They try to spread the label of “Lame White Dude” on both sides. You have boomer conservatives shitting on White people and trying to look cool for minorities because they’ve been raised to worship Blacks their whole life, while simultaneously being told that everything wrong with the world is the “White” liberals fault.
It’s also a means of discouraging any kind of positive White Identity movement. That faggot from the Babylon Bee is a perfect example.
Lets not forget boomer conservatives who crap on video games and people who play them even though many would otherwise be politically aligned with them
I always cringe when cuckservatives try to play the "lol ypipo so lame" card. Obviously it's hilarious that ideological progressives are so white, but it's hilarious because they're cucked, not because being white is inherently lame. Progressives made being white uncool, because progressives are uncool, not because whites are uncool.
Blacks wouldn't be trying to appropriate everything from knights to vikings to cowboys and country music and metal if whites weren't cool. Redneck culture is everywhere these days, albeit in a perverted, corporate, and cucked form, and its popularity may unfortunately end up being its demise as it gets thoroughly declawed by globohomo. But that's another conversation, my point is that white people can also "keep it real" and be "cool" as long as they're not afraid of being called racist, the stereotype of the chinless suburban middle class white cuck dad is a product of progressivism.
Nevermind that the kind of self-effacing emasculating cuck humor that's so prevalent among white millennial men was originally a Jewish thing to begin with, because Jewish men are a bunch of cucked pussy-whipped dweebs. Sheeit, come to think of it even fags got cucked by becoming pets for affluent liberal white (and Jewish, originally, as well) women, although fags are more hiding their power level than being cucks since they know that white women are their biggest advocates.
to be fair, a lot of normies are still programmed to instantly dismiss anything if it criticizes someone who is Jewish. if you want normie acceptance, it is better to focus on the individuals, organizations, and what they are doing.
Take the Soros conspiracy for instance. George Soros is a rich asshole who spends his money installing activist judges and funding riots. there's plenty reason to hate him. but the moment the Soros conspiracy gained traction, it was instantly put down by a single narrative: George Soros is jewish, therefore the Soros conspiracy is antisemitic. This worked.
the individual is an asshole because they are an asshole. their assholery may be influenced by their Creed or religion, but at the end of the day it is their choice to be an asshole. if you want support, focus less on their faith and more on them as individuals.
Optics fags are usually retarded, but they are right about one thing. We do need to actually sell our ideas to people, instead of just screaming in our bubble.
Part of that is knowing when to push or downplay things to better market it to the audience we wish to court. Normally, this will mean not being a sperg and screaming about Jews and Niggers directly and outright when making a point because, as you said, it makes everyone tune out immediately.
If optics fags actually focused on optics they would have point. The problem is that they try to water down our ideas, usually because they're barely disguised leftist house niggers like Matt Walsh and his butt buddy Joel Berry.
I've said around here before and I'll say again, they aren't as impenetrable as you think.
The problem is A)trying to discourse online is always losing and B)most people act like fucking spergs while doing so.
I've had great success in bringing friends and associates with radical Leftist ideas and poison and bringing them down to much more nuanced and milquetoast versions of that. Its not miracle work, they weren't suddenly "based," but a radical feminist being given the seed of doubt that women can and do lie about rape and abuse will do more work across time than 15 "DAE JEWS?!" posts.
I also think screaming about any particular group is missing the point entirely. The thing that unifies these people are their shit ideas, so that's what we need to defeat.
I'm not trying to trick or subvert anyone when I say "stop screaming about Jews or niggers." it's legitimately focusing on the wrong thing.
And where do those shit ideas come from? communism is from judaism its the belief that a small chosen group of people get to dictate everyone else and everyone else is cattle . communism was invented by the jew karl marx and frankfurt school which was also jewish.
first of all, what you describe is socialism which Karl Marx deemed was a step towards communism. communism is a utopian ideal where everything is shared, which can only be achieved in a world free of scarcity. Karl Marx's communism does not have a government once the revolution is complete. Karl Marx's communism is also completely doomed to fail because scarcity will always exist, as well as human nature.
