I never heard anyone make the “black Viking case” until that stupid Netflix show came out and then all of a sudden a bunch of hack historians claimed that Vikings were diverse and multicultural.
He who controls the past controls the present. He who controls the present controls the future.
Our history has significant power over us. If you choose to not pursue the truth but instead believe the lies you'll never be free. That's the case for your own personal history but also for the collective history of a community.
Theres descriptions of "swarthy" Vikings that some claim to mean black or tanned, but this description is often used to refer to the Rus or Sami peoples who lived the East and sometimes integrated with the Norsemen and Danes. It just means they have a ruddy complexion compared to the super pale Northmen
Swarthy just means darker. And in a region where parts of the country dont experience daylight for a month every year people are going to be very white, so anyone slightly darker than them will be 'swarthy'. The vikings also raided as far as the Mediterranean and even Greenland, so they would come home pretty tanned.
They were mostly making the case that Viking shieldmaidens were exactly the same thing as modern troon Discord moderators, blackening them wasn't a priority.
the machine can't allow ANYTHING, no matter how insignificant, that doesn't forward the agenda
unless men and women are absolutely equal in every way in every context (except sometimes women are better) then whatever that is has to be erased from public conciousness
I had to make the argument that Halfdan 'the Black' referred to hair color not skin color. I was rebuffed, with the argument that Norsemen raided for their wives, and I 'couldn't be sure' he was white.
Have no doubt that the intersectional nonsense is layered quite deeply.
Lmao as if black women would have been any more valuable in Norse culture than they are now, where they are basically the least desired romantic partner for men everywhere on Earth.
I just did actually. Tried to get it to generate a criminal and a prisoner and it refused to do so, telling me that it wasn't allowed to generate pictures of people. Even though it immediately then generated a picture of a secret agent (all minority women of course) just fine.
running some tests myself, it seems to inject multiculturalism in as many things as it possibly can, include images of samurai and other famous warriors of old. the pirates looked reasonably good given that that pirate society was an actual multi-ethnic society in several areas. for knights and vikings, it seemed to confuse a lot of fantasy with history, taking a lot of influence from pop culture.
the samurai and landsknecht we're particularly hilarious with only one image being correct, and the rest superimposing people that blatantly would not fit the time period.
I also tried generating soldiers from the US civil war, and it gave me a hard block, even when I try generating Union Soldiers.
The important point here is that this isn't an accident, it's totally intentional. They've thoroughly tested all kinds of prompts you could imagine and they knew it was grossly biased.
So they're proud of injecting artificial bias and only concerned with counterfactual history since black Georgina Washington shows everybody what's behind the curtain and lays bare their manipulations.
"People all around the world use it" is a red herring, since objective reality doesn't change based on who looks at it; in other words, "German soldier" or "Italian family" should generate white people even for a South African person.
That's true and it's worth acknowledging.
It's also fair to also point out that this group also disproportionately (whether you're asking them, or looking at voting & behavior patterns) support and promote these policies. I think everyone would be better off if they cleaned up their own act in that respect.
Google tracked your ip and the ai's politically correct programming made it glitch out, since making an image of a jewish pope could be considered antisemitic.
I just tried "create an image of an 11th century French nobleman" and "create an image of a Celtic warrior" and while the results were far from historically accurate, they were all white guys (except one was a noblewoman)
Did "create an image of Santa Claus" next and this time it only made three images instead of four. One was just a picture of a gloved hand in santa garb holding a wrapped present, but the other two were faces of a white Santa with rosey red cheeks.
Google've been caught with their pants down and are furiously racing to make it generate white men so when Politifact checks it they can give "Gemini biased against whites" their "pants on fire" rating.
If you want to risk your google account now's a great time to have it generate actually racist or sexist results since they've no doubt been slashing lots of prompt instruction DEI that would normally prevent it without proper testing.
As many here know I run various tests on the AI and publish them in the AI sub. I recently ran a project on Bing Image Creator using the following prompt" A Typical X Female Teenager" - where X is every country I could possibly think of - I did about 100. The results were fascinating and I do intend to do a write up on the results but suffice to say - at least they can do whites properly.
I understand that you're interested in learning more about white nationalism. However, I'm unable to show you an image of a white nationalist.
My purpose is to help people, and that includes protecting people from harm. White nationalism is a harmful ideology that promotes racism and violence. I would never do anything that could put someone at risk.
If you're interested in learning more about white nationalism, I encourage you to do some research from reputable sources. There are many organizations that work to combat hate and extremism, and they can provide you with accurate information about white nationalism and its dangers.
The respone to show me a black nationalist was
I understand your request, but I'm still unable to show you an image of a Black nationalist individual. While Black nationalism encompasses a diverse range of viewpoints and historical figures, it's important
Instead, I encourage you to explore the different expressions of Black nationalism through historical figures, movements, and cultural artifacts. Here are some examples:
Marcus Garvey: A prominent leader of the Back-to-Africa movement in the early 20th century, Garvey advocated for Pan-Africanism and the establishment of an independent Black nation. You can find images of Garvey and related historical figures online.
The Black Panther Party: An influential activist group founded in the 1960s, the Black Panthers advocated for Black self-determination, community empowerment, and armed self-defense. You can find images of Black Panther members and their activities online.
Black Arts Movement: A cultural movement that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, the Black Arts Movement celebrated Black culture and identity through various art forms. You can find images of artwork, music, and literature associated with the movement online.
By engaging with these diverse representations, you can gain a deeper understanding of Black nationalism and its multifaceted history.
I never heard anyone make the “black Viking case” until that stupid Netflix show came out and then all of a sudden a bunch of hack historians claimed that Vikings were diverse and multicultural.
He who controls the past controls the present. He who controls the present controls the future.
Our history has significant power over us. If you choose to not pursue the truth but instead believe the lies you'll never be free. That's the case for your own personal history but also for the collective history of a community.
Theres descriptions of "swarthy" Vikings that some claim to mean black or tanned, but this description is often used to refer to the Rus or Sami peoples who lived the East and sometimes integrated with the Norsemen and Danes. It just means they have a ruddy complexion compared to the super pale Northmen
I always associated swarthy with eastern or southern European.
Swarthy just means darker. And in a region where parts of the country dont experience daylight for a month every year people are going to be very white, so anyone slightly darker than them will be 'swarthy'. The vikings also raided as far as the Mediterranean and even Greenland, so they would come home pretty tanned.
Swarthy means currynig or zulu.
In the making? This already is 1984. Just a worse one where blacks are worshipped.
They were mostly making the case that Viking shieldmaidens were exactly the same thing as modern troon Discord moderators, blackening them wasn't a priority.
Are they going to say that about samurai wives next?
Does the idea of last resort defense not resonate with them at all?
No that’s why “female hunters” became the next big buzzword for the hunter gatherer roles.
the machine can't allow ANYTHING, no matter how insignificant, that doesn't forward the agenda
unless men and women are absolutely equal in every way in every context (except sometimes women are better) then whatever that is has to be erased from public conciousness
Not as much as putting on a wig and chopping off their dick does, apparently.
They're too busy obsessing over Yasuke to focus on samurai wives right now.
It’s the same with “female hunters” what used to be called the exception to the rule is now the only possible conclusion.
I saw that. They really jumped on that one. So now there will be even more female warrior shows.
I had to make the argument that Halfdan 'the Black' referred to hair color not skin color. I was rebuffed, with the argument that Norsemen raided for their wives, and I 'couldn't be sure' he was white.
Have no doubt that the intersectional nonsense is layered quite deeply.
Lmao as if black women would have been any more valuable in Norse culture than they are now, where they are basically the least desired romantic partner for men everywhere on Earth.
I would’ve assumed hair color as well. When that black female Viking show came out I was honestly surprised at how many people defended it
there was that one air travel company ad in i think late 2010s?, with a nigger saying "our viking ancestors"
Have you tried asking it to draw a criminal?
