A group of pretty white girls in one place is obviously always going to be offensive to a certain tribe of demons. I'm surprised that he is surprised by this.
To the shock of many the image did not come with the red swastika. We're getting to absurd levels of trying to cancel people. What next? Put illegal content at pixel level?
It's literally a picture designed with AI for the purpose to have a swastica made of the clothes. Deny it if you want, but that's the reality. Lying about it doesn't change that.
I said it yesterday and I will say it again today: When you have made Matt Walsh the least cringe individual in a given situation, you have done something incredibly wrong and need to rethink your life.
I saw it right away as a thumbnail but my vision beyond a few inches is blurry without glasses. I thought it was that obvious to everyone and was surprised he didn't see it but I guess it's harder to see than I thought.
I'm guessing it's AI. I know some stuff out there will let you seed a base image, so you'd just need to feed it a swastika and say make a nice white family and it would retain the swastika shape.
We can't all be intelligent. It would be a nice exercise to put this image in a catalogue of pictures with Scandinavian women and show it to a bunch of people then close it and ask them witch picture had the swastika. Then maybe you'll understand how ridiculous your argument is
He shared the post, but he didn't know that it was an AI image that hid the symbol in it, meaning people are grasping at straws to attack him and are trying to ascribe their intent onto his action.
A group of pretty white girls in one place is obviously always going to be offensive to a certain tribe of demons. I'm surprised that he is surprised by this.
Except the image was clearly made with AI to have a swastica in it. Maybe he noticed, maybe he didn't, but that is what the image is.
To the shock of many the image did not come with the red swastika. We're getting to absurd levels of trying to cancel people. What next? Put illegal content at pixel level?
It's literally a picture designed with AI for the purpose to have a swastica made of the clothes. Deny it if you want, but that's the reality. Lying about it doesn't change that.
Never claimed any of that. Using an altered image that hides a swastica to try to cancel someone is retarded. I never claimed anything else
he was replying to someone else's twitter post that had posted that picture and the JIDFs are mad at him for that lmao .
HH brother.
hitler was a fag
Cry about it.
When the faggot isnt the most cringe and detestable person in the scenario, you need to rethink everything.
I said it yesterday and I will say it again today: When you have made Matt Walsh the least cringe individual in a given situation, you have done something incredibly wrong and need to rethink your life.
I wouldn't have noticed without the lines lol
I think it's insane that anyone could without. Even with the lines I don't see it- the lines don't seem that sensical to me.
Nice to see Matt channeling Shiloh energy here in his reply.
I wouldn't have noticed either until it was pointed out. It's easier to make out on a tiny phone screen. (zoomed out)
I spent a fair amount of time looking at that photo and didn't see anything.
If you squint your eyes until they go blurry it pops out immediately, but otherwise its not going to show to almost anyone.
Its unironically one of the better "hidden pictures" I've ever seen.
I saw it right away as a thumbnail but my vision beyond a few inches is blurry without glasses. I thought it was that obvious to everyone and was surprised he didn't see it but I guess it's harder to see than I thought.
I've only seen it on my computer monitor, even squinting you can't see it.
Maybe they are Buddhist that are really bad at drawing the actual swastika
Even Sarah Silverman wouldn't see a swastika in that post.
Is that one altered on the left? What an odd coincidence if not.
I couldn’t care less if he posted a swastika. It’s just a symbol. Get over it.
I'm guessing it's AI. I know some stuff out there will let you seed a base image, so you'd just need to feed it a swastika and say make a nice white family and it would retain the swastika shape.
It is ai
It's the exact same image, just without the Charlie Day lines. However that was created with AI.
It is very obviously an AI generated swastika and nobody's scoring any points by pretending it isn't.
I did not find that obvious at all, sure if you told me to look closely I would have seen it but otherwise is just a normal picture of white women.
You're either blind, retarded, or just lying.
We can't all be intelligent. It would be a nice exercise to put this image in a catalogue of pictures with Scandinavian women and show it to a bunch of people then close it and ask them witch picture had the swastika. Then maybe you'll understand how ridiculous your argument is
The Jude is triggered
Guy who gets his political philosophy from a queer Mexican thinks he wins by posting words he doesn't really understand.
If you have to have it on a tiny phone screen with your arm stretched all the way out while squinting to see it, then it's not "very obvious".
If something has to be explained to you, complete with big red lines to highlight the it, then it's by definition not "very obvious".
You are also blind, retarded, or lying. It's even more obvious in.a small thumbnail.
My eyes are trained to look for the happy merchant
He shared the post, but he didn't know that it was an AI image that hid the symbol in it, meaning people are grasping at straws to attack him and are trying to ascribe their intent onto his action.
Total AI post.
I remember that being shared outside of Matt Walsh's feed. I'm pretty sure it actually is an AI generated swastika post.
It has been confirmed as such.