“You have heard that it was said, ‘you shall not commit adultery’ but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
I've said it before and will say it again. Male chastity is a key weapon against women and feminism as most female power comes from their sexuality.
Men have been so corrupted by their unrestrained sexual passions that they are unable to see that pornography is a tool to enslave them. It's particular sad when you see men advocating for themselves to be manipulated more - "don't you dare get in the way of my access to pornography!" Junkies looking for the next high.
They are so corrupted that they see marriage entirely in terms of access to sex, instead of it's actual purpose of creating a stable environment to raise children. They are so corrupted they think the pinnacle of femininity is a woman who whores herself out to the world, instead of a woman who displays feminine virtues.
Link sex back to it's primary purpose - bringing children into the world - and suddenly much of the corruption in the world is on the back foot.
Male chastity is a key weapon against women and feminism as most female power comes from their sexuality.
What insults do women use when most trying to harm or damage a man? Small penis, I never came, I always faked it, your dick looks weird, you're a virgin, you're an incel, you have never touched a woman, you're a creep, that's so rapey, etc. Every single one of them is always about your sexual value to another woman. I have NEVER had a woman tell me I was dishonest, or lazy, or irresponsible like you would hear a man tell another man; his quality of character over his sexual prowess.
A man's best bet against women is denying them the things they think they can buy with their bodies; money, attention, and time. If men could overcome their baser desires and ignore the modern day prostitutes, the women would have to change their despicable behaviors or go hungry.
A man's best bet against women is denying them the things they think they can buy with their bodies; money, attention, and time. If men could overcome their baser desires and ignore the modern day prostitutes, the women would have to change their despicable behaviors or go hungry.
Indeed. Although I will add one other thing, which goes back to the point of the original commenter, the quote from Matthew 5:27-28. I've known what you pointed out for years - that denying women attention they crave from their sexuality would starve them from power. Yet, I myself was unable to use this knowledge to wean myself off this addiction. Not until I realized how much enslavement was intentionally designed to pull me away from God, from His moral law. Therein was the answer to freedom. For in turning back to God, in turning back to Jesus and His Church, there was the freedom I sought.
Not looking at pornography because it harms me? A motivator that wasn't really working.
Not looking at pornography because it pulled me away from God? That was the motivation I needed. And the strength I could draw on.
the women would have to change their despicable behaviors or go hungry.
Or do what they do now, and have the state demonize everyone single, and push for those people to be taxed more for their benefit.
Just like every other time a society deserted women - bachelor taxes, or you get attacked for being the reason there's mass immigration like they're doing in SK.
Gotta victim blame to push the fucking trad agenda.
Let's just ignore that if it wasn't for tradfucks and the Satanic Panic, men would still hold a slim majority in high school teaching staff. The moment women became the majority, the toxic in-group bias culture prevailed.
That's where all the issues started. And we're repeating the same script with "groomers", but with them already owning a majority...it's about to get a whole lot worse.
The satanic panic was driven by left-wing psychology quacks, numbnuts. The fact everyone blames the Right for it now -- even the Right themselves -- is testament to the left's enduring ability to shift blame.
It's the same as the "Hollywood blacklists," which everyone thinks was the government banning commie screenwriters, but actually was Hollywood banning snitches who outed the commie screenwriters.
It's an organised strategy to indoctrinate more sexual degeneracy and addictions on society, especially younger BUT ONLY using real people.
They want them addicted to porn with real people because if people can just use fictional content, whether made by AI or drawn, then they can draw a fiction/reality divide in their heads and not be a slave to their sexual urges
It's why Asia isn't full of drag shows to kids and pedo parades compared to the west.
Bruh, Asia is full of waifus and girlfriend simulators, Google what's "GFE: Girlfriend Experience". Almost as if men inherently search for those and have value...
Yep but they don't have drag shows targeting kids or pedo parades.
China stops that DEAD with their media control and I'm more surprised places like South Korea, Vietnam and Japan don't have them which leads me to think the language barrier is slowing infection by the Western degenerates.
Japan having a yearly 'penis parade' to promote fertility but not pride parade really suggests this whole thing is artificial.
