They're having trouble finding wealthy enough marks thanks to the job market they rigged. They're not going to tolerate the existence of a beta, not even temporarily, unless the divorce rape they're planning will be lucrative enough. There's only so much wealth they can steal from a guy their policies condemned to a $15/hr Walmart job, and it's not worth it to them.
From a certain standpoint, I guess they're playing the same kind of approach that some guys have been doing on dating sites, social media, and IRL for ages: Keep hitting on women, no matter how shitty their approach is, because eventually someone somewhere does actually say yes.
Oh I agree. While the scenarios are similar, the level of potential exploitation and risk is not exactly so balanced. Mostly it occurred to me how strikingly similar the RNG-jackpot mentality was in both behaviors.
First of all...have more children than you can afford?
The party of fiscal responsibility, sacrificing their main principle of the altar of gynocentrism in the hope of finding naive kids to wife up the TERF rats that have crawled out of the feminist sewer to join us.
It's sickening when you realize what's actually going on here. I had a lot more typed but Rule 16...
It's sickening when you realize what's actually going on here.
The GOP is a shit party with nothing to run on so they are spouting pro-family platitudes to try to appeal to normal people. You, being very abnormal, are having a meltdown over their milquetoast messaging.
Hiring and immigration would eventually require them to explicitly stand up for the White people who vote for their sorry asses. Their Zionist donors are going to find that off-putting.
They could maybe work on gender bias in schools but that's too much work for them.
They do sometimes talk about something of these things, but if they go too hard, they risk creating the impression they will actually do something. That can be costly when they inevitably fail to deliver because they don't care. It's much safer to spout vague, milquetoast pro-family stuff. It doesn't create any real expectations and only risks alienating weirdos like you who are tiny in number.
Can you talk about anything without invoking Jews?
The reason why immigration is such an issue is because someone has to fund Social Security in the future, and birth rates keep falling because men are avoiding women (correctly).
Can you talk about anything without invoking women - aside from the break you take to peddle Jewish Nationalism and #Believe(Jewish)Women?
War, immigration, and hiring are all issues crawling with Jewish influence. /shrug
The reason why immigration is such an issue is because someone has to fund Social Security in the future, and birth rates keep falling because men are avoiding women (correctly).
Imagine believing this bullshit. Immigration is costing us money, you fucking idiot. They could just spend the money earmarked for things like their housing on Social Security if they wanted to.
That's too funny considering Dom treats you with kid gloves compared to me. R16 is the "Jew rule." The only reason Dom begrudgingly moderates you for it is to maintain the false pretense that it's identity neutral.
You're believing in a lie that ceases to exist the second we elect our own Javier Milei. Which will happen when things get bad enough. Social security will not last forever. No government policy in history ever has because no government has. Everything has its time and dies.
I quit paying much attention to the "manosphere" years ago, but most of it looks like an op, aside from people who focus on legal action and policy reforms.
I remember there was a big push for Title IX changes that Betsy DeVos eventually implemented under Trump. Biden immediately undid them, and I don't see much push back against it anymore.
Instead, the "manosphere" seems focused on DoA meme "policy changes" like "Repeal the 19th." Gone are the lucid (and non-partisan) arguments that were used in the lead up to Trump. What happened? Am I just missing something?
It doesn't even look like much of anything to do with men's rights at all. It's garbage like the Whatever podcast (social media dumpster diving for clicks) and botted YouTube videos about "rejecting modernity and returning to tradition" (where tradition is being roided-out mutant).
I'm also convinced that these dating and lifestyle podcasts operated by Muslims are a glowie op because it's part of the same tactic of ideologies trying to manipulate young men
Did you know what Islam teaches you should do with men women don't want? They should be a sacrifice for Islam, and spill their blood for "Palestine".
Courting TERFism will go down as the GOP's worst electoral mistake.
A mostly male-supported party taking a feminist stance, that caused the whole platform to lurch that way.
And if you want to win with no principles, that might work...if you weren't also anti-abortion!