Karl Marx was a privileged trust fund baby with a laughably terrible grasp of economics who thought he could solve the world's problems. his religion is only tangentially related to his shit idea. Most Jews would be insulted to be associated with his ideas.
the Frankfort school was indeed a Jewish school, run by a very small number of Jews that were likely part of the same sect. whether the school was operating honestly or was part of some conspiracy to destroy the West is up for debate in my opinion, but I can tell you everyday rank and file Jews not only know very little about that school, but would actively distance themselves from it given the degenerate ideas that have come out of it.
Tribalism is a basic human instinct, so often times a group is their ideas. Its ingrained in their mind so deep that the two cannot be separated. For example, basketball and black guys for a neutral example. Or Slavs and valuing human life. As such, I don't think you can defeat an idea in any real form without destroying the group itself. Maybe in some perfect world with infinite time and money, but not reality where people are suffering with each wasted moment.
But we end up in the same place regardless, which is "stop screaming like a retard it doesn't help anyone." It anything, at all, is to be accomplished it must be done with consideration for how you will be discredited and appear with adjustments done to counter that.
We are not getting out of this without bloodshed the likes of which western countries haven't seen for 300 years.
That's already happening, they're just good at distracting everyone, so it's not really shown anywhere. This is why the "optics fags" exist, because it's obviously tangential to the "permission" model of achieving an audience.
We're slowly moving away from that but we're between two worlds at the moment. Things like a legitimate cryptocurrency would definitely help there, but a half assed one can work too, anything to break up the old "natural" monopolies of the past.
Example:
Someone call you a racist and you go on an apology spree over it? You're an idiot and your career will be destroyed. Why? Because apologizing (especially for something politically related) is a sign of weakness in today's world, you won't gain anything by apologizing and will instead give the SJWs the ammo needed to confirm your destruction in the eyes of normies. The correct response is to tell them to fuck off.
Another example:
You discover that a very wealthy Jewish individual is running a corporation that is actively trying to control several aspects of society and more or less create a new slave caste. How do you bring this to the public?
If your answer is to immediately state that they are Jewish your answer is likely bad optics. Normies are extremely protective of Jewish people, if you point out that he is Jewish you will be dismissed as a schizoid moron and thus your efforts will be in vain.
So whats the correct way to bring this information to the public, and perhaps hint at his ethnicity without overtly stating it? Focus on the wealth and the highly likely chance that the individual comes from a very wealthy family, and give the individuals full name. If they had a prior name, give that too. Then just provide the evidence of wrongdoing
Mentioning the name will often provide some clues as to background, and providing context for their wealth (especially cliffnotes history of that wealth) hints this as well.
Left wingers are absolutely fine with collective guilt (so long as it's applied against White people), or positive collective pursuits (so long as it's not White people). Right wingers are fine with collective guilt (so long as it's Muslim Middle Easterners, illegal aliens, or White people) or positive collective pursuits (so long as it's not White people). The left has a vocal minority that despises zionism (because of what jews are doing to the Palestinians), while the right prizes itself on "judeo-Christian" values and the biggest supporter of Israel.
I guess I'm not good at explaining it, but you people seem to love genocide. Islamic terrorists exist, so you'd murder all muslims. Israel and shitty banks exist, so you'd murder all jews. Gay Pedophiles exist, so you'd murder all gays.
Ignoring the absurdly bad ethics behind this, you unironically make the same mistake Hitler made. by casting such a wide net, you capture so many innocents that you'd justifiably forever be known as the evil one.
Bringing things back to OP, SBI is an asshole organization, run by an asshole. The fact that that asshole is a jew is not the reason he's an asshole, even if it may factor in. He's an asshole because he chose to create a company whose sole purpose is to inject Seattle identity politics into games via protection racket. Other jews who have nothing to do with SBI or any other marxist inflation, have nothing to do with him either. punishing them for something they didn't do is not only "bad optics", it is evil.
Of course, Mossad can't abide by any anti-Israel conversation being anything other than retarded jew genocide sabre rattling. If the anger gets pointed at their government in such a way that they can't hide behind their meatshields, they lose. That's why the majority of stormfag posts appear.
