He just pointed out that people who say it's not "okay to be white" are a hate group (true) & that white people should run the fuck away from a hate group.
The white supremacist thing to say would be that whites should hate black people back and organize and hate/fight back in order to protect whites against blacks, to drive blacks out of "white" areas and basically go on the attack, not to run away.
Scott Adams basically came to the realization of white flight, which is nothing new.
In 1870, The Nation covered the large-scale migrations of white Americans; "The report of the Emigration Commissioners of Louisiana, for the past year, estimates the white exodus from the Southern Atlantic States, Alabama, and Mississippi, to the trans-Mississippi regions, at scores of thousands".[23] By 1888, with rhetoric typical of the time, Walter Thomas Mills's The Statesman publication predicted: Social and political equality and the political supremacy of the negro element in any southern state must lead to one of three things: A white exodus, a war of races, or the destruction of representative institutions, as in the District of Columbia.[24]
So white flight was a well known thing even back in the 1800s. The reasons were different back then, though, more based on racist disgust than non-racist legitimate fears.
This could’ve easily been solved by asking these people “were you a slave” and then moving on once they said no. And what percentage do you need to have? I keep saying a great Mel brooks style comedy could be made with. White guy who is like 5 percent African descent gets a reparation payment.
But in all seriousness every white person who supports this should have to pay the taxes. Everyone else move out. Also do they not realize if they actually pay this out it’s only a matter of time before they are whining about something else. Never listen to people with a victim mentality
What's more, the whining from the activist classes isn't going to stop. But afterwards, they can be shut up with "you got your dough, what do you want now?"
23andme: HAHA, TAKE THAT, WIGHT SUPREMACISTS! We'll make you believe that you're part black. DIE MAD ABOUT IT.
White supremacist: Cool, I am 0.03% black! Now they can't complain when I say the word 'nigger'!
I'll bet anyone that more "black" people have been upset over the percentage of white DNA that they have than "white" people over the percentage of black DNA.
I see black people who are surprised by having white ancestry and it always confuses me how they can be clueless. I mean look at an African compared to a black American. Clearly you are either a little or a lot lighter for a reason. An African co worker once jokingly told me that I’m not pure African because my coffee has at least a few spoonfuls of cream. But all that to say it shouldn’t be surprising. I knew my last name came from a white guy. Also if you look at American slavery it wasn’t uncommon for the master to have a mistress amongst the slaves or have kids with his slaves.
I mean look at an African compared to a black American
Africans aren't real blacks, you know. They didn't even vote for Joe Biden. They're also privileged bastards who have never had to deal with racism in America.
Clearly you are either a little or a lot lighter for a reason.
Maybe they think that Africans just have a really dark tan.
Also if you look at American slavery it wasn’t uncommon for the master to have a mistress amongst the slaves or have kids with his slaves.
Right, and these kids were often those who were set free - which gave them a head start in access to the dominant American culture, which at least in the 19th century was something to write home about. When proper blacks arrived in the north, who had less acculturation, people responded by passing laws that banned all blacks from restaurants, etc. This was the reason why the NAACP was founded, and it concerns were those of the mulatto elite - access to white neighborhoods and schools, which had been lost to the backlash to the Great Migraton.
Thomas Sowell writes about that in one of his books. But you also had black elites in New England where slavery was abolished before the founding (WEB Dubois come from that line). My gg grandfather was the child of his slave owner and a slave. He got a few acres of land from his dad and was given to the legitimate daughter of his slave master so his half sister.
On another side of the family I had a gg grandfather who was white from a blue blood family but claimed to be black (otherwise I wouldn’t be here). I’ve been doing research into his past but it’s hard to find. I did find his father and ancestry but I imagine something must have happened to cause him to live amongst blacks in the late 1800s
After slavery. He was given to his half sister when she got married and when his father died (after slavery) he was given some land and raised his family there and worked for her and her husband (although I’m pretty certain she knew they were siblings).
I think this is ultimately their goal, to make everything reparations.