I have a lot of interactions with TERFs. I archive some. If you prod them enough, they will say something about supporting reducing the male population.
TERFs will blow up in a big way, on whoever has them on their side.
Either the Solanas origin of all this gets exposed and feminism's victim act collapses and the people who supported them get burned or they coup the party in 2028 and turn it into a feminist husk that can't win anything.
There's no good ending where you defeat the trans ideology by shilling the people who caused it.
Their problem is that they forgot to ask if anyone really gives much of a shit. They could easily feature this and not lose support, but as we discussed above, they don't have much in the way of deliverable promises. It's a lot like the pro-family rhetoric you are salty about. It's just something normal people agree with so they are featuring it heavily.
Yeah without doing something about divorce laws and bring back fault there no chance. Even if you have a good job an entitled/bored women can ruin that any time she wants, then she gets the house you will have to pay for and you can also pay rent to not live on the streets or in your car.
Anyone else finding downvotes to simply not be sticking in this thread? "Strangely" you can upvote every comment as many times as you like but trying the same with downvotes removes them after a few moments.
Is this some kind of throttle Dom or the site has put in place under the expectation nobody can read more than 3 words a minute and therefore can't downvote more than 1 retarded take every hour?
Imp, this isn't even aimed at you, so sit the fuck down before you sperg out about those downvotes you always claim to not give a shit about.
Imp is back and Dom is MIA as usual these days so moderation gets put on automatic.
I actually offered to help moderate some of the smaller issues a year or so ago but after the series of shitshows that have happened here with actual porn spam, ban evasions, shills, and other shit I wouldn't even take the task if compensated for it.
18yo, virgin, healthy BMI score, feminine, does what her husband tells her to do.
Alright, start finding these women and setting them up with the men. Wait, these women are getting flown to Dubai to suck dick in exchange for expensive parties.
For those of you who are anti family and are dead set against taking responsibility for having children, what is your alternative?
LDAR? Vidya and porn until your dick stops working due to old age then rope? Be gay?
If you are dedicated to some other higher calling that is fine, the people who say "have a family" aren't talking to you. But to the vast majority of men the effort and expense of a family will be their contribution to civilization.
I get "well I'm doing things X, Y, and Z to both prepare myself and to find the right girl, but I haven't found her yet." However outright rejection of the notion of a family because "its hard" and "sometimes it goes bad" and "I don't feel like it" is just a childish cry of "I didn't ask to be born!" when your parents tell you to take out the trash.
It is weird how everyone thinks young men are magical. Are you all going to help them get these wives, like was done in ye olden times?
Oh, there's no shortage of "former" feminists looking for a naive mark.
Those marriages won't last past whenever the time/earnings curve peaks, but society will gaslight those men into thinking they did something wrong.
They're having trouble finding wealthy enough marks thanks to the job market they rigged. They're not going to tolerate the existence of a beta, not even temporarily, unless the divorce rape they're planning will be lucrative enough. There's only so much wealth they can steal from a guy their policies condemned to a $15/hr Walmart job, and it's not worth it to them.
From a certain standpoint, I guess they're playing the same kind of approach that some guys have been doing on dating sites, social media, and IRL for ages: Keep hitting on women, no matter how shitty their approach is, because eventually someone somewhere does actually say yes.
It's just the GOP engaging in pro-family platitudes bro. It's not that deep.
Oh I agree. While the scenarios are similar, the level of potential exploitation and risk is not exactly so balanced. Mostly it occurred to me how strikingly similar the RNG-jackpot mentality was in both behaviors.
Oh, don't get me started on fucking KPIs.
I could give a rant about that, that would break Rule 16 so much I'd be banned for life.
Stop bullying and lecturing young men and Start. Holding. Women. Accountable. For. Their. Behavior. You miserable, simping, closeted homosexuals.
Women are responsible for 70%+ of all divorces.
If we want to make marriages more suitable for kids then stop financially rewarding women for divorce.
make prenups standard
put more men in family courts
put cameras in family court
end alimony- you don’t deserve anything “because i was used to it”
End no-fault divorce too!! Investigate whores.
