Why do these people have zero self control?
(twitter.com)
Comments (62)
sorted by:
40,000 years of evolutionary divergence and the lack of a thousand years of 6th century Angl-Saxon law to punish criminals and cull murderers.
/we are not the same.
I feel like the behavioral and genetic effects of hanging all of your criminals doesn't get talked about often enough.
Few people know about 'the Execution Hypothesis'.
This is also one of the reasons I believe that abortion in cases of rape should not just be legal, but that it should be regarded as a good thing. I want fewer genes of rapists around, not more.
While I can concede the utility of it, I'm still going to balk at the prospect from a moral perspective. That kid didn't do anything to deserve the axe.
Utility and modernist morality are often at odds.
Sounds like a good way to breed out the warrior caste and leave faggots and women to run things
This.
About ten percent of boys, perhaps as much as twenty percent, are born with the genetic predisposition to be hyper-competitive.
With excellent parenting, they learn to harness that competitive drive and to excel.
Without good parenting they become frustrated and violent. They have poor impulse control, and if they develop a problem with authority or become angry and aggressive, they bounce in and out of prison until they are about 40. At that point they are either dead or they calm down.
There hasn't been a study, but I bet these guys make up a large percentage of top athletes, elite soldiers, surgeons etc. Professions that really call for a competitive drive benefit from these adaptions.
If you cull them out of the population you will lose your top soldiers etc.
That said, there is more to the behavior we are witnessing than just the Warrior Gene.
The first or the second part of my comment?
The Execution Hypothesis is what I'm talking about. Not really your comment.
Exactly. It produces a large amount of evolutionary pressure.
Same for exposure to livestock and the need for seasonal planning.
during the Anglo-Saxon rise to order, something like 1 in 100 were hanged.
Funny you bring up Anglo-Saxon because those sounded like English accents. Maybe you are kinda the same
Not only are they pathetic animals..
..they are weak as SHIT as she stood her ground quite well despite being surrounded, I feel like if she could, one punch would take out one of these mouth breathers.
They always gang up on their victims like the hyenas they are.
They learned that from home
Rev. Kevin Samuels was assassinated for spotlighting the dysfunctional ugliness of "black culture."
Bill Cosby was thrown in jail over made-up charges because he dared to tell blacks to pull their pants up.
I remember him. I thought he died of natural causes?
I don't believe it. The Matrix had every incentive to remove him, especially since he was in talks to have his show syndicated on local TV in Georgia. If that had happened, he would have really become unstoppable. Rev. Samuels was lifting black men out the Plantation!
He was telling young black men they didn't have settle for ghetto hogs, or relive the trauma they endured under their toxic single moms with toxic welfare queens that only sleep with men they can extract resources from, making them no better than live-in prostitutes.
He was telling young black men that there was nothing cool about walking around with their pants around their ankles or burning their cash on Gucci belts or in clubs to impress people who don't care or even like them.
He was telling young black women not to imitate their single, never-married aunties or take any advice from them. "Where's your husband, ma'am? Where's your husband, ma'am? Exactly. Single women keep women single."
The Matrix had every incentive to remove him!
It's in their genes.
Immigrants in Europe also gang up on people when they attack them.
Not immigrants, illegal alien invaders.
Unfortunately, in Europe, not just illegal alien invaders.
It was like watching a group of kobolds failing to take down a troll.
If she pulled out a gun and shot all of them I would cheer lmao
And that would be a totally justified response. How? What would a uniformed cop do if he/ she were surrounded and taking assaults from every direction? If you really want to get technical with the legality, her assailants prohibited her fleeing the scene, placing her in clear and imminent danger. She had no option but to defend herself. If I were a lawyer, I'd gladly take her case all the way to the Supreme Court.
The comments know. The comments don't disappoint.
They aren't people
They are rewarded for acting like animals. I guarantee some will see this and downplay it or make excuses
They already are in the comments. 🙄
I'm becoming increasingly racist
I was pretty racist, now I’m even more racist.
Racism is sooo antiquated. There's no need for it. Just judge them by the content of their character, just like MLK jr. asked.
They do all the rest. After all, they can't help themselves. Just judge them by their character. Easy. You're the good guy, see? 😏
IKR?!
My brother and I were talking about that very thing
Tell your brother there's no need to be racist. That's what the "bad guys" do, see? You judge them by the content of their character, just like MLK jr. asked. Then you let these "people" do the rest, and they will because they can't help themselves. It's not your fault they predictably prove themselves to be of poor character. You're an ally. You don't see skin color, just character. You're the good guy, see? 😏
Well I’m willing to give anyone a chance and I know it isn’t the Christian thing to do to make assumptions about people. I’m aware of demographic stats but I’ll give anyone individual a chance. I can be pollyannish in some ways
Not me. Never. I'm just judging folks by the content of their character, just like MLK jr. asked me to.
I'm an "ally," I am. 😏
https://i.imgur.com/GoUCuwk.gif
Biologically they are more closely related to monkeys than humans
Measured how?
Pet dogs have more genetic markers in common with wild wolves than black people do with white people yet dogs and wolves are classified as separate species.
Whether true or not, that has no bearing on your original claim. Even if pet dogs have more in common with wolves than blacks do with whites, it wouldn't mean that blacks are closer to animals than they are to humans.
That's a whole other claim that's been proven by someone that's a lot smarter than you or I.
But you don't really care, you want to believe what you want. I could throw up any stats and you'd refuse to believe it because you'd rather think of yourself as a good person and blacks actually are the same species, even while their actions constantly prove my point.
and all that would happen is the link I provided would mysteriously get taken down so people like you can continue to push your bullshit and say there's no evidence.
Then I don't understand why you responded by talking about a completely separate issue.
That wasn't the question, and in fact, I don't care much if blacks are or are not 'the same species'. Your claim that 'biology' proves that blacks are closer to animals than to Aryan supermen, however, seems clearly wrong - and you didn't even try to defend it in your two replies.
It's very obvious and has been stated and restated many, many times. It is in the genetic markers and that has been proven.
If you want a source you can find it yourself- it's out there. I'm just not here to help you along since it's clear you're looking to doubt it anyway.
I never said anything about 'Aryan supermen'. If that's what you're implying I am, you've clearly got an agenda. All I said is that blacks are clearly a different species. Anyone that has spent enough time around them will have already figured that out and there is data to back it up.
But you're clearly not here to have a real discussion. If you want to find evidence, trust me it's there. Go find it.
As for this discussion, you're not responding in good faith and I've got more important shit to do than continue with someone that argues that water isn't wet. You need evidence for something so obvious?
This is my last response. If you're having this much trouble with such an easily proven/researched topic you've got a long way to go and you should get on it. I'm done helping you but you're welcome for helping you start your journey.
My bet is you're not bright enough and will instead respond to this, which would prove everything I said about you.
They're not people.
Because there are no consequences for any bad behavior.
Feral pack animals exhibiting feral pack animal behavior.
They do not understand how to act like a modern human as they have yet to attain the sentience of members of the higher evolved branches of the human species.
Never relax
"People"? As in, "human"?
Yes, I know. Just play along for the mods. 🙄
Because they’re wild animals. Stay away from them.