Give $5k to each black - about $200 billion, that could happen as insane as it is. But then Jews need $10k each because dying in the holocaust is worse than slavery, right? And the Indians need gibs too!
Whites will get $100 for WWII to save the Jews and northern whites $500 for
fighting civil war to free blacks from slavery - why so low? Because the men that died in war aren't the real victims.
By the time everybody's done getting their free money it won't be worth anything.
Gavin Newsome wants to become president of the United States and the best way to do that is to pander to the 13% black voting bloc that 90% votes for Democrats each and every time.
Blacks and hispanics are the reason why the political landscape of the USA is so schizophrenic and unhinged.
You need to understand what this article is saying: effete wine merchant Gavin Newsom set up a "task force" on reparations, which has no power to do anything, and this article is just about them having a little meeting where they traded fantasies.
But local residents took aim at the taskforce during Friday's heated meeting, with one man demanding Moore 'step down and step aside' as she was not fit for the job. 'This is all political theatre and it needs to end,' he added.
True.
I just hope no black people actually believe this shit and start moving here. California only has 6.5% blacks, about half the national average, and it's one of the few good things about the state. I live in one of the lowest percentage black areas in the whole country, and yet they still manage to ruin things here sometimes. Thankfully the LAPD kicked the shit out of BLM at least.
Another thing to consider is that CA is only 35.2% white, lowest of any major state in the country. (lowest excluding hawaii) 40% hispanic. 16% asian. 6.5% black. 4.2% multiracial (which tbh are probably mostly blacks).
Nonwhites give 0 fucks about blacks, especially when they'd be the ones paying. You think a single asian or hispanic gives a shit about reparations?
Actually, non-whites are a good deal more racist against blacks than whites. It's just white people who are not racist. Here in Europe, the only racist people I have ever encountered were not white.
especially when they'd be the ones paying. You think a single asian or hispanic gives a shit about reparations?
It would alienate A LOT of Asians and Hispanics from those pushing it, if they actually had to turn over their hard won cash to blacks because "slavery".
That is why I would not be unhappy if San Francisco did pay $5 million to each black. Make it as crazy as possible.
Actually, non-whites are a good deal more racist against blacks than whites.
They just don't put up with bullshit from black people and respond to them in a natural way. Whites have been neutered by Leftist politics and conditioned that whites aren't allowed to resent blacks when they constantly see blacks behaving badly.
It's human nature when you see a certain group constantly up to no good, to develop negative impressions of that group.
Here in Europe, the only racist people I have ever encountered were not white.
Even if a white person was racist, they'd be too afraid to admit it probably. I had a romanian girlfriend in college, and after she trusted me, one day she came to me in whispered tones and started telling me about how terrible the gypsies and the jews were. I had a jewish roommate and I didn't think anything of him being jewish.
But outside of eastern europe my impression of white euros is that they're primarily self-hating.
That is why I would not be unhappy if San Francisco did pay $5 million to each black. Make it as crazy as possible.
Yeah, I'm 100% behind libtard crazy shit as long as it only affects them and not the rest of us. The only real problem with libtards is the minority of sane people trapped under their rule who have to suffer from their delusional ideology.
But to be honest, this is all a scam.
White liberals truly, deep down, don't care about black people. Sure, they PRETEND TO, and they compete with one another over how many black dicks they can suck in a very high visibility and performative way, which sometimes results in some trivial benefits for blacks (like some black actress gets cast in a white role), but in the big picture, they don't care. Whenever it gets to the point where shit like this is being considered and people start to worry it might be real, the libs all pull back in a big way.
IMO reparations talk is just a pander to black voters by libtards like Newsom with political ambitions. The only people who truly want reparations are the black activists themselves, and they're a small powerless minority screeching "gib me".
It's human nature when you see a certain group constantly up to no good, to develop negative impressions of that group.
Right, but as for the people I know, they have no reason to have negative views of blacks. They just don't like them. At least, they have prejudices that blacks are up to no good, if a black is a cool person, they don't have a problem with him.