Fucker has one daughter.
Ah, another hypocrite who's quite happy to put the futures of others against the wall.
First of all...have more children than you can afford?
The party of fiscal responsibility, sacrificing their main principle of the altar of gynocentrism in the hope of finding naive kids to wife up the TERF rats that have crawled out of the feminist sewer to join us.
It's sickening when you realize what's actually going on here. I had a lot more typed but Rule 16...
jameson.webm
The GOP is a shit party with nothing to run on so they are spouting pro-family platitudes to try to appeal to normal people. You, being very abnormal, are having a meltdown over their milquetoast messaging.
Opposing obvious hiring discrimination (The majority of new hires in 2022 were Ukrainian women!)
Immigration (but not as a fucking racial agenda, as a law and order agenda)
Anti-war policy
Fix gender bias in the schools
Rebuilding higher education now that everyone at the top has been exposed as a Nazi wannabe.
There, I gave them a platform that would win.
Hiring and immigration would eventually require them to explicitly stand up for the White people who vote for their sorry asses. Their Zionist donors are going to find that off-putting.
Anti-war and immigration are also things the Zionist lobby doesn't want.
They could maybe work on gender bias in schools but that's too much work for them.
They do sometimes talk about something of these things, but if they go too hard, they risk creating the impression they will actually do something. That can be costly when they inevitably fail to deliver because they don't care. It's much safer to spout vague, milquetoast pro-family stuff. It doesn't create any real expectations and only risks alienating weirdos like you who are tiny in number.
Can you talk about anything without invoking Jews?
The reason why immigration is such an issue is because someone has to fund Social Security in the future, and birth rates keep falling because men are avoiding women (correctly).
Can you talk about anything without invoking women - aside from the break you take to peddle Jewish Nationalism and #Believe(Jewish)Women?
War, immigration, and hiring are all issues crawling with Jewish influence. /shrug
Imagine believing this bullshit. Immigration is costing us money, you fucking idiot. They could just spend the money earmarked for things like their housing on Social Security if they wanted to.
It's so hard to debate without breaking Rule 16. I feel neutered.
That's too funny considering Dom treats you with kid gloves compared to me. R16 is the "Jew rule." The only reason Dom begrudgingly moderates you for it is to maintain the false pretense that it's identity neutral.
That's absolutely correct, that's why you have Twitter and c/feminism to post all you want unoposed
No they don't.
You're believing in a lie that ceases to exist the second we elect our own Javier Milei. Which will happen when things get bad enough. Social security will not last forever. No government policy in history ever has because no government has. Everything has its time and dies.
Imp, the most PC woman hater evah
I quit paying much attention to the "manosphere" years ago, but most of it looks like an op, aside from people who focus on legal action and policy reforms.
I remember there was a big push for Title IX changes that Betsy DeVos eventually implemented under Trump. Biden immediately undid them, and I don't see much push back against it anymore.
Instead, the "manosphere" seems focused on DoA meme "policy changes" like "Repeal the 19th." Gone are the lucid (and non-partisan) arguments that were used in the lead up to Trump. What happened? Am I just missing something?
You're right.
The MRA movement got taken over by obvious plants.
It doesn't even look like much of anything to do with men's rights at all. It's garbage like the Whatever podcast (social media dumpster diving for clicks) and botted YouTube videos about "rejecting modernity and returning to tradition" (where tradition is being roided-out mutant).
Is that the one they invite porn stars on to show how dumb they are? I'm curious if it's the general "profession" or just the people they select.
I mean, steroids are probably less damaging to your health than marriage.
Did you know what Islam teaches you should do with men women don't want? They should be a sacrifice for Islam, and spill their blood for "Palestine".
You're a Zionist. You want men to spill blood and sink money into the other side of that cause.
Courting TERFism will go down as the GOP's worst electoral mistake.
A mostly male-supported party taking a feminist stance, that caused the whole platform to lurch that way.
And if you want to win with no principles, that might work...if you weren't also anti-abortion!
I have a lot of interactions with TERFs. I archive some. If you prod them enough, they will say something about supporting reducing the male population.
TERFs will blow up in a big way, on whoever has them on their side.
Either the Solanas origin of all this gets exposed and feminism's victim act collapses and the people who supported them get burned or they coup the party in 2028 and turn it into a feminist husk that can't win anything.
There's no good ending where you defeat the trans ideology by shilling the people who caused it.
Republicans have chosen the popular and even trending side on the "trannies in sports" question. https://news.gallup.com/poll/507023/say-birth-gender-dictate-sports-participation.aspx
Their problem is that they forgot to ask if anyone really gives much of a shit. They could easily feature this and not lose support, but as we discussed above, they don't have much in the way of deliverable promises. It's a lot like the pro-family rhetoric you are salty about. It's just something normal people agree with so they are featuring it heavily.
Because they omitted the actual popular option - stop wasting people's money on women's sports!
The people most rabid about this issue are also pro-abortion. It's a vote losing issue.
Not because of what it is, but what it signals to people.
Pro-abortion zealots are far more animated over abortion.
They're the same people. You just notice them more because you're on the receiving end.
Are you saying you are worried about the GOP alienating pro-abortion people?
Fuck off you anti-natalist shill.
Fuck off, women's shill. Even with my reputation, this stays a popular opinion.
Only way I'd consider marriage is under two unnegotiatable conditions:
All legal status of marriage back to pre 1800 conditions so they are more patriarchal
Woman in question not a bitch
I might be able to find the later without her being a jekyll/Hyde but that first one is impossible in the West.
Yeah without doing something about divorce laws and bring back fault there no chance. Even if you have a good job an entitled/bored women can ruin that any time she wants, then she gets the house you will have to pay for and you can also pay rent to not live on the streets or in your car.
Anyone else finding downvotes to simply not be sticking in this thread? "Strangely" you can upvote every comment as many times as you like but trying the same with downvotes removes them after a few moments.
Is this some kind of throttle Dom or the site has put in place under the expectation nobody can read more than 3 words a minute and therefore can't downvote more than 1 retarded take every hour?
Imp, this isn't even aimed at you, so sit the fuck down before you sperg out about those downvotes you always claim to not give a shit about.
Imp is back and Dom is MIA as usual these days so moderation gets put on automatic.
I actually offered to help moderate some of the smaller issues a year or so ago but after the series of shitshows that have happened here with actual porn spam, ban evasions, shills, and other shit I wouldn't even take the task if compensated for it.
Dom made this mess, he can deal with it.
I've noticed that across the board for a while. It seems like a client-side code thing. I doubt the moderators have control over that.
18yo, virgin, healthy BMI score, feminine, does what her husband tells her to do.
Alright, start finding these women and setting them up with the men. Wait, these women are getting flown to Dubai to suck dick in exchange for expensive parties.
For those of you who are anti family and are dead set against taking responsibility for having children, what is your alternative?
LDAR? Vidya and porn until your dick stops working due to old age then rope? Be gay?
If you are dedicated to some other higher calling that is fine, the people who say "have a family" aren't talking to you. But to the vast majority of men the effort and expense of a family will be their contribution to civilization.
I get "well I'm doing things X, Y, and Z to both prepare myself and to find the right girl, but I haven't found her yet." However outright rejection of the notion of a family because "its hard" and "sometimes it goes bad" and "I don't feel like it" is just a childish cry of "I didn't ask to be born!" when your parents tell you to take out the trash.
A man who allows himself to become a decadent sack of atrophy, spitting on the sacrifices of his ancestors, deserves to be ashamed.
Do you think wanking and vidya is a "legitimate lifestyle choice?"
You spend all this time trying to tear me down but you still fail to present any alternative.
How are you expending your limited time on this earth that is more worthwhile than creating and molding the next generation?
did I exhaust your dialog tree?