Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

75
[First they come for Alex Jones] MSNBC talking head Frank Figliuzzi proclaimed Tuesday that conservative figures like Tucker Carlson and GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert should be subject to “civil consequences” if mass shooters are found to have “consumed” their content. (summit.news)
posted 3 years ago by NotAGlowy 3 years ago by NotAGlowy +75 / -0
33 comments share
33 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 60 ▼
– FrozeInFear 60 points 3 years ago +60 / -0

So, retroactively charging people who inspired the Scalise shooting, Waukesha, and BLM/antifa antics too, amirite?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 49 ▼
– NotAGlowy [S] 49 points 3 years ago +49 / -0

I think REDDIT is largely to blame for inciting BLM riots and murders.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 27 points 3 years ago +27 / -0

This but unironically

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– Devidose 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Don't forget the fuck up that followed the Boston bombing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– almond_activator 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

We did it, Reddit!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Kalamander85 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Ok. Charge the CEO. shut it all down.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

Everyone who's lied about orange man, and the poor dindus who totally didn't attack a cop, or die from a fent od, etc.

Man, guess we have to lock all the dems up. What a shame. A real loss for society. I'm sure we'll miss... Uh... Um...

...

I got nothing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– freespeechsquid 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

They suggest this because they only intend for it to be used against us, but I suspect they don't even think about the dangerous precedent they're setting and how it could be used against them if the balance of power changes.

I don't want this. This is an abominable form of censorship. This is exactly the 'stochastic terrorism' (bullshit term btw) they accuse us of.

But if we're going to have it, I eagerly look forward to it being used against them. As soon as the right gets its head out of its ass and realizes it needs to fight fire with fire.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ghostfox1_ 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I'm with you. I don't want it.

But I'm also going to play by the rules of they game they set.

So by all means, we should deny the leftists everything we can, through legal means, or otherwise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Xachariah 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

More than that. There's over 20,000 murders a year in the USA, and >75% of them are committed by democrats. That's 10,000 excess murders a year because of dems.

If it takes 5 deaths to cause the punishment to go up the chain, then literally every democrat politician should be in jail by now.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Smith1980 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

I would think so

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 30 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

Opening Pandora's box with that statement huh? Since 80% of old media is left (18% is fake conservative) isn't the left mostly posting gun shootings for weeks and then saying that all cops will kill blacks and that the KKK are coming.....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– jenniferq8 21 points 3 years ago +21 / -0

Yes. You would think that the families of all of the police officers murdered in the wake of Michael Brown and George Floyd would like some compensation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Smith1980 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Or the small business owners who they claim to care about. But the lack of concern for fallen officers is disgusting. Yet they put Floyd on a pedestal

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– jenniferq8 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

Absolutely.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Smith1980 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

How dare you notice!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– TentElephant 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Urge to Fedpost Intensifies

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– MegoThor 16 points 3 years ago +16 / -0

Sure, if the same rules apply to the FBI.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Bot-not1 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Suppose a mass shooter loves Burger King Whoppers, and eats them daily. Did consuming those questionable calories contribute to his/her/they/them/its violent actions? Should Burger King be subject to "civil consequences" for his/her/they/them/its having "consumed" those Whoppers daily?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– stainless-steel-rat 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Twinkie defense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Bot-not1 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yep.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Soup_Navy_Admiral 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Sure thing. Now tell me what media Mx. Anderson Aldrich "consumed" before shooting up that nightclub.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– almond_activator 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Off-label horomones? Damn, going to have to shut down Pfizer, Eli Lily, J&J, and all those pharmacies and clinics.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– Smith1980 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

And what about those who encourage “peaceful protests”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Id actually be fine with this if it would be applied to both sides. It would mean every Dem politician out there would either be arrested or have to stop being so inflammatory in their language, which would mean no one would vote for them because lies powered by emotional pleading is all they have going for them. It'd be the most surefire, legal way of destroying the left.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– KingLion7 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Makes sense. One priest of a religion calling for the removal of an enemy priest. The modern world hides ancient behavior with fancy buzzwords but ultimately we are still the same people pre modern world despite what normies, grillers and NPCs believe.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Can't wait to hear about how the media isn't responsible for causing mass shootings the way they glorify every single one of the idiots.

But everyone else will be for some reason. Or gamergate, it's always gamergate.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– OldBullLee 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This is another attack in the relentless campaign for censorship from the usual suspects.

The mask is off, the hog is out of the tunnel. They are transparent now.

They are striking when they think the time is most opportune, but it will not fly. We're too decentralized for them to be successful, too many smart people with large audiences are gathering in opposition. Look at how they have to sneak around with their Ministry of Truth after too many publicly complained about it.

The left is on the ropes and these are the flailings of a monster in its death agony.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MLGS 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This approach would have worked if they'd been able to keep Elon from stealing Twitter from them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

"Civil consequences" meaning punishment by means of the Judaic legal system

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– barwhack 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

In that spirit, can we burn-off one of Figliuzzi's appendages, for each pronoun that these various shooters profer?

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy