It's realistic. Blacks are always committing crimes. They deserve to be treated with suspicion. If blacks want better they should police themselves better. Instead they would rather maintain a narrative that this treatment is unwarranted.
Not realistic at all, every employee wouldn’t give a shit since they don’t get paid enough and carrying a concealed weapon in a movie theater is banned in like 90% of places and even if he did draw it all he would do is damn his family for years as NBC and CNN drags his body into the streets labeling him a “racist bigot”.
What WOULD be realistic is if the black guy was wearing thug attire, blasting incomprehensible Ebonics, and then got pissed and threatened to beat the white woman over the counter.
As someone who has to model and apply foundational STEM concepts onto to real world applications. Nah it ain't, unfortunately. It gets so many layers deep if you want the fully precise truth.
But the scripts vapid celebrities and their sycophant writers come up with? They sure as hell are. Any attempt to justify them longer than a couple of sentences only deserves distain and a "It ain't that deep bro'."
When they asked people how many unarmed black people they thought were gunned down by police in America every year, the numbers were staggering. 10k, 100k, and up. That year it was something like 7-13.
You’re statistically more likely to get stuck by lightning and die than to be a black unarmed citizen who gets shot and killed by police. Thats an actual fact
I get that it's easy for this to be considered overblown and purposefully provocative but, in all reality this type of thing happens to people all the time.
In this case it's happening to a black guy who looks like he's out on a date. Shitty thing to happen and shouldn't be the case - I think we're all down with that.
The scab that is being picked here though is that the whole George Floyd thing started with a teller contacting the police because he paid for this purchase with a bill above his apparent pay grade.
Pushing the black care instead of the white trailer trash card might be popular at the moment, but biases based on prejudices are a thing and should be brought up when they are unjust.
That said, some prejudices keep you alive - so it's not free passes for not grooming* a little when you can.
*Washing, shaving, keeping yourself kempt - not the tranny stuff.
I can say the whole rigamarole shown in the clip isn't even a uniquely race thing.
I've seen plenty of my white trash friends and relatives go through similar "passive aggressive trying to get rid of you." Its a class thing, with the general assumption being that the poor and/or less sophisticated will bring trouble and aren't even worth associating with, but you can't outright tell them to leave without creating a scene. The problem of course being, every black person looks poor and/or like they will bring trouble so it is a much more common thing on their end.
I don't even blame the people for doing it, because most of the time they have good reason to do so and not a lot of reasons not to prevent the risk.
Theatre does tend to exaggerate themes to get the idea across to idiots - it's par for the course - and so you are right that it is a heavily implied reality moreso than what is normally observed.
The justification for this is that if it goes too far then the compromise will be more in line with what was originally intended to be the goal.
It's garish, trite and more than a little condescending to many but that's not who their intended audience to educate is.
Now that ^ is what the next question should be as it is shitting on the great work done by civil rights activists in the 1950's by presuming that people are as ignorant as they were then.
A modern racist isn't being so from a lack of understanding or empathy A modern racist is being so on purpose - and that goes regardless of the colour of your skin.
The scab that is being picked here though is that the whole George Floyd thing started with a teller contacting the police because he paid for this purchase with a bill above his apparent pay grade.
And the teller pointed them at a convicted armed robber in the middle of a drug deal. How can you argue that George Floyd was the victim of racial profiling without making it evidence that racial profiling works?
Nobody gets called out for being black, you DO get called out for being black and SUSPICIOUS though. You’d think this would make the black community act more carefully and culturally competent but instead they think everyone else is the problem and that they should embrace thug culture as a counter movement. Meanwhile any actual competent black people get called “uncle Toms” for wanting their race to not be seen as violent animals.
How can you argue that George Floyd was the victim of racial profiling without making it evidence that racial profiling works?
George Floyd was a scumbag. But, according to the teller, he didn't know who George was and so profiled him on the twenty (A dodgy looking note) and his manager's say so.
Profiling is human nature and is often right. In the US it is racial profiling that is the focus of the advert and that is what they are trying to bring into the front and centre of discussion.
Of course their teller was white, because they've got their own racist agenda to push while trying to say that racial profiling is wrong - it's all bullshit.
He knew who Floyd was insomuch as he knew he was the guy who just tried to pay with a counterfeit bill. That alone is perfectly valid grounds for calling the cops, you don't have to call it "profiling"?
