Actually, non-whites are a good deal more racist against blacks than whites.
They just don't put up with bullshit from black people and respond to them in a natural way. Whites have been neutered by Leftist politics and conditioned that whites aren't allowed to resent blacks when they constantly see blacks behaving badly.
It's human nature when you see a certain group constantly up to no good, to develop negative impressions of that group.
Here in Europe, the only racist people I have ever encountered were not white.
Even if a white person was racist, they'd be too afraid to admit it probably. I had a romanian girlfriend in college, and after she trusted me, one day she came to me in whispered tones and started telling me about how terrible the gypsies and the jews were. I had a jewish roommate and I didn't think anything of him being jewish.
But outside of eastern europe my impression of white euros is that they're primarily self-hating.
That is why I would not be unhappy if San Francisco did pay $5 million to each black. Make it as crazy as possible.
Yeah, I'm 100% behind libtard crazy shit as long as it only affects them and not the rest of us. The only real problem with libtards is the minority of sane people trapped under their rule who have to suffer from their delusional ideology.
But to be honest, this is all a scam.
White liberals truly, deep down, don't care about black people. Sure, they PRETEND TO, and they compete with one another over how many black dicks they can suck in a very high visibility and performative way, which sometimes results in some trivial benefits for blacks (like some black actress gets cast in a white role), but in the big picture, they don't care. Whenever it gets to the point where shit like this is being considered and people start to worry it might be real, the libs all pull back in a big way.
IMO reparations talk is just a pander to black voters by libtards like Newsom with political ambitions. The only people who truly want reparations are the black activists themselves, and they're a small powerless minority screeching "gib me".
It's human nature when you see a certain group constantly up to no good, to develop negative impressions of that group.
Right, but as for the people I know, they have no reason to have negative views of blacks. They just don't like them. At least, they have prejudices that blacks are up to no good, if a black is a cool person, they don't have a problem with him.
But outside of eastern europe my impression of white euros is that they're primarily self-hating.
I don't see much self-hatred. It's more beaten into submission. Even leftist whites will trash talk foreigners in my presence (but for behavior, not out of racism). The division in Europe is not white vs. non-white, but indigenous vs. foreigner and Muslim vs. non-Muslim.
Yeah, I'm 100% behind libtard crazy shit as long as it only affects them and not the rest of us. The only real problem with libtards is the minority of sane people trapped under their rule who have to suffer from their delusional ideology.
I know sane people who spout 'libtard' pieties who think nothing of it. As long as it has no cost, it is easy to believe in insanity. The good thing about reparatons is that costs will be imposed on these people.
White liberals truly, deep down, don't care about black people. Sure, they PRETEND TO, and they compete with one another over how many black dicks they can suck in a very high visibility and performative way, which sometimes results in some trivial benefits for blacks (like some black actress gets cast in a white role), but in the big picture, they don't care. Whenever it gets to the point where shit like this is being considered and people start to worry it might be real, the libs all pull back in a big way.
Sowell explains it best. Blacks, as well as others groups, are just mascots to white liberals. They'll operate in your name, but obviously, they do not operate in your interests.
The only people who truly want reparations are the black activists themselves, and they're a small powerless minority screeching "gib me".
I doubt even black activists want it, because that would sabotage their business model. How much patience will there be for 'black advocacy' after every black got half a million, and the ones with discipline and talent made good use of it, while the ones without squandered it and went back and demanded more? The ideal situation is where they agitate for reparations but are neverable to get them.
they have no reason to have negative views of blacks.
If you have an internet connection or a tv, though, you can see a lot of black people behaving badly, even if it isn't in person.
I know sane people who spout 'libtard' pieties who think nothing of it. As long as it has no cost, it is easy to believe in insanity. The good thing about reparatons is that costs will be imposed on these people.
This is especially true of young people. Also people learn to lie and spout pieties they don't really believe in as a sort of defense mechanism and virtue signal.
Sowell explains it best. Blacks, as well as others groups, are just mascots to white liberals. They'll operate in your name, but obviously, they do not operate in your interests.
Yeah, deep down, white liberals just want to use blacks as a weapon against the Right. If the Left had absolute power and the Right was Thanos snapped out of existence, all their bullshit ideology would collapse since it only exists to gain power. That's why the Left would eat each other as soon as they "won" and vanquished the Right.
I doubt even black activists want it, because that would sabotage their business model. How much patience will there be for 'black advocacy' after every black got half a million, and the ones with discipline and talent made good use of it, while the ones without squandered it and went back and demanded more? The ideal situation is where they agitate for reparations but are neverable to get them.
Japan paid Korea off over the comfort women and Korea never shuts up about it. Payoffs don't work. They take the money then they make excuses for why its never enough. There is no circumstance where blacks will ever say "okay, slavery is repaid, we will calm down and stop playing the victim now". They will push the victimhood as hard as possible all the way until they can flip to supremacy.
If you have an internet connection or a tv, though, you can see a lot of black people behaving badly, even if it isn't in person.
I had an internet connections and a TV for years, and I never saw black people behaving badly. First place I actually did see it was that sub PublicFreakout, before they purged anything that made their favorite demographics look bad.
