Not an argument, going to hooters is 1. A choice and 2. A private business, not a public space, the same as any strip club. The latter is as the post says, a public space which has different standards. They are essentially equating a strip club to a public library…
I've never been to one, but isn't it just a normal restaurant where the waitresses wear a uniform that makes the breasts and cleavage more prominent, like the Dirndl outfits women wear at Oktoberfest?
Sure, it sounds suggestive, but not outrageously so. I've heard they have good chicken wings and fries.
Yeah it's not a big deal at all imo. Children will see more skin at any public pool or beach. Lefties just hate it because they hate pretty women who enjoy flaunting their assets.
I actually banged a Hooters waitress when I was 20. She stuffed her bra and wouldn't let me take it off during sex lol.
The actual equivalent is bringing your kid to a strip club, not a Hooters.
No, often the real equivalent would be your child's school bringing your kid to a strip club without your consent when they're supposed to be teaching them math or something, then smearing you as a "far-right bigot" and calling the police on you when you complain.
And the fact that I can make such extreme comparisons and still have it be accurate just shows how bad things are.
I’m so sick of things that were common sense not too long ago. Up until recently it was understood that drag was adult entertainment. Also these people threw a fit about Kirk Cameron reading Bible stories to kids.
Yeah this is common sense. I don't think it's right to put a little girl in a Hooter's shirt as it borders on sexualization, but there's nothing wrong with Hooters and the bottom one with the guy in drag is weird and disturbing to any normal person.
People acting like this is not common sense are being contrarians. Half of them do it to rebel against rules they considered too religious/patriarchal/conservative, and then instill their own wacky values just to say "How does it feel, losers?" It's not a good faith argument and they don't actually believe memes like this.
I hope there is nothing weird about him. His sister is good too although if I were her I’d stop doing interviews with the far left magazines or news sites because they will ask why great American family channel has no gay couples
Up until recently it was understood that drag was adult entertainment.
Up until recently it was understood that male and female was different, and that *gasp* there are only two genders.
It's insane how far and how fast things have spiraled. Liberal perspectives from twenty - even ten - years ago would now be "hate speech" and a firable offence if it came out you'd ever said it, even in private.
One is trashy but still in the general vicinity of traditional heterosexuality and might even lead to reproductive sex one day, the other is intended to manipulate your children into ending your bloodline.
They're right. There shouldn't be Hooters-brand clothing made in children's sizes, and children shouldn't be brought to Hooters either for the same reason drag queens shouldn't be reading to children or teaching classes. Though to be fair, Hooters uniforms really aren't that racy in a vacuum. They're a helluva lot more conservative than what drag queens wear.
Hooters is just women in tight shorts and tank tops. They aren’t taking their clothes off. They may flirt with people but it’s pretty tame. Hooters would not be my first choice of place to take my kids to eat at. But if by some weird circumstance on a road trip all the fast food places around we’re having drag events, you bet I’d take my kid to hooters. It would be way easier than explaining why that man is in a dress.
Sure, I don't like what's being communicated by the top image either. But it's abundantly clear that it isn't in any way analogous to having some retarded degenerate telling little boys that they might be 'happier' if they try emulating little girls and describing sexual activity of a deviant kind and in explicit detail to children, and so forth. These kids will be confused and guilty about any opposite sex attraction that they might have even in the least worst case scenario. No wonder something like 15% of the American generation born after 2000 are now identifying as LGBT (as opposed to something like 5% of the boomers): keep that up and you'll become a majority, as you so desire, in a few more generations.
The choice of photo is also obviously loaded and propagandistic: notice that the bottom photo is full of parents, sending the false message that there's safeguards, responsibility, &c. 'Like, only bigots think that kids would be left alone with drag queens, we aren't that irresponsible!' Almost every photo of these losers looks more offensive than one chosen here: a teacher might be the only other adult visible in most of them. Similarly, the use of 'may be present' is loaded language: schools and libraries are not places where children may be present (may, implying that it may be fraction of a percent possible that children may be in such environments), but are, with practically 100% certainty.
I’ll be honest. If that man-woman thing was looking like that and reading to kids then I wouldn’t care
You're just as bad then because that's how you enable these degenerates to start spreading their roots because as Americans say, you give them an inch they want a mile. Even without escalating, it still poisons a child's mind into thinking that an adult man wearing a female wig dressed in female clothing is normal.
When you want something out of your society you cut it at the root and purge it completely, you don't gamble it ''well maybe kids would have a laugh at it'', doesn't matter, it's enough for just 1 kid to see it and think it's normal and continue to carry on a degenerate opinion and eventually maybe even do it himself.
There's a million different ways to make a young child laugh that don't include an emasculated adult man in women's attire reading to your kids, they're extremely impressionable at this age and if their degenerate parents bring them to these shows then I can imagine it's not all of the degeneracy these kids are exposed to and taught.
It would be weird for drag queen story hour for adults too…. Unless I have paid for an audio book I don’t want another person reading for me. Adding Drag Queens to anything will always make it more weird. Some examples: Drag queen roadside clean up, Drag queen pottery class. Drag Queen karate class…… all of these things would be normal for anyone of any age to be apart of, but adding drag queens 100% makes it weird.
Yup. I used to be pretty tolerant of this sort of thing, but the slippery slope has proven itself undefeated, and now as far as I'm concerned these people can fuck right off. I feel bad for the tiny amount of people who do suffer from gender dysphoria, and I don't want them "genocided" or anything, but they should keep their activities to themselves, in private, among consenting adults, and not try to force others to "accept" them, and just live their lives while, you know, not touching kids.
Not all trannies - or other deviants - are kid-touchers, but normalizing and embracing deviancy will inevitably lead to said kid-touching. For the good of society, fringe "lifestyles" have to stay fringe, should be kept out of the public eye and, yes, should be shamed if they try to pull any nonsense whatsoever.
Several people have pointed out the circumcision exception in some of the ani-tranny bills. Usually like some sort of gotcha. Often there are masses of replies from people who want that banned too.
Your terms are acceptable. Minors shouldn't be allowed at Hooters because it is adult entertainment.
Oh you're still mad as if the argument was made in bad faith?
Okay Groomer.
This is the way
Not an argument, going to hooters is 1. A choice and 2. A private business, not a public space, the same as any strip club. The latter is as the post says, a public space which has different standards. They are essentially equating a strip club to a public library…
The actual equivalent is bringing your kid to a strip club, not a Hooters.
That said, the fact that Hooters is even a thing speaks to how lazy we've been and why degeneracy has pushed so far into mainstream.
I've never been to one, but isn't it just a normal restaurant where the waitresses wear a uniform that makes the breasts and cleavage more prominent, like the Dirndl outfits women wear at Oktoberfest?
Sure, it sounds suggestive, but not outrageously so. I've heard they have good chicken wings and fries.
Yeah it's not a big deal at all imo. Children will see more skin at any public pool or beach. Lefties just hate it because they hate pretty women who enjoy flaunting their assets.
I actually banged a Hooters waitress when I was 20. She stuffed her bra and wouldn't let me take it off during sex lol.
No, often the real equivalent would be your child's school bringing your kid to a strip club without your consent when they're supposed to be teaching them math or something, then smearing you as a "far-right bigot" and calling the police on you when you complain.
And the fact that I can make such extreme comparisons and still have it be accurate just shows how bad things are.
I’m so sick of things that were common sense not too long ago. Up until recently it was understood that drag was adult entertainment. Also these people threw a fit about Kirk Cameron reading Bible stories to kids.
Who is pushing for girls to go to hooters?
Mommy's future little whore is what her shirt should say because it's always the same cum bucket pushing this shit on their kids.
Yeah this is common sense. I don't think it's right to put a little girl in a Hooter's shirt as it borders on sexualization, but there's nothing wrong with Hooters and the bottom one with the guy in drag is weird and disturbing to any normal person.
People acting like this is not common sense are being contrarians. Half of them do it to rebel against rules they considered too religious/patriarchal/conservative, and then instill their own wacky values just to say "How does it feel, losers?" It's not a good faith argument and they don't actually believe memes like this.
Kirk Cameron is kinda nuts, but his heart is in the right place.
I say that as a born-again Christian. Something about him just rubs me the wrong way for some reason.
I hope there is nothing weird about him. His sister is good too although if I were her I’d stop doing interviews with the far left magazines or news sites because they will ask why great American family channel has no gay couples
Up until recently it was understood that male and female was different, and that *gasp* there are only two genders.
It's insane how far and how fast things have spiraled. Liberal perspectives from twenty - even ten - years ago would now be "hate speech" and a firable offence if it came out you'd ever said it, even in private.
One is trashy but still in the general vicinity of traditional heterosexuality and might even lead to reproductive sex one day, the other is intended to manipulate your children into ending your bloodline.
At least the top understands what a woman is.