I'm trying to illustrate that George Floyd being black wasn't his problem. It was that people knew he was a bad guy and took appropriate steps.
The video at the top is trying to suggest that it's the black thing when it isn't.
Sometimes people get profiled wrongly, for whatever reason. To mirror the physical currency being rejected as a means of bringing up racism is a dick move by those who produced it.
I have never seen or even heard of shit like this happening anywhere. Left wingers, a cult centers on hatred, has to fabricate an alternative reality where they can have something to hate, to fuel their vile dogma.
Cashiers typically get minimum wage. If you’re at a nice place, maybe marginally more. Unless it’s a family shop, they really don’t care if you did pay with counterfeit money or a stolen credit card, outside of it having been so obvious they’d get fired.
I really hate the entire idea that we are supposed to take Dong Lover seriously as a person.
He is a skinny little nerd, who grew a beard to try and hide it. Nothing about him is ghetto or even black (culturally or spiritually). He literally just wrote rap music and everyone just let him go from dumb geek to "voice of the negros."
About 20 years ago in Tucson, I was going to a dive bar with my wife and there was a door man checking IDs. He was a normal looking white guy and my wife and I were normal looking white people. We were pretty obviously over 21.
He looks at my driver license and says the photo doesn't look like me so I have to sign my name in a log book (the photo did look like me). Whatever. I just scribble on the line some gobbledygook. He says that doesn't match the signature on the license so I have to do it again. Like I'm going to give some faggot little door man my real signature.
I tell him to fuck off and we leave and go somewhere else.
Looks like I fucked up and should have cried about it or something.
I love how people try to defend the idea making up stories and being ambiguous about their fictionality, because the guy with a literal fraud conviction is teaching important moral lessons.
Maybe he should go to an all blacks theater, not that it would make much of a difference since the thing they're lamenting here is basically pattern recognition. I can imagine this scenario if you were clearly on crack, wearing some gaudy monkey attire, grabbing your crotch and screeching in bixnoodian eboniacs - even then it'd be 1 out of maybe 100 that (rightfully) get cockblocked.
"ReEeeEeEE it's satire why are you getting so triggered over it reeeeeee!"
The implication by even making something like this is that there are grains of truth to it. That is what is supposed to make it funny. Whatever supposed grains of truth exist to justify this exist purely within the heads of crazy leftists.
People usually forget black people usually live in black areas. The cops they deal with, the cashiers that take their fake money, their shitty teachers making them fail the SATs, and the people stealing their bikes are mostly black, just like they are.
It's not just racial shit, on youtube shorts I've noticed a huge number of clips from shows where there's completely unreasonable people persecuting someone and the protagonist does some totally cool suave move that you would totally do if it was you in that situation. It's like it was all written by someone in the shower after they lost an argument. There must be tons of people addicted to this instant amygdala stimulation.
It feeds into my greater rage addiction theory - when you see something like this it makes you angry and stimulates your nervous system to prepare you for conflict. This stimulant effect is something that you can become addicted to.
My theory on why they love it so is less about biochemical addiction and more on it being an unmet need psychological.
The most exploitative parts of modern societies/governments are about subtly fucking over the general population in a myriad of small and slow ways that aren't initially obvious to average normies and leave no recourse for fighting back by the time a midwit would realize what has happened. They constantly just have this vague feeling of injustice and desire for conflict, and they waste all that motivation on the first embarrassingly half-baked strawman presented to them, instead of having the mental fortitude to hold on to it and think about how to get back at whoever is actually fucking them over.
It's realistic. Blacks are always committing crimes. They deserve to be treated with suspicion. If blacks want better they should police themselves better. Instead they would rather maintain a narrative that this treatment is unwarranted.
It's warranted.
Not realistic at all, every employee wouldn’t give a shit since they don’t get paid enough and carrying a concealed weapon in a movie theater is banned in like 90% of places and even if he did draw it all he would do is damn his family for years as NBC and CNN drags his body into the streets labeling him a “racist bigot”.
What WOULD be realistic is if the black guy was wearing thug attire, blasting incomprehensible Ebonics, and then got pissed and threatened to beat the white woman over the counter.
Every time a liberal uses that many words, you can be sure they don't even understand it.
