It should be noted, in most places around the world, that's already been achieved. Both the UK and Australia are infamously bad for this. For example in Australia, if you have ANYTHING that you admit is for self defence, you will be prosecuted. The only time you may use an object as a weapon for self defence is if it's an object of opportunity. You have a moment to pause and get a weapon? Not an object of opportunity. You have a moment to fashion a makeshift weapon (like rolling a newspaper into a club)? Not an object of opportunity.
The state HATES the idea of people capable of defending themselves, because people that can defend against common criminals can defend against the career criminals that are the state itself. Self-Defence is hated by the state because it can be used against the state. It's that simple.
Restaurant with residence above. Guy breaks in restaurant and owner, fearing for his family in the same building, rearranges a few plates in the guy's skull.
Who got in more trouble? The owner, of course.
I just want simple rules, man. You break into my house where my family is sleeping and you forfeit your life. If you happen to leave with it, consider yourself lucky. Simple.
I just want simple rules, man. You break into my house where my family is sleeping and you forfeit your life. If you happen to leave with it, consider yourself lucky. Simple.
I always hate the people who say "well, you shouldn't try to kill these people, just deter them away with warning shots" and it's just so stupid, because wanna know what was the warning? The locked fucking doors. If you go further, that's your fault. Anything past that point, you forfeit your safety. You were warned, and you went further.
I fucking despite anything that is anti-self defence.
Yep. Police doesn't do shit. My ex went full psycho, threw plates at me and hit me, then called the police and I was the one that wasn't allowed in his home for three days. Of course she took all my shit but I got everything back through court. Police are mens enemy though.
A lot of people store their sports gear under their bed for this purpose. Not just their bat or whatever, but all of it. Storing it separately is a sign of preparation, and makes it not a weapon of opportunity. Storing it where it actually belongs is a legitimate thing though.
Regardless, it's still fucked to the very core that self-ownership (and therefore the defence of self) is illegal. If you don't own yourself, you don't own anything. Which is, of course, the entire point of trying to outlaw self defence.
So true. Over the years I've been trained to start saving shit the instant something big happens. Videos will hit Twitter but be impossible to find two or three days later.
They’re so desperate for another martyr. They want another Summer of Love. I don’t think that’d happen even if this had been a perfectly unjustified intentional killing, since I think frustrations (whether legit or not) have to boil up over long periods of time before they are spent in rioting on that scale, and once spent they have to be “recharged” so to speak. But it shouldn’t happen regardless, because even if you went only by the optics and asked zero questions (as woke thought leaders would like), this footage isn’t half as powerful as Floyd’s death.
Edit: On the 15 minute thing, it’s pretty wild how stuff like that goes viral and no one checks. I remember with Floyd the amount of time he was allegedly under the knee became a meme, like 8 minutes 46 seconds or whatever it was exactly. That became a hashtag, at least one event had a moment of silence for that length of time, etc. Then come to find out at the trial the real time frame was actually LONGER. So it would have been in wokesters’ interest to check the facts and they still didn’t, millions of people had access to the video and nobody bothered to check. Expect the 15-minute meme to die hard if it even does die
Meanwhile, these same people think nothing of the great ghetto pastime called “the knockout game”, which literally kills people.
If someone possesses a “delicate constitution”, whether by health condition or drug abuse, such that any attempt to physically restrain him will result in his probable death, are we expected to forego all physical interventions regardless of his behavior?
And if there’s no way to tell someone’s poor physical health at a glance, does that mean no one can deploy any physical interventions at all, ever? What if a person’s behavior is putting other people at risk? What if the next person he assaults has a “delicate constitution” and dies?
It all comes down to one question: do we go out of our way, as a society, to respect the health and well being of criminals as they are in the process of denying that respect to law-abiding citizens? Do we prioritize the criminal to such a degree that innocents are needlessly harmed?
The answer to this question should be a resounding “no”.
So how did the dude die? I haven't looked into this much but I haven't really seen anything that explicitly said. Leftists claim he was choked out but as someone who isn't retarded I don't take that claim at face value. Did he OD like Saint Floyd?
I don't think anyone actually knows yet. Probably going to be one of those situations where the coroner's report is super hard to find and you get a bunch of journalists pontificating and claiming they know instead.
It's just a lot harder to choke someone to death than the retarded normies think. And if he didn't flat out choke him to death then there is really no way the dude is guilty in any sane society. But we live in clown world so that wouldn't stop him from being convicted even if there was plenty of evidence he didn't kill him.
Only other thing I could think of would be a blood choke but that would require a slightly different hold than I saw in the little 2 minute clip. And he would have to maintain it pretty hard for a bit even after the dude goes limp and unconscious which I highly doubt but you never know.
With that manifesto thing, I think someone needs to create a convincing fake one and release it, claiming it was a "leak." It would force the FBI to put up or shut up.
After Fentanyl Floyd, do you really think they're going to make that mistake again, especially in leftist central that is NYC? Nah, this man was clearly the most innocent victim out there and dindu nuffin wrong. That is always the intended narrative, and they're not going to fuck up like they did with Floyd.
Being a good Samaritan only makes sense in white societies with rule of law. It's an alien concept to non-whites, as is the notion of "citizens arrest." They see white people jumping into dangerous situations to stop a bad guy and they don't think "Hero", they think "Why did you get involved? He wasn't bothering YOU."
I genuinely hope that once this guy left the NYPD station after they initially declined to press charges he decided to take himself and his family down to Mexico for a few weeks' vacation "until things cool off a bit"
Anyone who deals with a "Jogger/Scholar/Youth/Michael Jackson Impersonator/Future Astronaut" in the US should do the same. Or be prepared to give it the ol' Waco try.
Long have the people of the proud Dindu nation suffered under the tyranny of The Kek. Rise up Dindu! Claim your reparations in the form of sneakers, LED screens, and fortified wine! Large mansions await your high priestesses! You need only fill their coffers with pungent virtue.
The left really wants to criminalize self-defense. You can tell they're still bitter about how the Rittenhouse case went.
It should be noted, in most places around the world, that's already been achieved. Both the UK and Australia are infamously bad for this. For example in Australia, if you have ANYTHING that you admit is for self defence, you will be prosecuted. The only time you may use an object as a weapon for self defence is if it's an object of opportunity. You have a moment to pause and get a weapon? Not an object of opportunity. You have a moment to fashion a makeshift weapon (like rolling a newspaper into a club)? Not an object of opportunity.
The state HATES the idea of people capable of defending themselves, because people that can defend against common criminals can defend against the career criminals that are the state itself. Self-Defence is hated by the state because it can be used against the state. It's that simple.
I heard some story from... Germany, I think.
Restaurant with residence above. Guy breaks in restaurant and owner, fearing for his family in the same building, rearranges a few plates in the guy's skull.
Who got in more trouble? The owner, of course.
I just want simple rules, man. You break into my house where my family is sleeping and you forfeit your life. If you happen to leave with it, consider yourself lucky. Simple.
I always hate the people who say "well, you shouldn't try to kill these people, just deter them away with warning shots" and it's just so stupid, because wanna know what was the warning? The locked fucking doors. If you go further, that's your fault. Anything past that point, you forfeit your safety. You were warned, and you went further.
I fucking despite anything that is anti-self defence.
Yep. Police doesn't do shit. My ex went full psycho, threw plates at me and hit me, then called the police and I was the one that wasn't allowed in his home for three days. Of course she took all my shit but I got everything back through court. Police are mens enemy though.
That happened to a restaurant owner in Minneapolis(?) during the Summer of Floyd. Guy killed himself after the DA decided to press charges.
"I'm lazy and can't organize my tools. Thats why there are hammers placed 'randomly' throughout my house."
A lot of people store their sports gear under their bed for this purpose. Not just their bat or whatever, but all of it. Storing it separately is a sign of preparation, and makes it not a weapon of opportunity. Storing it where it actually belongs is a legitimate thing though.
Regardless, it's still fucked to the very core that self-ownership (and therefore the defence of self) is illegal. If you don't own yourself, you don't own anything. Which is, of course, the entire point of trying to outlaw self defence.
Archive, backup, archive, backup, archive, backup, archive, backup.
Anything against the narrative will be memory holed and purged with fire.
One backup here: https://files.catbox.moe/wvr62t.mp4
So true. Over the years I've been trained to start saving shit the instant something big happens. Videos will hit Twitter but be impossible to find two or three days later.
Are the two guys keeping his arms still also in trouble? I’m praying for this guy. He doesn’t deserve to be charged.
They’re so desperate for another martyr. They want another Summer of Love. I don’t think that’d happen even if this had been a perfectly unjustified intentional killing, since I think frustrations (whether legit or not) have to boil up over long periods of time before they are spent in rioting on that scale, and once spent they have to be “recharged” so to speak. But it shouldn’t happen regardless, because even if you went only by the optics and asked zero questions (as woke thought leaders would like), this footage isn’t half as powerful as Floyd’s death.