But outside of eastern europe my impression of white euros is that they're primarily self-hating.
I don't see much self-hatred. It's more beaten into submission. Even leftist whites will trash talk foreigners in my presence (but for behavior, not out of racism). The division in Europe is not white vs. non-white, but indigenous vs. foreigner and Muslim vs. non-Muslim.
Yeah, I'm 100% behind libtard crazy shit as long as it only affects them and not the rest of us. The only real problem with libtards is the minority of sane people trapped under their rule who have to suffer from their delusional ideology.
I know sane people who spout 'libtard' pieties who think nothing of it. As long as it has no cost, it is easy to believe in insanity. The good thing about reparatons is that costs will be imposed on these people.
White liberals truly, deep down, don't care about black people. Sure, they PRETEND TO, and they compete with one another over how many black dicks they can suck in a very high visibility and performative way, which sometimes results in some trivial benefits for blacks (like some black actress gets cast in a white role), but in the big picture, they don't care. Whenever it gets to the point where shit like this is being considered and people start to worry it might be real, the libs all pull back in a big way.
Sowell explains it best. Blacks, as well as others groups, are just mascots to white liberals. They'll operate in your name, but obviously, they do not operate in your interests.
The only people who truly want reparations are the black activists themselves, and they're a small powerless minority screeching "gib me".
I doubt even black activists want it, because that would sabotage their business model. How much patience will there be for 'black advocacy' after every black got half a million, and the ones with discipline and talent made good use of it, while the ones without squandered it and went back and demanded more? The ideal situation is where they agitate for reparations but are neverable to get them.
they have no reason to have negative views of blacks.
If you have an internet connection or a tv, though, you can see a lot of black people behaving badly, even if it isn't in person.
I know sane people who spout 'libtard' pieties who think nothing of it. As long as it has no cost, it is easy to believe in insanity. The good thing about reparatons is that costs will be imposed on these people.
This is especially true of young people. Also people learn to lie and spout pieties they don't really believe in as a sort of defense mechanism and virtue signal.
Sowell explains it best. Blacks, as well as others groups, are just mascots to white liberals. They'll operate in your name, but obviously, they do not operate in your interests.
Yeah, deep down, white liberals just want to use blacks as a weapon against the Right. If the Left had absolute power and the Right was Thanos snapped out of existence, all their bullshit ideology would collapse since it only exists to gain power. That's why the Left would eat each other as soon as they "won" and vanquished the Right.
I doubt even black activists want it, because that would sabotage their business model. How much patience will there be for 'black advocacy' after every black got half a million, and the ones with discipline and talent made good use of it, while the ones without squandered it and went back and demanded more? The ideal situation is where they agitate for reparations but are neverable to get them.
Japan paid Korea off over the comfort women and Korea never shuts up about it. Payoffs don't work. They take the money then they make excuses for why its never enough. There is no circumstance where blacks will ever say "okay, slavery is repaid, we will calm down and stop playing the victim now". They will push the victimhood as hard as possible all the way until they can flip to supremacy.
If you have an internet connection or a tv, though, you can see a lot of black people behaving badly, even if it isn't in person.
I had an internet connections and a TV for years, and I never saw black people behaving badly. First place I actually did see it was that sub PublicFreakout, before they purged anything that made their favorite demographics look bad.
This is even more true for first gen immigrants who use internet for stuff in their native language, and TV for movies exclusively.
Ironically, the people who follow Western media regard blacks as victims and discriminated against.
Yeah, deep down, white liberals just want to use blacks as a weapon against the Right. If the Left had absolute power and the Right was Thanos snapped out of existence, all their bullshit ideology would collapse since it only exists to gain power. That's why the Left would eat each other as soon as they "won" and vanquished the Right.
I mean, it would just spiral into greater and greater madness. Or perhaps into greater sanity, because I believe that these movements are fundamentally random. If they get everything they want, they'll fabricate new grievances, splinter their old coalition, and just keep grinding on.