They want them addicted to porn with real people because if people can just use fictional content, whether made by AI or drawn, then they can draw a fiction/reality divide in their heads and not be a slave to their sexual urges
The results revealed that hentai consumers did not differ from non-hentai or non-porn consumers on avoidant attachment. However, among females, hentai consumers were higher on anxious attachment compared to non-porn consumers.
Now that's VERY interesting, especially since the type of fictional content that is very popular with women is WAY more fucked up than men on average.
Just saying, men probably love '100 girlfriends who really love me' the most while women love 'redo of healer' more and that's just the non hentai, I'm scared to see what Hentai tag is more popular with women...
Did you actually read that study, or do you just link it to make your politics sound more valid?
Because its hilariously bad. Even the in the summary they admit they had a less than 300 sample, and randomly removed up to 70 of them due to "not
correctly answering the validity question" (aka, they were causing data that didn't fit with our hypothesis).
Then its an online self report on fucking porn habits. I shouldn't have to point out how useless that is for getting anything resembling the "truth" from people, let alone having any validity to make any statements about people or society.
Finally, in their own words:
The current study found that individuals who consumed hentai in the past year did not seem to differ from the other pornography consumer types in terms of their attraction towards humans and their desire for a human romantic relationship. However, hentai consumers did differ from other pornography consumer types in terms of how they perceived anime characters physically and romantically. Therefore, future studies are encouraged to differentiate hentai from human pornography.
and
The results did not support the first hypothesis; hentai consumers did not significantly score higher on attachment avoidance than non-hentai and
non-porn consumers. However, the second hypothesis was partially supported; female hentai consumers scored higher on attachment anxiety than females in the non-porn consumer group
So all they proved were fucking women have higher attachment anxiety if they are the type of femcels who have resorted to needing porn. Which any of us could have guessed at. Their study was so bad they couldn't even twist it to support their hypothesis and had to straight up admit it was wrong. Which props to them for.
Which is why I question if you even read the study. Because it says nothing about paraphilia other then hentai being a fucking paraphilia. And it fails to prove anything you accused it of (even in just the summary) other than women are neurotic.
Then its an online self report on fucking porn habits. I shouldn't have to point out how useless that is for getting anything resembling the "truth" from people, let alone having any validity to make any statements about people or society.
My only statement was that porn -- all of it -- is bad. Regardless of if it's fictional or real.
Their study was so bad they couldn't even twist it to support their hypothesis and had to straight up admit it was wrong. Which props to them for.
Which doesn't detract from my original statement: all porn is bad.
Which is why I question if you even read the study. Because it says nothing about paraphilia other then hentai being a fucking paraphilia.
You've been prone to emotional outbursts before whenever I make basic statements, which makes no sense to me. My original statement was..."hentai creates paraphilia addictions as well as much higher attachment anxiety rates compared to standard porn"
This was noted in the study, where it states... "Fictophilia is a type of paraphilia. Paraphilia involves individuals having atypical sexual arousal towards atypical things or objects. Paraphilia exists across many different cultures, but the exact prevalence of people who experience paraphilias is unknown (Bhugra et al., 2010). "
This doesn't contradict or detract from my statements, which was simply that hentai creates paraphilia addictions due to fictophilia. It's just a statement of fact, since hentai isn't real, and people addicted to hentai will have established a paraphilia, spawned from fictophilia, an issue that would become a growing problem due to AI pornography, as discussed here:
https://www.livemint.com/opinion/columns/the-emergence-of-fictosexuals-and-its-reverberations-11652892543383.html
And it fails to prove anything you accused it of (even in just the summary) other than women are neurotic.
Re-read my original statement... slowly. I noted that hentai is not better than standard porn, it still has many of the same pitfalls and problems, as discussed in the piece above, and as noted in the study, which noted that -- to your own quote from the study -- there was no difference in addiction rates between hentai and non-hentai pornography, other than raised attachment anxiety. I didn't mention anything about differences in gender, this is something you drew up on your own.
If you have your own emotional connection to the subject matter, then that's all fine. But nothing in the study nor in your own post contradict anything I wrote in a simple two sentence comment.
Calm down, re-read what I said, and try to understand the original intent before replying.
