Can confirm
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (70)
sorted by:
Show me the maggots every time over that shit.
Much worse than maggots.
Maggots are just butterflies in the making (I mean some of them are). Anal sex doesn't give birth to anything beautiful.
It stops idiots from breeding.
They reproduce by molesting children
Social virus is everywhere.
Step 1: Parent better.
_aggots
No surprise. I have zero interest in lgbt content. Part of the reason I mainly watch older stuff
Faggots can cause the same response as maggots? It's like poetry.
At least maggots are a useful part of the ecosystem, it feels insulting comparing them to fudgepackers.
Homosexuality is noted by a low (or faulty) disgust reflex.
Yeah lack of gag reflex, if you will.
They have plenty of performative disgust over White Christian families
It's the same for women too.
Is it?
Lots of Women seem more flexible. Douglas Murray joked about how all “lesbian” women frequently marry a guy.
There's a difference between college "lesbians" and fat dykes with problem glasses, short neon hair and septum piercings, though.
Yeah just about every woman I've ever managed to ask said they'd rather watch two women kiss than two men.
Ha! I knew it wasn't just me.
My best friend, who i know since childhood and love like a brother, is gay.
I have seen him kiss his partner like a 100x already. And I still have the same visceral reaction.
I'll never get used to it.
Maybe this is why I despise the BG3 and cannot understand its massive popularity.
But what about gay maggots kissing?
faggot maggots? what is the world coming to
It is called Sexual Disgust, and it is an evolutionary adaptation.
Huh, they don't have the tech to read minds yet right? If they next say me seeing two attractive women kissing is like seeing cute songbirds then we're going to have to talk /s
Homophbia? It's not fear, it's disgust
Yeah, NGL, don't wanna see that.
But that's basically your average South Park episode. :')
From a freedom standpoint sure the consenting adults can live and be romantic all they want. Dont bother me or attack my beliefs and I’ll show the same respect
Except that we're at the part where they've proven that they'll never do that, ever. They will always bother you and they will always attack your beliefs, because they never wanted to be left alone. They wanted to force their perverted deviancy on normal people.
What now?
This is where I'm at. Look at where it was just 10 years ago versus where we are as a society now with the LGBTBBQGTA5 shit and tell me with a straight face that normalizing this shit was a good idea.
Correct. That's precisely why I say that tolerance is a sin.
GTA6 is getting a trailer soon. So they have to change the flag.
A body in motion will remain in motion until it is acted upon by an equal and opposite force.
The civil rights movement was always going to morph into a black/female/LGBTQ supremacy movement that pushes degenerate and deviant behavior. These people were never going to stop of their own volition at some reasonable conclusion to their advocacy. We were supposed to meet their movement with our own counter-movement before they destroyed western civilization.
It is not a right to be a pervert.
I know. But from a Christian standpoint we can’t use violence against them unless we are physically attacked. Stand strong and represent what Christ asks us to be. Calling out sin is important but I’ve learned that it’s pointless to try to have a theological conversation
What? Pacifism is not a part of Christianity. Particularly not if it means giving the wicked free reign and an endless supply of innocent victims.
Christ called us to be shepherds. It is a poor shepherd that refuses to shoot a wolf.
Besides the cross, what's the main symbol of Christianity (ok fish is big, dove, etc.)? The shepherd's crook. Bishops staffs are designed to look like a shepherd's crook.
Why?
Jesus as the Good Shepherd.
You think that crook was just for looks? Hell no. Shepherds are not soft, pacifistic men who let their flocks go where they will, eat what they will, and be preyed upon by predators.
No, that crook is for whacking the sheep on the ass when they go astray. The hook is for yanking a wayward sheep back in line and even rescuing a fallen or trapped lamb.
This idea of a soft, effeminiate, pacfistic "live life as you will" Jesus, is ahistorical and flawed.
You're missing the point. The shepherd protects his flock. The shepherd protects his flock from threats both internal and external.
Jesus was tough and critical to his followers. He challenged. He pushed.
"Force people into submission" is not a message of Jesus. Nor is a "live and let live" attitude towards his followers. It's those who are held to a high standard.
I’ m not a pacifist, and I do believe in self defense but I try to avoid violence unless it’s necessary. I don’t think turn the other cheek means to stand by while people get killed. I just don’t know how you and the lgbt activists with all the power behind them. Obviously prayer is crucial as well as teaching the children the right things.
I remember when gay marriage was being debated I never would’ve dreamed it would be so pervasive.
Sorry for being confusing.
There are worse fates than being killed. Such as consigning their immortal souls to hell.
If you're peaceful to the wolf, you leave the lambs at their mercy.
Agreed. I definitely don’t fear death due to salvation in Christ
Unironically yes. And you've more than earned it.
I’m not aware of anyone killing someone for being gay. I’ve never done so and that is obviously evil. Thanks for the non-sequitur buddy
I said as a Christian I believe homosexuality is a sin. I don’t hate them and won’t preach to them or discuss the unless they specifically want a discussion. I was pretty clear.
The past two decades have made it pretty clear that fence was there for a very good reason.
It's admirable on a human level but you can't let them have a single millimeter of anything on any social issue.