This is even more true for first gen immigrants who use internet for stuff in their native language, and TV for movies exclusively.
Ironically, the people who follow Western media regard blacks as victims and discriminated against.
Yeah, deep down, white liberals just want to use blacks as a weapon against the Right. If the Left had absolute power and the Right was Thanos snapped out of existence, all their bullshit ideology would collapse since it only exists to gain power. That's why the Left would eat each other as soon as they "won" and vanquished the Right.
I mean, it would just spiral into greater and greater madness. Or perhaps into greater sanity, because I believe that these movements are fundamentally random. If they get everything they want, they'll fabricate new grievances, splinter their old coalition, and just keep grinding on.
Obviously, that last part is true of the right as well. Suppose you arrive at a socially conservative consensus, then a lot of people who don't want tax cuts for Goldman Sachs will splinter from the right. This may be why the right never actually gets anything done, because it keeps people as hostage to their movement.
There is no circumstance where blacks will ever say "okay, slavery is repaid, we will calm down and stop playing the victim now". They will push the victimhood as hard as possible all the way until they can flip to supremacy.
I think a lot of ordinary blacks will, so the activists will then convince them that they are still victims so their grift can continue. However, the rest of society will then be much less likely to buy into the narrative.
I had an internet connections and a TV for years, and I never saw black people behaving badly. First place I actually did see it was that sub PublicFreakout, before they purged anything that made their favorite demographics look bad.
True, but people old enough to remember the LA riots & rodney king, or OJ Simpson, etc might feel differently. There was a lull in black shit after OJ until BLM started to ramp up in 2014, culminating in the riots in 2020.
There is also a pervasive global belief that blacks are backward and inferior based on the simple truth that Africa is such a shitshow. Everyone knows Africa is backward and poor, and the logical conclusion is that it's because the people living there are fuck ups who can't get their shit straight. These kinds of beliefs are reinforced by things like AIDS becoming so rampant there and literally no where else in the world, and also stuff like the murder of white farmers leading to famine, riots in south africa, constant stories of things like tribal genocide and mass murder (congo in the 90s, south sudan, etc), and somalia being a failed state with pirates.
If they get everything they want, they'll fabricate new grievances, splinter their old coalition, and just keep grinding on.
True but that's why if you put them (intersectional groups) all on an island together they'd immediately devolve into a battle royale against each other. Sure you'd have "sane" voices like Bill Maher, who are only half-retarded Leftists, but they'd be a small minority on that island and likely eaten first. Maher only gains traction in the US because he appeals to a class of white people, especially women, who reject the Right because they drank the kool-aid that Republicans are evil racist misogynist blah blah blah, and these people want a huge, overbearing welfare state and socialism and the stripping of many freedoms, but they're not on board with what their intersectional tribal allies want. They pretend to be, because they feel they need to to present a unified front against the Right, but deep down they're against it, they're just too afraid to speak out. Maher speaks out for them, so they can rally behind him. That's his niche. It's still a minority position on the Left, though. They aren't nominating or electing people like Maher.
Obviously, that last part is true of the right as well. Suppose you arrive at a socially conservative consensus, then a lot of people who don't want tax cuts for Goldman Sachs will splinter from the right. This may be why the right never actually gets anything done, because it keeps people as hostage to their movement.
I don't actually agree. I think the vast majority of people on the Right just want freedom, capitalism, and generally the status quo of a couple decades ago before the woke shit came in. Most of them would be happy to be apolitical, and the only reason most people on the Right are becoming more political now is as a defensive reaction.
Yes, there are some authoritarians on the right who want to do shit like ban porn, but they're a minority and in a "right wing only" state, the authoritarians would be in the minority and lack power, particularly because the whole reason the authoritarians get any motivation is because they feel they need to resort to authoritarianism to combat the degeneracy of the Left, which would not exist in a Right-only state.
They just don't put up with bullshit from black people and respond to them in a natural way. Whites have been neutered by Leftist politics and conditioned that whites aren't allowed to resent blacks when they constantly see blacks behaving badly.
It's human nature when you see a certain group constantly up to no good, to develop negative impressions of that group.
Even if a white person was racist, they'd be too afraid to admit it probably. I had a romanian girlfriend in college, and after she trusted me, one day she came to me in whispered tones and started telling me about how terrible the gypsies and the jews were. I had a jewish roommate and I didn't think anything of him being jewish.
But outside of eastern europe my impression of white euros is that they're primarily self-hating.
Yeah, I'm 100% behind libtard crazy shit as long as it only affects them and not the rest of us. The only real problem with libtards is the minority of sane people trapped under their rule who have to suffer from their delusional ideology.
But to be honest, this is all a scam.
White liberals truly, deep down, don't care about black people. Sure, they PRETEND TO, and they compete with one another over how many black dicks they can suck in a very high visibility and performative way, which sometimes results in some trivial benefits for blacks (like some black actress gets cast in a white role), but in the big picture, they don't care. Whenever it gets to the point where shit like this is being considered and people start to worry it might be real, the libs all pull back in a big way.