Edit: On the 15 minute thing, it’s pretty wild how stuff like that goes viral and no one checks. I remember with Floyd the amount of time he was allegedly under the knee became a meme, like 8 minutes 46 seconds or whatever it was exactly. That became a hashtag, at least one event had a moment of silence for that length of time, etc. Then come to find out at the trial the real time frame was actually LONGER. So it would have been in wokesters’ interest to check the facts and they still didn’t, millions of people had access to the video and nobody bothered to check. Expect the 15-minute meme to die hard if it even does die
The comments are pure cancer. “Chokeholds are Lethal Force!”. “Manslaughter Bare Minimum!”.
Meanwhile, these same people think nothing of the great ghetto pastime called “the knockout game”, which literally kills people.
If someone possesses a “delicate constitution”, whether by health condition or drug abuse, such that any attempt to physically restrain him will result in his probable death, are we expected to forego all physical interventions regardless of his behavior?
And if there’s no way to tell someone’s poor physical health at a glance, does that mean no one can deploy any physical interventions at all, ever? What if a person’s behavior is putting other people at risk? What if the next person he assaults has a “delicate constitution” and dies?
It all comes down to one question: do we go out of our way, as a society, to respect the health and well being of criminals as they are in the process of denying that respect to law-abiding citizens? Do we prioritize the criminal to such a degree that innocents are needlessly harmed?
The answer to this question should be a resounding “no”.
I've been spamming these two videos at people in response to that bullshit.
Remember this one from last year? Where the black guy grabs a white woman by the hair and drags her around the car, and she's quietly mouthing "Help me" to the other passengers?
And this one, where a woman was sucker punched and beat so badly that she lost an eye.
Many such cases.
If white people don't leave blue states and cities, they shouldn't be surprised when they get attacked by packs of dindus.
So how did the dude die? I haven't looked into this much but I haven't really seen anything that explicitly said. Leftists claim he was choked out but as someone who isn't retarded I don't take that claim at face value. Did he OD like Saint Floyd?
I don't think anyone actually knows yet. Probably going to be one of those situations where the coroner's report is super hard to find and you get a bunch of journalists pontificating and claiming they know instead.
But if the coroner saw the video, what the facts say don't matter. Chauvin proved this is the new normal.
It's just a lot harder to choke someone to death than the retarded normies think. And if he didn't flat out choke him to death then there is really no way the dude is guilty in any sane society. But we live in clown world so that wouldn't stop him from being convicted even if there was plenty of evidence he didn't kill him.
Oh that marine is fucked. 2nd degree murder, 20 years, no parole.
probably drug related.
choking someone for a couple minutes then letting go soon after they're unconscious is not going to kill a normal healthy person.
people can hold their breath 2+ minutes pretty easily. actual brain damage takes 5+ minutes.
idk if the autopsy is ever going to be released
Only other thing I could think of would be a blood choke but that would require a slightly different hold than I saw in the little 2 minute clip. And he would have to maintain it pretty hard for a bit even after the dude goes limp and unconscious which I highly doubt but you never know.
So yeah my money is on drugs at the moment.
UFC guys get choked out all the time and no one dies.
Am I seeing it wrong, or does he not take a deep breath right there at the end when everyone’s left him alone?
I can't wait for the postmortem so we can see what drugs this guy had in his system.
it will be released right after the tranny shooter manifesto
With that manifesto thing, I think someone needs to create a convincing fake one and release it, claiming it was a "leak." It would force the FBI to put up or shut up.
After Fentanyl Floyd, do you really think they're going to make that mistake again, especially in leftist central that is NYC? Nah, this man was clearly the most innocent victim out there and dindu nuffin wrong. That is always the intended narrative, and they're not going to fuck up like they did with Floyd.
They'll never make that public. You know why.
Honestly if you've ever even considered being a good Samaritan you should be wearing a balaclava at all times
Being a good Samaritan only makes sense in white societies with rule of law. It's an alien concept to non-whites, as is the notion of "citizens arrest." They see white people jumping into dangerous situations to stop a bad guy and they don't think "Hero", they think "Why did you get involved? He wasn't bothering YOU."
I genuinely hope that once this guy left the NYPD station after they initially declined to press charges he decided to take himself and his family down to Mexico for a few weeks' vacation "until things cool off a bit"
Anyone who deals with a "Jogger/Scholar/Youth/Michael Jackson Impersonator/Future Astronaut" in the US should do the same. Or be prepared to give it the ol' Waco try.
Long have the people of the proud Dindu nation suffered under the tyranny of The Kek. Rise up Dindu! Claim your reparations in the form of sneakers, LED screens, and fortified wine! Large mansions await your high priestesses! You need only fill their coffers with pungent virtue.
Pour one out for the homies.