Obviously, that last part is true of the right as well. Suppose you arrive at a socially conservative consensus, then a lot of people who don't want tax cuts for Goldman Sachs will splinter from the right. This may be why the right never actually gets anything done, because it keeps people as hostage to their movement.
There is no circumstance where blacks will ever say "okay, slavery is repaid, we will calm down and stop playing the victim now". They will push the victimhood as hard as possible all the way until they can flip to supremacy.
I think a lot of ordinary blacks will, so the activists will then convince them that they are still victims so their grift can continue. However, the rest of society will then be much less likely to buy into the narrative.
I had an internet connections and a TV for years, and I never saw black people behaving badly. First place I actually did see it was that sub PublicFreakout, before they purged anything that made their favorite demographics look bad.
True, but people old enough to remember the LA riots & rodney king, or OJ Simpson, etc might feel differently. There was a lull in black shit after OJ until BLM started to ramp up in 2014, culminating in the riots in 2020.
There is also a pervasive global belief that blacks are backward and inferior based on the simple truth that Africa is such a shitshow. Everyone knows Africa is backward and poor, and the logical conclusion is that it's because the people living there are fuck ups who can't get their shit straight. These kinds of beliefs are reinforced by things like AIDS becoming so rampant there and literally no where else in the world, and also stuff like the murder of white farmers leading to famine, riots in south africa, constant stories of things like tribal genocide and mass murder (congo in the 90s, south sudan, etc), and somalia being a failed state with pirates.
If they get everything they want, they'll fabricate new grievances, splinter their old coalition, and just keep grinding on.
True but that's why if you put them (intersectional groups) all on an island together they'd immediately devolve into a battle royale against each other. Sure you'd have "sane" voices like Bill Maher, who are only half-retarded Leftists, but they'd be a small minority on that island and likely eaten first. Maher only gains traction in the US because he appeals to a class of white people, especially women, who reject the Right because they drank the kool-aid that Republicans are evil racist misogynist blah blah blah, and these people want a huge, overbearing welfare state and socialism and the stripping of many freedoms, but they're not on board with what their intersectional tribal allies want. They pretend to be, because they feel they need to to present a unified front against the Right, but deep down they're against it, they're just too afraid to speak out. Maher speaks out for them, so they can rally behind him. That's his niche. It's still a minority position on the Left, though. They aren't nominating or electing people like Maher.
Obviously, that last part is true of the right as well. Suppose you arrive at a socially conservative consensus, then a lot of people who don't want tax cuts for Goldman Sachs will splinter from the right. This may be why the right never actually gets anything done, because it keeps people as hostage to their movement.
I don't actually agree. I think the vast majority of people on the Right just want freedom, capitalism, and generally the status quo of a couple decades ago before the woke shit came in. Most of them would be happy to be apolitical, and the only reason most people on the Right are becoming more political now is as a defensive reaction.
Yes, there are some authoritarians on the right who want to do shit like ban porn, but they're a minority and in a "right wing only" state, the authoritarians would be in the minority and lack power, particularly because the whole reason the authoritarians get any motivation is because they feel they need to resort to authoritarianism to combat the degeneracy of the Left, which would not exist in a Right-only state.
True, but people old enough to remember the LA riots & rodney king, or OJ Simpson, etc might feel differently
Yeah, I think the LA Riots definitely had some effect. My dad once told me something like "whenever the power goes out, black people start stealing stuff". I think that was the result of that.
There is also a pervasive global belief that blacks are backward and inferior based on the simple truth that Africa is such a shitshow. Everyone knows Africa is backward and poor, and the logical conclusion is that it's because the people living there are fuck ups who can't get their shit straight.
Maybe, but obviously, you can also blame it on colonialism which a lot of people do. I don't think it's either, but there you go.
They aren't nominating or electing people like Maher.
I think it's the majority position on the left, or would be. The problem is that all the elites are on the other side, so Maher's position will lose out.
Most of them would be happy to be apolitical, and the only reason most people on the Right are becoming more political now is as a defensive reaction.