Jews Christians Muslims Buddhists etc. operate across the world with varying levels of success and ethics. to say any of these religions are the root cause of some evil is incredibly naive. Casting such a wide net will ensnare more innocents than guilty, which will create a backlash that ultimately causes your movement to fail.
people who use identity politics as a weapon know this, and are constantly poisoning the well. racial supremacist ethnostates like Israel, for instance, literally profit from people parroting rhetoric such as "Judaism is a disease", because it generates more sympathy for them.
Your last paragraph sorta suggest that collectivism works, since there's an ethnostate but white people should judge the individual, and not collectivise? If it works for Isreal why shouldn't we do it?
to say any of these religions are the root cause of some evil is incredibly naive
Maybe you’re the one being naive. The problem is culture. Social norms, morality, and behavior are driven by culture, with religion being a large part of culture. You know damn well that religion itself dictates morality and social norms. Now before you talk about atheists the jewish community is very strong and tight-nit, while there maybe lots of non practicing jews they still exist within the culture of the jewish community where norms are enforced. So when you’re going around calling people naive do you have any idea what jewish morality is like? Do you know what jewish law states about non-jews?
all jews are the same and follow the exact same code of ethics
this is leftist logic, just applied to Jews instead of Christians. there are many different sects of Judaism that range from benign to supremacist. While the Israeli government might fall towards the supremacist side, most everyday Jews do not give a shit. the only reason anyone supports the Israeli government is because they believe they will be massacred if that government falls.
The thing to do is find articles written by jews praising whatever Jews are behind the social malady being discussed. You can always find one and usually several within the first page of Google results. Their algorithm favors things written by Jews and things that put jews in a positive light so those articles will he ridiculously easy to find.
To be fair, satanism was mentioned below the fold, if you expand the original tweet. It wasn't specifically Jewish satanism, but it did mention satanism.
But yeah, Jewish satanists are out to destroy video games.
It totally mentioned satanism and the OP cut it off and people here should be questioning why. The tweet response was legit trying to help. There's a time and a place, but making memes that look like a homeless schizo's ramblings on the subway wall is rarely the correct tactic.
I have to wonder if OP was one of the types arguing that SBI group's Steam board should have stayed open to let people name the Jew all day long. Yes that would have been an effective tactic. How does this help video games again?
It totally mentioned satanism and the OP cut it off
To be fair (again), OP didn't do that, Twitter did. I saw the actual tweet when this was posted days ago, and all the vaguely schizo stuff was cut off by Twitter as it was at the bottom of the image. You had to expand image to see any of it.
So OP may or may not even know the full story, since he's posting screenshots and not links.
Serious question, in the infographic, the bottom part, when they say 'the affected video game company', do they mean the publisher? The IP holder? I ask because it would also possibly confuse normies (and even an autist like me) by seeing 'sometimes goes bankrupt' and then 'financially rewarded' so close together.
Even in the picture itself it shows that it is more than just jews doing this shit. It is reductive to absurdity,
actively damaging to the argument and does make you look retarded to reduce it to "it's da JOOOOS". That ignores, outright hides the fact that it's all leftists.
It aligns perfectly with the national socialism retardation, where leftists try to slide the right into believing that "far right" loops back to strong central government. It sends idiot men off on tangents that ruin their ability to effectively counter leftist dogma, by making them look retarded. It provides cover for the globalist cause, and while that actual psyop isn't intended to ever succeed fully, it also pushes towards the globalist' goals.
The globalists, the sick "elite", the sociopaths that rise to power using leftism, do not actually care which dogma they have to preach to gain power. If you concentrate power into strong central government it will always be corrupted by those kinds of people.
Going "reee JOOOOOS" makes you look retarded and serves their goals. If you can contain your sperging and use terms that actually include ALL of the people that are a problem, you will not only be more accurate, but more successful in combating leftism and not pigeonholed into "that one nazi retard" by anyone you try to talk to.
Gates isn't a jew, and has done more damage than anyone short of Soros - and that's debatable. Trudeau isn't a jew. Biden. Obama. Xi. The mexican government. The britfag government. The german government. The french. Stalin. Mao. Hitler. All these non jewish leftist sociopathic or satanic demons that work or worked against their nations interests' - Leftists. Statists. Globalists. Demons.
