75
Comments (33)
sorted by:
60
FrozeInFear 60 points ago +60 / -0

So, retroactively charging people who inspired the Scalise shooting, Waukesha, and BLM/antifa antics too, amirite?

49
NotAGlowy [S] 49 points ago +49 / -0

I think REDDIT is largely to blame for inciting BLM riots and murders.

27
ApparentlyImAHeretic 27 points ago +27 / -0

This but unironically

16
Devidose 16 points ago +16 / -0

Don't forget the fuck up that followed the Boston bombing.

3
almond_activator 3 points ago +3 / -0

We did it, Reddit!

15
Kalamander85 15 points ago +15 / -0

Ok. Charge the CEO. shut it all down.

20
ghostfox1_ 20 points ago +20 / -0

Everyone who's lied about orange man, and the poor dindus who totally didn't attack a cop, or die from a fent od, etc.

Man, guess we have to lock all the dems up. What a shame. A real loss for society. I'm sure we'll miss... Uh... Um...

...

I got nothing.

2
freespeechsquid 2 points ago +2 / -0

They suggest this because they only intend for it to be used against us, but I suspect they don't even think about the dangerous precedent they're setting and how it could be used against them if the balance of power changes.

I don't want this. This is an abominable form of censorship. This is exactly the 'stochastic terrorism' (bullshit term btw) they accuse us of.

But if we're going to have it, I eagerly look forward to it being used against them. As soon as the right gets its head out of its ass and realizes it needs to fight fire with fire.

2
ghostfox1_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm with you. I don't want it.

But I'm also going to play by the rules of they game they set.

So by all means, we should deny the leftists everything we can, through legal means, or otherwise.

7
Xachariah 7 points ago +7 / -0

More than that. There's over 20,000 murders a year in the USA, and >75% of them are committed by democrats. That's 10,000 excess murders a year because of dems.

If it takes 5 deaths to cause the punishment to go up the chain, then literally every democrat politician should be in jail by now.

5
Smith1980 5 points ago +5 / -0

I would think so

30
SoctaticMethod1 30 points ago +30 / -0

Opening Pandora's box with that statement huh? Since 80% of old media is left (18% is fake conservative) isn't the left mostly posting gun shootings for weeks and then saying that all cops will kill blacks and that the KKK are coming.....

21
jenniferq8 21 points ago +21 / -0

Yes. You would think that the families of all of the police officers murdered in the wake of Michael Brown and George Floyd would like some compensation.

15
Smith1980 15 points ago +15 / -0

Or the small business owners who they claim to care about. But the lack of concern for fallen officers is disgusting. Yet they put Floyd on a pedestal

8
jenniferq8 8 points ago +8 / -0

Absolutely.

12
Smith1980 12 points ago +12 / -0

How dare you notice!

17
TentElephant 17 points ago +17 / -0

Urge to Fedpost Intensifies

16
MegoThor 16 points ago +16 / -0

Sure, if the same rules apply to the FBI.

14
Bot-not1 14 points ago +14 / -0

Suppose a mass shooter loves Burger King Whoppers, and eats them daily. Did consuming those questionable calories contribute to his/her/they/them/its violent actions? Should Burger King be subject to "civil consequences" for his/her/they/them/its having "consumed" those Whoppers daily?

13
Soup_Navy_Admiral 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sure thing. Now tell me what media Mx. Anderson Aldrich "consumed" before shooting up that nightclub.

3
almond_activator 3 points ago +3 / -0

Off-label horomones? Damn, going to have to shut down Pfizer, Eli Lily, J&J, and all those pharmacies and clinics.

11
LawNmowermaN 11 points ago +11 / -0

Let's take it further: Every rapper with a major record label should just contribute to a fund for victims of gang violence.

10
Smith1980 10 points ago +10 / -0

And what about those who encourage “peaceful protests”

6
SparkMandrill83 6 points ago +6 / -0

Id actually be fine with this if it would be applied to both sides. It would mean every Dem politician out there would either be arrested or have to stop being so inflammatory in their language, which would mean no one would vote for them because lies powered by emotional pleading is all they have going for them. It'd be the most surefire, legal way of destroying the left.

6
KingLion7 6 points ago +6 / -0

Makes sense. One priest of a religion calling for the removal of an enemy priest. The modern world hides ancient behavior with fancy buzzwords but ultimately we are still the same people pre modern world despite what normies, grillers and NPCs believe.

5
Pandelume 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree to your terms.

5
nuggetpatrol 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can't wait to hear about how the media isn't responsible for causing mass shootings the way they glorify every single one of the idiots.

But everyone else will be for some reason. Or gamergate, it's always gamergate.

1
OldBullLee 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is another attack in the relentless campaign for censorship from the usual suspects.

The mask is off, the hog is out of the tunnel. They are transparent now.

They are striking when they think the time is most opportune, but it will not fly. We're too decentralized for them to be successful, too many smart people with large audiences are gathering in opposition. Look at how they have to sneak around with their Ministry of Truth after too many publicly complained about it.

The left is on the ropes and these are the flailings of a monster in its death agony.

1
MLGS 1 point ago +1 / -0

This approach would have worked if they'd been able to keep Elon from stealing Twitter from them.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Civil consequences" meaning punishment by means of the Judaic legal system

1
barwhack 1 point ago +1 / -0

In that spirit, can we burn-off one of Figliuzzi's appendages, for each pronoun that these various shooters profer?