I genuinely don't understand the logic of that post. Why acknowledge that men and women are sexualized in different ways only to then insist that you can't complain male sexualization in games unless it's done the EXACT same way as female sexualization?
It's an own-goal. The yaoi-fag is talking to the tranny-fag using a post that directly points out the differences in preferences between men and women.
It's almost like women enjoy seeing gigachad men while men enjoy seeing cute and helpless girls with skimpy clothes. What a revelation. I know you're a troll but you can do better.
Tell women to stop sexualizing themselves, and then we could talk about FICTIONAL media depictions. And stop acting like every fucking movies in the universe is some dude bro bikini girl action movie, there is literally plenty of media for women to watch that is catered at them. Maybe stop intentionally going into things that aren't made for you? Ffs the western gaming market for the last decade or so literally goes out of their way to not sexualize female characters in order to not offend women.
Yeah men were so uncomfortable with MCU Thor, which is why the majority of the people who went to go see his movies were men and his movies make over a billion dollars in the box office.
Rape is one of the biggest sexual fantasies women have, bar none. They adore the notion of a strong, powerful man loosing control from due to a woman's sheer sexuality, rendering them helpless and having their way with them.
This has been known for decades. From 'My Secret Garden' to every romance novel published. And for your own sanity, I advise you not go looking at the stuff you can find on Amazon in their ebook section.
Society really, really doesn't want to start tackling the notion that the more depraved sex isn't the male side of the equation.
Because women get turned on by dominate men. I can’t think of a video game character that’s as ridiculously submissive as Maggie gillienhal walking around in bondage gear in the secretary. Meanwhile cammy white can beat up a 300lb Russian wrestler
Men and aren’t just different - they are complimentary. Of course men prefer submissive and agreeable women while women prefer dominant and disagreeable men. Welcome to sexual dichotomy.
No shit Sherlock. I could argue that the men tend to be reduced to their bank accounts, status, and abilities in appealing to women. That romance novels set up unrealistic expectations about men.
And then these same people will be the first arguing that men and women aren’t really different. That there are no differences in brain chemistry.
All this written diarrhea amounts to is “heads I win, tails you lose” and yet so many people buy it.
Top camwhores make ten times that in just a month. And you know what? I respect that grind. Ain't seeing one cent from me, and I don't find it a point of attraction, but I do acknowledge the wealth.
Funny thing, though: Most simps don't want to be reminded of the fact their primary camwhore makes a million a month from thousands of simps just like them. Beyond not finding the wealth grindset attractive, they find it actively un-attractive, most of the simps fantasize about being the sole provider and protector, that's why they get pissy if their camwhore "idol" interacts with another male in any way. The thought of their idol making scads of money off thousands of men repulses them, they have to actively suppress that knowledge.
It's not about coherence, it's about removing all forms of male power whatsoever, especially the Male Gaze. It's literally fine when they do it because women "don't have power" and are "taking back power" by dressing like whores. When YOU dress them like whores, you are turning them into dolls you have power over.
This is their apeshit, schitzo reasoning for every decision they make revolving around this topic. It's literally not supposed to make sense to you because they are actively warring against everything that you are (and by extension, God and all His creation as well).
You can't do one without the other, we see the effects of that in reality.
Is it no wonder why women have been copying male aggression and even looks despite it being completely unappealing given their natural physique and the rise in men deprived of their counterbalance taking on the qualities they seek in women?
The implementations of this is less representation has led to real world consequences.
These leftists have no standards beyond "I'm always right". Even if you take every opinion they hold over a month and see they all contradict, they're always right so each opinion is correct, regardless of the "context" they love using as a shield. Whining about agency whilst completely disregarding it as to WHY men are sexualized this way or why women are sexualized that way.
So it's the fictional men have agency and fictional women do not fallacy again.
The agency comes from the creator. If the art is depicted in a specific way, we have to assume that the depicted person in the art, male or female, must want that.
It's been pointed out before, many times. But it never seems to make it inside the left's hate bubble.
How about any woke Mortal Kombat that's come out in the last five years or so? The women are all butch and fully-clothed, yet the men are still wearing cartoonish shit like loin cloths. If they at least enforced their bullshit across the board instead of the double standards, I'd respect their position more (even if I disagree). Instead it's just typical feminazi shit where only THEIR sensibilities matter.
Is this is the case, then why don't men in real life dress up as gay strippers with cock pockets to attract women? And why are women the only ones who go around parading their bodies, while men who do it in a similar fashion only really attract gay men? It's almost like men and women are inherently different, especially in terms of sexual dynamics, you stupid faggot (inb4 "it's cuz of muh patriarchy!). And lmao at this dumb fairy saying that men in romance novels LITERALLY TARGETED AT FUCKING WOMEN aren't sexualizing the men lmao (it's almost like women like actual dominant and strong men, not weak pussy faggots like you!). Imagine listening to these "people" and letting them dictate what you are and aren't allowed to make or consume.