They have succesfully propagandized people into believing "commie" is not something to be ashamed of - but when you confront them with how actually evil their ideologies are, they recoil far harder than the actual "name the jew reaction" that crypto-leftist forum sliders talk about. Those same faggots also recoil when confronted with the fact that they are lefties or feds. If you fall for the fucking horseshit that "far right" loops around from anti-government to "we need all powerful government to rule us for racial identity politics" you are actually fucking retarded.
This has been discussed ad nauseum on /pol/ for many years. If it can be statistically proven that every institution that's pushing this stuff is overwhelmingly jewish, far beyond their population percentage (which is usually between 0.5-2% in the average Western nation), that means jews have an inordinate responsibility for these bad things. You're right that other people are involved, which is why I prefer the term "globalist", which is all encompassing, and more normie friendly until we get to the really propaganda breaking bits about jewish involvement in various things.
However, ignoring jewish over representation is really, really stupid. It's like claiming crime stat differences by race doesn't exist because "White people do crimes, too". Saying this means you have zero understanding of per capita. It's just as stupid as saying "I saw a friendly bear at the circus once, therefore all bears are friendly". You're using exceptions to try to disprove the rule.
This doesn't mean you have to jump to the end and decry "all jews bad", but it certainly doesn't mean you should ignore jewish over representation in bad things. It's called pattern recognition. It's a learned survival trait so you can figure out what's good for you and what's bad for you. Ignoring pattern recognition intentionally is identical to shooting yourself in the foot while running away from a bear.
You entirely missed the point. Going "reee joos" is reductive and makes every attempt at showing people what is actually wrong fail. It is used as a forum sliding tactic.
There are a lot of leftist jews, and they're scum. There are a lot of criminal blacks, and they're scum. But when you fall into leftist collectivist bullshit you actively become dumber. You are failing to notice the actual problem or deliberately forum sliding, one or the other. Defending the socialist goons that try to actively derail any actual right wing organization with this shitpost that misses the point is some motte and bailey bullshit and you know it.
Collectivism isn't inherently wrong. That's a false belief pushed on the right to make people take up self destructive individualism, where it's not counterbalanced with collectivism. It's to make the right (White people) not collectivize, making us much easier to control, to make us act like atomized individuals devoid of all commonality and mutual interests, so we don't group up and fight back. Individualism and collectivism, by themselves, are self destructive. They must be married.
Furthermore, if you think all peoples, races, animals, plants, and lifeforms are identical, amd the only differences are "socio-economic" factors, you're deluded. Discrimination, the ability to see two different things are different, is a necessary foundation for wisdom (and survival). If you intentionally ignore those differences to appeal to idiots (normies), you're also stupid. But, like I said in the previous comment, I actually agree with you that we shouldn't jump straight to the end of the conversation. Normies (people still plugged into the propaganda) require time and subtlety to break down the propaganda they've been fed.
Collectivism is a subhuman mindset. If you cannot recognize that people are not just a subset of group stereotypes and separate the individual from the collective, you are not a real human being, just a mindless drone. It is the rot that allows sociopaths to direct the leftist zombies.
Furthermore, if you think all peoples, races, animals, plants, and lifeforms are identical, amd the only differences are "socio-economic" factors, you're deluded
Never once have I said that, fool. Being able to recognize group trends is not the only element of collectivism.
They try to spread the label of “Lame White Dude” on both sides. You have boomer conservatives shitting on White people and trying to look cool for minorities because they’ve been raised to worship Blacks their whole life, while simultaneously being told that everything wrong with the world is the “White” liberals fault.
It’s also a means of discouraging any kind of positive White Identity movement. That faggot from the Babylon Bee is a perfect example.
Lets not forget boomer conservatives who crap on video games and people who play them even though many would otherwise be politically aligned with them
Taking a 5 minutes break from their 6 hours of daily television / sportsball watching to berate the generations below them for playing videogames.
I always cringe when cuckservatives try to play the "lol ypipo so lame" card. Obviously it's hilarious that ideological progressives are so white, but it's hilarious because they're cucked, not because being white is inherently lame. Progressives made being white uncool, because progressives are uncool, not because whites are uncool.
