If you gleaned anything from my post other than "porn is bad"
I don't give a shit about your post. I cared about the study you linked because I wanted to see the studies conducted to something I could agree with. The study ended up being retardedly bad to a point where it had nothing to do with what you were trying to say it did, and drew in the question of your own capability to make a statement on the matter if you think otherwise.
I got your point, its the same bargain bin "porn is bad!" that gets posted 20 times a day. You just tried to spice it up with an appeal to authority without reading it, then cried about semantics when you couldn't back it up.
Trying to convince people they are mad when your argument is failing won't help you win them or the spectators to your side. You need better studies and a better debate club.
I don't give a shit about your post. I cared about the study you linked because I wanted to see the studies conducted to something I could agree with.
Again, that's a you problem. Your emotional instability caused you go on a long rant about something that had nothing to do with my post. Check your insecurity.
The study ended up being retardedly bad to a point where it had nothing to do with what you were trying to say it did,
I literally didn't say it said anything other than porn is bad, regardless of it being hentai or real. YOU extrapolated an entire strawman to sate your own emotional attachment to the subject matter. Again, that's a YOU problem that had nothing to do with my post.
I got your point, its the same bargain bin "porn is bad!" that gets posted 20 times a day. You just tried to spice it up with an appeal to authority without reading it, then cried about semantics when you couldn't back it up.
The study did back it up. Try again.
Trying to convince people they are mad when your argument is failing won't help you win them or the spectators to your side. You need better studies and a better debate club.
It was a reply to the original post about hentai being a viable alternative to real porn, to which I responded it has the exact same pitfalls. Nothing you wrote in your screeds refute or even address my original point, which is a failing on your side to comprehend a simple two-sentence comment.
Ergo, there was no debate, just irrefutable facts: Porn is bad.
Dang homie, is all you got "u mad?" over and over? That's pretty weak. At least yelling "semantics!" is something. But let's go back to the start.
as hentai creates paraphilia addictions as well as much higher attachment anxiety rates compared to standard porn
Two points, one of which you conceded as saying "that's semantics" is acknowledging its right but you think it doesn't matter. But that's okay.
The second is purposefully lying because it leaves out importance distinctions, in that it only was the case (in this study) for females. Like saying the US has a low IQ and massive violent crime problem, but not mentioning its almost entirely centered around black populations driving it up. A lie by omission always found in people who can't back up their own narrative.
Which is why I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you just read the headline and hypothesis and rushed to link it. Because otherwise you are just lying about what it says. Again, I truly don't care about your porn debate. I only care about extremely bad studies and the retards who treat them as if they are worth their salt. That's why I didn't counter a thing you said in the initial comment and spent the entire time criticizing it.
Of which you haven't defended in the slightest all the giant failures it has, such as tiny sample size with arbitrary removals and being an online self report probably because you can't and its easier to just accuse me of being biased.
Here, I'll even help you out though. It being an online self report means the gender difference is probably meaningless, because women are much more likely to be open about victimizing traits like "anxiety" while men are not. Something they didn't account for whatsoever and would likely normalize the gender gap. There you go, I defeated one of my own points for you! It was just that easy when you actually engage with your own material.
None of this has anything to do with my original point. That porn --regardless of if it's hentai or real -- is bad.
I linked to a study that said hentai is as bad as non-hentai. You corroborated that point in your reply with two paragraphs from the study that corroborated my point: porn is bad.
That was literally the only reason the study was linked.
Everything else in your unhinged diatribes are based on fallacies related to points I never made, strawmen related to topics I never brought up (i.e., gender differences), and patting yourself on the back for attacking a wildly tangential series of non-sequiturs, because -- I get it -- you have to protect your pride after completely misconstruing, not understanding, and failing to comprehend the two-sentence post I made.
If you get this unhinged because some random person brought up a basic fact and linked to a study that corroborates that fact (i.e., porn is bad) then I can only imagine how unhinged you might become on more serious topic matters in the meat space.
Seriously, I hope you aren't married or planning on doing so because your emotional outbursts are not good for long term or healthy relationships. If you are married then all this behaviour does is create more conflict, resentment, and a lot of unpacked baggage built up over time.
My advice to you, mate, is to seriously seek some help to get your anger issues resolved.
Of course you never brought up those points or topics, you didn't read your own study and just hoped linking it would give enough appeal to authority to win over the easily duped. I brought them up to point out how bad of a study it was, and you took that personally.
