At this point I've seen dozens of low-level Israel-aligned accounts proclaiming some version of "Joe is stupider" while quoting this video. If you view post engagements you can see them lined up one after the other. It's like a JIDF drone swarm on the internet.
The only thing that's surprising about this is how these people think they can manufacture consensus on the internet in the same way they used to do it with newspapers in the boomer era. It's laughable.
Man if the feed on my phone's homepage is any indication they definitely think they can manufacture consensus. I get YouTube recommendations that are the complete opposite of stuff I watch.
I think the MSM is still not convinced they aren't the 4th estate anymore. They keep saying the press is a benchmark of democracy but everyone knows they are compromised.
The only thing that's surprising about this is how these people think they can manufacture consensus on the internet
One of the recent "political tell all" books about the Harris campaign shows how they thought they could manipulate Rogan into giving them a huge leg up, and that they consider the loss of his show (and Trump getting it) one of the biggest reasons they lost.
So the literal Powers That Be with infinite money and connections thought they could control the biggest podcast in the world for their favor and failed so spectacularly they handed the win to their opponent, almost entirely through hubris of their own power.
Also, Joe is pretty stupid. Its why he can get literally anyone on his show (they think they can talk around him easily) and people constantly let down their guard enough to admit shit in front of him. No hate on the guy, but his great strength is in being a "no thoughts, head empty" bouncing board for important people to monologue at.
Also, Joe is pretty stupid. Its why he can get literally anyone on his show (they think they can talk around him easily) and people constantly let down their guard enough to admit shit in front of him. No hate on the guy, but his great strength is in being a "no thoughts, head empty" bouncing board for important people to monologue at.
The phrase "too dumb to fool" comes to mind. He's almost a living example of the Socratic method with his own fact-checker, Jamie.
"no thoughts, head empty" bouncing board for important people to monologue at.
I don't think this is a product of him being stupid, I think it's his business model. he doesn't really have an agenda behind his podcast, The way he makes money is by getting interesting people on his show to say whatever they want. he doesn't seem to have any filters on which kind of interesting people, just anyone who is interesting. he would have Jesus, God, and Satan on his podcast without batting an eye.
If you've seen Joe outside his podcast, its not just business model. That's just him as a person. He is a walking meathead who compensated for a long time by just being loud and aggressive, before his podcast taught him it was better to just stay quieter for success.
Its also why he doesn't try to have an agenda, he isn't actually capable of that deep of thought and planning. He destroyed Carlos Mencia for joke thefts, and then turned around and gave Amy Schumer (a confirmed rapist) every excuse under the sun why she didn't steal jokes she obviously stole. He just reacts in the moment to whatever is happening.
This sounds like its hate, but its literally why he can get those interesting people on his show. No other podcast could pull from both sides, Zlist comedians to literal elites like Musk and Jack Dorsey (at the time), both presidential candidates. Its what makes him successful.
Kamala desperately needed to be on there and just act like a normal person. She didn’t even need to be this charismatic cool person, just not be a politician and act a bit looser.
Which is usually what Rogan is best at. It humanized Musk back when, it did it for Dorsey, it works for most people who aren't completely compromised idiots whose "normal" mode is completely unlikeable like Adam Conover.
Problem is, I don't think Harris was remotely capable of that. She was so fake that if she tried to loosen up she might end up saying some real nigga shit and tank herself in a different way.
It's a scary thought. The only reason normies even noticed is because they tried to whitewash a karen warhawk, a senile old man and diversity hire. What would happen if they tried with someone who isn't unable to hide their disdain for the public. Is that how they elevated the Obamas?
I mean yeah. Obama was a literal blank slate, empty history when he came into the spotlight. All anyone talked about was "he was a community organizer" and then it was just "he black" and other low stakes nonsense.
It wasn't until midway into Trump's first term that people started to go back and look into his actual history and find more questionable things.
That's why the hebrew language is so important to them and translations have never been that good.
It does allow them to live in their own bubble with their world view completely unchallenged and it prevents a fair portion of their citizens from seeing anything outside the walls.
