He's definitely the most disruptive genuine user. Or, was, but he's already spent a year banned at this point so the reality of Imp's psychosis has given way to the myth.
Im 100% sure its just spam and derailing threads. Its not what he says. I say similar shit too. But i dont splurge out on every thread. And rip.. we wont see him for a year?
The problem with portraying yourself as ultra badasses who never fail and throw their bodies in the way to protect their clients is that it really sticks out when someone doesn't fucking do it.
And when that failure has a very specific trait to them, that people already suspect is a problem, it'll make it stick out all the more.
She was quietly retired at some point after that (not fired and possibly arrested, of course). However, it would seem that she's still in the circle, as NPR asked her a couple questions about the assassination attempt: https://archive.md/zxjny
I don't think her statement itself is noteworthy, just the fact that they brought her in.
Was it because DEI almost caused a former president to DIE?
That might be reason number one as to why you're footing the blame on this one.
Another could be the pathetically bad excuses tossed out immediately upon being questioned about it. "Not my department" "Slanted roof" "Out of the area" It was less than 150 yards away. The guy that got shot could sink a golf ball from that range.
no one thought to put that useless ham beast on the roof? it’s not like she was doing anything useful on the ground, she can at least stand on the roof and take up space like a scarecrow
Why would it be illiegal? I think everyone should implement as much or as little DEI as they want. The problem with governments and the like is that those that implement it or want to have it implemented have nothing to fear when (not if, we're talking about DEI here) shit hits the fan. It's neither their money that gets burned nor their lives that get ruined.
"give opportunities to women and minorities" means nothing, they already had the opportunities, there was no one saying they can't apply.
Thing is, they would have to explain why would they have 20 something % women when I assume the one that want to become secret service are 99% men. Would imply that the women were not only as good as men but 20 times better.
Would it be hard to prove that they are discriminating against men?
Why would they need to explain? There's no incentive nor duty to hire only based on merit. They just lower the standards so women can get in and stop hiring men.
I mean, sure, everyone knows that they discriminate against men, but they didn't break any actual rules doing so.
I had responded to Imp's comment and said he was being too charitable.
I'm still here, Imp isn't...kind of ridiculous.
This legalese-style modding bullshit is so weird. Imp said something, I essentially said I agreed with most of it, but that he was actually being more forgiving toward women than he had to be, based on his stated stats.
Funny thing is, it's not like I dislike him or anything. I just find his hypocrisy, single-mindedness, and the delusion that he's always correct hilarious, and fun to push back on.
Trump shot, man killed. Women most affected.
Imp banned for a year again, for bullshit reasons. R.I.P.
I don't get it. He's far from our most disruptive user.
Nah, he is pretty bad
He's definitely the most disruptive genuine user. Or, was, but he's already spent a year banned at this point so the reality of Imp's psychosis has given way to the myth.
Wait for real? What for this time? He was literally back for like a week. My username is relevant again.
This.
He basically said women have an ingroup bias.
How could someone think such an insane thing?
Im 100% sure its just spam and derailing threads. Its not what he says. I say similar shit too. But i dont splurge out on every thread. And rip.. we wont see him for a year?
Womens rights were a mistake
No, it was sabotage.
Wow, banned for a whole year.
This is an injustice. I need my Imp fix at least 4 times a year.
dom needs to go
The problem with portraying yourself as ultra badasses who never fail and throw their bodies in the way to protect their clients is that it really sticks out when someone doesn't fucking do it.
And when that failure has a very specific trait to them, that people already suspect is a problem, it'll make it stick out all the more.
Then you have prior incidents like this
https://freebeacon.com/politics/secret-service-agent-suggests-wouldnt-take-bullet-trump/
She was quietly retired at some point after that (not fired and possibly arrested, of course). However, it would seem that she's still in the circle, as NPR asked her a couple questions about the assassination attempt: https://archive.md/zxjny
I don't think her statement itself is noteworthy, just the fact that they brought her in.
One of them did it... but she uh - sorta did it because she was a FUCKING DWARF compared to the big motherfuckers.
5'6 woman trying to ''shield'' her 6'1+ client.
Unfit for the job. Still hired because quotas.
I'm going to guess that Biden's SS detail doesn't contain diversity hires.
Was it because DEI almost caused a former president to DIE?
That might be reason number one as to why you're footing the blame on this one.
Another could be the pathetically bad excuses tossed out immediately upon being questioned about it. "Not my department" "Slanted roof" "Out of the area" It was less than 150 yards away. The guy that got shot could sink a golf ball from that range.
no one thought to put that useless ham beast on the roof? it’s not like she was doing anything useful on the ground, she can at least stand on the roof and take up space like a scarecrow
Fuckers deserve all the criticism they get. A president almost died on their watch, bunch of useless fuckers.
But of course, that assumes they weren’t in on it, while evidence seem to hint that this was all on purpose.
How is having DEI in a federal agency legal? Although I assume is the same for the military.
Why would it be illiegal? I think everyone should implement as much or as little DEI as they want. The problem with governments and the like is that those that implement it or want to have it implemented have nothing to fear when (not if, we're talking about DEI here) shit hits the fan. It's neither their money that gets burned nor their lives that get ruined.
Isn't race and gender based discrimination illegal, especially for government?
I think so, but it's only a question of how you articulate it.
and then just stop hiring men without telling them it's because they are men wouldn't be a problem, I guess.
may be a different story.
"give opportunities to women and minorities" means nothing, they already had the opportunities, there was no one saying they can't apply.
Thing is, they would have to explain why would they have 20 something % women when I assume the one that want to become secret service are 99% men. Would imply that the women were not only as good as men but 20 times better.
Would it be hard to prove that they are discriminating against men?
Why would they need to explain? There's no incentive nor duty to hire only based on merit. They just lower the standards so women can get in and stop hiring men.
I mean, sure, everyone knows that they discriminate against men, but they didn't break any actual rules doing so.
Pro-tip: Don't be shit at your job, people won't tell you that you are shit at your job.
Mandatory ''Secret Cervix'' joke.
Had to make sure it wasn't Imp posting this lmao. You got to it before he did!
He's banned
Again?
What number are we at now.
No idea what number now but it's for a year I think
I had responded to Imp's comment and said he was being too charitable.
I'm still here, Imp isn't...kind of ridiculous.
This legalese-style modding bullshit is so weird. Imp said something, I essentially said I agreed with most of it, but that he was actually being more forgiving toward women than he had to be, based on his stated stats.
I've never been banned.
I found it fun watching you have slapfights with him. Should've left him stay
Funny thing is, it's not like I dislike him or anything. I just find his hypocrisy, single-mindedness, and the delusion that he's always correct hilarious, and fun to push back on.