That certainly is true for me. I really don't care about politics, or don't want to care, but the problem is that it keeps coming for me.
Similar to amnesty, one of my big issues with repartitions (putting aside how the entire thing is retarded for the moment), is that there's no endpoint. Will the black population stop listening to race grifters, stop buying into the victimhood narrative, and finally feel like past wrongs have been made right? Will they never whine about racism again? Or maybe some will take the money and go to Africa (haha, that would be a hilarious eye-opening experience for them.)
Point is, let's say you pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to every black person in the country. Is "racism" solved? Do the journos shut up about it forevermore? Do we end diversity hiring, "positive discrimination," quotas, and affirmative action?
Of course not. Grifters will be back and asking for Reparations 2.0 almost immediately. You could pay every black person those hundreds of thousands of dollars, and the grifter class would say it was devaluating black contributions and suffering, and was yet another mark of Hwite Supremacy.
The only way I'd even consider supporting something absurd like reparations or amnesty is if it was absolutely guaranteed to be a one-and-done thing. But of course they'd lie anyway. No, fuck off, race grifters. Things were pretty good here for everyone for a while. If you really want to make things better, clean out the rot in the government, who are doing all this to us.
White Californians about to go full Scott Adams?
He did literally nothing wrong
He just pointed out that people who say it's not "okay to be white" are a hate group (true) & that white people should run the fuck away from a hate group.
The white supremacist thing to say would be that whites should hate black people back and organize and hate/fight back in order to protect whites against blacks, to drive blacks out of "white" areas and basically go on the attack, not to run away.
Scott Adams basically came to the realization of white flight, which is nothing new.
So white flight was a well known thing even back in the 1800s. The reasons were different back then, though, more based on racist disgust than non-racist legitimate fears.
There's a case to be made that he didn't go far enough.
This could’ve easily been solved by asking these people “were you a slave” and then moving on once they said no. And what percentage do you need to have? I keep saying a great Mel brooks style comedy could be made with. White guy who is like 5 percent African descent gets a reparation payment.
But in all seriousness every white person who supports this should have to pay the taxes. Everyone else move out. Also do they not realize if they actually pay this out it’s only a matter of time before they are whining about something else. Never listen to people with a victim mentality
Can you imagine how Asian and Hispanic taxpayers are going to react when they're handed the bill for this nonsense?
This isn't the Democratic party shooting themselves in the foot. It's a shotgun blast from under the chin.
Precisely. Which is why I hope this passes.
What's more, the whining from the activist classes isn't going to stop. But afterwards, they can be shut up with "you got your dough, what do you want now?"
Nope. They'll never shut up, they'll just say it isn't enough and demand more.
This other story proves it. By setting a ridiculously high number, and then doling out less, they're setting the stage for continuous revolution.
"You HAD to give me that $360k, white boy, but you people owe us way more than that."
23andme: HAHA, TAKE THAT, WIGHT SUPREMACISTS! We'll make you believe that you're part black. DIE MAD ABOUT IT.
White supremacist: Cool, I am 0.03% black! Now they can't complain when I say the word 'nigger'!
I'll bet anyone that more "black" people have been upset over the percentage of white DNA that they have than "white" people over the percentage of black DNA.
I see black people who are surprised by having white ancestry and it always confuses me how they can be clueless. I mean look at an African compared to a black American. Clearly you are either a little or a lot lighter for a reason. An African co worker once jokingly told me that I’m not pure African because my coffee has at least a few spoonfuls of cream. But all that to say it shouldn’t be surprising. I knew my last name came from a white guy. Also if you look at American slavery it wasn’t uncommon for the master to have a mistress amongst the slaves or have kids with his slaves.
Africans aren't real blacks, you know. They didn't even vote for Joe Biden. They're also privileged bastards who have never had to deal with racism in America.
Maybe they think that Africans just have a really dark tan.
Right, and these kids were often those who were set free - which gave them a head start in access to the dominant American culture, which at least in the 19th century was something to write home about. When proper blacks arrived in the north, who had less acculturation, people responded by passing laws that banned all blacks from restaurants, etc. This was the reason why the NAACP was founded, and it concerns were those of the mulatto elite - access to white neighborhoods and schools, which had been lost to the backlash to the Great Migraton.