No it is a paraphilia. That's a clever bit of word trickery you are trying to use, by insinuating that hentai is creating more paraphilias when the study says nothing of the such. Your own statement is false, as someone who consumes hentai already has a paraphilia and the study conducts zero effort on any other paraphilia.
there was no difference in addiction rates between hentai and non-hentai pornography, other than raised attachment anxiety. I didn't mention anything about differences in gender, this is something you drew up on your own.
Well yes, because you didn't actually read the study so you didn't note how it openly said only women had attachment anxiety issues after consuming hentai. Or you did, but deliberately left that schism out because it undermines your point because people would ask why women were like that instead of jumping to "porn bad!"
You made two points, both of which I'd probably agree with, and then linked a useless study that supports them in no way and even on the off chance it did would still prove nothing because of how poorly setup it was to begin with.
I don't care about your porn debate, just get better "studies" if you want to link some source to appeal to Science™.
as someone who consumes hentai already has a paraphilia and the study conducts zero effort on any other paraphilia.
This is literally semantics.
Well yes, because you didn't actually read the study so you didn't note how it openly said only women had attachment anxiety issues after consuming hentai. Or you did, but deliberately left that schism out because it undermines your point because people would ask why women were like that instead of jumping to "porn bad!"
I left out gender because porn is bad for men and women, period.
You seriously need to get your emotional irrationality under control. If you gleaned anything from my post other than "porn is bad" that is entirely a you problem.
EDIT: I should also point out that the study served the job well of pointing out hentai addiction is still an addiction-- even by your own admission a paraphilia -- which was the original point: AI or real life, porn addiction is bad.
If you gleaned anything from my post other than "porn is bad"
I don't give a shit about your post. I cared about the study you linked because I wanted to see the studies conducted to something I could agree with. The study ended up being retardedly bad to a point where it had nothing to do with what you were trying to say it did, and drew in the question of your own capability to make a statement on the matter if you think otherwise.
I got your point, its the same bargain bin "porn is bad!" that gets posted 20 times a day. You just tried to spice it up with an appeal to authority without reading it, then cried about semantics when you couldn't back it up.
Trying to convince people they are mad when your argument is failing won't help you win them or the spectators to your side. You need better studies and a better debate club.
I don't give a shit about your post. I cared about the study you linked because I wanted to see the studies conducted to something I could agree with.
Again, that's a you problem. Your emotional instability caused you go on a long rant about something that had nothing to do with my post. Check your insecurity.
The study ended up being retardedly bad to a point where it had nothing to do with what you were trying to say it did,
I literally didn't say it said anything other than porn is bad, regardless of it being hentai or real. YOU extrapolated an entire strawman to sate your own emotional attachment to the subject matter. Again, that's a YOU problem that had nothing to do with my post.
I got your point, its the same bargain bin "porn is bad!" that gets posted 20 times a day. You just tried to spice it up with an appeal to authority without reading it, then cried about semantics when you couldn't back it up.
The study did back it up. Try again.
Trying to convince people they are mad when your argument is failing won't help you win them or the spectators to your side. You need better studies and a better debate club.
It was a reply to the original post about hentai being a viable alternative to real porn, to which I responded it has the exact same pitfalls. Nothing you wrote in your screeds refute or even address my original point, which is a failing on your side to comprehend a simple two-sentence comment.
Ergo, there was no debate, just irrefutable facts: Porn is bad.
Anyone's whose talked to an OF hoe knows that the real money isn't in any of the pictures or videos. Its in the fake relationships. The ones I knew would make $100s a month from guys just for a single text response a day, everyday. Minimum level effort, but gives these guys some form of validation beyond just the horny.
Once they reach a mass enough to have way too many guys to keep track of, aka being whatever a "star" is, I'm not surprised they hire standins to fulfill it.
I can't even hate the women in this case, much as I hate ever giving them space. Parasocial relationships are literally being foisted upon every personality on the internet. Social media pages, Twitch Streamers, random hoes, Political Talking Heads.
Every single fucking zoomer and terminally online person, of which there are a lot of both, seems determined to make you be in one with them as a prerequisite for their fandom and support.
Banning this won't do enough. You have to hit the root of the issue.
No, not banning porn. Not tradcon BS.
We need to bribe men to re-enter the field of education, because the feminist majority has harmed every boy who went through it. Whether it's drugging them unnecessarily, teaching them to hate themselves (which is what facilitates this validation racket) or just grading them down to push the "future is female" agenda, it's all obvious and something has to be done.
