"give opportunities to women and minorities" means nothing, they already had the opportunities, there was no one saying they can't apply.
Thing is, they would have to explain why would they have 20 something % women when I assume the one that want to become secret service are 99% men. Would imply that the women were not only as good as men but 20 times better.
Would it be hard to prove that they are discriminating against men?
Why would they need to explain? There's no incentive nor duty to hire only based on merit. They just lower the standards so women can get in and stop hiring men.
I mean, sure, everyone knows that they discriminate against men, but they didn't break any actual rules doing so.
"give opportunities to women and minorities" means nothing, they already had the opportunities, there was no one saying they can't apply.
Thing is, they would have to explain why would they have 20 something % women when I assume the one that want to become secret service are 99% men. Would imply that the women were not only as good as men but 20 times better.
Would it be hard to prove that they are discriminating against men?
Why would they need to explain? There's no incentive nor duty to hire only based on merit. They just lower the standards so women can get in and stop hiring men.
I mean, sure, everyone knows that they discriminate against men, but they didn't break any actual rules doing so.