Blacks wouldn't be trying to appropriate everything from knights to vikings to cowboys and country music and metal if whites weren't cool. Redneck culture is everywhere these days, albeit in a perverted, corporate, and cucked form, and its popularity may unfortunately end up being its demise as it gets thoroughly declawed by globohomo. But that's another conversation, my point is that white people can also "keep it real" and be "cool" as long as they're not afraid of being called racist, the stereotype of the chinless suburban middle class white cuck dad is a product of progressivism.
Nevermind that the kind of self-effacing emasculating cuck humor that's so prevalent among white millennial men was originally a Jewish thing to begin with, because Jewish men are a bunch of cucked pussy-whipped dweebs. Sheeit, come to think of it even fags got cucked by becoming pets for affluent liberal white (and Jewish, originally, as well) women, although fags are more hiding their power level than being cucks since they know that white women are their biggest advocates.
to be fair, a lot of normies are still programmed to instantly dismiss anything if it criticizes someone who is Jewish. if you want normie acceptance, it is better to focus on the individuals, organizations, and what they are doing.
Take the Soros conspiracy for instance. George Soros is a rich asshole who spends his money installing activist judges and funding riots. there's plenty reason to hate him. but the moment the Soros conspiracy gained traction, it was instantly put down by a single narrative: George Soros is jewish, therefore the Soros conspiracy is antisemitic. This worked.
the individual is an asshole because they are an asshole. their assholery may be influenced by their Creed or religion, but at the end of the day it is their choice to be an asshole. if you want support, focus less on their faith and more on them as individuals.
Optics fags are usually retarded, but they are right about one thing. We do need to actually sell our ideas to people, instead of just screaming in our bubble.
Part of that is knowing when to push or downplay things to better market it to the audience we wish to court. Normally, this will mean not being a sperg and screaming about Jews and Niggers directly and outright when making a point because, as you said, it makes everyone tune out immediately.
If optics fags actually focused on optics they would have point. The problem is that they try to water down our ideas, usually because they're barely disguised leftist house niggers like Matt Walsh and his butt buddy Joel Berry.
Can’t sell things to people who don’t want to buy the product, let alone people who have been brainwashed to believe any product you touch is poison
I've said around here before and I'll say again, they aren't as impenetrable as you think.
The problem is A)trying to discourse online is always losing and B)most people act like fucking spergs while doing so.
I've had great success in bringing friends and associates with radical Leftist ideas and poison and bringing them down to much more nuanced and milquetoast versions of that. Its not miracle work, they weren't suddenly "based," but a radical feminist being given the seed of doubt that women can and do lie about rape and abuse will do more work across time than 15 "DAE JEWS?!" posts.
I also think screaming about any particular group is missing the point entirely. The thing that unifies these people are their shit ideas, so that's what we need to defeat.
I'm not trying to trick or subvert anyone when I say "stop screaming about Jews or niggers." it's legitimately focusing on the wrong thing.
And where do those shit ideas come from? communism is from judaism its the belief that a small chosen group of people get to dictate everyone else and everyone else is cattle . communism was invented by the jew karl marx and frankfurt school which was also jewish.
And Judaism believes in 8 genders https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-eight-genders-in-the-talmud/ where do you think transgenderism ideas come from. the first transgender clinic was opened by a jew
first of all, what you describe is socialism which Karl Marx deemed was a step towards communism. communism is a utopian ideal where everything is shared, which can only be achieved in a world free of scarcity. Karl Marx's communism does not have a government once the revolution is complete. Karl Marx's communism is also completely doomed to fail because scarcity will always exist, as well as human nature.
Karl Marx was a privileged trust fund baby with a laughably terrible grasp of economics who thought he could solve the world's problems. his religion is only tangentially related to his shit idea. Most Jews would be insulted to be associated with his ideas.
the Frankfort school was indeed a Jewish school, run by a very small number of Jews that were likely part of the same sect. whether the school was operating honestly or was part of some conspiracy to destroy the West is up for debate in my opinion, but I can tell you everyday rank and file Jews not only know very little about that school, but would actively distance themselves from it given the degenerate ideas that have come out of it.
Tribalism is a basic human instinct, so often times a group is their ideas. Its ingrained in their mind so deep that the two cannot be separated. For example, basketball and black guys for a neutral example. Or Slavs and valuing human life. As such, I don't think you can defeat an idea in any real form without destroying the group itself. Maybe in some perfect world with infinite time and money, but not reality where people are suffering with each wasted moment.