Poor lost brother, for he is cornered by the corrupt satanist women and cower at her propaganda. He rather flee than think women can be made to see the light. He is such gleefuly the west's footsoldier
Jesus in the Bible told men to not simp.
Indeed.
I've said it before and will say it again. Male chastity is a key weapon against women and feminism as most female power comes from their sexuality.
Men have been so corrupted by their unrestrained sexual passions that they are unable to see that pornography is a tool to enslave them. It's particular sad when you see men advocating for themselves to be manipulated more - "don't you dare get in the way of my access to pornography!" Junkies looking for the next high.
They are so corrupted that they see marriage entirely in terms of access to sex, instead of it's actual purpose of creating a stable environment to raise children. They are so corrupted they think the pinnacle of femininity is a woman who whores herself out to the world, instead of a woman who displays feminine virtues.
Link sex back to it's primary purpose - bringing children into the world - and suddenly much of the corruption in the world is on the back foot.
What insults do women use when most trying to harm or damage a man? Small penis, I never came, I always faked it, your dick looks weird, you're a virgin, you're an incel, you have never touched a woman, you're a creep, that's so rapey, etc. Every single one of them is always about your sexual value to another woman. I have NEVER had a woman tell me I was dishonest, or lazy, or irresponsible like you would hear a man tell another man; his quality of character over his sexual prowess.
A man's best bet against women is denying them the things they think they can buy with their bodies; money, attention, and time. If men could overcome their baser desires and ignore the modern day prostitutes, the women would have to change their despicable behaviors or go hungry.
Indeed. Although I will add one other thing, which goes back to the point of the original commenter, the quote from Matthew 5:27-28. I've known what you pointed out for years - that denying women attention they crave from their sexuality would starve them from power. Yet, I myself was unable to use this knowledge to wean myself off this addiction. Not until I realized how much enslavement was intentionally designed to pull me away from God, from His moral law. Therein was the answer to freedom. For in turning back to God, in turning back to Jesus and His Church, there was the freedom I sought.
Not looking at pornography because it harms me? A motivator that wasn't really working.
Not looking at pornography because it pulled me away from God? That was the motivation I needed. And the strength I could draw on.
Or do what they do now, and have the state demonize everyone single, and push for those people to be taxed more for their benefit.
Just like every other time a society deserted women - bachelor taxes, or you get attacked for being the reason there's mass immigration like they're doing in SK.
/u/Lethn
Gotta victim blame to push the fucking trad agenda.
Let's just ignore that if it wasn't for tradfucks and the Satanic Panic, men would still hold a slim majority in high school teaching staff. The moment women became the majority, the toxic in-group bias culture prevailed.
That's where all the issues started. And we're repeating the same script with "groomers", but with them already owning a majority...it's about to get a whole lot worse.
The satanic panic was driven by left-wing psychology quacks, numbnuts. The fact everyone blames the Right for it now -- even the Right themselves -- is testament to the left's enduring ability to shift blame.
It's the same as the "Hollywood blacklists," which everyone thinks was the government banning commie screenwriters, but actually was Hollywood banning snitches who outed the commie screenwriters.
So how come we're seeing the same script being repeated by the right now?
You're forgetting that the right back then was in bed with Catherine MacKinnon and her definitely not lover Andrea Dworkin.
Remember the Meese Report? Oh, we all had to ban porn to the point that we are siding with the male genocide psychos.
Sounding familiar yet?
Maybe a liTtlE hint will be of seRvice For working thiS out.
Porn, always at the forefront of tech.
When they do something interplanetary, it will be time to pack your bags.
It's an organised strategy to indoctrinate more sexual degeneracy and addictions on society, especially younger BUT ONLY using real people.
They want them addicted to porn with real people because if people can just use fictional content, whether made by AI or drawn, then they can draw a fiction/reality divide in their heads and not be a slave to their sexual urges
It's why Asia isn't full of drag shows to kids and pedo parades compared to the west.
Bruh, Asia is full of waifus and girlfriend simulators, Google what's "GFE: Girlfriend Experience". Almost as if men inherently search for those and have value...
Yep but they don't have drag shows targeting kids or pedo parades.