Thomas Sowell writes about that in one of his books. But you also had black elites in New England where slavery was abolished before the founding (WEB Dubois come from that line). My gg grandfather was the child of his slave owner and a slave. He got a few acres of land from his dad and was given to the legitimate daughter of his slave master so his half sister.
On another side of the family I had a gg grandfather who was white from a blue blood family but claimed to be black (otherwise I wouldn’t be here). I’ve been doing research into his past but it’s hard to find. I did find his father and ancestry but I imagine something must have happened to cause him to live amongst blacks in the late 1800s
Yes, where do you think I got it?
He got land while still being a slave???
After slavery. He was given to his half sister when she got married and when his father died (after slavery) he was given some land and raised his family there and worked for her and her husband (although I’m pretty certain she knew they were siblings).
I had that, plus Asian and Eastern European added to mine. Less than 2 percent total for all but still.
Why not? I say anyone with any amount of African DNA should flock to California for a payment
I think this is ultimately their goal, to make everything reparations.
Give $5k to each black - about $200 billion, that could happen as insane as it is. But then Jews need $10k each because dying in the holocaust is worse than slavery, right? And the Indians need gibs too!
Whites will get $100 for WWII to save the Jews and northern whites $500 for fighting civil war to free blacks from slavery - why so low? Because the men that died in war aren't the real victims.
By the time everybody's done getting their free money it won't be worth anything.
CALIFORNIA NEVER HAD SLAVERY
This is insufficient. As written the eligibility requirements are racist.
Descendants of slaves often won't have any documentation to prove their claim.
The CA residence requirement is also racist and excludes hundreds of thousands of African Americans who are or have been homeless.
The only way to ensure equity is to pay every person who identifies as African American, no questions asked.
Go Gavin!
Gavin Newsome wants to become president of the United States and the best way to do that is to pander to the 13% black voting bloc that 90% votes for Democrats each and every time.
Blacks and hispanics are the reason why the political landscape of the USA is so schizophrenic and unhinged.
I'm in California. It's never going to happen.
You need to understand what this article is saying: effete wine merchant Gavin Newsom set up a "task force" on reparations, which has no power to do anything, and this article is just about them having a little meeting where they traded fantasies.
True.
I just hope no black people actually believe this shit and start moving here. California only has 6.5% blacks, about half the national average, and it's one of the few good things about the state. I live in one of the lowest percentage black areas in the whole country, and yet they still manage to ruin things here sometimes. Thankfully the LAPD kicked the shit out of BLM at least.
Another thing to consider is that CA is only 35.2% white, lowest of any major state in the country. (lowest excluding hawaii) 40% hispanic. 16% asian. 6.5% black. 4.2% multiracial (which tbh are probably mostly blacks).
Nonwhites give 0 fucks about blacks, especially when they'd be the ones paying. You think a single asian or hispanic gives a shit about reparations?
This makes so much fucking sense lol
My eyes have been opened.
Because he's just like Ronald Reagan?
Actually, non-whites are a good deal more racist against blacks than whites. It's just white people who are not racist. Here in Europe, the only racist people I have ever encountered were not white.
It would alienate A LOT of Asians and Hispanics from those pushing it, if they actually had to turn over their hard won cash to blacks because "slavery".
That is why I would not be unhappy if San Francisco did pay $5 million to each black. Make it as crazy as possible.
They just don't put up with bullshit from black people and respond to them in a natural way. Whites have been neutered by Leftist politics and conditioned that whites aren't allowed to resent blacks when they constantly see blacks behaving badly.
It's human nature when you see a certain group constantly up to no good, to develop negative impressions of that group.
Even if a white person was racist, they'd be too afraid to admit it probably. I had a romanian girlfriend in college, and after she trusted me, one day she came to me in whispered tones and started telling me about how terrible the gypsies and the jews were. I had a jewish roommate and I didn't think anything of him being jewish.