So their solution is to make all media sanitized and safe corporate slop instead of making games for women and letting games for men to still exist without bitching? I saw a poster on r/mendrawingwomen say that "we shouldn't sexualize anyone, just give everyone a power fantasy", fuck it's like your Christian mom telling you "those video games and metal music should have less killing and more educational things" all over again.
Being sexualized IS a power fantasy for many women.
The OP brings up the men on romance covers, but the women that grace those covers aren't representing their target demographic, either. There's not many top-selling romances about a morbidly obese eczema-ridden bugbear woman, either. Unattractive women in women's power fantasies are generally very easily made attractive: Too thin rather than too fat, messy hair cured with a single brushing, glasses with the dumbest frames imaginable to be replaced with wireframes or contact lenses. And they WILL be made attractive before even the third act's begun, because they must, to give a power fantasy to the (woman) reader that they too can be sexually desirable.
It's why feminazis can only write female leads as Mary Sue's on traditionally male franchises. The idea that a female is inferior in any context is too much for their fragile egos so they always start overpowered rather than the heroes journey.
Of course it is, that's part of the double standard.
Stripping a man naked to humiliate him: hilarious.
Stripping a woman naked to humiliate her: hate crime.
Because, as everyone has already said, ad nauseum, women want dominant men (so it's subversive/funny when they're ridiculed) while men want alluring women (which makes it subversive/funny when they're crass).
I genuinely don't understand the logic of that post. Why acknowledge that men and women are sexualized in different ways only to then insist that you can't complain male sexualization in games unless it's done the EXACT same way as female sexualization?
To show you they are in control. To take your complaint and throw it into the metaphorical trash.
It's an own-goal. The yaoi-fag is talking to the tranny-fag using a post that directly points out the differences in preferences between men and women.
I like the fact that the sexualization she's criticizing is the sexualization made for women.
You think men on romance novels should be submissive because muh equality? Too bad, because literally every other woman on Earth disagrees with you.
It's almost like women enjoy seeing gigachad men while men enjoy seeing cute and helpless girls with skimpy clothes. What a revelation. I know you're a troll but you can do better.
What does that have to do with anything? Is sexualization bad or too much sexualization bad? What’s the appropriate amount of sexualization?
You know how many times I've seen Edward from Twilight? Precisely zero because I never watched the movie. It's that simple.
And I guarantee if I did see it I would think nothing of it because I'm not a little bitch.
they deserve it
Tell women to stop sexualizing themselves, and then we could talk about FICTIONAL media depictions. And stop acting like every fucking movies in the universe is some dude bro bikini girl action movie, there is literally plenty of media for women to watch that is catered at them. Maybe stop intentionally going into things that aren't made for you? Ffs the western gaming market for the last decade or so literally goes out of their way to not sexualize female characters in order to not offend women.
Yeah men were so uncomfortable with MCU Thor, which is why the majority of the people who went to go see his movies were men and his movies make over a billion dollars in the box office.
False. Modern male sexualization makes them look like sex toys controlled by women (and deviant dudes).
Most women want to be treated like sex toys.
Rape is one of the biggest sexual fantasies women have, bar none. They adore the notion of a strong, powerful man loosing control from due to a woman's sheer sexuality, rendering them helpless and having their way with them.
This has been known for decades. From 'My Secret Garden' to every romance novel published. And for your own sanity, I advise you not go looking at the stuff you can find on Amazon in their ebook section.
Society really, really doesn't want to start tackling the notion that the more depraved sex isn't the male side of the equation.
Why would anyone want to look at a woman with stubble?
I mean, you know men and women have different sexual organs, right?
Do you seriously think people should want to look at a guy with titties just to make things "equal"?
Every time...
They can't turn it off even when they try to infiltrate.
Because women get turned on by dominate men. I can’t think of a video game character that’s as ridiculously submissive as Maggie gillienhal walking around in bondage gear in the secretary. Meanwhile cammy white can beat up a 300lb Russian wrestler
Street Fighter 2 is an execellent example of a game where the women are sexy but in no way submissive.
We've got Zangief flexing in a banana hammock while Chun Li boasts about being the strongest women in the world before every fight.
But, of course, that assumes that this twit actually plays games.
We live in a matriarchy, where everyone has to dance to the tune of whores/ Karens.
damn that's a lotta words
too bad i'm not readin' em
i like looking at hot girls and you can cope, seethe, and DIE.
Leftists seem unable to understand men and women are fundamentally different so traits that enhance sexual attraction for each are different.
Men who seem able to provide and protect are more attractive. That's mostly innate, not cultural.
Men and aren’t just different - they are complimentary. Of course men prefer submissive and agreeable women while women prefer dominant and disagreeable men. Welcome to sexual dichotomy.
There is a term for sexy, submissive men.
It's "twink", and women are not the target demographic.
Fuck me!
A tumblr post is reposted on Reddit which is then posted on Twitter/X and now we're getting it here?!?!
I'd go to fuckin' tumblr is I wanted this piss in between hour long videos from breadtubers all repeating the same story typed up by someone else.
The Romance section is aimed at women... Somehow the women are being sexualized but the men aren't? Does Fabio know this?
But those fictional men have agency....somehow.