China stops that DEAD with their media control and I'm more surprised places like South Korea, Vietnam and Japan don't have them which leads me to think the language barrier is slowing infection by the Western degenerates.
Japan having a yearly 'penis parade' to promote fertility but not pride parade really suggests this whole thing is artificial.
They have pride parades... Mostly pushed by foreign organizations
Let me guess, they happen but aren't covered by anyone local, just international organisations?
Japan is pretty degenerate- they only banned actual CP in 2014
Wrong, 1999, they banned possession of it in 2014
Still don't have an organised pedophilia groups on the scale of Epstein though so...
Don't you dare call out Soctatic on his daily japanese simping.
This actually is not true, as hentai creates paraphilia addictions as well as much higher attachment anxiety rates compared to standard porn: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1158136021001080
It's a major problem regardless of the type of porn people consume.
On women 🤔
Now that's VERY interesting, especially since the type of fictional content that is very popular with women is WAY more fucked up than men on average.
Just saying, men probably love '100 girlfriends who really love me' the most while women love 'redo of healer' more and that's just the non hentai, I'm scared to see what Hentai tag is more popular with women...
Did you actually read that study, or do you just link it to make your politics sound more valid?
Because its hilariously bad. Even the in the summary they admit they had a less than 300 sample, and randomly removed up to 70 of them due to "not correctly answering the validity question" (aka, they were causing data that didn't fit with our hypothesis).
Then its an online self report on fucking porn habits. I shouldn't have to point out how useless that is for getting anything resembling the "truth" from people, let alone having any validity to make any statements about people or society.
Finally, in their own words:
and
So all they proved were fucking women have higher attachment anxiety if they are the type of femcels who have resorted to needing porn. Which any of us could have guessed at. Their study was so bad they couldn't even twist it to support their hypothesis and had to straight up admit it was wrong. Which props to them for.
Which is why I question if you even read the study. Because it says nothing about paraphilia other then hentai being a fucking paraphilia. And it fails to prove anything you accused it of (even in just the summary) other than women are neurotic.
My only statement was that porn -- all of it -- is bad. Regardless of if it's fictional or real.
Which doesn't detract from my original statement: all porn is bad.
You've been prone to emotional outbursts before whenever I make basic statements, which makes no sense to me. My original statement was..."hentai creates paraphilia addictions as well as much higher attachment anxiety rates compared to standard porn"
This was noted in the study, where it states... "Fictophilia is a type of paraphilia. Paraphilia involves individuals having atypical sexual arousal towards atypical things or objects. Paraphilia exists across many different cultures, but the exact prevalence of people who experience paraphilias is unknown (Bhugra et al., 2010). "
This doesn't contradict or detract from my statements, which was simply that hentai creates paraphilia addictions due to fictophilia. It's just a statement of fact, since hentai isn't real, and people addicted to hentai will have established a paraphilia, spawned from fictophilia, an issue that would become a growing problem due to AI pornography, as discussed here: https://www.livemint.com/opinion/columns/the-emergence-of-fictosexuals-and-its-reverberations-11652892543383.html
Re-read my original statement... slowly. I noted that hentai is not better than standard porn, it still has many of the same pitfalls and problems, as discussed in the piece above, and as noted in the study, which noted that -- to your own quote from the study -- there was no difference in addiction rates between hentai and non-hentai pornography, other than raised attachment anxiety. I didn't mention anything about differences in gender, this is something you drew up on your own.
If you have your own emotional connection to the subject matter, then that's all fine. But nothing in the study nor in your own post contradict anything I wrote in a simple two sentence comment.
Calm down, re-read what I said, and try to understand the original intent before replying.
No it is a paraphilia. That's a clever bit of word trickery you are trying to use, by insinuating that hentai is creating more paraphilias when the study says nothing of the such. Your own statement is false, as someone who consumes hentai already has a paraphilia and the study conducts zero effort on any other paraphilia.
Well yes, because you didn't actually read the study so you didn't note how it openly said only women had attachment anxiety issues after consuming hentai. Or you did, but deliberately left that schism out because it undermines your point because people would ask why women were like that instead of jumping to "porn bad!"
You made two points, both of which I'd probably agree with, and then linked a useless study that supports them in no way and even on the off chance it did would still prove nothing because of how poorly setup it was to begin with.