But we end up in the same place regardless, which is "stop screaming like a retard it doesn't help anyone." It anything, at all, is to be accomplished it must be done with consideration for how you will be discredited and appear with adjustments done to counter that.
If optics were the key Jared Taylor and Mark Collett would be swimming in white identitarians.
That's already happening, they're just good at distracting everyone, so it's not really shown anywhere. This is why the "optics fags" exist, because it's obviously tangential to the "permission" model of achieving an audience.
We're slowly moving away from that but we're between two worlds at the moment. Things like a legitimate cryptocurrency would definitely help there, but a half assed one can work too, anything to break up the old "natural" monopolies of the past.
Optics matter.
Example: Someone call you a racist and you go on an apology spree over it? You're an idiot and your career will be destroyed. Why? Because apologizing (especially for something politically related) is a sign of weakness in today's world, you won't gain anything by apologizing and will instead give the SJWs the ammo needed to confirm your destruction in the eyes of normies. The correct response is to tell them to fuck off.
Another example:
You discover that a very wealthy Jewish individual is running a corporation that is actively trying to control several aspects of society and more or less create a new slave caste. How do you bring this to the public?
If your answer is to immediately state that they are Jewish your answer is likely bad optics. Normies are extremely protective of Jewish people, if you point out that he is Jewish you will be dismissed as a schizoid moron and thus your efforts will be in vain.
So whats the correct way to bring this information to the public, and perhaps hint at his ethnicity without overtly stating it? Focus on the wealth and the highly likely chance that the individual comes from a very wealthy family, and give the individuals full name. If they had a prior name, give that too. Then just provide the evidence of wrongdoing
Mentioning the name will often provide some clues as to background, and providing context for their wealth (especially cliffnotes history of that wealth) hints this as well.
Left wingers are absolutely fine with collective guilt (so long as it's applied against White people), or positive collective pursuits (so long as it's not White people). Right wingers are fine with collective guilt (so long as it's Muslim Middle Easterners, illegal aliens, or White people) or positive collective pursuits (so long as it's not White people). The left has a vocal minority that despises zionism (because of what jews are doing to the Palestinians), while the right prizes itself on "judeo-Christian" values and the biggest supporter of Israel.
so don't stoop to their level
Refusing to use the tools available to you is a losing strategy. Use them judiciously, but you need to use them if you intend to win.
it's amazing how many accounts suddenly swarm you when you name Israel instead of naming the Jew.
It's almost as if you're saying dumb shit that warrants a rebuke.
I guess I'm not good at explaining it, but you people seem to love genocide. Islamic terrorists exist, so you'd murder all muslims. Israel and shitty banks exist, so you'd murder all jews. Gay Pedophiles exist, so you'd murder all gays.
Ignoring the absurdly bad ethics behind this, you unironically make the same mistake Hitler made. by casting such a wide net, you capture so many innocents that you'd justifiably forever be known as the evil one.
Bringing things back to OP, SBI is an asshole organization, run by an asshole. The fact that that asshole is a jew is not the reason he's an asshole, even if it may factor in. He's an asshole because he chose to create a company whose sole purpose is to inject Seattle identity politics into games via protection racket. Other jews who have nothing to do with SBI or any other marxist inflation, have nothing to do with him either. punishing them for something they didn't do is not only "bad optics", it is evil.
Of course, Mossad can't abide by any anti-Israel conversation being anything other than retarded jew genocide sabre rattling. If the anger gets pointed at their government in such a way that they can't hide behind their meatshields, they lose. That's why the majority of stormfag posts appear.
This sounds like some mad projection on your part.
However, this is a good way to lock yourself behind not being able to truly identify the disease behind the symptoms.
Judaism is, as we all know, an extremely flawed and corrupt religion. Dodging the main driving force behind these issues doesn’t help anyone’s cause
Jews Christians Muslims Buddhists etc. operate across the world with varying levels of success and ethics. to say any of these religions are the root cause of some evil is incredibly naive. Casting such a wide net will ensnare more innocents than guilty, which will create a backlash that ultimately causes your movement to fail.
people who use identity politics as a weapon know this, and are constantly poisoning the well. racial supremacist ethnostates like Israel, for instance, literally profit from people parroting rhetoric such as "Judaism is a disease", because it generates more sympathy for them.
focus on the individual, not the religion.
