They are always against gatekeeping whether its hobbies, countries, gender , etc. etc. They always talk like gatekeeping is a bad thing
Heaven has gates, hell doesnt
Comments (27)
sorted by:
They are not against gatekeeping they gatekeep any field they infest
Lefties are against gatekeeping now the same way they were for "tolerance" in the 60-90s. No bad tactics.
They have no rules, no morals or principles, they just "want." Everything about them is "gibsmedat."
Ayn Rand was right to call them Moochers.
When they say "gatekeeping" they mean "not allowing gay commie infiltration".
Barbarians looking to pillage don't like it when the city gates are closed.
They worm their way into anything interesting and then gatekeep the founders out.
Israel has closed borders
Yet demands we open ours to their enemies
We're all enemies to them per 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15
Don't know about that last statement, Hell is probably installing gates thanks to the antics of the 20th and 21st centuries alone...
They're scared of gatekeeping as it shows active monitoring and resistance, if they are noticed in their degenerate actions then the normies might catch wind and things get hot.
The leftists ONLY get power by the complacency of the normies and that only happens when they can get away with their actions without people actively fighting them. It's why Gamergate still haunts them to this day and we're a bunch of basement dwellers lol.
It's a limbo bar.
"When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles."
Leftist infestation in a nutshell
They realise deep down they are cancer but cannot admit it.
It's the same for accusations of purity spiraling. Anyone who is complaining about it needs to be removed.
The worst is people accusing you of “purity testing” when you expect the most basic adherence to fundamental principles. It’s not unreasonable to demand that right wing politicians oppose mass immigration.
indeed. i'm not even demanding they form roving hunting squads, just closing the borders and deporting those that they do catch organically.
Going off of current_horror's comment on "purity testing", purity spiraling depends on what principles should be adhered to by the group. When I see clashing in the forum, it's disagreement on which of those are fundamental, but also on what specific problems should be tackled first and how to handle them.
The fallout of Gamergate caused people of various beliefs and opinions to be thrown into "the pit". Most just wanted to play videogames and watch anime, but it was a good idea for people to branch away and discuss geopolitics along with the root causes of why media was being corrupted. The problem is now new iterations of KiA opened further to the point where you have groups of users that strongly disagree on certain principles, sometimes fundamental ones. Opening it up to discussion of almost anything is paramount for free speech, but that's why there's threads of atheists screeching about Bible thumping, routine intense arguements over the legality of lolicon, or the stupid DeSantis vs. Trump arguments. Although, it's pretty much guaranteed of any group to come together on some things and disagree on others.
Current tension is coming from the desperation for immediate resolution while we're losing time... but there's members hardlining on every single thing. If you keep making hard lines on even non-fundamental principles that not everyone in your current group can agree upon, you start losing people. You still need strength in numbers, unless willing to die for your beliefs after ousting everyone that disagreed with at least one of those matters more than living a full life. That's where the concern of purity spiraling originates from.
You, in particular, are one of the ones I was thinking of when I wrote this. You along with all the other leftist pretending to be centrist need to be removed.
You clearly haven't read my comment/post history to come to that conclusion. Don't lump me in with Lethn just because I defended him for having his own opinions.
I disagree. What do you think a "safe space" is?
They are against anything that doesn’t let them get what they want, and what they want is always power and influence.
In this case, gatekeeping doesn’t let them contort a hobby into their own twisted vision of what it “should” be, which would be a mirror of the leftist’s values.
Leftists are against gatekeeping because they are, to a man, objectionable people.
Feminists are only against gatekeeping that keeps them out of men's spaces. They're all for gatekeeping when it comes to women privileges.
Keep the barbarians out and mount them on pikes.
Vlad Tepes had the right idea.