You haven't been inducted into the mysteries of the science, and thus you have no standing to interpret the sacred writings. You shall not question the priests of democracy!
Well, that, and a rather outdated business model for publications and the expansion for universities to prioritize themselves as an ever expanding business.
"Internet experts" doing calculations on a napkin would have done at least as well modeling infections, deaths, and injections effectiveness as all the world's governments experts.
Because the "real experts" were so far off their projections were utterly useless ( unless the point was to fabricate an excuse to play Pandemic and violate our human rights in an authoritarian power grab, in that case they were very usefull ).
Yeah, I don't really need to be an expert here, do I? All I really need is a surface level knowledge of statistics, vaccines, recent events, and public policy to figure out that the jabs likely wouldn't work. And guess what I found on the internet :)
It's incredible the change of attitude the left has had towards large pharmaceutical companies in the past 5 years. In 2017, they would have told you that Pfizer only cares about profits and would happily let people die if it helped their bottom line. In 2022, entertaining the notion that Pfizer would rush out a product that was ineffective or unsafe for a huge payday is unthinkable.
You don't need a PhD to read the reactions people are getting and the deaths that have been recorded and come to the conclusion that their drugs aren't safe
Probably plenty of PhDs would squirm to read that headline. On top of everything else that's been said, I'm going to go ahead and guess that internet searches did most of the heavy lifting in most PhD qualifications worldwide by now. Fighting over who has the 'real' science is worthless. If scientific institutions didn't reflect the values that have enabled these last few years of irrationality and poison, they would have resisted it rather than having embraced it.
You haven't been inducted into the mysteries of the science, and thus you have no standing to interpret the sacred writings. You shall not question the priests of democracy!
The hilarious part of why they still hide everything behind paywalls. They don’t want you to be able to see what they claim as facts.
Well, that, and a rather outdated business model for publications and the expansion for universities to prioritize themselves as an ever expanding business.
Who has the largest criminal fine in history again?
How many medical experts does it take to internet search:
"How many billion did Pfizer make in a single quarter from a single product that we now know doesn't work"?
Don't read peer reviewed studies and medical journals yourself, trust CNN - brought to you by Pfizer.
I thought this was a meme....they seriously put this up?
That's ironic on some many levels.
The comments are great too: "People @pfizer mentioned can reply". Cowards.
So scared of dissent they disable replies.
appeal to authority fallacy.
"Internet experts" doing calculations on a napkin would have done at least as well modeling infections, deaths, and injections effectiveness as all the world's governments experts.
Because the "real experts" were so far off their projections were utterly useless ( unless the point was to fabricate an excuse to play Pandemic and violate our human rights in an authoritarian power grab, in that case they were very usefull ).
Yeah, I don't really need to be an expert here, do I? All I really need is a surface level knowledge of statistics, vaccines, recent events, and public policy to figure out that the jabs likely wouldn't work. And guess what I found on the internet :)
real scientists don't stifle questions or need immunity from the consequences of their product.
Experts are baffled how Pfizer can still tweet something like this.
It's incredible the change of attitude the left has had towards large pharmaceutical companies in the past 5 years. In 2017, they would have told you that Pfizer only cares about profits and would happily let people die if it helped their bottom line. In 2022, entertaining the notion that Pfizer would rush out a product that was ineffective or unsafe for a huge payday is unthinkable.
You don't need a PhD to read the reactions people are getting and the deaths that have been recorded and come to the conclusion that their drugs aren't safe
Probably plenty of PhDs would squirm to read that headline. On top of everything else that's been said, I'm going to go ahead and guess that internet searches did most of the heavy lifting in most PhD qualifications worldwide by now. Fighting over who has the 'real' science is worthless. If scientific institutions didn't reflect the values that have enabled these last few years of irrationality and poison, they would have resisted it rather than having embraced it.