Female. Visible tats. Camo makeup is just completely wrong, even if I assume half of it washed off in the river. Old, OLD ass weapon, that looks like an M16A2 with some fucked up third party rail on it, that's not even a suitable training weapon anymore. Hair not secured. No helmet. Straps aren't even tight so that ruck is probably photoshopped on(it doesn't appear to be dripping water either).
But at least she doesn't have her finger on the trigger.
Oh no, that's not a third party rail. That's the external zeroing system for the ELCAN C79 machine gun scope. It was specifically designed that way for Canada.
She will do a modest jump down with her gear on and break something, or simply walk too long with her backback and equipement on and develop a stress fracture.
This is exactly what happened to an ex coworker of mine.
She had tried to join the Aussie army and they had to go on a hike with heavy backpacks, but that was all it took to fracture her spine. Now she has some fused bones or something.
Amazing.
Not even support. Navies used to refuse noblewomen onto ships because the captains knew how out-of-control the simping would get. Simping kills morale.
No magazine in the rifle, but that is not that unusual in a training environment. Her hair is coming loose out of her bun, which is why female grooming standards should be the same as the male ones.
Women grooming standards is a touchy subject. Most men in the US military are terrified of enforcing it because it almost always draws complaints. In general, women have to have their hair up in a bun if it is long enough to go past the collar if it is down. If not in a bun, it can't be longer than the bottom of the collar in the back.
IME, women are always fussing with it when doing anything that involves physical labor, so I believe they should just have the same standard as men do.
Female. Visible tats. Camo makeup is just completely wrong, even if I assume half of it washed off in the river. Old, OLD ass weapon, that looks like an M16A2 with some fucked up third party rail on it, that's not even a suitable training weapon anymore. Hair not secured. No helmet. Straps aren't even tight so that ruck is probably photoshopped on(it doesn't appear to be dripping water either).
But at least she doesn't have her finger on the trigger.
But has a ring on her finger, with a diamond. I don't think that would fly in combat
Would hate to be the guy who bought that...
Yeah, he is sharing with the whole crew.
Probably a dyke bro
Didn't zoom in that far but yes that's a big nope.
That's the one I noticed.
Probably because I've seen a "degloving" injury before.
Only click on "Image Search" if you have a decent stomach.
Seen it before, those kind go rings with gloves ...
Do they come with magazines for them? This chick has max one shot here, so she might as well be carrying a musket.
😄
Is that a blank firing adapter on the barrel?
Oh no, that's not a third party rail. That's the external zeroing system for the ELCAN C79 machine gun scope. It was specifically designed that way for Canada.
Women don't belong in combat roles in the military, this shouldn't be controversial. Stick to support roles and espionage, ladies.
She will do a modest jump down with her gear on and break something, or simply walk too long with her backback and equipement on and develop a stress fracture.
Women have lower bone density.
Women are more than 30 times more likely to blow-out a hip ligament under a heavy load. Like, say, marching with a 90 pound pack.
Having women in combat roles either means eating the injury rate or accepting them having men carry their gear for them.
This is exactly what happened to an ex coworker of mine. She had tried to join the Aussie army and they had to go on a hike with heavy backpacks, but that was all it took to fracture her spine. Now she has some fused bones or something. Amazing.
Not even support. Navies used to refuse noblewomen onto ships because the captains knew how out-of-control the simping would get. Simping kills morale.
Women can best serve by being wives and mothers as nature intended.
Stick to staying home and raising the future generation.
You don't want them defecting because the other guys are better looking.
No magazine in the rifle, but that is not that unusual in a training environment. Her hair is coming loose out of her bun, which is why female grooming standards should be the same as the male ones.
Look at the end of the barrel it's got a dummy screw on it. You don't put a mag in when you have those.
[Edit: I didn't look closely enough, that's a blank adapter. OP is right she should have a mag in.
Tch, another one I didn't zoom in enough for. You are absolutely right, and another mark against the photo.
Gardening gloves too.
Mechanix has gloves that are military issue now.
https://www.mechanix.com/us-en/tactical-and-military-gloves/
Some of those have NSN assigned, which means the canuks probably have them in their supply system.
I stand corrected.
I only recognized them because I have a couple pairs I bought from lowes. Never would have thought they made military gear too.
Better than what I have. I keep a pair of bright red Milwaukee gloves on my gun belt when I go shooting, lol.
Look at this guy with his fancy Milwaukee gloves.
Are US military grooming standards also lower for women?
Looks like Canada has been lowering standards for “racialized canadians” and women :
https://x.com/rebelnewsonline/status/1892290412418630018
Women grooming standards is a touchy subject. Most men in the US military are terrified of enforcing it because it almost always draws complaints. In general, women have to have their hair up in a bun if it is long enough to go past the collar if it is down. If not in a bun, it can't be longer than the bottom of the collar in the back.
IME, women are always fussing with it when doing anything that involves physical labor, so I believe they should just have the same standard as men do.
Boxer braids were good enough for the Spartans. They are good enough for try-hard chicks with guns.
And, like the Spartan, they can do each other's hair.
Learn Russian and Chinese now.
The selector is in the fire position.
I know nothing about the military but this is Canada’s real risk :
https://x.com/crypto_mma/status/1958939355239608578
That's everyone's risk bro. Next gen warfare right there.
The only ads where you see whites anymore are military recruitment ads. Really gets the old noggin' joggin'.
I make that face when I'm in Canada, too.
This looks like a transfag to me. Am I wrong? Is this an actual woman?
Canadian eh? Would you want a woman or an indian-canadian as your backup???
She couldn't carry that pack for any meaningful distance. Lol women
No magazine...etc.
Since when does the dishwasher get a rifle?
Ugly tranny looking creature. Idk seems about right for cucknadians