I don't think I've ever seen Joe shit talk his previous guests, either. You could tell he was pissed at the time, and I'm glad he was annoyed enough to still be mocking him. Well deserved.
Murray really hit the bottom of the intellectual barrel in that interview. He started out by intimating that Joe was somehow unintentionally working for the palestenians by having an open mind or even hosting the debate. It was super odd.
I don't want to give the guy any undeserved credit, but you have to wonder, if you are actually like 140IQ smart, and the isrealis find a way to compromise you, and force you to do their bidding, would you find a clever way to just throw every argument after that?
Because.. it's Dave Smith across from you.. how hard would it have been to actually win that by less obvious subterfuge? No offense against Dave but he would have been handicapped in the odds just by Murray's past experience alone.
Hard to make sense of. Unless the guy is just that whacked.
What's funny is seeing all the normie forums saying things like he should balance views out, or hear from both sides. But they love having The Daily Show and late night host bring out anyone to share a liberal opinion with no appeal to authority. It seems expert just means someone who agrees with me.
the problem is nobody on their side actually wants to go on rogan, because he'd rip them apart, that and they've painted him as this far-right neo-nazi vax-denier, and they dont want to be hit with their own guilt-by-association friendly-fire..
Question is, was Murray sent in there to popularize this view that Rogan / JRE needs balance or are they trying to capitalize on his argument.
I think this was an orchestrated strategy all along to attack JRE and Murray was sent in there to make this balance/experts issue the focus. Apparently Murray was trying to go on solo and Joe insisted on a Dave Smith sparring partner; Murray v Joe would have gone the opposite way.
He's pretty liberal though. He'll say something anti-White or decry the antisemitisms all on his own without prompting. Then he'll say something to make them mad again. It's not the first time they tried to cancel him either. Remember the Spotify walkouts?
At this point I've seen dozens of low-level Israel-aligned accounts proclaiming some version of "Joe is stupider" while quoting this video. If you view post engagements you can see them lined up one after the other. It's like a JIDF drone swarm on the internet.
The only thing that's surprising about this is how these people think they can manufacture consensus on the internet in the same way they used to do it with newspapers in the boomer era. It's laughable.
Man if the feed on my phone's homepage is any indication they definitely think they can manufacture consensus. I get YouTube recommendations that are the complete opposite of stuff I watch.
I think the MSM is still not convinced they aren't the 4th estate anymore. They keep saying the press is a benchmark of democracy but everyone knows they are compromised.
I feel narcissist are unaware consciously that they are lying. It’s probably easier to keep telling lies if your sub conscious keeps it from you.
One of the recent "political tell all" books about the Harris campaign shows how they thought they could manipulate Rogan into giving them a huge leg up, and that they consider the loss of his show (and Trump getting it) one of the biggest reasons they lost.
So the literal Powers That Be with infinite money and connections thought they could control the biggest podcast in the world for their favor and failed so spectacularly they handed the win to their opponent, almost entirely through hubris of their own power.
Also, Joe is pretty stupid. Its why he can get literally anyone on his show (they think they can talk around him easily) and people constantly let down their guard enough to admit shit in front of him. No hate on the guy, but his great strength is in being a "no thoughts, head empty" bouncing board for important people to monologue at.
The phrase "too dumb to fool" comes to mind. He's almost a living example of the Socratic method with his own fact-checker, Jamie.
It's too bad his factchecker Jamie leans slightly to the left as well.
I wish i had a Jamie.
I don't think this is a product of him being stupid, I think it's his business model. he doesn't really have an agenda behind his podcast, The way he makes money is by getting interesting people on his show to say whatever they want. he doesn't seem to have any filters on which kind of interesting people, just anyone who is interesting. he would have Jesus, God, and Satan on his podcast without batting an eye.
If you've seen Joe outside his podcast, its not just business model. That's just him as a person. He is a walking meathead who compensated for a long time by just being loud and aggressive, before his podcast taught him it was better to just stay quieter for success.