It's just a collection of big words that is supposed to quantify an emotional reaction to something into empirical data... and it never will be.
The truth is almost always simple. Lies require complex explanations.
Remember to apply this principle when scrutinizing some of the more verbose posters here.
Giz and Lethn on suicide watch.
As someone who has to model and apply foundational STEM concepts onto to real world applications. Nah it ain't, unfortunately. It gets so many layers deep if you want the fully precise truth.
But the scripts vapid celebrities and their sycophant writers come up with? They sure as hell are. Any attempt to justify them longer than a couple of sentences only deserves distain and a "It ain't that deep bro'."
Ask them what percentage of black people make up the US population and you'll find out if they're living in reality or no.
I'd bet good money the people posting would startling rattling off the number of 30% or higher.
When they asked people how many unarmed black people they thought were gunned down by police in America every year, the numbers were staggering. 10k, 100k, and up. That year it was something like 7-13.
You’re statistically more likely to get stuck by lightning and die than to be a black unarmed citizen who gets shot and killed by police. Thats an actual fact
I get that it's easy for this to be considered overblown and purposefully provocative but, in all reality this type of thing happens to people all the time.
In this case it's happening to a black guy who looks like he's out on a date. Shitty thing to happen and shouldn't be the case - I think we're all down with that.
The scab that is being picked here though is that the whole George Floyd thing started with a teller contacting the police because he paid for this purchase with a bill above his apparent pay grade.
Regardless of where you are on the Derek Chauvin handling of the situation, where the bill came from and the young black clerk who had to report it to the police show that it's a problem that's endemic in the US.
Pushing the black care instead of the white trailer trash card might be popular at the moment, but biases based on prejudices are a thing and should be brought up when they are unjust.
That said, some prejudices keep you alive - so it's not free passes for not grooming* a little when you can.
*Washing, shaving, keeping yourself kempt - not the tranny stuff.
I can say the whole rigamarole shown in the clip isn't even a uniquely race thing.
I've seen plenty of my white trash friends and relatives go through similar "passive aggressive trying to get rid of you." Its a class thing, with the general assumption being that the poor and/or less sophisticated will bring trouble and aren't even worth associating with, but you can't outright tell them to leave without creating a scene. The problem of course being, every black person looks poor and/or like they will bring trouble so it is a much more common thing on their end.
I don't even blame the people for doing it, because most of the time they have good reason to do so and not a lot of reasons not to prevent the risk.
Theatre does tend to exaggerate themes to get the idea across to idiots - it's par for the course - and so you are right that it is a heavily implied reality moreso than what is normally observed.
The justification for this is that if it goes too far then the compromise will be more in line with what was originally intended to be the goal.
It's garish, trite and more than a little condescending to many but that's not who their intended audience to educate is.
Now that ^ is what the next question should be as it is shitting on the great work done by civil rights activists in the 1950's by presuming that people are as ignorant as they were then.
A modern racist isn't being so from a lack of understanding or empathy A modern racist is being so on purpose - and that goes regardless of the colour of your skin.
And the teller pointed them at a convicted armed robber in the middle of a drug deal. How can you argue that George Floyd was the victim of racial profiling without making it evidence that racial profiling works?
Nobody gets called out for being black, you DO get called out for being black and SUSPICIOUS though. You’d think this would make the black community act more carefully and culturally competent but instead they think everyone else is the problem and that they should embrace thug culture as a counter movement. Meanwhile any actual competent black people get called “uncle Toms” for wanting their race to not be seen as violent animals.
George Floyd was a scumbag. But, according to the teller, he didn't know who George was and so profiled him on the twenty (A dodgy looking note) and his manager's say so.
Profiling is human nature and is often right. In the US it is racial profiling that is the focus of the advert and that is what they are trying to bring into the front and centre of discussion.
Of course their teller was white, because they've got their own racist agenda to push while trying to say that racial profiling is wrong - it's all bullshit.
He knew who Floyd was insomuch as he knew he was the guy who just tried to pay with a counterfeit bill. That alone is perfectly valid grounds for calling the cops, you don't have to call it "profiling"?
I'm trying to illustrate that George Floyd being black wasn't his problem. It was that people knew he was a bad guy and took appropriate steps.
The video at the top is trying to suggest that it's the black thing when it isn't.