But outside of eastern europe my impression of white euros is that they're primarily self-hating.
Yeah, I'm 100% behind libtard crazy shit as long as it only affects them and not the rest of us. The only real problem with libtards is the minority of sane people trapped under their rule who have to suffer from their delusional ideology.
But to be honest, this is all a scam.
White liberals truly, deep down, don't care about black people. Sure, they PRETEND TO, and they compete with one another over how many black dicks they can suck in a very high visibility and performative way, which sometimes results in some trivial benefits for blacks (like some black actress gets cast in a white role), but in the big picture, they don't care. Whenever it gets to the point where shit like this is being considered and people start to worry it might be real, the libs all pull back in a big way.
IMO reparations talk is just a pander to black voters by libtards like Newsom with political ambitions. The only people who truly want reparations are the black activists themselves, and they're a small powerless minority screeching "gib me".
Right, but as for the people I know, they have no reason to have negative views of blacks. They just don't like them. At least, they have prejudices that blacks are up to no good, if a black is a cool person, they don't have a problem with him.
I don't see much self-hatred. It's more beaten into submission. Even leftist whites will trash talk foreigners in my presence (but for behavior, not out of racism). The division in Europe is not white vs. non-white, but indigenous vs. foreigner and Muslim vs. non-Muslim.
I know sane people who spout 'libtard' pieties who think nothing of it. As long as it has no cost, it is easy to believe in insanity. The good thing about reparatons is that costs will be imposed on these people.
Sowell explains it best. Blacks, as well as others groups, are just mascots to white liberals. They'll operate in your name, but obviously, they do not operate in your interests.
I doubt even black activists want it, because that would sabotage their business model. How much patience will there be for 'black advocacy' after every black got half a million, and the ones with discipline and talent made good use of it, while the ones without squandered it and went back and demanded more? The ideal situation is where they agitate for reparations but are neverable to get them.
If you have an internet connection or a tv, though, you can see a lot of black people behaving badly, even if it isn't in person.
This is especially true of young people. Also people learn to lie and spout pieties they don't really believe in as a sort of defense mechanism and virtue signal.
Yeah, deep down, white liberals just want to use blacks as a weapon against the Right. If the Left had absolute power and the Right was Thanos snapped out of existence, all their bullshit ideology would collapse since it only exists to gain power. That's why the Left would eat each other as soon as they "won" and vanquished the Right.
Japan paid Korea off over the comfort women and Korea never shuts up about it. Payoffs don't work. They take the money then they make excuses for why its never enough. There is no circumstance where blacks will ever say "okay, slavery is repaid, we will calm down and stop playing the victim now". They will push the victimhood as hard as possible all the way until they can flip to supremacy.
I had an internet connections and a TV for years, and I never saw black people behaving badly. First place I actually did see it was that sub PublicFreakout, before they purged anything that made their favorite demographics look bad.
This is even more true for first gen immigrants who use internet for stuff in their native language, and TV for movies exclusively.
Ironically, the people who follow Western media regard blacks as victims and discriminated against.
I mean, it would just spiral into greater and greater madness. Or perhaps into greater sanity, because I believe that these movements are fundamentally random. If they get everything they want, they'll fabricate new grievances, splinter their old coalition, and just keep grinding on.
Obviously, that last part is true of the right as well. Suppose you arrive at a socially conservative consensus, then a lot of people who don't want tax cuts for Goldman Sachs will splinter from the right. This may be why the right never actually gets anything done, because it keeps people as hostage to their movement.
I think a lot of ordinary blacks will, so the activists will then convince them that they are still victims so their grift can continue. However, the rest of society will then be much less likely to buy into the narrative.
True, but people old enough to remember the LA riots & rodney king, or OJ Simpson, etc might feel differently. There was a lull in black shit after OJ until BLM started to ramp up in 2014, culminating in the riots in 2020.