Its also why he doesn't try to have an agenda, he isn't actually capable of that deep of thought and planning. He destroyed Carlos Mencia for joke thefts, and then turned around and gave Amy Schumer (a confirmed rapist) every excuse under the sun why she didn't steal jokes she obviously stole. He just reacts in the moment to whatever is happening.
This sounds like its hate, but its literally why he can get those interesting people on his show. No other podcast could pull from both sides, Zlist comedians to literal elites like Musk and Jack Dorsey (at the time), both presidential candidates. Its what makes him successful.
Kamala desperately needed to be on there and just act like a normal person. She didn’t even need to be this charismatic cool person, just not be a politician and act a bit looser.
Which is usually what Rogan is best at. It humanized Musk back when, it did it for Dorsey, it works for most people who aren't completely compromised idiots whose "normal" mode is completely unlikeable like Adam Conover.
Problem is, I don't think Harris was remotely capable of that. She was so fake that if she tried to loosen up she might end up saying some real nigga shit and tank herself in a different way.
It's a scary thought. The only reason normies even noticed is because they tried to whitewash a karen warhawk, a senile old man and diversity hire. What would happen if they tried with someone who isn't unable to hide their disdain for the public. Is that how they elevated the Obamas?
I mean yeah. Obama was a literal blank slate, empty history when he came into the spotlight. All anyone talked about was "he was a community organizer" and then it was just "he black" and other low stakes nonsense.
It wasn't until midway into Trump's first term that people started to go back and look into his actual history and find more questionable things.
That's why the hebrew language is so important to them and translations have never been that good.
It does allow them to live in their own bubble with their world view completely unchallenged and it prevents a fair portion of their citizens from seeing anything outside the walls.
This is amazing and hilarious.
I don't think I've ever seen Joe shit talk his previous guests, either. You could tell he was pissed at the time, and I'm glad he was annoyed enough to still be mocking him. Well deserved.
Murray really hit the bottom of the intellectual barrel in that interview. He started out by intimating that Joe was somehow unintentionally working for the palestenians by having an open mind or even hosting the debate. It was super odd.
I don't want to give the guy any undeserved credit, but you have to wonder, if you are actually like 140IQ smart, and the isrealis find a way to compromise you, and force you to do their bidding, would you find a clever way to just throw every argument after that?
Because.. it's Dave Smith across from you.. how hard would it have been to actually win that by less obvious subterfuge? No offense against Dave but he would have been handicapped in the odds just by Murray's past experience alone.
Hard to make sense of. Unless the guy is just that whacked.
Murray was on Bill Maher crying about it still.
Good.
And the New York Post, too. Keep crying, Doug.
What's funny is seeing all the normie forums saying things like he should balance views out, or hear from both sides. But they love having The Daily Show and late night host bring out anyone to share a liberal opinion with no appeal to authority. It seems expert just means someone who agrees with me.
the problem is nobody on their side actually wants to go on rogan, because he'd rip them apart, that and they've painted him as this far-right neo-nazi vax-denier, and they dont want to be hit with their own guilt-by-association friendly-fire..
Question is, was Murray sent in there to popularize this view that Rogan / JRE needs balance or are they trying to capitalize on his argument.
I think this was an orchestrated strategy all along to attack JRE and Murray was sent in there to make this balance/experts issue the focus. Apparently Murray was trying to go on solo and Joe insisted on a Dave Smith sparring partner; Murray v Joe would have gone the opposite way.
That thread is completely full of israeli hasbara accounts pushing lies about Rogan and the genocide apartheid israel i guilty of.
That pre-planned theatrical silent gasp look Murray pulled was obnoxious.
RIP Joe Rogan. He’ll do a mea culpa like rfk jr soon
He's pretty liberal though. He'll say something anti-White or decry the antisemitisms all on his own without prompting. Then he'll say something to make them mad again. It's not the first time they tried to cancel him either. Remember the Spotify walkouts?
I originally misread the title as "Joe Rogan makes fun OF neocon Israel booster
withTim Dillon"Douglas Murray's comments were a bit elitist.