They're right. There shouldn't be Hooters-brand clothing made in children's sizes, and children shouldn't be brought to Hooters either for the same reason drag queens shouldn't be reading to children or teaching classes. Though to be fair, Hooters uniforms really aren't that racy in a vacuum. They're a helluva lot more conservative than what drag queens wear.
So the price for getting rid of drag degeneracy is that we also have to get rid of the degenerate boob restaurant? Seem like reasonable terms.
Breastaurant
Why exactly is it legal to drag your kids to an adult themed restaurant? I always thought it was against the law.
Hooters is just women in tight shorts and tank tops. They aren’t taking their clothes off. They may flirt with people but it’s pretty tame. Hooters would not be my first choice of place to take my kids to eat at. But if by some weird circumstance on a road trip all the fast food places around we’re having drag events, you bet I’d take my kid to hooters. It would be way easier than explaining why that man is in a dress.
he chose the most benign picture possible to represent the drag queen case, and it still looks very objectionable.
Poor argument in the graphic.
Sure, I don't like what's being communicated by the top image either. But it's abundantly clear that it isn't in any way analogous to having some retarded degenerate telling little boys that they might be 'happier' if they try emulating little girls and describing sexual activity of a deviant kind and in explicit detail to children, and so forth. These kids will be confused and guilty about any opposite sex attraction that they might have even in the least worst case scenario. No wonder something like 15% of the American generation born after 2000 are now identifying as LGBT (as opposed to something like 5% of the boomers): keep that up and you'll become a majority, as you so desire, in a few more generations.
The choice of photo is also obviously loaded and propagandistic: notice that the bottom photo is full of parents, sending the false message that there's safeguards, responsibility, &c. 'Like, only bigots think that kids would be left alone with drag queens, we aren't that irresponsible!' Almost every photo of these losers looks more offensive than one chosen here: a teacher might be the only other adult visible in most of them. Similarly, the use of 'may be present' is loaded language: schools and libraries are not places where children may be present (may, implying that it may be fraction of a percent possible that children may be in such environments), but are, with practically 100% certainty.
They're both degenerate, but at least the first scenario is likely to still result in the child growing up to sexually reproduce.
The kids in the bottom image are being fast-tracked to homosexuality and self-mutilation.
You're just as bad then because that's how you enable these degenerates to start spreading their roots because as Americans say, you give them an inch they want a mile. Even without escalating, it still poisons a child's mind into thinking that an adult man wearing a female wig dressed in female clothing is normal.
When you want something out of your society you cut it at the root and purge it completely, you don't gamble it ''well maybe kids would have a laugh at it'', doesn't matter, it's enough for just 1 kid to see it and think it's normal and continue to carry on a degenerate opinion and eventually maybe even do it himself.
There's a million different ways to make a young child laugh that don't include an emasculated adult man in women's attire reading to your kids, they're extremely impressionable at this age and if their degenerate parents bring them to these shows then I can imagine it's not all of the degeneracy these kids are exposed to and taught.
Sheer laziness
People are retarded. They think everything is wrong if it offends them.
Amusing.
Face the wall please.
there is literally nothing wrong with hooters. stop pretending there is.
But it is weird in the first place to have a drag queen story hour for kids. I guess it was inevitable for it to turn into what we see now
It would be weird for drag queen story hour for adults too…. Unless I have paid for an audio book I don’t want another person reading for me. Adding Drag Queens to anything will always make it more weird. Some examples: Drag queen roadside clean up, Drag queen pottery class. Drag Queen karate class…… all of these things would be normal for anyone of any age to be apart of, but adding drag queens 100% makes it weird.
I mean, you are right. But actually, it should be.
Yup. I used to be pretty tolerant of this sort of thing, but the slippery slope has proven itself undefeated, and now as far as I'm concerned these people can fuck right off. I feel bad for the tiny amount of people who do suffer from gender dysphoria, and I don't want them "genocided" or anything, but they should keep their activities to themselves, in private, among consenting adults, and not try to force others to "accept" them, and just live their lives while, you know, not touching kids.
Not all trannies - or other deviants - are kid-touchers, but normalizing and embracing deviancy will inevitably lead to said kid-touching. For the good of society, fringe "lifestyles" have to stay fringe, should be kept out of the public eye and, yes, should be shamed if they try to pull any nonsense whatsoever.
Several people have pointed out the circumcision exception in some of the ani-tranny bills. Usually like some sort of gotcha. Often there are masses of replies from people who want that banned too.