wouldn't believe a wooden puppet, ventriloquist voice, would you?
When your priorities are "this will help my opponent" you know you're talking to a journalist. Normal people would worry that this would happen to their child, spouse, themselves...at this point I believe them all to be fucking bug people, not actual real living people, no soul, no ambition(other than money), no thought.
Tragic as any loss of human life maybe, the U.S. is a very long way from Ukraine. Why would a female refugee travel alone to a country that shares no border or common language with her country of origin? Moreover, why is a pretty young woman riding public transit anywhere in the western world?
You're not allowed to question why immigrants run to the countries with the biggest load of handouts.
Leftoids will say people have a right to claim a refugee status (I don't disagree) but they will fail to mention that the globally recognized definition of a refugee and their rights states that they should flee to the nearest safe country available.
Somehow I doubt the USA was the closest available country.
“Refugee” is a meaningless category now.
They are the ultimate bullies. They strike from behind the protection of their corporation. They are like that little bastard in grade school who never got the beating he deserved because his big brother would kick the ass of anyone who tried.
"More undeniable real-life events back what MAGA's been saying the whole time," isn't the own they think it is. They're technically right, just pathetically obsessed.
Journalists aren't people, treat them as such.