Courting TERFism will go down as the GOP's worst electoral mistake.
A mostly male-supported party taking a feminist stance, that caused the whole platform to lurch that way.
And if you want to win with no principles, that might work...if you weren't also anti-abortion!
I have a lot of interactions with TERFs. I archive some. If you prod them enough, they will say something about supporting reducing the male population.
TERFs will blow up in a big way, on whoever has them on their side.
Either the Solanas origin of all this gets exposed and feminism's victim act collapses and the people who supported them get burned or they coup the party in 2028 and turn it into a feminist husk that can't win anything.
There's no good ending where you defeat the trans ideology by shilling the people who caused it.
Their problem is that they forgot to ask if anyone really gives much of a shit. They could easily feature this and not lose support, but as we discussed above, they don't have much in the way of deliverable promises. It's a lot like the pro-family rhetoric you are salty about. It's just something normal people agree with so they are featuring it heavily.
Courting TERFism will go down as the GOP's worst electoral mistake.
A mostly male-supported party taking a feminist stance, that caused the whole platform to lurch that way.
And if you want to win with no principles, that might work...if you weren't also anti-abortion!
I have a lot of interactions with TERFs. I archive some. If you prod them enough, they will say something about supporting reducing the male population.
TERFs will blow up in a big way, on whoever has them on their side.
Either the Solanas origin of all this gets exposed and feminism's victim act collapses and the people who supported them get burned or they coup the party in 2028 and turn it into a feminist husk that can't win anything.
There's no good ending where you defeat the trans ideology by shilling the people who caused it.
Republicans have chosen the popular and even trending side on the "trannies in sports" question. https://news.gallup.com/poll/507023/say-birth-gender-dictate-sports-participation.aspx
Their problem is that they forgot to ask if anyone really gives much of a shit. They could easily feature this and not lose support, but as we discussed above, they don't have much in the way of deliverable promises. It's a lot like the pro-family rhetoric you are salty about. It's just something normal people agree with so they are featuring it heavily.
Because they omitted the actual popular option - stop wasting people's money on women's sports!
The people most rabid about this issue are also pro-abortion. It's a vote losing issue.
Not because of what it is, but what it signals to people.
Pro-abortion zealots are far more animated over abortion.
They're the same people. You just notice them more because you're on the receiving end.