Why would it be illiegal? I think everyone should implement as much or as little DEI as they want. The problem with governments and the like is that those that implement it or want to have it implemented have nothing to fear when (not if, we're talking about DEI here) shit hits the fan. It's neither their money that gets burned nor their lives that get ruined.
"give opportunities to women and minorities" means nothing, they already had the opportunities, there was no one saying they can't apply.
Thing is, they would have to explain why would they have 20 something % women when I assume the one that want to become secret service are 99% men. Would imply that the women were not only as good as men but 20 times better.
Would it be hard to prove that they are discriminating against men?
Why would they need to explain? There's no incentive nor duty to hire only based on merit. They just lower the standards so women can get in and stop hiring men.
I mean, sure, everyone knows that they discriminate against men, but they didn't break any actual rules doing so.
Why would it be illiegal? I think everyone should implement as much or as little DEI as they want. The problem with governments and the like is that those that implement it or want to have it implemented have nothing to fear when (not if, we're talking about DEI here) shit hits the fan. It's neither their money that gets burned nor their lives that get ruined.
Isn't race and gender based discrimination illegal, especially for government?
I think so, but it's only a question of how you articulate it.
and then just stop hiring men without telling them it's because they are men wouldn't be a problem, I guess.
may be a different story.
"give opportunities to women and minorities" means nothing, they already had the opportunities, there was no one saying they can't apply.
Thing is, they would have to explain why would they have 20 something % women when I assume the one that want to become secret service are 99% men. Would imply that the women were not only as good as men but 20 times better.
Would it be hard to prove that they are discriminating against men?
Why would they need to explain? There's no incentive nor duty to hire only based on merit. They just lower the standards so women can get in and stop hiring men.
I mean, sure, everyone knows that they discriminate against men, but they didn't break any actual rules doing so.