Yeah. Some states, including Hungary, usually get back more money in EU funds than they pay into it... nominally. The problem is, the EU funds going back to those states come with all sorts of strings attached, they can't just spend it on whatever they want.
I'm not talking about the morality AT ALL. I'm talking about the effectiveness. When you're out of power, violence will be used as an excuse to crush you. And when you are in power, there are far more deft ways of handling things (e.g. by suppressing people to the extent that they start violence, and then you can paint them as the aggressor).
Consider the fact that you and I are not killed as it is by the ruling classes. Is it because they are not persuaded that it is 'moral'? No, it's because they can keep people down far more easily in other ways, and with less backlash.
Do not accept or become dependent on other structures financially, lest you be coerced into accepting their demands. That is the real lesson here.
The people offering you free money are probably more dangerous than armed robbers, because they are going to become armed robbers who you will have to let into your home.
You know, that reminded me of a Czech article I read a long time ago. It's a sort of a thought exercise about the Prague Spring and the 1968 Warsaw Pact invasion, and about how the EU does the same thing so much better now. You might find it interesting.
Czechoslovakia must be acquired in a different way. Our institute is proposing an extensive subsidy plan. Financial subsidies will be at least forty percent cheaper than an armed invasion. We will use the subsidies to buy their politicians and high officials, because they will decide on the subsidies. We will also buy the population. Let's remember how loyal the Germans were to Hitler for building them highways. At each entrance to the highway there will be a prominent inscription Built with the help of structural funds financed by the Soviet Union. We will subsidize buildings, businesses, student social stays, whatever. It is essential to create a sufficiently strong layer of Czechoslovak elites who will be dependent on subsidies: because then Czechoslovakia will be dependent on the Soviet Union.
meets conditions related to judiciary independence
Judiciary independence? Independence from not doing exactly what the EU wants at all times? Sounds like an oxymoron to me. How about we let the countries decide the laws and the degenerates can have the independence of keeping it to themselves.
How it started: "Let's form a political body to represent the common interests of Europe and compete against large, foreign, powers".
How it's going: "Subvert your culture and pimp your children or we'll bankrupt you".
Fun Fact: Immediately after WWII prostitution was legalized in Germany.
Not getting free money is not bankrupting anyone. Or would you claim any country would bankrupt Ukraine if we stopped giving them money for free?
iirc every member state pays money into the EU
this is probably more like a refund?
Yeah. Some states, including Hungary, usually get back more money in EU funds than they pay into it... nominally. The problem is, the EU funds going back to those states come with all sorts of strings attached, they can't just spend it on whatever they want.
taking someone's money with no intent to return it is called theft.
Then Hungary should just veto everything and bring the entire EU crashing down.
I remember them trying to do that last time. Good shit.
That or they actually don't have the money, they're looking for an excuse to delay since they spent it on heating.
They are obsessed with pushing gender deviance and sexuality on schoolchildren.
If the Soviet Union was the Evil Empire, it seems the EU wants to establish itself as the Pedo Empire.
And white replacement, don't forget that.
The Otto be a man Empire?
This...this is quid pro quo...IMPEACH!
Excuse me, you seem to have forgotten the slogan of the regime.
"It's OK when we do it."
Can we find room in the 1.7 TRILLION bill to spend 22 billion on being as based as Hungary? PLEASE?!
It's time to start drawing and quartering the faggots.
Name checks out.
At some point violence will become the morally correct course of action. The trajectory compels it. It's just a question of where the threshold is.
Violence is never the answer.
It's a question, and the answer is YES.
I'm not talking about the morality AT ALL. I'm talking about the effectiveness. When you're out of power, violence will be used as an excuse to crush you. And when you are in power, there are far more deft ways of handling things (e.g. by suppressing people to the extent that they start violence, and then you can paint them as the aggressor).
Consider the fact that you and I are not killed as it is by the ruling classes. Is it because they are not persuaded that it is 'moral'? No, it's because they can keep people down far more easily in other ways, and with less backlash.
I am an American. The very founding of my country demonstrates that your argument is irrelevant.
The very founding of your "country" (you mean state) demonstrates that local elites can resist centralized authority in a decentralized empire.
Surely, you're not as much of a dumbass to think that conditions are even remotely similar today.
If by faggots you mean politicians then sure
Leave the EU or be made extinct. The EU will extinguish your native population by drowning you in migrants all the way down to 0.
Do not accept or become dependent on other structures financially, lest you be coerced into accepting their demands. That is the real lesson here.
The people offering you free money are probably more dangerous than armed robbers, because they are going to become armed robbers who you will have to let into your home.
You know, that reminded me of a Czech article I read a long time ago. It's a sort of a thought exercise about the Prague Spring and the 1968 Warsaw Pact invasion, and about how the EU does the same thing so much better now. You might find it interesting.
https://novinychrudim-cz.translate.goog/2017/08/21/pavel-kohout-kdyby-breznev-byl-o-trochu-chytrejsi/?_x_tr_sl=cs&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp
BRICS will no doubt be extending their hand.
Just leave the EU at that point.
Judiciary independence? Independence from not doing exactly what the EU wants at all times? Sounds like an oxymoron to me. How about we let the countries decide the laws and the degenerates can have the independence of keeping it to themselves.
Judicial independence from accountability to nation state. Judges in the EU must serve the EU, it seems.
Withholding money until Hungary suicides itself? Don't hold your breath.