There is also a pervasive global belief that blacks are backward and inferior based on the simple truth that Africa is such a shitshow. Everyone knows Africa is backward and poor, and the logical conclusion is that it's because the people living there are fuck ups who can't get their shit straight. These kinds of beliefs are reinforced by things like AIDS becoming so rampant there and literally no where else in the world, and also stuff like the murder of white farmers leading to famine, riots in south africa, constant stories of things like tribal genocide and mass murder (congo in the 90s, south sudan, etc), and somalia being a failed state with pirates.
True but that's why if you put them (intersectional groups) all on an island together they'd immediately devolve into a battle royale against each other. Sure you'd have "sane" voices like Bill Maher, who are only half-retarded Leftists, but they'd be a small minority on that island and likely eaten first. Maher only gains traction in the US because he appeals to a class of white people, especially women, who reject the Right because they drank the kool-aid that Republicans are evil racist misogynist blah blah blah, and these people want a huge, overbearing welfare state and socialism and the stripping of many freedoms, but they're not on board with what their intersectional tribal allies want. They pretend to be, because they feel they need to to present a unified front against the Right, but deep down they're against it, they're just too afraid to speak out. Maher speaks out for them, so they can rally behind him. That's his niche. It's still a minority position on the Left, though. They aren't nominating or electing people like Maher.
I don't actually agree. I think the vast majority of people on the Right just want freedom, capitalism, and generally the status quo of a couple decades ago before the woke shit came in. Most of them would be happy to be apolitical, and the only reason most people on the Right are becoming more political now is as a defensive reaction.
Yes, there are some authoritarians on the right who want to do shit like ban porn, but they're a minority and in a "right wing only" state, the authoritarians would be in the minority and lack power, particularly because the whole reason the authoritarians get any motivation is because they feel they need to resort to authoritarianism to combat the degeneracy of the Left, which would not exist in a Right-only state.
Yeah, I think the LA Riots definitely had some effect. My dad once told me something like "whenever the power goes out, black people start stealing stuff". I think that was the result of that.
Maybe, but obviously, you can also blame it on colonialism which a lot of people do. I don't think it's either, but there you go.
I think it's the majority position on the left, or would be. The problem is that all the elites are on the other side, so Maher's position will lose out.
That certainly is true for me. I really don't care about politics, or don't want to care, but the problem is that it keeps coming for me.
Yeah, I think Jośe will start up an inquisition if they try this shit. California belongs to the latino boys.
I can tell you for sure, if I were black I'd be renting a U-Haul and moving to California pronto.
Archive - https://archive.is/CkmtG
Edit to add - also found on Bloomberg, https://archive.is/RCFfB
And white people should be heading out. Interesting situation that would be
good luck affording the real estate here
Section 8.
Fuck that shit. They want reparations.
Cut them a cheque for $5k and send them back to wherever Thier ancestors were collected from.
Save tons of money with the caveat that it will only be eligible to those in that group that have been paying taxes.
Similar to amnesty, one of my big issues with repartitions (putting aside how the entire thing is retarded for the moment), is that there's no endpoint. Will the black population stop listening to race grifters, stop buying into the victimhood narrative, and finally feel like past wrongs have been made right? Will they never whine about racism again? Or maybe some will take the money and go to Africa (haha, that would be a hilarious eye-opening experience for them.)
Point is, let's say you pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to every black person in the country. Is "racism" solved? Do the journos shut up about it forevermore? Do we end diversity hiring, "positive discrimination," quotas, and affirmative action?
Of course not. Grifters will be back and asking for Reparations 2.0 almost immediately. You could pay every black person those hundreds of thousands of dollars, and the grifter class would say it was devaluating black contributions and suffering, and was yet another mark of Hwite Supremacy.
The only way I'd even consider supporting something absurd like reparations or amnesty is if it was absolutely guaranteed to be a one-and-done thing. But of course they'd lie anyway. No, fuck off, race grifters. Things were pretty good here for everyone for a while. If you really want to make things better, clean out the rot in the government, who are doing all this to us.
I identify as a black Californian. Now gimme.