It's an organised strategy to indoctrinate more sexual degeneracy and addictions on society, especially younger BUT ONLY using real people.
They want them addicted to porn with real people because if people can just use fictional content, whether made by AI or drawn, then they can draw a fiction/reality divide in their heads and not be a slave to their sexual urges
It's why Asia isn't full of drag shows to kids and pedo parades compared to the west.
Bruh, Asia is full of waifus and girlfriend simulators, Google what's "GFE: Girlfriend Experience". Almost as if men inherently search for those and have value...
Yep but they don't have drag shows targeting kids or pedo parades.
China stops that DEAD with their media control and I'm more surprised places like South Korea, Vietnam and Japan don't have them which leads me to think the language barrier is slowing infection by the Western degenerates.
Japan having a yearly 'penis parade' to promote fertility but not pride parade really suggests this whole thing is artificial.
They want them addicted to porn with real people because if people can just use fictional content, whether made by AI or drawn, then they can draw a fiction/reality divide in their heads and not be a slave to their sexual urges
The results revealed that hentai consumers did not differ from non-hentai or non-porn consumers on avoidant attachment. However, among females, hentai consumers were higher on anxious attachment compared to non-porn consumers.
Now that's VERY interesting, especially since the type of fictional content that is very popular with women is WAY more fucked up than men on average.
Just saying, men probably love '100 girlfriends who really love me' the most while women love 'redo of healer' more and that's just the non hentai, I'm scared to see what Hentai tag is more popular with women...
Did you actually read that study, or do you just link it to make your politics sound more valid?
Because its hilariously bad. Even the in the summary they admit they had a less than 300 sample, and randomly removed up to 70 of them due to "not
correctly answering the validity question" (aka, they were causing data that didn't fit with our hypothesis).
Then its an online self report on fucking porn habits. I shouldn't have to point out how useless that is for getting anything resembling the "truth" from people, let alone having any validity to make any statements about people or society.
Finally, in their own words:
The current study found that individuals who consumed hentai in the past year did not seem to differ from the other pornography consumer types in terms of their attraction towards humans and their desire for a human romantic relationship. However, hentai consumers did differ from other pornography consumer types in terms of how they perceived anime characters physically and romantically. Therefore, future studies are encouraged to differentiate hentai from human pornography.
and
The results did not support the first hypothesis; hentai consumers did not significantly score higher on attachment avoidance than non-hentai and
non-porn consumers. However, the second hypothesis was partially supported; female hentai consumers scored higher on attachment anxiety than females in the non-porn consumer group
So all they proved were fucking women have higher attachment anxiety if they are the type of femcels who have resorted to needing porn. Which any of us could have guessed at. Their study was so bad they couldn't even twist it to support their hypothesis and had to straight up admit it was wrong. Which props to them for.
Which is why I question if you even read the study. Because it says nothing about paraphilia other then hentai being a fucking paraphilia. And it fails to prove anything you accused it of (even in just the summary) other than women are neurotic.
Then its an online self report on fucking porn habits. I shouldn't have to point out how useless that is for getting anything resembling the "truth" from people, let alone having any validity to make any statements about people or society.
My only statement was that porn -- all of it -- is bad. Regardless of if it's fictional or real.
Their study was so bad they couldn't even twist it to support their hypothesis and had to straight up admit it was wrong. Which props to them for.
Which doesn't detract from my original statement: all porn is bad.
Which is why I question if you even read the study. Because it says nothing about paraphilia other then hentai being a fucking paraphilia.
You've been prone to emotional outbursts before whenever I make basic statements, which makes no sense to me. My original statement was..."hentai creates paraphilia addictions as well as much higher attachment anxiety rates compared to standard porn"
This was noted in the study, where it states... "Fictophilia is a type of paraphilia. Paraphilia involves individuals having atypical sexual arousal towards atypical things or objects. Paraphilia exists across many different cultures, but the exact prevalence of people who experience paraphilias is unknown (Bhugra et al., 2010). "
This doesn't contradict or detract from my statements, which was simply that hentai creates paraphilia addictions due to fictophilia. It's just a statement of fact, since hentai isn't real, and people addicted to hentai will have established a paraphilia, spawned from fictophilia, an issue that would become a growing problem due to AI pornography, as discussed here:
https://www.livemint.com/opinion/columns/the-emergence-of-fictosexuals-and-its-reverberations-11652892543383.html
And it fails to prove anything you accused it of (even in just the summary) other than women are neurotic.
Re-read my original statement... slowly. I noted that hentai is not better than standard porn, it still has many of the same pitfalls and problems, as discussed in the piece above, and as noted in the study, which noted that -- to your own quote from the study -- there was no difference in addiction rates between hentai and non-hentai pornography, other than raised attachment anxiety. I didn't mention anything about differences in gender, this is something you drew up on your own.
If you have your own emotional connection to the subject matter, then that's all fine. But nothing in the study nor in your own post contradict anything I wrote in a simple two sentence comment.
Calm down, re-read what I said, and try to understand the original intent before replying.
No it is a paraphilia. That's a clever bit of word trickery you are trying to use, by insinuating that hentai is creating more paraphilias when the study says nothing of the such. Your own statement is false, as someone who consumes hentai already has a paraphilia and the study conducts zero effort on any other paraphilia.
there was no difference in addiction rates between hentai and non-hentai pornography, other than raised attachment anxiety. I didn't mention anything about differences in gender, this is something you drew up on your own.