My point still stands completely untouched, the study was in fact terrible and you didn't read it. So my pride is as intact as the mirth this entire thing has brought me, which only increases the more you try and insult me as it reveals you have nothing else but personal attacks to try and salvage your failed position by making me look like a loon.
Call me a virgin next and accuse me of gaslighting, that way we can get the entire set of basic bitch jabs in.
I don't give a shit about your post. I cared about the study you linked because I wanted to see the studies conducted to something I could agree with. The study ended up being retardedly bad to a point where it had nothing to do with what you were trying to say it did, and drew in the question of your own capability to make a statement on the matter if you think otherwise.
I got your point, its the same bargain bin "porn is bad!" that gets posted 20 times a day. You just tried to spice it up with an appeal to authority without reading it, then cried about semantics when you couldn't back it up.
Trying to convince people they are mad when your argument is failing won't help you win them or the spectators to your side. You need better studies and a better debate club.
Again, that's a you problem. Your emotional instability caused you go on a long rant about something that had nothing to do with my post. Check your insecurity.
I literally didn't say it said anything other than porn is bad, regardless of it being hentai or real. YOU extrapolated an entire strawman to sate your own emotional attachment to the subject matter. Again, that's a YOU problem that had nothing to do with my post.
The study did back it up. Try again.
It was a reply to the original post about hentai being a viable alternative to real porn, to which I responded it has the exact same pitfalls. Nothing you wrote in your screeds refute or even address my original point, which is a failing on your side to comprehend a simple two-sentence comment.
Ergo, there was no debate, just irrefutable facts: Porn is bad.
Dang homie, is all you got "u mad?" over and over? That's pretty weak. At least yelling "semantics!" is something. But let's go back to the start.
Two points, one of which you conceded as saying "that's semantics" is acknowledging its right but you think it doesn't matter. But that's okay.
The second is purposefully lying because it leaves out importance distinctions, in that it only was the case (in this study) for females. Like saying the US has a low IQ and massive violent crime problem, but not mentioning its almost entirely centered around black populations driving it up. A lie by omission always found in people who can't back up their own narrative.
Which is why I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you just read the headline and hypothesis and rushed to link it. Because otherwise you are just lying about what it says. Again, I truly don't care about your porn debate. I only care about extremely bad studies and the retards who treat them as if they are worth their salt. That's why I didn't counter a thing you said in the initial comment and spent the entire time criticizing it.
Of which you haven't defended in the slightest all the giant failures it has, such as tiny sample size with arbitrary removals and being an online self report probably because you can't and its easier to just accuse me of being biased.
Here, I'll even help you out though. It being an online self report means the gender difference is probably meaningless, because women are much more likely to be open about victimizing traits like "anxiety" while men are not. Something they didn't account for whatsoever and would likely normalize the gender gap. There you go, I defeated one of my own points for you! It was just that easy when you actually engage with your own material.
None of this has anything to do with my original point. That porn --regardless of if it's hentai or real -- is bad.
I linked to a study that said hentai is as bad as non-hentai. You corroborated that point in your reply with two paragraphs from the study that corroborated my point: porn is bad.
That was literally the only reason the study was linked.
Everything else in your unhinged diatribes are based on fallacies related to points I never made, strawmen related to topics I never brought up (i.e., gender differences), and patting yourself on the back for attacking a wildly tangential series of non-sequiturs, because -- I get it -- you have to protect your pride after completely misconstruing, not understanding, and failing to comprehend the two-sentence post I made.
If you get this unhinged because some random person brought up a basic fact and linked to a study that corroborates that fact (i.e., porn is bad) then I can only imagine how unhinged you might become on more serious topic matters in the meat space.
Seriously, I hope you aren't married or planning on doing so because your emotional outbursts are not good for long term or healthy relationships. If you are married then all this behaviour does is create more conflict, resentment, and a lot of unpacked baggage built up over time.
My advice to you, mate, is to seriously seek some help to get your anger issues resolved.
Of course you never brought up those points or topics, you didn't read your own study and just hoped linking it would give enough appeal to authority to win over the easily duped. I brought them up to point out how bad of a study it was, and you took that personally.
My point still stands completely untouched, the study was in fact terrible and you didn't read it. So my pride is as intact as the mirth this entire thing has brought me, which only increases the more you try and insult me as it reveals you have nothing else but personal attacks to try and salvage your failed position by making me look like a loon.
Call me a virgin next and accuse me of gaslighting, that way we can get the entire set of basic bitch jabs in.