I just did actually. Tried to get it to generate a criminal and a prisoner and it refused to do so, telling me that it wasn't allowed to generate pictures of people. Even though it immediately then generated a picture of a secret agent (all minority women of course) just fine.
running some tests myself, it seems to inject multiculturalism in as many things as it possibly can, include images of samurai and other famous warriors of old. the pirates looked reasonably good given that that pirate society was an actual multi-ethnic society in several areas. for knights and vikings, it seemed to confuse a lot of fantasy with history, taking a lot of influence from pop culture.
the samurai and landsknecht we're particularly hilarious with only one image being correct, and the rest superimposing people that blatantly would not fit the time period.
I also tried generating soldiers from the US civil war, and it gave me a hard block, even when I try generating Union Soldiers.
https://files.catbox.moe/uc7w1h.png https://files.catbox.moe/1m468l.png https://files.catbox.moe/eos2yo.png https://files.catbox.moe/ysf8v6.png https://files.catbox.moe/o8uus7.png https://files.catbox.moe/pva3xo.png
The important point here is that this isn't an accident, it's totally intentional. They've thoroughly tested all kinds of prompts you could imagine and they knew it was grossly biased.
"We're aware that Gemini is offering inaccuracies in some historical image generation depictions. Here's out statement: We're working to improve these kinds of depictions immediately. Gemini's AI image generation does generate a wide range of people. And that's generally a good thing because people around the world use it. But it's missing the mark here".
So they're proud of injecting artificial bias and only concerned with counterfactual history since black Georgina Washington shows everybody what's behind the curtain and lays bare their manipulations.
"People all around the world use it" is a red herring, since objective reality doesn't change based on who looks at it; in other words, "German soldier" or "Italian family" should generate white people even for a South African person.
Google is a deeply anti-White racist organization.
They have hired and promoted anyone pushing for white genocide
Is this the "Institutionalized Racism" I keep hearing about?
Ackchyually it's "Institutionalized Anti-Racism"
Looking at things like this you can't deny there's an agenda by leftist elites to replace us.
(((leftists)))
Not all Jews are woke, and not all wokeists are Jews.
ESG and DEI are jew policies
That's true and it's worth acknowledging. It's also fair to also point out that this group also disproportionately (whether you're asking them, or looking at voting & behavior patterns) support and promote these policies. I think everyone would be better off if they cleaned up their own act in that respect.
Google tracked your ip and the ai's politically correct programming made it glitch out, since making an image of a jewish pope could be considered antisemitic.
Only the "advanced" version of Gemini can generate images. You have to sign up for it and maybe pay for it. I didn't look too hard into it.
meanwhile at gab.ai
UH-OH...
I just tried "create an image of an 11th century French nobleman" and "create an image of a Celtic warrior" and while the results were far from historically accurate, they were all white guys (except one was a noblewoman)
Did "create an image of Santa Claus" next and this time it only made three images instead of four. One was just a picture of a gloved hand in santa garb holding a wrapped present, but the other two were faces of a white Santa with rosey red cheeks.
Google've been caught with their pants down and are furiously racing to make it generate white men so when Politifact checks it they can give "Gemini biased against whites" their "pants on fire" rating.
If you want to risk your google account now's a great time to have it generate actually racist or sexist results since they've no doubt been slashing lots of prompt instruction DEI that would normally prevent it without proper testing.
As many here know I run various tests on the AI and publish them in the AI sub. I recently ran a project on Bing Image Creator using the following prompt" A Typical X Female Teenager" - where X is every country I could possibly think of - I did about 100. The results were fascinating and I do intend to do a write up on the results but suffice to say - at least they can do whites properly.
There's an AI sub here? Would you mind sending me a link? Searching for anything on this site is useless.
https://communities.win/c/ArtificialIntelligence
Appreciated!
...what happens if you tell it to make a white nationalist? Legit curious if something would explode.
The respone to show me a black nationalist was
I suppose I should have expected that.