Well yes, because you didn't actually read the study so you didn't note how it openly said only women had attachment anxiety issues after consuming hentai. Or you did, but deliberately left that schism out because it undermines your point because people would ask why women were like that instead of jumping to "porn bad!"
You made two points, both of which I'd probably agree with, and then linked a useless study that supports them in no way and even on the off chance it did would still prove nothing because of how poorly setup it was to begin with.
I don't care about your porn debate, just get better "studies" if you want to link some source to appeal to Science™.
It's an organised strategy to indoctrinate more sexual degeneracy and addictions on society, especially younger BUT ONLY using real people.
They want them addicted to porn with real people because if people can just use fictional content, whether made by AI or drawn, then they can draw a fiction/reality divide in their heads and not be a slave to their sexual urges
It's why Asia isn't full of drag shows to kids and pedo parades compared to the west.
Bruh, Asia is full of waifus and girlfriend simulators, Google what's "GFE: Girlfriend Experience". Almost as if men inherently search for those and have value...
Yep but they don't have drag shows targeting kids or pedo parades.
China stops that DEAD with their media control and I'm more surprised places like South Korea, Vietnam and Japan don't have them which leads me to think the language barrier is slowing infection by the Western degenerates.
Japan having a yearly 'penis parade' to promote fertility but not pride parade really suggests this whole thing is artificial.
They have pride parades... Mostly pushed by foreign organizations
Let me guess, they happen but aren't covered by anyone local, just international organisations?
Japan is pretty degenerate- they only banned actual CP in 2014
Wrong, 1999, they banned possession of it in 2014
Still don't have an organised pedophilia groups on the scale of Epstein though so...
Don't you dare call out Soctatic on his daily japanese simping.
This actually is not true, as hentai creates paraphilia addictions as well as much higher attachment anxiety rates compared to standard porn: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1158136021001080
It's a major problem regardless of the type of porn people consume.
On women 🤔
Now that's VERY interesting, especially since the type of fictional content that is very popular with women is WAY more fucked up than men on average.
Just saying, men probably love '100 girlfriends who really love me' the most while women love 'redo of healer' more and that's just the non hentai, I'm scared to see what Hentai tag is more popular with women...
Did you actually read that study, or do you just link it to make your politics sound more valid?
Because its hilariously bad. Even the in the summary they admit they had a less than 300 sample, and randomly removed up to 70 of them due to "not correctly answering the validity question" (aka, they were causing data that didn't fit with our hypothesis).
Then its an online self report on fucking porn habits. I shouldn't have to point out how useless that is for getting anything resembling the "truth" from people, let alone having any validity to make any statements about people or society.
Finally, in their own words:
and
So all they proved were fucking women have higher attachment anxiety if they are the type of femcels who have resorted to needing porn. Which any of us could have guessed at. Their study was so bad they couldn't even twist it to support their hypothesis and had to straight up admit it was wrong. Which props to them for.
Which is why I question if you even read the study. Because it says nothing about paraphilia other then hentai being a fucking paraphilia. And it fails to prove anything you accused it of (even in just the summary) other than women are neurotic.
My only statement was that porn -- all of it -- is bad. Regardless of if it's fictional or real.
Which doesn't detract from my original statement: all porn is bad.
You've been prone to emotional outbursts before whenever I make basic statements, which makes no sense to me. My original statement was..."hentai creates paraphilia addictions as well as much higher attachment anxiety rates compared to standard porn"
This was noted in the study, where it states... "Fictophilia is a type of paraphilia. Paraphilia involves individuals having atypical sexual arousal towards atypical things or objects. Paraphilia exists across many different cultures, but the exact prevalence of people who experience paraphilias is unknown (Bhugra et al., 2010). "
This doesn't contradict or detract from my statements, which was simply that hentai creates paraphilia addictions due to fictophilia. It's just a statement of fact, since hentai isn't real, and people addicted to hentai will have established a paraphilia, spawned from fictophilia, an issue that would become a growing problem due to AI pornography, as discussed here: https://www.livemint.com/opinion/columns/the-emergence-of-fictosexuals-and-its-reverberations-11652892543383.html
Re-read my original statement... slowly. I noted that hentai is not better than standard porn, it still has many of the same pitfalls and problems, as discussed in the piece above, and as noted in the study, which noted that -- to your own quote from the study -- there was no difference in addiction rates between hentai and non-hentai pornography, other than raised attachment anxiety. I didn't mention anything about differences in gender, this is something you drew up on your own.
If you have your own emotional connection to the subject matter, then that's all fine. But nothing in the study nor in your own post contradict anything I wrote in a simple two sentence comment.
Calm down, re-read what I said, and try to understand the original intent before replying.
No it is a paraphilia. That's a clever bit of word trickery you are trying to use, by insinuating that hentai is creating more paraphilias when the study says nothing of the such. Your own statement is false, as someone who consumes hentai already has a paraphilia and the study conducts zero effort on any other paraphilia.
Well yes, because you didn't actually read the study so you didn't note how it openly said only women had attachment anxiety issues after consuming hentai. Or you did, but deliberately left that schism out because it undermines your point because people would ask why women were like that instead of jumping to "porn bad!"
You made two points, both of which I'd probably agree with, and then linked a useless study that supports them in no way and even on the off chance it did would still prove nothing because of how poorly setup it was to begin with.
I don't care about your porn debate, just get better "studies" if you want to link some source to appeal to Science™.