Sometimes people get profiled wrongly, for whatever reason. To mirror the physical currency being rejected as a means of bringing up racism is a dick move by those who produced it.
George Floyd tried to pay with xerox'd money lol
Blood libel.
They're so thirsty for their non-existent oppression that it's basically a fetish, replete with bizarre, twisted fantasies.
I'm like 75% sure DG jerked off to this script before filming. And the other 25% is only because of erectile dysfunction.
Guess they didn't want anyone talking during the movie.
I have never seen or even heard of shit like this happening anywhere. Left wingers, a cult centers on hatred, has to fabricate an alternative reality where they can have something to hate, to fuel their vile dogma.
Cashiers typically get minimum wage. If you’re at a nice place, maybe marginally more. Unless it’s a family shop, they really don’t care if you did pay with counterfeit money or a stolen credit card, outside of it having been so obvious they’d get fired.
A lot of places would care though, but only when counterfeit bills cost them a lot of money in business.
You know, like liquor stores and gas stations. And typically the people paying in counterfeit bills have similar melanin levels
I really hate the entire idea that we are supposed to take Dong Lover seriously as a person.
He is a skinny little nerd, who grew a beard to try and hide it. Nothing about him is ghetto or even black (culturally or spiritually). He literally just wrote rap music and everyone just let him go from dumb geek to "voice of the negros."
Bro was irl urkel and was mad about it
My own stupid anecdote:
About 20 years ago in Tucson, I was going to a dive bar with my wife and there was a door man checking IDs. He was a normal looking white guy and my wife and I were normal looking white people. We were pretty obviously over 21.
He looks at my driver license and says the photo doesn't look like me so I have to sign my name in a log book (the photo did look like me). Whatever. I just scribble on the line some gobbledygook. He says that doesn't match the signature on the license so I have to do it again. Like I'm going to give some faggot little door man my real signature.
I tell him to fuck off and we leave and go somewhere else.
Looks like I fucked up and should have cried about it or something.
Dhar Mann youtube channel does this all the time. Makes up fake scenarios and the leftists that watch it comment on it as if it happened for real.
I love how people try to defend the idea making up stories and being ambiguous about their fictionality, because the guy with a literal fraud conviction is teaching important moral lessons.
Maybe he should go to an all blacks theater, not that it would make much of a difference since the thing they're lamenting here is basically pattern recognition. I can imagine this scenario if you were clearly on crack, wearing some gaudy monkey attire, grabbing your crotch and screeching in bixnoodian eboniacs - even then it'd be 1 out of maybe 100 that (rightfully) get cockblocked.
"ReEeeEeEE it's satire why are you getting so triggered over it reeeeeee!"
The implication by even making something like this is that there are grains of truth to it. That is what is supposed to make it funny. Whatever supposed grains of truth exist to justify this exist purely within the heads of crazy leftists.
what is this even from?
"Atlanta," apparently?
Atlanta is majority black, 60%+ so it casts even more doubt over his bullshit.
People usually forget black people usually live in black areas. The cops they deal with, the cashiers that take their fake money, their shitty teachers making them fail the SATs, and the people stealing their bikes are mostly black, just like they are.
It's not just racial shit, on youtube shorts I've noticed a huge number of clips from shows where there's completely unreasonable people persecuting someone and the protagonist does some totally cool suave move that you would totally do if it was you in that situation. It's like it was all written by someone in the shower after they lost an argument. There must be tons of people addicted to this instant amygdala stimulation.
It feeds into my greater rage addiction theory - when you see something like this it makes you angry and stimulates your nervous system to prepare you for conflict. This stimulant effect is something that you can become addicted to.
My theory on why they love it so is less about biochemical addiction and more on it being an unmet need psychological.
The most exploitative parts of modern societies/governments are about subtly fucking over the general population in a myriad of small and slow ways that aren't initially obvious to average normies and leave no recourse for fighting back by the time a midwit would realize what has happened. They constantly just have this vague feeling of injustice and desire for conflict, and they waste all that motivation on the first embarrassingly half-baked strawman presented to them, instead of having the mental fortitude to hold on to it and think about how to get back at whoever is actually fucking them over.
It's a complete fantasy. It's so unrealistic to anyone who goes out and has life experience. You have to be an ideologue to believe this
The demand for racism exceeds the supply?