Your last paragraph sorta suggest that collectivism works, since there's an ethnostate but white people should judge the individual, and not collectivise? If it works for Isreal why shouldn't we do it?
the Israeli ethno state survives solely off the charity of others. it does not work if that charity dries up.
Actually they survive through enslaving others with banking and usury
that would be Switzerland
no
Maybe you’re the one being naive. The problem is culture. Social norms, morality, and behavior are driven by culture, with religion being a large part of culture. You know damn well that religion itself dictates morality and social norms. Now before you talk about atheists the jewish community is very strong and tight-nit, while there maybe lots of non practicing jews they still exist within the culture of the jewish community where norms are enforced. So when you’re going around calling people naive do you have any idea what jewish morality is like? Do you know what jewish law states about non-jews?
this is leftist logic, just applied to Jews instead of Christians. there are many different sects of Judaism that range from benign to supremacist. While the Israeli government might fall towards the supremacist side, most everyday Jews do not give a shit. the only reason anyone supports the Israeli government is because they believe they will be massacred if that government falls.
Thanks for putting the strawman that you wanted to argue against up front. Saved me the trouble of reading your post.
Normie acceptance is achieved by winning power, not by trying to appease their sensibilities.
The thing to do is find articles written by jews praising whatever Jews are behind the social malady being discussed. You can always find one and usually several within the first page of Google results. Their algorithm favors things written by Jews and things that put jews in a positive light so those articles will he ridiculously easy to find.
the 5 other founders of blackrock are also jewish
When they ask you "why do you need to say they are jewish?" you can ask them "why do you want to mislead people in to thinking they are White"?
I do... because they are.
that's just a tautology, like "pedo faggot"
Same as unholy Rabbi or slimy jew
To be fair, satanism was mentioned below the fold, if you expand the original tweet. It wasn't specifically Jewish satanism, but it did mention satanism.
But yeah, Jewish satanists are out to destroy video games.
It totally mentioned satanism and the OP cut it off and people here should be questioning why. The tweet response was legit trying to help. There's a time and a place, but making memes that look like a homeless schizo's ramblings on the subway wall is rarely the correct tactic.
I have to wonder if OP was one of the types arguing that SBI group's Steam board should have stayed open to let people name the Jew all day long. Yes that would have been an effective tactic. How does this help video games again?
To be fair (again), OP didn't do that, Twitter did. I saw the actual tweet when this was posted days ago, and all the vaguely schizo stuff was cut off by Twitter as it was at the bottom of the image. You had to expand image to see any of it.
So OP may or may not even know the full story, since he's posting screenshots and not links.
What a curious thing to say.
Kim Belair is also Jewish
They mentioned nothing of jewish satanism. What an odd thing to say.
Serious question, in the infographic, the bottom part, when they say 'the affected video game company', do they mean the publisher? The IP holder? I ask because it would also possibly confuse normies (and even an autist like me) by seeing 'sometimes goes bankrupt' and then 'financially rewarded' so close together.
Remember the pornhub AMA? Some stupid yenta jumped the gun when a user asked why they promote all that awful incest shit on the frontpage
"REEEE ANTISEMITIC CONSPIRACIES"
Except banks are just banks. How does the head man being successful factor in to it?
Even in the picture itself it shows that it is more than just jews doing this shit. It is reductive to absurdity, actively damaging to the argument and does make you look retarded to reduce it to "it's da JOOOOS". That ignores, outright hides the fact that it's all leftists.
It aligns perfectly with the national socialism retardation, where leftists try to slide the right into believing that "far right" loops back to strong central government. It sends idiot men off on tangents that ruin their ability to effectively counter leftist dogma, by making them look retarded. It provides cover for the globalist cause, and while that actual psyop isn't intended to ever succeed fully, it also pushes towards the globalist' goals.
The globalists, the sick "elite", the sociopaths that rise to power using leftism, do not actually care which dogma they have to preach to gain power. If you concentrate power into strong central government it will always be corrupted by those kinds of people.