IMO reparations talk is just a pander to black voters by libtards like Newsom with political ambitions. The only people who truly want reparations are the black activists themselves, and they're a small powerless minority screeching "gib me".
Right, but as for the people I know, they have no reason to have negative views of blacks. They just don't like them. At least, they have prejudices that blacks are up to no good, if a black is a cool person, they don't have a problem with him.
I don't see much self-hatred. It's more beaten into submission. Even leftist whites will trash talk foreigners in my presence (but for behavior, not out of racism). The division in Europe is not white vs. non-white, but indigenous vs. foreigner and Muslim vs. non-Muslim.
I know sane people who spout 'libtard' pieties who think nothing of it. As long as it has no cost, it is easy to believe in insanity. The good thing about reparatons is that costs will be imposed on these people.
Sowell explains it best. Blacks, as well as others groups, are just mascots to white liberals. They'll operate in your name, but obviously, they do not operate in your interests.
I doubt even black activists want it, because that would sabotage their business model. How much patience will there be for 'black advocacy' after every black got half a million, and the ones with discipline and talent made good use of it, while the ones without squandered it and went back and demanded more? The ideal situation is where they agitate for reparations but are neverable to get them.
If you have an internet connection or a tv, though, you can see a lot of black people behaving badly, even if it isn't in person.
This is especially true of young people. Also people learn to lie and spout pieties they don't really believe in as a sort of defense mechanism and virtue signal.
Yeah, deep down, white liberals just want to use blacks as a weapon against the Right. If the Left had absolute power and the Right was Thanos snapped out of existence, all their bullshit ideology would collapse since it only exists to gain power. That's why the Left would eat each other as soon as they "won" and vanquished the Right.
Japan paid Korea off over the comfort women and Korea never shuts up about it. Payoffs don't work. They take the money then they make excuses for why its never enough. There is no circumstance where blacks will ever say "okay, slavery is repaid, we will calm down and stop playing the victim now". They will push the victimhood as hard as possible all the way until they can flip to supremacy.
I had an internet connections and a TV for years, and I never saw black people behaving badly. First place I actually did see it was that sub PublicFreakout, before they purged anything that made their favorite demographics look bad.
This is even more true for first gen immigrants who use internet for stuff in their native language, and TV for movies exclusively.
Ironically, the people who follow Western media regard blacks as victims and discriminated against.
I mean, it would just spiral into greater and greater madness. Or perhaps into greater sanity, because I believe that these movements are fundamentally random. If they get everything they want, they'll fabricate new grievances, splinter their old coalition, and just keep grinding on.
Obviously, that last part is true of the right as well. Suppose you arrive at a socially conservative consensus, then a lot of people who don't want tax cuts for Goldman Sachs will splinter from the right. This may be why the right never actually gets anything done, because it keeps people as hostage to their movement.
I think a lot of ordinary blacks will, so the activists will then convince them that they are still victims so their grift can continue. However, the rest of society will then be much less likely to buy into the narrative.
True, but people old enough to remember the LA riots & rodney king, or OJ Simpson, etc might feel differently. There was a lull in black shit after OJ until BLM started to ramp up in 2014, culminating in the riots in 2020.
There is also a pervasive global belief that blacks are backward and inferior based on the simple truth that Africa is such a shitshow. Everyone knows Africa is backward and poor, and the logical conclusion is that it's because the people living there are fuck ups who can't get their shit straight. These kinds of beliefs are reinforced by things like AIDS becoming so rampant there and literally no where else in the world, and also stuff like the murder of white farmers leading to famine, riots in south africa, constant stories of things like tribal genocide and mass murder (congo in the 90s, south sudan, etc), and somalia being a failed state with pirates.
True but that's why if you put them (intersectional groups) all on an island together they'd immediately devolve into a battle royale against each other. Sure you'd have "sane" voices like Bill Maher, who are only half-retarded Leftists, but they'd be a small minority on that island and likely eaten first. Maher only gains traction in the US because he appeals to a class of white people, especially women, who reject the Right because they drank the kool-aid that Republicans are evil racist misogynist blah blah blah, and these people want a huge, overbearing welfare state and socialism and the stripping of many freedoms, but they're not on board with what their intersectional tribal allies want. They pretend to be, because they feel they need to to present a unified front against the Right, but deep down they're against it, they're just too afraid to speak out. Maher speaks out for them, so they can rally behind him. That's his niche. It's still a minority position on the Left, though. They aren't nominating or electing people like Maher.
I don't actually agree. I think the vast majority of people on the Right just want freedom, capitalism, and generally the status quo of a couple decades ago before the woke shit came in. Most of them would be happy to be apolitical, and the only reason most people on the Right are becoming more political now is as a defensive reaction.
Yes, there are some authoritarians on the right who want to do shit like ban porn, but they're a minority and in a "right wing only" state, the authoritarians would be in the minority and lack power, particularly because the whole reason the authoritarians get any motivation is because they feel they need to resort to authoritarianism to combat the degeneracy of the Left, which would not exist in a Right-only state.