I don't care about your porn debate, just get better "studies" if you want to link some source to appeal to Science™.
This is literally semantics.
I left out gender because porn is bad for men and women, period.
You seriously need to get your emotional irrationality under control. If you gleaned anything from my post other than "porn is bad" that is entirely a you problem.
EDIT: I should also point out that the study served the job well of pointing out hentai addiction is still an addiction-- even by your own admission a paraphilia -- which was the original point: AI or real life, porn addiction is bad.
I don't give a shit about your post. I cared about the study you linked because I wanted to see the studies conducted to something I could agree with. The study ended up being retardedly bad to a point where it had nothing to do with what you were trying to say it did, and drew in the question of your own capability to make a statement on the matter if you think otherwise.
I got your point, its the same bargain bin "porn is bad!" that gets posted 20 times a day. You just tried to spice it up with an appeal to authority without reading it, then cried about semantics when you couldn't back it up.
Trying to convince people they are mad when your argument is failing won't help you win them or the spectators to your side. You need better studies and a better debate club.
Again, that's a you problem. Your emotional instability caused you go on a long rant about something that had nothing to do with my post. Check your insecurity.
I literally didn't say it said anything other than porn is bad, regardless of it being hentai or real. YOU extrapolated an entire strawman to sate your own emotional attachment to the subject matter. Again, that's a YOU problem that had nothing to do with my post.
The study did back it up. Try again.
It was a reply to the original post about hentai being a viable alternative to real porn, to which I responded it has the exact same pitfalls. Nothing you wrote in your screeds refute or even address my original point, which is a failing on your side to comprehend a simple two-sentence comment.
Ergo, there was no debate, just irrefutable facts: Porn is bad.
Anyone's whose talked to an OF hoe knows that the real money isn't in any of the pictures or videos. Its in the fake relationships. The ones I knew would make $100s a month from guys just for a single text response a day, everyday. Minimum level effort, but gives these guys some form of validation beyond just the horny.
Once they reach a mass enough to have way too many guys to keep track of, aka being whatever a "star" is, I'm not surprised they hire standins to fulfill it.
I can't even hate the women in this case, much as I hate ever giving them space. Parasocial relationships are literally being foisted upon every personality on the internet. Social media pages, Twitch Streamers, random hoes, Political Talking Heads.
Every single fucking zoomer and terminally online person, of which there are a lot of both, seems determined to make you be in one with them as a prerequisite for their fandom and support.
Welcome back, Imp.
Try not to get banned this time.
Fuck the libertarians, ban this. Women should not be allowed to take advantage of lonely men this way.
Banning this won't do enough. You have to hit the root of the issue.
No, not banning porn. Not tradcon BS.
We need to bribe men to re-enter the field of education, because the feminist majority has harmed every boy who went through it. Whether it's drugging them unnecessarily, teaching them to hate themselves (which is what facilitates this validation racket) or just grading them down to push the "future is female" agenda, it's all obvious and something has to be done.
I am in favor of gender and race segregated education.
Governments need to step in and ban this stuff. It's purely exploitative.
don’t worry. AI will soon replace e-thots. Enjoy your coomer subscription: gack-max tier 10. $10.99/mo
It will get worse - https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/which-countries-are-most-interested-generative-ai
Philippines is number 1 in generative AI usage for this reason
Didn't Cr1TiKaL do that too some time ago? Or was that a clone virus... I wasn't paying much attention.
Comedy is becoming reality at ever greater speed.
Proof that the western woman is rotten, this does not happen under Allah's the glorious and mighty's guidance
It still happens, you’re just still allowed to smack a bitch under Islam.
Because you just strap a bomb on the men women didn't want and tell them to die for Palliestine.
I hope you may be enlightened by Allah's truth and reject western propaganda. For Allah's words cut through western lies like a sword
Your prophet fucked a 9 year old and is supposedly the perfect man every muslim should be like. You're no better than groomer trannies.
I literally saw it on video. Boys are taught that if they don't find a wife, their greater purpose is to be a martyr for Islam.
Poor lost brother, for he is cornered by the corrupt satanist women and cower at her propaganda. He rather flee than think women can be made to see the light. He is such gleefuly the west's footsoldier
Islam is fake and gay.
Concerned that this is upvoted. Maybe just kneejerk anger at me.