Going "reee JOOOOOS" makes you look retarded and serves their goals. If you can contain your sperging and use terms that actually include ALL of the people that are a problem, you will not only be more accurate, but more successful in combating leftism and not pigeonholed into "that one nazi retard" by anyone you try to talk to.
Gates isn't a jew, and has done more damage than anyone short of Soros - and that's debatable. Trudeau isn't a jew. Biden. Obama. Xi. The mexican government. The britfag government. The german government. The french. Stalin. Mao. Hitler. All these non jewish leftist sociopathic or satanic demons that work or worked against their nations interests' - Leftists. Statists. Globalists. Demons.
They have succesfully propagandized people into believing "commie" is not something to be ashamed of - but when you confront them with how actually evil their ideologies are, they recoil far harder than the actual "name the jew reaction" that crypto-leftist forum sliders talk about. Those same faggots also recoil when confronted with the fact that they are lefties or feds. If you fall for the fucking horseshit that "far right" loops around from anti-government to "we need all powerful government to rule us for racial identity politics" you are actually fucking retarded.
This has been discussed ad nauseum on /pol/ for many years. If it can be statistically proven that every institution that's pushing this stuff is overwhelmingly jewish, far beyond their population percentage (which is usually between 0.5-2% in the average Western nation), that means jews have an inordinate responsibility for these bad things. You're right that other people are involved, which is why I prefer the term "globalist", which is all encompassing, and more normie friendly until we get to the really propaganda breaking bits about jewish involvement in various things.
However, ignoring jewish over representation is really, really stupid. It's like claiming crime stat differences by race doesn't exist because "White people do crimes, too". Saying this means you have zero understanding of per capita. It's just as stupid as saying "I saw a friendly bear at the circus once, therefore all bears are friendly". You're using exceptions to try to disprove the rule.
This doesn't mean you have to jump to the end and decry "all jews bad", but it certainly doesn't mean you should ignore jewish over representation in bad things. It's called pattern recognition. It's a learned survival trait so you can figure out what's good for you and what's bad for you. Ignoring pattern recognition intentionally is identical to shooting yourself in the foot while running away from a bear.
You entirely missed the point. Going "reee joos" is reductive and makes every attempt at showing people what is actually wrong fail. It is used as a forum sliding tactic.
There are a lot of leftist jews, and they're scum. There are a lot of criminal blacks, and they're scum. But when you fall into leftist collectivist bullshit you actively become dumber. You are failing to notice the actual problem or deliberately forum sliding, one or the other. Defending the socialist goons that try to actively derail any actual right wing organization with this shitpost that misses the point is some motte and bailey bullshit and you know it.
Collectivism isn't inherently wrong. That's a false belief pushed on the right to make people take up self destructive individualism, where it's not counterbalanced with collectivism. It's to make the right (White people) not collectivize, making us much easier to control, to make us act like atomized individuals devoid of all commonality and mutual interests, so we don't group up and fight back. Individualism and collectivism, by themselves, are self destructive. They must be married.
Furthermore, if you think all peoples, races, animals, plants, and lifeforms are identical, amd the only differences are "socio-economic" factors, you're deluded. Discrimination, the ability to see two different things are different, is a necessary foundation for wisdom (and survival). If you intentionally ignore those differences to appeal to idiots (normies), you're also stupid. But, like I said in the previous comment, I actually agree with you that we shouldn't jump straight to the end of the conversation. Normies (people still plugged into the propaganda) require time and subtlety to break down the propaganda they've been fed.
Hellsbells00 is jewish you aren't going to convince him of anything
Collectivism is a subhuman mindset. If you cannot recognize that people are not just a subset of group stereotypes and separate the individual from the collective, you are not a real human being, just a mindless drone. It is the rot that allows sociopaths to direct the leftist zombies.
Never once have I said that, fool. Being able to recognize group trends is not the only element of collectivism.
Bill gates mother has a jewish surname, and is a banker and he looks like a jew especially in his younger days. im going to assume he is one
It is a maternal culture. If she was a jew, he'd be a jew. Unless he was baptised. But he'd still be ethnically jewish, right?
No one thinks Woody Allen isn’t Jewish. No one thinks Ivanka Trump is. It’s an ethnicity.