First of all...have more children than you can afford?
The party of fiscal responsibility, sacrificing their main principle of the altar of gynocentrism in the hope of finding naive kids to wife up the TERF rats that have crawled out of the feminist sewer to join us.
It's sickening when you realize what's actually going on here. I had a lot more typed but Rule 16...
It's sickening when you realize what's actually going on here.
The GOP is a shit party with nothing to run on so they are spouting pro-family platitudes to try to appeal to normal people. You, being very abnormal, are having a meltdown over their milquetoast messaging.
Hiring and immigration would eventually require them to explicitly stand up for the White people who vote for their sorry asses. Their Zionist donors are going to find that off-putting.
They could maybe work on gender bias in schools but that's too much work for them.
They do sometimes talk about something of these things, but if they go too hard, they risk creating the impression they will actually do something. That can be costly when they inevitably fail to deliver because they don't care. It's much safer to spout vague, milquetoast pro-family stuff. It doesn't create any real expectations and only risks alienating weirdos like you who are tiny in number.
Can you talk about anything without invoking Jews?
The reason why immigration is such an issue is because someone has to fund Social Security in the future, and birth rates keep falling because men are avoiding women (correctly).
I quit paying much attention to the "manosphere" years ago, but most of it looks like an op, aside from people who focus on legal action and policy reforms.
I remember there was a big push for Title IX changes that Betsy DeVos eventually implemented under Trump. Biden immediately undid them, and I don't see much push back against it anymore.
Instead, the "manosphere" seems focused on DoA meme "policy changes" like "Repeal the 19th." Gone are the lucid (and non-partisan) arguments that were used in the lead up to Trump. What happened? Am I just missing something?
It doesn't even look like much of anything to do with men's rights at all. It's garbage like the Whatever podcast (social media dumpster diving for clicks) and botted YouTube videos about "rejecting modernity and returning to tradition" (where tradition is being roided-out mutant).
I'm also convinced that these dating and lifestyle podcasts operated by Muslims are a glowie op because it's part of the same tactic of ideologies trying to manipulate young men
Did you know what Islam teaches you should do with men women don't want? They should be a sacrifice for Islam, and spill their blood for "Palestine".
Courting TERFism will go down as the GOP's worst electoral mistake.
A mostly male-supported party taking a feminist stance, that caused the whole platform to lurch that way.
And if you want to win with no principles, that might work...if you weren't also anti-abortion!
I have a lot of interactions with TERFs. I archive some. If you prod them enough, they will say something about supporting reducing the male population.
TERFs will blow up in a big way, on whoever has them on their side.
Either the Solanas origin of all this gets exposed and feminism's victim act collapses and the people who supported them get burned or they coup the party in 2028 and turn it into a feminist husk that can't win anything.
There's no good ending where you defeat the trans ideology by shilling the people who caused it.
Their problem is that they forgot to ask if anyone really gives much of a shit. They could easily feature this and not lose support, but as we discussed above, they don't have much in the way of deliverable promises. It's a lot like the pro-family rhetoric you are salty about. It's just something normal people agree with so they are featuring it heavily.
First of all...have more children than you can afford?
The party of fiscal responsibility, sacrificing their main principle of the altar of gynocentrism in the hope of finding naive kids to wife up the TERF rats that have crawled out of the feminist sewer to join us.
It's sickening when you realize what's actually going on here. I had a lot more typed but Rule 16...
jameson.webm
The GOP is a shit party with nothing to run on so they are spouting pro-family platitudes to try to appeal to normal people. You, being very abnormal, are having a meltdown over their milquetoast messaging.
Opposing obvious hiring discrimination (The majority of new hires in 2022 were Ukrainian women!)
Immigration (but not as a fucking racial agenda, as a law and order agenda)
Anti-war policy
Fix gender bias in the schools
Rebuilding higher education now that everyone at the top has been exposed as a Nazi wannabe.
There, I gave them a platform that would win.
Hiring and immigration would eventually require them to explicitly stand up for the White people who vote for their sorry asses. Their Zionist donors are going to find that off-putting.
Anti-war and immigration are also things the Zionist lobby doesn't want.
They could maybe work on gender bias in schools but that's too much work for them.
They do sometimes talk about something of these things, but if they go too hard, they risk creating the impression they will actually do something. That can be costly when they inevitably fail to deliver because they don't care. It's much safer to spout vague, milquetoast pro-family stuff. It doesn't create any real expectations and only risks alienating weirdos like you who are tiny in number.
Can you talk about anything without invoking Jews?
The reason why immigration is such an issue is because someone has to fund Social Security in the future, and birth rates keep falling because men are avoiding women (correctly).
Imp, the most PC woman hater evah
I quit paying much attention to the "manosphere" years ago, but most of it looks like an op, aside from people who focus on legal action and policy reforms.
I remember there was a big push for Title IX changes that Betsy DeVos eventually implemented under Trump. Biden immediately undid them, and I don't see much push back against it anymore.
Instead, the "manosphere" seems focused on DoA meme "policy changes" like "Repeal the 19th." Gone are the lucid (and non-partisan) arguments that were used in the lead up to Trump. What happened? Am I just missing something?
You're right.
The MRA movement got taken over by obvious plants.
It doesn't even look like much of anything to do with men's rights at all. It's garbage like the Whatever podcast (social media dumpster diving for clicks) and botted YouTube videos about "rejecting modernity and returning to tradition" (where tradition is being roided-out mutant).
Did you know what Islam teaches you should do with men women don't want? They should be a sacrifice for Islam, and spill their blood for "Palestine".
You're a Zionist. You want men to spill blood and sink money into the other side of that cause.
Courting TERFism will go down as the GOP's worst electoral mistake.
A mostly male-supported party taking a feminist stance, that caused the whole platform to lurch that way.
And if you want to win with no principles, that might work...if you weren't also anti-abortion!
I have a lot of interactions with TERFs. I archive some. If you prod them enough, they will say something about supporting reducing the male population.
TERFs will blow up in a big way, on whoever has them on their side.
Either the Solanas origin of all this gets exposed and feminism's victim act collapses and the people who supported them get burned or they coup the party in 2028 and turn it into a feminist husk that can't win anything.
There's no good ending where you defeat the trans ideology by shilling the people who caused it.
Republicans have chosen the popular and even trending side on the "trannies in sports" question. https://news.gallup.com/poll/507023/say-birth-gender-dictate-sports-participation.aspx
Their problem is that they forgot to ask if anyone really gives much of a shit. They could easily feature this and not lose support, but as we discussed above, they don't have much in the way of deliverable promises. It's a lot like the pro-family rhetoric you are salty about. It's just something normal people agree with so they are featuring it heavily.
Because they omitted the actual popular option - stop wasting people's money on women's sports!
The people most rabid about this issue are also pro-abortion. It's a vote losing issue.
Not because of what it is, but what it signals to people.
Fuck off you anti-natalist shill.
Fuck off, women's shill. Even with my reputation, this stays a popular opinion.