First, no threat identification was made. If you're going to identify a threat, actually articulate something of value. Here's one that literally no-one pointed out because 'black man bad': dude was literally curled up into a fetal position, with a hoodie over his face, and crying, on a bus. That's you're dead give away that something's wrong. It is incorrect to see Clarence Thomas walking down the street and start shooting.
Second, "White in-group preference" is inherently stupid, because it's no different than saying, "the Gypsies and Albanians are my brothers. We are no different."
Yes. Yes, we are. It's the same reason the English and Irish are focusing on English and Irish identity. And why Albanian and Polish immigration is also being restricted by the nationalists. This is the same shit Enoch Powell was trying to explain 50 years ago. "he yppo" is not good enough.
You defense mechanism should be towards your actual people... the Americans. (Or at least my people, I don't remember where your from)
What you should be recognizing is that 50 years of continual communist agitation and capture of black communities might have had a negative effect on a population... as it did with the east germans when their IQ was 1 SD lower than the westerners. You don't want to accept that blacks are to communists what women are to communists: a skin-suit to deflect your attack and re-direct you in the wrong direction.
The relevant identity is White American (with White sometimes used as a short hand). The non-Whites don't care about an American identity. They care about race. This isn't because of Communism. That's just how they are. Communists have weaponized them to be fair, but they used them to do a bunch of shit you support.
Even by your own standards this would have to be false. If racial ingroup preference (but not ethnic or local preference) is strongly genetically coded, then like heterosexuality, you're not really going to be able to socialize people against such an in-group preference.
But your problem is that it isn't genetic, because the racial category you are using is so abstract to be multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-lingual, and involves totally dissimilar people.
The American ethnos is where the in-group actually lies due to tradition, history, geography, culture, and values.
The rejection of the American ethnos is a dedicated effort that Communists have engaged in forever, and so do you.
In reality, yes, non-whites, and even many immigrants outside of mass migration, typically supported the American ethnos because they wanted to be part of it, because it's better than anything they ever had.
Yes. White in-group preference doesn't make sense because you're trying to affiliate yourself with something that isn't your group.
Why would I think "Ah yes, I prefer to be around fellow whites like gypsies and Portland communists. These are my people." Compared to being around actual local community members, ethnic group members, and religious group members.
If I'm Anti-White by that stance, am I also anti-Black and anti-Jew because Africans and American Blacks are wildly different people with almost nothing in common, and European atheists aren't jews?
Literal nonsense on all accounts.
First, no threat identification was made. If you're going to identify a threat, actually articulate something of value. Here's one that literally no-one pointed out because 'black man bad': dude was literally curled up into a fetal position, with a hoodie over his face, and crying, on a bus. That's you're dead give away that something's wrong. It is incorrect to see Clarence Thomas walking down the street and start shooting.
Second, "White in-group preference" is inherently stupid, because it's no different than saying, "the Gypsies and Albanians are my brothers. We are no different."
Yes. Yes, we are. It's the same reason the English and Irish are focusing on English and Irish identity. And why Albanian and Polish immigration is also being restricted by the nationalists. This is the same shit Enoch Powell was trying to explain 50 years ago. "he yppo" is not good enough.
You defense mechanism should be towards your actual people... the Americans. (Or at least my people, I don't remember where your from)
What you should be recognizing is that 50 years of continual communist agitation and capture of black communities might have had a negative effect on a population... as it did with the east germans when their IQ was 1 SD lower than the westerners. You don't want to accept that blacks are to communists what women are to communists: a skin-suit to deflect your attack and re-direct you in the wrong direction.
The relevant identity is White American (with White sometimes used as a short hand). The non-Whites don't care about an American identity. They care about race. This isn't because of Communism. That's just how they are. Communists have weaponized them to be fair, but they used them to do a bunch of shit you support.
Even by your own standards this would have to be false. If racial ingroup preference (but not ethnic or local preference) is strongly genetically coded, then like heterosexuality, you're not really going to be able to socialize people against such an in-group preference.
But your problem is that it isn't genetic, because the racial category you are using is so abstract to be multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-lingual, and involves totally dissimilar people.
The American ethnos is where the in-group actually lies due to tradition, history, geography, culture, and values.
The rejection of the American ethnos is a dedicated effort that Communists have engaged in forever, and so do you.
In reality, yes, non-whites, and even many immigrants outside of mass migration, typically supported the American ethnos because they wanted to be part of it, because it's better than anything they ever had.
White Americans speak the same language, dumbass.
WTF is the American ethos?
Americans. You know how you call them "Amerimutts"?
And you claim you're not anti-White...
Are you familiar with the prisoner's dilemma?
Yes. White in-group preference doesn't make sense because you're trying to affiliate yourself with something that isn't your group.
Why would I think "Ah yes, I prefer to be around fellow whites like gypsies and Portland communists. These are my people." Compared to being around actual local community members, ethnic group members, and religious group members.
If I'm Anti-White by that stance, am I also anti-Black and anti-Jew because Africans and American Blacks are wildly different people with almost nothing in common, and European atheists aren't jews?