They're having trouble finding wealthy enough marks thanks to the job market they rigged. They're not going to tolerate the existence of a beta, not even temporarily, unless the divorce rape they're planning will be lucrative enough. There's only so much wealth they can steal from a guy their policies condemned to a $15/hr Walmart job, and it's not worth it to them.
From a certain standpoint, I guess they're playing the same kind of approach that some guys have been doing on dating sites, social media, and IRL for ages: Keep hitting on women, no matter how shitty their approach is, because eventually someone somewhere does actually say yes.
Oh, there's no shortage of "former" feminists looking for a naive mark.
Those marriages won't last past whenever the time/earnings curve peaks, but society will gaslight those men into thinking they did something wrong.
They're having trouble finding wealthy enough marks thanks to the job market they rigged. They're not going to tolerate the existence of a beta, not even temporarily, unless the divorce rape they're planning will be lucrative enough. There's only so much wealth they can steal from a guy their policies condemned to a $15/hr Walmart job, and it's not worth it to them.
From a certain standpoint, I guess they're playing the same kind of approach that some guys have been doing on dating sites, social media, and IRL for ages: Keep hitting on women, no matter how shitty their approach is, because eventually someone somewhere does actually say yes.
Oh, don't get me started on fucking KPIs.
I could give a rant about that, that would break Rule 16 so much I'd be banned for life.