No shit Sherlock. I could argue that the men tend to be reduced to their bank accounts, status, and abilities in appealing to women. That romance novels set up unrealistic expectations about men.
And then these same people will be the first arguing that men and women aren’t really different. That there are no differences in brain chemistry.
All this written diarrhea amounts to is “heads I win, tails you lose” and yet so many people buy it.
Lol, imagine if people started calling out thots by asking them if they were over 6' or made more than $100k, rather than simping for their pictures.
Women do not want that, guaranteed.
Top camwhores make ten times that in just a month. And you know what? I respect that grind. Ain't seeing one cent from me, and I don't find it a point of attraction, but I do acknowledge the wealth.
Funny thing, though: Most simps don't want to be reminded of the fact their primary camwhore makes a million a month from thousands of simps just like them. Beyond not finding the wealth grindset attractive, they find it actively un-attractive, most of the simps fantasize about being the sole provider and protector, that's why they get pissy if their camwhore "idol" interacts with another male in any way. The thought of their idol making scads of money off thousands of men repulses them, they have to actively suppress that knowledge.
Lucifer in Dante's Inferno. There I found one for them.
I’m so sick of this double standard.
It's not about coherence, it's about removing all forms of male power whatsoever, especially the Male Gaze. It's literally fine when they do it because women "don't have power" and are "taking back power" by dressing like whores. When YOU dress them like whores, you are turning them into dolls you have power over.
This is their apeshit, schitzo reasoning for every decision they make revolving around this topic. It's literally not supposed to make sense to you because they are actively warring against everything that you are (and by extension, God and all His creation as well).
I truly hate faggots
You can't do one without the other, we see the effects of that in reality.
Is it no wonder why women have been copying male aggression and even looks despite it being completely unappealing given their natural physique and the rise in men deprived of their counterbalance taking on the qualities they seek in women?
The implementations of this is less representation has led to real world consequences.
These leftists have no standards beyond "I'm always right". Even if you take every opinion they hold over a month and see they all contradict, they're always right so each opinion is correct, regardless of the "context" they love using as a shield. Whining about agency whilst completely disregarding it as to WHY men are sexualized this way or why women are sexualized that way.
So it's the fictional men have agency and fictional women do not fallacy again.
The agency comes from the creator. If the art is depicted in a specific way, we have to assume that the depicted person in the art, male or female, must want that.
It's been pointed out before, many times. But it never seems to make it inside the left's hate bubble.
Can you believe it that when men are sexualized their masculine features and characteristics are emphasized?
How about any woke Mortal Kombat that's come out in the last five years or so? The women are all butch and fully-clothed, yet the men are still wearing cartoonish shit like loin cloths. If they at least enforced their bullshit across the board instead of the double standards, I'd respect their position more (even if I disagree). Instead it's just typical feminazi shit where only THEIR sensibilities matter.
Why do you keep deleting everything?
Is this is the case, then why don't men in real life dress up as gay strippers with cock pockets to attract women? And why are women the only ones who go around parading their bodies, while men who do it in a similar fashion only really attract gay men? It's almost like men and women are inherently different, especially in terms of sexual dynamics, you stupid faggot (inb4 "it's cuz of muh patriarchy!). And lmao at this dumb fairy saying that men in romance novels LITERALLY TARGETED AT FUCKING WOMEN aren't sexualizing the men lmao (it's almost like women like actual dominant and strong men, not weak pussy faggots like you!). Imagine listening to these "people" and letting them dictate what you are and aren't allowed to make or consume.
Obligatory:
https://imgchest.com/p/9p4nvba5ynq
So their solution is to make all media sanitized and safe corporate slop instead of making games for women and letting games for men to still exist without bitching? I saw a poster on r/mendrawingwomen say that "we shouldn't sexualize anyone, just give everyone a power fantasy", fuck it's like your Christian mom telling you "those video games and metal music should have less killing and more educational things" all over again.
Being sexualized IS a power fantasy for many women.
The OP brings up the men on romance covers, but the women that grace those covers aren't representing their target demographic, either. There's not many top-selling romances about a morbidly obese eczema-ridden bugbear woman, either. Unattractive women in women's power fantasies are generally very easily made attractive: Too thin rather than too fat, messy hair cured with a single brushing, glasses with the dumbest frames imaginable to be replaced with wireframes or contact lenses. And they WILL be made attractive before even the third act's begun, because they must, to give a power fantasy to the (woman) reader that they too can be sexually desirable.
Male Power Fantasy: Being a strong badass who can save the world, do what he wants and get the girl.
Female Power Fantasy: Being the girl that the badass guy is completely obsessed with and devoted to by virtue of existing
It's why feminazis can only write female leads as Mary Sue's on traditionally male franchises. The idea that a female is inferior in any context is too much for their fragile egos so they always start overpowered rather than the heroes journey.
Of course it is, that's part of the double standard.
Stripping a man naked to humiliate him: hilarious.
Stripping a woman naked to humiliate her: hate crime.
Because, as everyone has already said, ad nauseum, women want dominant men (so it's subversive/funny when they're ridiculed) while men want alluring women (which makes it subversive/funny when they're crass).